should i get a 4890, or crossfire 2 4870 512's??

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

I already have a 4870 512, but i'm using a 24" moniter(1900x1200), so I need a little more juice. I can save $50 bucks by getting another 4870 512 instead of the 4890. Also if I did crossfire, would my e8500 be a bottleneck? Side note....... I have a 750watt pc power & cooling psu, and a Gigabyte GA-X48-DS4 motherboard.

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#2 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23857 Posts
Your E8500 wont bottleneck. you have enough power crossfire that bad boy.
Avatar image for washd123
washd123

3418

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 washd123
Member since 2003 • 3418 Posts

Your E8500 wont bottleneck. you have enough power crossfire that bad boy.04dcarraher

2 HD4870s > 1hd4890

really just save the money and wait a few weeks prices will drop and the 5800 series will be released

Avatar image for Blackfallen
Blackfallen

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Blackfallen
Member since 2005 • 857 Posts

i would wait and save honestly so far the 5870 looks to be very powerful card

Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Ya, I'm kinda on a budget right now. I agree the 5870 is gonna be sweet, but I put myself on a strict budget for the next year, so I'm looking for a cheap alternitive for now. Would a 4870 512 crossfire give me a boost, or would the 512 still hamper me at 1900x1200 even in crossfire?

Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts
i dont think your cpu would bottleneck crossfire 4870. if your on a budget then go for the 4870 but if your not then id get a 4890 (single) which then you can crossfire that later when you have the money. but 1 4890 would you great
Avatar image for Blackfallen
Blackfallen

857

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Blackfallen
Member since 2005 • 857 Posts

Ya, I'm kinda on a budget right now. I agree the 5870 is gonna be sweet, but I put myself on a strict budget for the next year, so I'm looking for a cheap alternitive for now. Would a 4870 512 crossfire give me a boost, or would the 512 still hamper me at 1900x1200 even in crossfire?

Genetic1

alright didnt know that lol. otherwise yes go for crossfire that baby you will get a good performance boost

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
It depends on how long you plan on keeping the card(s). VRAM requirements for DX11 games will be higher if you still have a DX10 card. If you're going to keep the card(s) for atleast a year, then I would recommend selling the 4870 and getting a 4890.
Avatar image for pureskull123
pureskull123

350

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#9 pureskull123
Member since 2007 • 350 Posts

i think you should get the new versions coming out. and get a better processor.

Avatar image for IMaBIOHAZARD
IMaBIOHAZARD

1464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#10 IMaBIOHAZARD
Member since 2008 • 1464 Posts
The 4890 is a very solid card, but two 4870's in Crossfire would likely just edge it out (keep in mind the 4890 is ATI's fastest single-GPU card). I'd say wait for the new 5800s, but if you really can't I'd have to agree with GeordiLaForge's opinion.
Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Ok, just found this..................http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-4870-x2-review-crossfire/11

According to this the 4870 512 crossfire kills a single 4870 512. On Mass Effect it equals a 4870x2 at 1900x1200. How could this be? It is encouraging, but is this for real?

Avatar image for IMaBIOHAZARD
IMaBIOHAZARD

1464

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#12 IMaBIOHAZARD
Member since 2008 • 1464 Posts

Ok, just found this..................http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon-hd-4870-x2-review-crossfire/11

According to this the 4870 512 crossfire kills a single 4870 512. On Mass Effect it equals a 4870x2 at 1900x1200. How could this be? It is encouraging, but is this for real?

Genetic1
Dual-GPU cards aren't as powerful as actually physically having two video cards based on the GPU the X2 card uses. Simply, Dual-Video-Card pwns Dual-GPU.
Avatar image for chris24l
chris24l

1288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 chris24l
Member since 2006 • 1288 Posts

with the 9.8 catalyst crossfire saw some great gains, so i say go for another 4870 to crossfire your rig. the 4890 is a great card but 4870 crossfire will get you better frames. but get a decent 4870, XFX, SAPPHIRE, MSI as long as its muchcheaper than the 4890 say at least $50.

Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

So you are saying that 2 4870 512mb in crossfire will actually realistically compete with a 4870x2 at 1920x1200 resolution. Seriously two 512mb cards will gain me comparable performance to a 4870x2? Pardon my ignorance, but am I right in saying that I will still only have 512mb even in crossfire, and if this is right, then how can the fps increase be so dramatic when compared with a single 4870 512 in those benchmarks?

Avatar image for chris24l
chris24l

1288

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 chris24l
Member since 2006 • 1288 Posts

So you are saying that 2 4870 512mb in crossfire will actually realistically compete with a 4870x2 at 1920x1200 resolution. Seriously two 512mb cards will gain me comparable performance to a 4870x2? Pardon my ignorance, but am I right in saying that I will still only have 512mb even in crossfire, and if this is right, then how can the fps increase be so dramatic when compared with a single 4870 512 in those benchmarks?

Genetic1

yes the crossfire 4870 will compete with a 4870x2. in most cases 4870 crossfire1 mb beats 4870x2. the 512 mb is not far behind. the 4870x2 may get the better of the 512mb when AA is added though, but not much. crossfire works really well when compared to the x2 cards. crossfire works really good with 9.8 catalyst.

Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Thank-you everyone for your help. I appreciate it.

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts

2 HD 4870 512MBs should be neck and neck with an HD 4870x2 1GB (512MB per GPU).
The HD 4870X2 2GB should outperform 2HD 4870 512MBs in memory intensive games
I have 2 HD 4870 512MBs in CrossfireX, it's awesome.

Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

That is great news for me!!! The issue that I keep running into is that alot of people are saying that even though it's a crossfire I still only am utilizing 512mb, not 1024mb(1GB). So because of that crossfiring two 512mb cards using a 1920x 1200 display is a wate of time, but the benchmarks seem to dispute that theory completley. The benchmarks seem to indicate a huge leap in fps at 1920x1200 crossfiring 4870 512mb cards.I posted a link to one set of benchmarks, and I just found another......http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3517&p=7 This shows a 92% increase crossfiring two 4870 512mb as opposed to using just one, and this is at 1920x1200(where crossfiring 512mb cards are not supposed to make a difference), but it dramatically does. It's weird, but freaking awesome!!!

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts

That is great news for me!!! The issue that I keep running into is that alot of people are saying that even though it's a crossfire I still only am utilizing 512mb, not 1024mb(1GB). So because of that crossfiring two 512mb cards using a 1920x 1200 display is a wate of time, but the benchmarks seem to dispute that theory completley. The benchmarks seem to indicate a huge leap in fps at 1920x1200 crossfiring 4870 512mb cards.I posted a link to one set of benchmarks, and I just found another......http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=3517&p=7 This shows a 92% increase crossfiring two 4870 512mb as opposed to using just one, and this is at 1920x1200(where crossfiring 512mb cards are not supposed to make a difference), but it dramatically does. It's weird, but freaking awesome!!!

Genetic1
There are few games that even use more than 512MB of VRAM, the speed boost usually comes for there being larger chunks of memory being free so it doesn't have to jump around as much to write to memory. I have no problems playing any game with my 2 HD 4870 512MBs at 1920x1200, Crysis is even playable at 1920x1200 highest settings with good framerates. I would imagine it would help if enabled AA though, and maybe give me a few frames more, but nothing drastic. The speed boost comes from having the extra transistors, not really a memory limitation. GDDR5 has the most bandwidth of any VRAM on the market anyway, even more than the 512-bit GDDR3 Nvidia uses, so even if you do get maxed, it's plenty fast and can swap out fast to compensate. 2 HD 4870 512MBs are great, you won't regret it.
Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Thanks dude, I'm picking it up tommorow morning. Can't wait.

Avatar image for jevery57
jevery57

258

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 jevery57
Member since 2009 • 258 Posts

My gains from CrossFiring two 512 mb 4870's, (as compared to a single). At stock CPU speed, (3.0) - 3DMard06 - 15,700 to 18,100, 3DMark Vantage – 9,577 to 13,745. Overclocked CPU to 4.0, - 18,900 to 23,100, 3DMark Vantage – 10,700 to 16,800. BIG difference in gameplay for $150.

Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts

My gains from CrossFiring two 512 mb 4870's, (as compared to a single). At stock CPU speed, (3.0) - 3DMard06 - 15,700 to 18,100, 3DMark Vantage – 9,577 to 13,745. Overclocked CPU to 4.0, - 18,900 to 23,100, 3DMark Vantage – 10,700 to 16,800. BIG difference in gameplay for $150.

jevery57
thats nice :)
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts

My gains from CrossFiring two 512 mb 4870's, (as compared to a single). At stock CPU speed, (3.0) - 3DMard06 - 15,700 to 18,100, 3DMark Vantage – 9,577 to 13,745. Overclocked CPU to 4.0, - 18,900 to 23,100, 3DMark Vantage – 10,700 to 16,800. BIG difference in gameplay for $150.

jevery57

I get 25,000+ in 3DMark06 with my rig below. 2 HD 4870 512MBs got a lot of power to them.

Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
I still say he should get the 4890, mainly due to the extra VRAM. DX11 games will use alot more video memory if you're not using a DX11 card. (Models rendered using DX11 will use 10x less memory and memory bandwidth, so the extra memory will be used by devs for things like shader and texture detail) If you have a DX10 card, you won't have the new hardware tessellation features, and having more VRAM will really make a difference. Games today already use alot more than 512MB VRAM if you truly max them out. Hell, even Doom 3 uses 512MB of VRAM on Ultra. I'm considering stepping up to cards with more VRAM so I can max out early DX11 games while I'm waiting on second gen DX11 cards. Just trying to give everyone a heads up ;)
Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts

Played far-cry 2 today, a switched from dx10 to dx9, and couldn't tell the difference. Dx11 can wait, I'm in no hurry. I bought a second 4870 512mb today, but havn't crossfired yet. It will do me just fine. I don't care if I get 100fps, or even 70fps, all I wan't is 60fps, and that will do fine. I never use AA, so that will help too.

Avatar image for eikast
eikast

196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 eikast
Member since 2006 • 196 Posts

I had a HD4870 card and last month I bought a GTX285. If you plan on buying ATI I wouldn't buy a card now and i'd only upgrade to a HD5870 either when it is released in October or wait until the holiday season.

Avatar image for Genetic1
Genetic1

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 Genetic1
Member since 2008 • 25 Posts
I won't be getting into the 58xx series until well into next year. I chose to crossfire until then. I know it's only 512mb, and I know your not doubling your vram, but the benchmarks I read were very promising. I know alot of new games are gonna be sucking memory, but that's ok. If vram was the only important thing, and you don't "double" it by crossfire, then why crossfire? Obviously there are other very tangible benifits from doing it.
Avatar image for eikast
eikast

196

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 eikast
Member since 2006 • 196 Posts

I won't be getting into the 58xx series until well into next year. I chose to crossfire until then. I know it's only 512mb, and I know your not doubling your vram, but the benchmarks I read were very promising. I know alot of new games are gonna be sucking memory, but that's ok. If vram was the only important thing, and you don't "double" it by crossfire, then why crossfire? Obviously there are other very tangible benifits from doing it.Genetic1

From my understanding crossfire doesn't double your VRAM. As a matter of fact for example if you were using xfire with a 512 and 1gb hd4870, the 1gb will only use 512. You might as well at least wait for the new cards that way ATi's DX10 cards will drop in price

Avatar image for Slig0
Slig0

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 Slig0
Member since 2009 • 2072 Posts

with the 9.8 catalyst crossfire saw some great gains, so i say go for another 4870 to crossfire your rig. the 4890 is a great card but 4870 crossfire will get you better frames. but get a decent 4870, XFX, SAPPHIRE, MSI as long as its muchcheaper than the 4890 say at least $50.

chris24l

Yeah, but there are issues in some games like BioShock and Anno1404 with black textures.

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts

From my understanding crossfire doesn't double your VRAM. As a matter of fact for example if you were using xfire with a 512 and 1gb hd4870, the 1gb will only use 512. You might as well at least wait for the new cards that way ATi's DX10 cards will drop in price

eikast

What part of his statement disagreed with yours? He just said the performance is there regardless of the fact memory doesn't double with CrossfireX.

[QUOTE="chris24l"]

with the 9.8 catalyst crossfire saw some great gains, so i say go for another 4870 to crossfire your rig. the 4890 is a great card but 4870 crossfire will get you better frames. but get a decent 4870, XFX, SAPPHIRE, MSI as long as its muchcheaper than the 4890 say at least $50.

Slig0

Yeah, but there are issues in some games like BioShock and Anno1404 with black textures.

Black textures in Bioshock with CrossfireX? First time I've heard of that. Bioshock performed great for me (as I would expect from Unreal Engine) and I never noticed any problems like that.

Avatar image for Slig0
Slig0

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 Slig0
Member since 2009 • 2072 Posts

[QUOTE="eikast"] What part of his statement disagreed with yours? He just said the performance is there regardless of the fact memory doesn't double with CrossfireX. [QUOTE="Slig0"]

[QUOTE="chris24l"]

with the 9.8 catalyst crossfire saw some great gains, so i say go for another 4870 to crossfire your rig. the 4890 is a great card but 4870 crossfire will get you better frames. but get a decent 4870, XFX, SAPPHIRE, MSI as long as its muchcheaper than the 4890 say at least $50.

Marfoo

Yeah, but there are issues in some games like BioShock and Anno1404 with black textures.

Black textures in Bioshock with CrossfireX? First time I've heard of that. Bioshock performed great for me (as I would expect from Unreal Engine) and I never noticed any problems like that.

No, with a single card. Have you tried Anno1404?