Intel C2D E8400, Sapphire HD4850 Vapor-X, 2GB ram, WinXp Pro. Everything is high (Except shadows. Have to set it medium). 40-60 in regular, 10-25 on collusions.
be careful in badlands sector....the bridge doesn't build if you're zooming at max speed on the fast vehicles. You'll just fall into the canyon and hit the bridge pillars
The thing i don't understand is, how this game can run flawless on an X-Box that have 3.2 GHz tri-core cpu and fails on a decent pc cpu?murekkep
Because the xbox is a set stand no hardware differences across the board, the PC on the other hand they have to scale for people that might not have the recommended specs and in any case if it is a port from a console it is usually slapped together with glue and duct tape to make it work.
3.4 Ghz Phenom 2 Quad, GTS 250, and 4 Gb Ram. Running the game at 1440x900, with all settings maxed and 4x anti-aliasing. I'm getting around 50/60 fps throughout, no dips whatsoever. It seems to be a really good port, if that's what you are asking...
3.4 Ghz Phenom 2 Quad, GTS 250, and 4 Gb Ram. Running the game at 1440x900, with all settings maxed and 4x anti-aliasing. I'm getting around 50/60 fps throughout, no dips whatsoever. It seems to be a really good port, if that's what you are asking...
psn8214
With that system everything has to run extremely well, what about arma 2 and gta iv..... i am trying to make a comparison.
The thing i don't understand is, how this game can run flawless on an X-Box that have 3.2 GHz tri-core cpu and fails on a decent pc cpu?murekkep
i thought it looked turd on the 360, really put me off it but i bought it because i was bored and tired of waitin for batman
q6600, 4gb ram, gtx 295 at 1280 x 1024, max graphic settings 8xaa guestimate about 50-60 fps, even during huge demolitions and stuff its butter smooth. 16xaa dips framerate a bit during major explosions
3.4 Ghz Phenom 2 Quad, GTS 250, and 4 Gb Ram. Running the game at 1440x900, with all settings maxed and 4x anti-aliasing. I'm getting around 50/60 fps throughout, no dips whatsoever. It seems to be a really good port, if that's what you are asking...
dakan45
With that system everything has to run extremely well, what about arma 2 and gta iv..... i am trying to make a comparison.
I max both, with view distance on Arma 2 set to 5,000. I would say I get about 40-50 fps on campaign. GTA IV I max most everything but texture res and view distance which are limited for not apparent reason, and get 60 fps 95% of the time. All running at 1440x900, of course.
3.4 Ghz Phenom 2 Quad, GTS 250, and 4 Gb Ram. Running the game at 1440x900, with all settings maxed and 4x anti-aliasing. I'm getting around 50/60 fps throughout, no dips whatsoever. It seems to be a really good port, if that's what you are asking...
psn8214
With that system everything has to run extremely well, what about arma 2 and gta iv..... i am trying to make a comparison.
I max both, with view distance on Arma 2 set to 5,000. I would say I get about 40-50 fps on campaign. GTA IV I max most everything but texture res and view distance which are limited for not apparent reason, and get 60 fps 95% of the time. All running at 1440x900, of course.
Go to the gta iv folder and create a txt called commandline and type this -norestrictions Save it and run gta iv.
Log in to comment