Should I Be Getting This Kind Of Performance?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

I've had this gaming rig a while now, and for the most part it serves me perfectly well. The only thing is I'm not sure if it's running as good as it should. The specs are...

RAM: 8GB DDR3
GPU: ATi HD 6970 2GB
CPU 3.20GHZ Quad Core

Team Fortress 2 runs perfectly all the time on max settings, but when I crank up the AA a fairly large FPs drop can be noticed. The game has such simple graphics that I didn't think it should be a problem...

Skyrim is the latest game I got, and it mildly stutters in certain areas and can drop to an estimate of 20 FPs when looking at busy parts. I'm on max settings, playing the game with everything on apart from AA. If I put AA on it becomes unplayable.

Is this rig under performing, or have I just set my expectations too high?

Avatar image for InternetSwag
InternetSwag

213

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 InternetSwag
Member since 2011 • 213 Posts
What resolution are you at?
Avatar image for FPSfan1985
FPSfan1985

2174

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 FPSfan1985
Member since 2011 • 2174 Posts

I've had this gaming rig a while now, and for the most part it serves me perfectly well. The only thing is I'm not sure if it's running as good as it should. The specs are...

RAM: 8GB DDR3
GPU: ATi HD 6970 2GB
CPU 3.20GHZ Quad Core

Team Fortress 2 runs perfectly all the time on max settings, but when I crank up the AA a fairly large FPs drop can be noticed. The game has such simple graphics that I didn't think it should be a problem...

Skyrim is the latest game I got, and it mildly stutters in certain areas and can drop to an estimate of 20 FPs when looking at busy parts. I'm on max settings, playing the game with everything on apart from AA. If I put AA on it becomes unplayable.

Is this rig under performing, or have I just set my expectations too high?

sune_Gem

Skyrim is just another **** console port of a game. You'll have to wait on fixes.

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#4 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

What resolution are you at?InternetSwag

1920x1080. Forgot to mention that sorry.

Avatar image for red12355
red12355

1251

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 red12355
Member since 2007 • 1251 Posts
Are your drivers updated?
Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#6 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

Are your drivers updated?red12355

Yeah, latest ATi drivers, sound card drivers and the games are all patched and everything.

Avatar image for Socijalisticka
Socijalisticka

1555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Socijalisticka
Member since 2011 • 1555 Posts

TF2 should not be dropping any frames. As for Skyrim with AA, it usually varies between 40-60 fps for me (and I have a weaker card then you do). Your build is underperforming.

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#8 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

TF2 should not be dropping any frames. As for Skyrim with AA, it usually varies between 40-60 fps for me (and I have a weaker card then you do). Your build is underperforming.

Socijalisticka

:(

What could possibly be causing it to do so? Any suggestions?

When I speak of turning on AA I refer to having AA on the maxinum ammount it allows by the way.

Avatar image for Socijalisticka
Socijalisticka

1555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Socijalisticka
Member since 2011 • 1555 Posts

[QUOTE="Socijalisticka"]

TF2 should not be dropping any frames. As for Skyrim with AA, it usually varies between 40-60 fps for me (and I have a weaker card then you do). Your build is underperforming.

sune_Gem

:(

What could possibly be causing it to do so? Any suggestions?

When I speak of turning on AA I refer to having AA on the maxinum ammount it allows by the way.

Idk it could also be because Skyrim is a mess atm, like the guy above said.

Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
Skyrim is a mess right now. My rig actually gets BETTER performance in Skyrim when I disable crossfire using RadeonPro. Furthermore, I still get about 40-60 FPS in the game (usually 60 FPS, but it does drop in places, especially towns; I've seen it go as low as 22 FPS in one city whose name I can't remember). That's all at 1920x1080 mind you. I suspect this could be due to gross unoptimization for the CPU, since this benchmark (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/skyrim-performance-benchmark,3074-9.html) shows that the minimum CPU needed to get 60 FPS average in Skyrim is an i5 2500k @ 4GHz.
Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#11 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

Skyrim is a mess right now. My rig actually gets BETTER performance in Skyrim when I disable crossfire using RadeonPro. Furthermore, I still get about 40-60 FPS in the game (usually 60 FPS, but it does drop in places, especially towns; I've seen it go as low as 22 FPS in one city whose name I can't remember). That's all at 1920x1080 mind you. I suspect this could be due to gross unoptimization for the CPU, since this benchmark (http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/skyrim-performance-benchmark,3074-9.html) shows that the minimum CPU needed to get 60 FPS average in Skyrim is an i5 2500k @ 4GHz.gameguy6700

Hmm, so you're saying it's a possibility that my CPU is bottle necking my games?

Seems strange though as my friend has a meer dual core running at 2.7GHZ with a Nvidia 9800 and 4GB RAM and is seemingly get the same gaming performance as me here...

Avatar image for Snotweasel530
Snotweasel530

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Snotweasel530
Member since 2010 • 636 Posts

I've had this gaming rig a while now, and for the most part it serves me perfectly well. The only thing is I'm not sure if it's running as good as it should. The specs are...

RAM: 8GB DDR3
GPU: ATi HD 6970 2GB
CPU 3.20GHZ Quad Core

sune_Gem

Quad Core what? AMD, Intel?

DDR3 - What speed? Timings?

What do your temps look like across the board?

Avatar image for NailedGR
NailedGR

997

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 NailedGR
Member since 2010 • 997 Posts

Drop AA to 4x and see what happens.

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#14 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

[QUOTE="sune_Gem"]

I've had this gaming rig a while now, and for the most part it serves me perfectly well. The only thing is I'm not sure if it's running as good as it should. The specs are...

RAM: 8GB DDR3
GPU: ATi HD 6970 2GB
CPU 3.20GHZ Quad Core

Snotweasel530

Quad Core what? AMD, Intel?

DDR3 - What speed? Timings?

What do your temps look like across the board?

Tempratures are always fine, my PC is actually freezing inside!

DDR3 RAM is 1600 MHZ.

The Quad Core is a Phenom II X4 955 Black Edition.

Drop AA to 4x and see what happens.

NailedGR

Skyrim at 4 samples of AA instead of 8 is running at about 25 FPs, still not good...

Avatar image for Snotweasel530
Snotweasel530

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#15 Snotweasel530
Member since 2010 • 636 Posts

Timings on the ram? I would suggest downclocking the RAM to the Phenom II's native 1333 and tighten up the timings. 9-9-9-24 and bump up the FSB inch by inch

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

Timings on the ram? I would suggest downclocking the RAM to the Phenom II's native 1333 and tighten up the timings. 9-9-9-24 and bump up the FSB inch by inch

Snotweasel530

I know how to lower the RAM frequency, but what exactly do you mean by tighten up timings? I'm not familiar with such settings.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
Download CFF explorer find the TESV.exe open it with CFF, click on file header bottom of the small window characteristics column click "click here" a new window will open check APP can handle >2gb , exit and save that will solve the sudden drops in FPS , but also make sure you use FXAA over normal AA in game.
Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#18 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

Download CFF explorer find the TESV.exe open it with CFF, click on file header bottom of the small window characteristics column click "click here" a new window will open check APP can handle >2gb , exit and save that will solve the sudden drops in FPS , but also make sure you use FXAA over normal AA in game. 04dcarraher

I was using both FXAA and AA at the same time. Also, it's not only Skyrim, it's multiple games.

Also, I put my RAM down to 1333MHZ and I didn't really notice a difference.

Avatar image for Snotweasel530
Snotweasel530

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Snotweasel530
Member since 2010 • 636 Posts

[QUOTE="Snotweasel530"]

Timings on the ram? I would suggest downclocking the RAM to the Phenom II's native 1333 and tighten up the timings. 9-9-9-24 and bump up the FSB inch by inch

sune_Gem

I know how to lower the RAM frequency, but what exactly do you mean by tighten up timings? I'm not familiar with such settings.

They're the latency timings that are most likely printed on the side of your DIMMs. Lower latency, faster RAM. You can change these in the bios. You can't get the low timings at 1600 that you can at 1333, or hell even at 1066 with super tight timings might be able to outperform slower timings at 1600. The faster the clock speed of your ram, the less stable it will be with low timings. Ex. 1333 with 7-7-7-24 > 1600 9-9-9-24.

SO. If you're stable at 1333 7-7-7-24, slowly bump up the FSB until you're not, back off one and give the voltage an ever so slight increase. Takes a little time to find the sweet spot.

And you are using quality RAM of course? 1 bad stick may not show its ugly self. Memtest may sound like the polar opposite of fun, but worth while if you're spend the time trying to optimize.

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#20 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

[QUOTE="sune_Gem"]

[QUOTE="Snotweasel530"]

Timings on the ram? I would suggest downclocking the RAM to the Phenom II's native 1333 and tighten up the timings. 9-9-9-24 and bump up the FSB inch by inch

Snotweasel530

I know how to lower the RAM frequency, but what exactly do you mean by tighten up timings? I'm not familiar with such settings.

They're the latency timings that are most likely printed on the side of your DIMMs. Lower latency, faster RAM. You can change these in the bios. You can't get the low timings at 1600 that you can at 1333, or hell even at 1066 with super tight timings might be able to outperform slower timings at 1600. The faster the clock speed of your ram, the less stable it will be with low timings. Ex. 1333 with 7-7-7-24 > 1600 9-9-9-24.

SO. If you're stable at 1333 7-7-7-24, slowly bump up the FSB until you're not, back off one and give the voltage an ever so slight increase. Takes a little time to find the sweet spot.

And you are using quality RAM of course? 1 bad stick may not show its ugly self. Memtest may sound like the polar opposite of fun, but worth while if you're spend the time trying to optimize.

I put the CPU FSB up from 200 to 210. The Ratio is at x17 now too running at 3570 MHZ while it was running at 3200 MHZ. The CPU-NB Frequency is running at 2100 up from 2000. I don't know anything about RAM timings and I can't find a setting that is recognisable to what you're talking about on the BIOS. So I would rather not mess with that.

I'm using a stock cooler, are these settings safe?

EDIT: I just noticed something. When using CPU-Z it says my DRAM frequency is 700 MHZ. Is this normal? Is it possible to place the RAM in slower sockets on the MB?

Avatar image for Snotweasel530
Snotweasel530

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Snotweasel530
Member since 2010 • 636 Posts

[QUOTE="Snotweasel530"]

They're the latency timings that are most likely printed on the side of your DIMMs. Lower latency, faster RAM. You can change these in the bios. You can't get the low timings at 1600 that you can at 1333, or hell even at 1066 with super tight timings might be able to outperform slower timings at 1600. The faster the clock speed of your ram, the less stable it will be with low timings. Ex. 1333 with 7-7-7-24 > 1600 9-9-9-24.

SO. If you're stable at 1333 7-7-7-24, slowly bump up the FSB until you're not, back off one and give the voltage an ever so slight increase. Takes a little time to find the sweet spot.

And you are using quality RAM of course? 1 bad stick may not show its ugly self. Memtest may sound like the polar opposite of fun, but worth while if you're spend the time trying to optimize.

sune_Gem

I put the CPU FSB up from 200 to 210. The Ratio is at x17 now too running at 3570 MHZ while it was running at 3200 MHZ. The CPU-NB Frequency is running at 2100 up from 2000. I don't know anything about RAM timings and I can't find a setting that is recognisable to what you're talking about on the BIOS. So I would rather not mess with that.

I'm using a stock cooler, are these settings safe?

EDIT: I just noticed something. When using CPU-Z it says my DRAM frequency is 700 MHZ. Is this normal? Is it possible to place the RAM in slower sockets on the MB?

If your temps are ok, then it's safe. I would suggest you change your CPU multiplier back to 16 though. When you increase the FSB, you increase the clock speeds of everything. The DRAM freq you see there is 1333 + (FSB change) / 2. That's normal. Your RAM is running at 1400 instead of 1333. Heres a link for more on RAM timings. They ARE important and worth learning about. Consult your mobo manual for bios instructions:

Looks like GS hatin on mozilla imbedding links copypasta this: http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/Understanding-RAM-Timings/26

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#22 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

I'm ready to give up, I've tried everything! I've fiddled with RAM timings rather aimlessly, increased my CPU's and Graphics Card's speed, got monitoring programs which show nothing abnormal and have changed the CCC settings around a tonne and yet my PC still can't play Team Fortress 2 and Skyrim on maxinum settings when apparantly it should be able to run them with full AA on and everything!

This is really putting my off PC gaming... :evil:

Avatar image for ionusX
ionusX

25778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#23 ionusX
Member since 2009 • 25778 Posts

fps is probably so high that your game is moving ultra slow to you.. this is a common problem.

go watch the tf2 1000fps video's on youtube.

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#24 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

Is it possible my CPU isn't up to scratch with the rest of the hardware? What power supply would you think I would need to run if all efficiently?

Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
600w will run all of that easily. As for the CPU and RAM, just leave the RAM and OC the CPU with a good aftermarket cooler, just up the multiplyer and voltage accordingly and your good to go.
Avatar image for RyviusARC
RyviusARC

5708

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 RyviusARC
Member since 2011 • 5708 Posts
Skyrim is only optimized for two cores. You need a very high clocked AMD CPU to clear the bottleneck. I sometimes get drops to 22fps if I am staring towards some town. But usually I get around 30-45 fps at 1680x1050. I play at max settings with a tweaked config file and 4xAA. I also have; AMD Athlon II x3 435 (Oced to 3.2ghz) Nvidia GTX 275 3 gigs of DDR2 RAM So even though you card is better than mine your CPU is going to be the culprit for holding performance back.
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="Socijalisticka"]

TF2 should not be dropping any frames. As for Skyrim with AA, it usually varies between 40-60 fps for me (and I have a weaker card then you do). Your build is underperforming.

sune_Gem

:(

What could possibly be causing it to do so? Any suggestions?

When I speak of turning on AA I refer to having AA on the maxinum ammount it allows by the way.

why would you use anything past 2 or 4x AA? Its worthless
Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#28 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

I just played DiRT 3 on absolute max settings with no slow down at all. Just Cause 2 benchmark test was at 60 FPs all the way throughout, yet when I played the game simply looking at this one mansion shot my frames down to like 20. Any other place it was perfectly smooth.

What's going on here? Why is my PC getting higher frames on certain games? Why does it seem to be anytime I look in a direction, be it a city on Skyrim or a building on Just Cause 2 that my frames drop then?

Come to think of it Team Fortress 2 and Skyrim both run on DirectX 9, and they're the games I have the most problems with...

Yeah, there's no way I'm getting those frames on those settings. Something is wrong and it's really bugging me...

Can anyone please give more suggestions?

Avatar image for Snotweasel530
Snotweasel530

636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#29 Snotweasel530
Member since 2010 • 636 Posts

Do you have vsync turned on? Try turning it off if you haven't. In game as well as system global settings

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#30 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

Do you have vsync turned on? Try turning it off if you haven't. In game as well as system global settings

Snotweasel530

The game gives no such setting. When vsync is forced on in CCC with triple buffering the game textures break down and green flashes occur on everything. With vsync forced off and triple buffering not turned on the FPs seems the same but atleast everything works with no flashing. That is on Skyrim anyway.

Avatar image for sune_Gem
sune_Gem

12463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#31 sune_Gem
Member since 2006 • 12463 Posts

Guys, I just made a big discovery! I had a 6950, not a 6970. I don't know what led me to believe it was a 6970 but it wasn't. Is the FPs I'm getting more understandable on a 6950?

I haven't been getting the wrong drivers as ATi has you download drivers to the card series, like HD 6*** so that still wouldn't explain lower frames.