I can see your point, but I dont let my personal feeling affect which games I get... unless its stupid broken drm or something.TerrorRizzing
It isn't really about "personal feelings" rather more about using the only voice I have which is my consumer spending pattern. It is becoming pretty clear now that gamers on both sides of the fence (console and PC) are having to put up with a crap load of rubbish from developers and publishers. It doesn't matter how much we complain or moan as long as we give into these practices they will keep on doing them.
Now I can't make everyone do this and I am not being sad enough to call for a "boycott" at the end of the day I can only control how I spend my money. So I am deciding that only companies that show they are fully committed to the platform of my choice will get the full asking price for their games along as they treat the PC version with the same commitment as the console version.
If Remedy and MS had released Alan Wake on the PC at the same time as the xbox 360 then I would have been entirely happy to have bought the game for full price. They didn't and so in my view the value of the game has now been reduced (especially since I already know the story thanks to console users spreading spoilers). So right now I class Alan Wake as only being worth a budget price tag of less than £20. Now since the game isn't very long and seems to be incredibly linear I can't see me playing it more than once, in my books that takes the games worth down to less than £10.
Finally I can't stand GFWL I hate it in MP and find it completely pointless in SP. It is a fair bet this will be a GFWL wich again reduces the worth of this game to me. So I would knock a fiver off for forcing me to put up with the crap that is GFWL. After all the maths is done that makes Alan Wake worth around £5 to me and I will be quite happy to pay that price and have no compulsion in waiting for it to hit that price.
Log in to comment