This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Dyrti_Byrd_2k2
Dyrti_Byrd_2k2

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Dyrti_Byrd_2k2
Member since 2007 • 143 Posts

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've read...

8800GTX > (x2) 8800GTS in SLI

If this is true... what is the point? I'm trying to decide between 1-8800GTX or 2-8800GTS's (640mb) in SLI.

Avatar image for Indestructible2
Indestructible2

5935

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 Indestructible2
Member since 2007 • 5935 Posts
8800GTS SLI is better than 8800GTX Single,though not by a whole lot,SLI is only useful if you have a 30" LCD @2560x1600,otherwise,its a way to make your e-peen bigger...
Avatar image for LahiruD
LahiruD

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 LahiruD
Member since 2006 • 2164 Posts

But some times 8800GTS SLI > 8800GTX.

But get a GTX bcoz some games doesn't support SLI & GTX is cheaper than 2x8800GTS SLI

Avatar image for Mr_NoName111
Mr_NoName111

1035

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Mr_NoName111
Member since 2005 • 1035 Posts
I'd get a GTX. Uses less power than 2x GTS', if i recall, and you also get the option of getting another GTX in the future to SLI THEM.
Avatar image for Zaber123
Zaber123

1159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#5 Zaber123
Member since 2003 • 1159 Posts
I can tell you 2x 2900XT will beat a GTX. Crossfire is more efficient than SLI at the moment. Although 2x 2900XTs will put out a lot of heat, take a lot of power, and need 4x 6pin PCI-E connectors (although you can get around this by using molex adapters). I would just go with one GTX, it's much easier, less demanding, and while slower it'll do you fine.
Avatar image for Hiryuu_
Hiryuu_

2521

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Hiryuu_
Member since 2006 • 2521 Posts

Two 8800GTS cards in SLi are better than a single 8800GTX, especially if you crank up AA or playing at a high resolution.

A single GTX isn't too significantly weaker, but with two GTS cards you'd have much higher power consumption and heat emission

Crossfire is only better than SLi at the moment because nVidia's SLi drivers for Vista blow.

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
Another reasons SLI isn't that great is because game developers specifically have to add SLI support to their game engine (correct if I'm wrong.), whereas Crossfire is completely driver driven and will work with any game.
Avatar image for Sentinel672002
Sentinel672002

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Sentinel672002
Member since 2004 • 1585 Posts

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've read...

8800GTX > (x2) 8800GTS in SLI

If this is true... what is the point? I'm trying to decide between 1-8800GTX or 2-8800GTS's (640mb) in SLI.

Dyrti_Byrd_2k2

SLI isn't a gimmick. It simply is what it is. Two cards in tandem, each dedicated to roughly half the work of a single card. How big is your monitor and at what resolution do you usually game? With a normal sized monitor, like 19" to 22", the GTX is more than you'd need for gaming right now. I say more is better, so get one of those. The only way I'd consider building an 8800GTS SLI rig, is if the price of a GTS card was closer to $200 a piece. Then two of them might be more bang for the buck than the single GTX...although you'd still have to allow for the added heat, power consumption and interior case space used for the SLI configuration... :roll:

Avatar image for Dyrti_Byrd_2k2
Dyrti_Byrd_2k2

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Dyrti_Byrd_2k2
Member since 2007 • 143 Posts
[QUOTE="Dyrti_Byrd_2k2"]

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've read...

8800GTX > (x2) 8800GTS in SLI

If this is true... what is the point? I'm trying to decide between 1-8800GTX or 2-8800GTS's (640mb) in SLI.

Sentinel672002

SLI isn't a gimmick. It simply is what it is. Two cards in tandem, each dedicated to roughly half the work of a single card. How big is your monitor and at what resolution do you usually game? With a normal sized monitor, like 19" to 22", the GTX is more than you'd need for gaming right now. I say more is better, so get one of those. The only way I'd consider building an 8800GTS SLI rig, is if the price of a GTS card was closer to $200 a piece. Then two of them might be more bang for the buck than the single GTX...although you'd still have to allow for the added heat, power consumption and interior case space used for the SLI configuration... :roll:

Cool.. thanks for the input. I'm leaning towards going with a single 8800GTX. I'm leaving this option open, but would it be stupid to even consider SLIing 2 8800GTX's to game on a 22" widescreen LCD @ 1680x1050? If/when there's a price drop on the GTX (be it a year or so from now), would 2 of these cards even fit in an Antec Nine Hundred?

BTW, nice rig! The pc I'm building should be VERY similar to yours.

Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#10 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
For raw performance, two 8800GTS's in SLi will outperform an 8800GTX. The issue is that some games just do not do SLi very well, or the only rendering mode it can work with is "SLiAA", which just has the two working together to provide a less performance-taxing AA/AF on the game. SLi makes sense if you have a really high-res monitor, and each new generation of geforce card has steadily improved the performance difference you can realize with SLi. SLi with the 8800's makes a bigger difference than it did when we started with the 6800's, or even the 78/7900's.
Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#11 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts
If you are not running at very high rez it won't make a noticeable difference. I'd say keep it simple for now, just not worth it right now. Power consumption, heat, fitting two of these monsters in your case, air flow issues. Just not worth it right now.
Avatar image for Dyrti_Byrd_2k2
Dyrti_Byrd_2k2

143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Dyrti_Byrd_2k2
Member since 2007 • 143 Posts

If you are not running at very high rez it won't make a noticeable difference. I'd say keep it simple for now, just not worth it right now. Power consumption, heat, fitting two of these monsters in your case, air flow issues. Just not worth it right now.vfibsux

Wise words! The wifey thanks you... haha!

Avatar image for lostamerican13
lostamerican13

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 lostamerican13
Member since 2007 • 168 Posts

Based on the charts at Tom's Hardware for Single VGA Cards and Dual/Quad VGA Setups,

The GTS yields an increase of ~30% in SLi
The GTX yields an increase of ~20% in SLi

Obviously the GTX out performs the GTS in the Single VGA Card, it's the ideal solution for such a situation. The GTS, while still losing to the GTX in SLi yields a overall higher increase in the Dual/Quad VGA Setups.

Nutshell?

Go with a GTX if you're looking for the single card solution, GTS SLi will offer more power and frames in games but, of course is more expensive. All depends what you plan on playing, and how you're going to play them graphics/resolution wise.

Simple as that.

Avatar image for Sentinel672002
Sentinel672002

1585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Sentinel672002
Member since 2004 • 1585 Posts
[QUOTE="Sentinel672002"][QUOTE="Dyrti_Byrd_2k2"]

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but from what I've read...

8800GTX > (x2) 8800GTS in SLI

If this is true... what is the point? I'm trying to decide between 1-8800GTX or 2-8800GTS's (640mb) in SLI.

Dyrti_Byrd_2k2

SLI isn't a gimmick. It simply is what it is. Two cards in tandem, each dedicated to roughly half the work of a single card. How big is your monitor and at what resolution do you usually game? With a normal sized monitor, like 19" to 22", the GTX is more than you'd need for gaming right now. I say more is better, so get one of those. The only way I'd consider building an 8800GTS SLI rig, is if the price of a GTS card was closer to $200 a piece. Then two of them might be more bang for the buck than the single GTX...although you'd still have to allow for the added heat, power consumption and interior case space used for the SLI configuration... :roll:

Cool.. thanks for the input. I'm leaning towards going with a single 8800GTX. I'm leaving this option open, but would it be stupid to even consider SLIing 2 8800GTX's to game on a 22" widescreen LCD @ 1680x1050? If/when there's a price drop on the GTX (be it a year or so from now), would 2 of these cards even fit in an Antec Nine Hundred?

BTW, nice rig! The pc I'm building should be VERY similar to yours.

Well, thanks. I only recently built this rig of mine. The 8800s are big. Very in fact. Yes, two of them would fit in an Antec Nine Hundred and the addition of an optional side mounted 120mm fan would be recommended in that configuration. You'd need a powerful PSU to be sure. Also, you can pretty much give up on other expansion cards with two GTXs. You might squeeze one additional card in...maybe, depending on the mother board configuration. That's why I opted out of the SLI thing. I need my expansion slots. And yes, two GTXs would be wasted on a 22" monitor...from a gaming stand point. Now if your goal is to pwn the world when it comes to 3DMark scores...:P

Avatar image for Runningflame570
Runningflame570

10388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Runningflame570
Member since 2005 • 10388 Posts
SLI overall is pretty much just a gimmick for people with too much money, it doesn't offer a 100% performance boost and even if you SLI the top cards in the class they will be outdated within a couple of years.