So i played kane and lynch 2 demo.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#1 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

So, it was short, perhaps shorter than the console version, its very badly optimized, the loadscreens are long, the framerate is low and it memory leaks when i look around sometimes.

The camera was a big mess with visual annoyances jumping around and the combat? You basicly take cover and shoot at the right time or you get hit and fall down and you have to press a button to stand up. It felt very specifc and the graphics are not even as good as they looked like. I am highly dissapointing, i was hoping it will be better than the first game, but it felt too specific and badly designed, perhaps they managed to make it worse than the first :(

In the good parts however the ai is agressive and can quickly get behind you and kill you. So i you can play by its rules, you might enjoy its hardcore gameplay.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#2 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Bump, anyone else?
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

You are wrong...thats all.

Seriously thoe I don't agree with any of your points(what a surprise.) The game ran fine for me, I don't know were your getting this badly optimized stuff from. I ran the game at full setting 1080p at 40-60 FPS on my 4870 512mb E8400 3.0ghz. The camera and "visual annoyances" are their to make the game seem more hectic, and it does a very good job if you ask me. You can turn most of this stuff off, but you are missing the point of the game if you did that. This game is just like any other third person shooter on the market. Maybe you just don't like third person shooters?

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#4 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
Sorry but i am not wrong, more people have problems with the perfomance and say its a bad port. Also a ton of people can come out and say that the visual annoyances are annoying and its not like any other third person shooter. Also i played too many third person shooter including the first and they are nothing like this game. Infact the camera is worse, the way the character falls down when you get hit is annoying and nothing like other third person shooters and in my opinion the visual annoyances are giving you a hard time to see the level design of the game. Sadly there is no way to turn it off. Also its funniy how you say that those visuals are "the point of the game" and "This game is just like any other third person shooter on the market. Maybe you just don't like third person shooters?" Because IT IS NOT like all other first person shooters, infact saying that i have the problem is insulting to me. So tell me, falling down when you hit is like all the other third person shooters eh? Pressing c to get up is like al lthe other third person shooters eh? Not to mention that third person shooter that you take cover are too similar to each other but kane any lynch 2 is nothiling like them. So sorry, but you are wrong, i am glad it run well for you, but its a fact its badly optimized and its nothing like most third person shooters in the market.
Avatar image for Resistance_Kid
Resistance_Kid

1171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#5 Resistance_Kid
Member since 2009 • 1171 Posts

Sorry but i am not wrong, more people have problems with the perfomance and say its a bad port. Also a ton of people can come out and say that the visual annoyances are annoying and its not like any other third person shooter. Also i played too many third person shooter including the first and they are nothing like this game. Infact the camera is worse, the way the character falls down when you get hit is annoying and nothing like other third person shooters and in my opinion the visual annoyances are giving you a hard time to see the level design of the game. Sadly there is no way to turn it off. Also its funniy how you say that those visuals are "the point of the game" and "This game is just like any other third person shooter on the market. Maybe you just don't like third person shooters?" Because IT IS NOT like all other first person shooters, infact saying that i have the problem is insulting to me. So tell me, falling down when you hit is like all the other third person shooters eh? Pressing c to get up is like al lthe other third person shooters eh? Not to mention that third person shooter that you take cover are too similar to each other but kane any lynch 2 is nothiling like them. So sorry, but you are wrong, i am glad it run well for you, but its a fact its badly optimized and its nothing like most third person shooters in the market.dakan45

You're the only one who says it's badly optimized. Dakan, I respect your opinion and everything, but it does get annoying when you start arguing with everyone who disagrees with your opinion. Just stop... please... for the sake of not arguing... :D

Oh and the falling down is actually realistic, especially since it happens when you get hit with a shotgun ;)

Avatar image for IU_Stizzal
IU_Stizzal

382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 IU_Stizzal
Member since 2010 • 382 Posts

I ran the game maxed out just fine. The only visual annoyance of any kind might be the lights, but I got over that in a matter of seconds. Regarding the falling down when I got hit, I didn't find this to be annoying, but it just added a different element to combat I guess. The game really didn't interest me too much, so I will probably pick it up in the future when I can find it cheap.

Avatar image for Masculus
Masculus

2878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Masculus
Member since 2009 • 2878 Posts

It has an interesting artstyle but is just too exagerated, it really gets annoying in some parts; sometimes you want to actually see whats in front you but the game just don't let you. You run for 3 seconds and the camera gets all blurred like your character has some horrible case of high blood pressure, then there is the simulation of a cell-phone camera with all the little errors and the annoying distorted light. It is irritating, but i wouldn't say based on that, that is a bad game. Itis not anugly game to look at but playing it is a different story.I'd say is not that great game simply because the shooting is not good, it feel weightless with far too much spraying just like CoD; also animations are kinda awkward and the camera is always set at an uncomfortable position. Seens to me that they ditched a lot of good ideas from the first game to make it more like a GoW clone, they should have sticked more with the Freedom Fighters formula rather than making the choice to be a pure TPS clone.

Performance wise i think it runs pretty well provided you have a decent CPU, after i replaced mine it stays mostly at 60fps on highest w/ 1440x900 + 4AA but I do have to say that framerate can be very unstable in some parts. Regarding being or not a bad port, i think that not having a chat option reveals it being a grotesque and crappy port.

Avatar image for IU_Stizzal
IU_Stizzal

382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 IU_Stizzal
Member since 2010 • 382 Posts

[QUOTE="Resistance_Kid"]You're the only one who says it's badly optimized. Dakan, I respect your opinion and everything, but it does get annoying when you start arguing with everyone who disagrees with your opinion. Just stop... please... for the sake of not arguing... :D

Oh and the falling down is actually realistic, especially since it happens when you get hit with a shotgun ;)

dakan45




Sorry bud, but i am not the only one who says that, i know people who have the same problem. Try to understand, i started this game with the hope of being good but it seems luck has just put me in crappy position again that everyone is irght and i was wrong.

I was hoping that this thread will come with argeement with the rest of the users but i guess i am in this postion again, whatever, screw it i got tired with goot intetions, screw it. I never bother again.

But please FOR THE LOVE OF GOD....dont defend games you never played with crap points like that, you get hit the assault rifles and falll down and with shotgun, i couldnt give a raths ass if its teallistic, it does not happen in any other third person games, neither your are on the ground and crawl and press c to stand up. Atlest have the courage to aknowledge that rather turning anything against me, i got tired of this crap. Its irritating.

I'll agree with you that I haven't seen falling down when being hit in any other 3rd person shooters that I remember. I could see how some might not like that feature, but mabe they intended it to be a little more realistic.

On a side note...Calm down man, its just the interent lol.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#10 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts
I just figured it out, there is something wrong with the prerended frames in the demo. I hope its fixed in the final release because 2 of my friends have the same issue too, it randomly lags when you look around sometimes, which is unacceptable for a system like mine. But i guess its just an issue that will be fixed in the end. I dont mind the shooting or the camera effects. You can turn them off in the options somewhere. Ill try to mess up a little bit to see how it runs.
Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

[QUOTE="Resistance_Kid"]You're the only one who says it's badly optimized. Dakan, I respect your opinion and everything, but it does get annoying when you start arguing with everyone who disagrees with your opinion. Just stop... please... for the sake of not arguing... :D

Oh and the falling down is actually realistic, especially since it happens when you get hit with a shotgun ;)

dakan45




Sorry bud, but i am not the only one who says that, i know people who have the same problem. Try to understand, i started this game with the hope of being good but it seems luck has just put me in crappy position again that everyone is irght and i was wrong.

I was hoping that this thread will come with argeement with the rest of the users but i guess i am in this postion again, whatever, screw it i got tired with goot intetions, screw it. I never bother again.

But please FOR THE LOVE OF GOD....dont defend games you never played with crap points like that, you get hit the assault rifles and falll down and with shotgun, i couldnt give a raths ass if its teallistic, it does not happen in any other third person games, neither your are on the ground and crawl and press c to stand up. Atlest have the courage to aknowledge that rather turning anything against me, i got tired of this crap. Its irritating.

Then you obviously just don't like the sty-le of the gameplay. All the points you mention just make me feel like you are missing the point of the game. You just fail to immerse yourself in the game. And yes...this game is just like any other third person shooter on the market. You take cover and shoot and has health regen. I don't see anything that stands out besides the down but not out system.

Avatar image for JackBurton
JackBurton

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 32

User Lists: 0

#12 JackBurton
Member since 2002 • 3808 Posts

you get hit the assault rifles and falll down and with shotgun, i couldnt give a raths ass if its teallistic, it does not happen in any other third person games [...] i got tired of this crap. Its irritating.

dakan45

iirc, this also occurs in Mafia (1)

pre-ordered w/o trying demo

Avatar image for Farkeman
Farkeman

1199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Farkeman
Member since 2009 • 1199 Posts
performance is ok , but the game itself looks like a bad console port :(
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#14 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"] you get hit the assault rifles and falll down and with shotgun, i couldnt give a raths ass if its teallistic, it does not happen in any other third person games [...] i got tired of this crap. Its irritating.

JackBurton

iirc, this also occurs in Mafia (1)

pre-ordered w/o trying demo

Really? I remember character reaction and animation to taking hits but i cant remember falling down. Anyway its more than your average take cover third person shooter. I replayed it just now with the fullscreen affects off, damn the game looks much worse without them. I toned some settings down and the game still lowers its framerate allot when you are at that crowded area. Its either a bug or they overload the unreal engine at that point. I was hoping this will be better than the first which i have no problems at all. So its either me having an issue only in the demo, or the game does not understand cool and quiet too well. Another user said that it runs only on one core. Perhaps thats why the loadscreens are too damn long and slow. What about you guys? While i still have strong faith in the game, i am pretty dissapointed by the quality of the demo, i dont know either fix what causes the problem or make the rest of the levels more simple, i dont know what to think, but i am pretty dissapointed and diss-encouraged to buy this game, i was hoping for a fast paced action game, but the framerate, gameplay mechanics and camera like visuals kinda kill the point of my interest on this game.
Avatar image for rmfd341
rmfd341

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#15 rmfd341
Member since 2008 • 3808 Posts
It's a demo for christ's sake, you guys complain too much based on a demo or even a beta. The game is fine, the get back in cover feature is something that really surprised me, although not realistical in a real life way, it's way more realistic to take a bullet, get stunned and fall, and soon after get back in cover. The camera is simply the art style, the developers said it, and although I don't like the ''shaky'' feeling to it sometimes, I appreciate the fact that they stood for uniqueness instead of doing the same camera every third person game has. The game ran fine for me, and I was satisfied by the graphics, besides, I managed to put it on max using a 9600 GT, which I admit, ain't as good as it was 2 years ago.
Avatar image for lucfonzy
lucfonzy

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 lucfonzy
Member since 2008 • 1835 Posts

Sorry but i am not wrong, more people have problems with the perfomance and say its a bad port. Also a ton of people can come out and say that the visual annoyances are annoying and its not like any other third person shooter. Also i played too many third person shooter including the first and they are nothing like this game. Infact the camera is worse, the way the character falls down when you get hit is annoying and nothing like other third person shooters and in my opinion the visual annoyances are giving you a hard time to see the level design of the game. Sadly there is no way to turn it off. Also its funniy how you say that those visuals are "the point of the game" and "This game is just like any other third person shooter on the market. Maybe you just don't like third person shooters?" Because IT IS NOT like all other first person shooters, infact saying that i have the problem is insulting to me. So tell me, falling down when you hit is like all the other third person shooters eh? Pressing c to get up is like al lthe other third person shooters eh? Not to mention that third person shooter that you take cover are too similar to each other but kane any lynch 2 is nothiling like them. So sorry, but you are wrong, i am glad it run well for you, but its a fact its badly optimized and its nothing like most third person shooters in the market.dakan45

Seems like you are trying to pass off your opinion as fact.

I ran the demo perfectly, I loved pretty much every second of it.

The art style was gritty, the gunplay was fun and hectic. I couldn't really see any bad points tbh, as far as third person shooters go this looks to be a very good one.

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#18 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Its..... A..... Demo......

I dont know how many times Ive hated a demo and loved the final game.

Some demos are a year old or more.

I suggest playing demos with a grain of salt..

Also just because it doesnt run well on your pc doesnt realy mean that everyone else runs the game bad.

Im not very interested in this game to be honest, but I dont find the pc version to be worse then the console versino of the demo that I tried.

Avatar image for LongZhiZi
LongZhiZi

2453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 LongZhiZi
Member since 2009 • 2453 Posts
Well, I played the demo as well. First, I should say that it ran fine for me. I didn't experience any kind of dropped frames that made me take notice, at least. That said, I didn't like the demo at all. I thought the gunplay was weak and stiff. The visual effects were ok, but I couldn't say I really liked them. I don't know whether I didn't stay in cover long enough, but it seemed like the beginning featured unlimited respawns for enemies. If the story was good, the gameplay is passable enough to justify $20 or less.
Avatar image for Resistance_Kid
Resistance_Kid

1171

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#20 Resistance_Kid
Member since 2009 • 1171 Posts

[QUOTE="Resistance_Kid"]You're the only one who says it's badly optimized. Dakan, I respect your opinion and everything, but it does get annoying when you start arguing with everyone who disagrees with your opinion. Just stop... please... for the sake of not arguing... :D

Oh and the falling down is actually realistic, especially since it happens when you get hit with a shotgun ;)

dakan45




Sorry bud, but i am not the only one who says that, i know people who have the same problem. Try to understand, i started this game with the hope of being good but it seems luck has just put me in crappy position again that everyone is irght and i was wrong.

I was hoping that this thread will come with argeement with the rest of the users but i guess i am in this postion again, whatever, screw it i got tired with goot intetions, screw it. I never bother again.

But please FOR THE LOVE OF GOD....dont defend games you never played with crap points like that, you get hit the assault rifles and falll down and with shotgun, i couldnt give a raths ass if its teallistic, it does not happen in any other third person games, neither your are on the ground and crawl and press c to stand up. Atlest have the courage to aknowledge that rather turning anything against me, i got tired of this crap. Its irritating.

I played the demo before you did ;)

But ok, I give in, although the falling down factor is not very good, especially since you have to press a button to get up, it's not a gamebreaker.

Avatar image for Tresca_
Tresca_

869

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 Tresca_
Member since 2008 • 869 Posts


But please FOR THE LOVE OF GOD....dont defend games you never played with crap points like that, you get hit the assault rifles and falll down and with shotgun, i couldnt give a raths ass if its teallistic, it does not happen in any other third person games, neither your are on the ground and crawl and press c to stand up. Atlest have the courage to aknowledge that rather turning anything against me, i got tired of this crap. Its irritating.

dakan45

Sorry, but why the fudge should developers of third person shooters stick to a set template? Because players are familiar with it? Playing the same mechanics gets boring. I'll welcome something new, even if it is something as small as falling on your rear end.

I think the feature makes sense. Unlike the first game when you get shot and fall on one knee, it's now up to you to get back up again before getting killed. Therefore you no longer have to depend on problematic AI to revive you, and you can now shoot while down. As a result it keeps you involved in the game, and it saves you braying like a donkey when the AI fails.

The demo ran fine for me also.

Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#22 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]Sorry but i am not wrong, more people have problems with the perfomance and say its a bad port. Also a ton of people can come out and say that the visual annoyances are annoying and its not like any other third person shooter. Also i played too many third person shooter including the first and they are nothing like this game. Infact the camera is worse, the way the character falls down when you get hit is annoying and nothing like other third person shooters and in my opinion the visual annoyances are giving you a hard time to see the level design of the game. Sadly there is no way to turn it off. Also its funniy how you say that those visuals are "the point of the game" and "This game is just like any other third person shooter on the market. Maybe you just don't like third person shooters?" Because IT IS NOT like all other first person shooters, infact saying that i have the problem is insulting to me. So tell me, falling down when you hit is like all the other third person shooters eh? Pressing c to get up is like al lthe other third person shooters eh? Not to mention that third person shooter that you take cover are too similar to each other but kane any lynch 2 is nothiling like them. So sorry, but you are wrong, i am glad it run well for you, but its a fact its badly optimized and its nothing like most third person shooters in the market.lucfonzy

Seems like you are trying to pass off your opinion as fact.

I ran the demo perfectly, I loved pretty much every second of it.

The art style was gritty, the gunplay was fun and hectic. I couldn't really see any bad points tbh, as far as third person shooters go this looks to be a very good one.

Its not a fact since it seems i am one of the few people who have the problem. But seriously? Me and my friends have bad perfomace, now it turns out its just us and a couple of other users? Seriously it runs well for everyone? Thats suprising because i usually dont have problems like that. As for the art style? What art style? The game is like its watched from a camera. I see no art here, unless you call the amateur camera directing to be art. Which i am gonna have to to crazy if you say yes, because amateur camera man is an amateur and not someone who is good at this profession or an artist suited for professional filiming. It really annoys me how people try to pass evey diffirent way of visuals in games as a suposelly "art style" a diffirent style, yes, but clearly not art. Anyway i thought the gunplay was too strict, without giving you freedom to try more things and as a reply to "immersion" sorry but i cant be immersed if a game looks like someone used a camera to film the game from his tv. If i wanted that i would go to youtube and find the worst gameplay video of this game and it would be better than plain the actual game because the "buffering" youtube like loadscreens will be faster, which seems to be way too long on my pc for a reason.
Avatar image for dakan45
dakan45

18819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#23 dakan45
Member since 2009 • 18819 Posts

[QUOTE="dakan45"]
But please FOR THE LOVE OF GOD....dont defend games you never played with crap points like that, you get hit the assault rifles and falll down and with shotgun, i couldnt give a raths ass if its teallistic, it does not happen in any other third person games, neither your are on the ground and crawl and press c to stand up. Atlest have the courage to aknowledge that rather turning anything against me, i got tired of this crap. Its irritating.

Tresca_

Sorry, but why the fudge should developers of third person shooters stick to a set template? Because players are familiar with it? Playing the same mechanics gets boring. I'll welcome something new, even if it is something as small as falling on your rear end.

I think the feature makes sense. Unlike the first game when you get shot and fall on one knee, it's now up to you to get back up again before getting killed. Therefore you no longer have to depend on problematic AI to revive you, and you can now shoot while down. As a result it keeps you involved in the game, and it saves you braying like a donkey when the AI fails.

The demo ran fine for me also.

I did not send its bad, but people here seem to always seem to think thats just because they did not have a problem with a feature, then its the same as other games, but tell me in honesty, is it? Because its nothing like it. Personally i prefer the usual health regenaration, especially the one in the first game, which did not gave you the idea that you actual take hit but just that bullets hit close to you. In the second game however blood splashes everywhere and you fall down a few hundrends of time, it just feels too much "hammering" on the player. "YOU GOT HIT" so it gives me idea " how many times i am gonna get hit and live?" Seriosly how many times you will hit, fall down and get up again? Not a rant, just an observation of mine.

Avatar image for Chris898
Chris898

720

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 Chris898
Member since 2005 • 720 Posts

its meant to look grainy, as if you are looking at cctv

Avatar image for lucfonzy
lucfonzy

1835

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 lucfonzy
Member since 2008 • 1835 Posts

its meant to look grainy, as if you are looking at cctv

Chris898

Ok maybe it's not an "art style" per se but it is a very different way of viewing and playing a game. It adds to the atmosphere.

Anyways, we live in modern times, art takes many forms, many things can be considered "art".

That's not to say modern art is good, because how is a messy bed nice to look at or worthy of recognition, but i like what they've done with Kane and Lynch, it's the little details that create the game. I personally loved the pixelated faces on innocents (noticed it in the multiplayer)

Also, the multiplayer game modes seem rather innovative, but I wouldn't buy it for the mp at all.

Avatar image for adamosmaki
adamosmaki

10718

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 2

#26 adamosmaki
Member since 2007 • 10718 Posts
I play the game with a 8800gt and a Q6600 and was able to play high settings at 1440x900 and framerate never droped below 35ps ( using fraps ) Loading screen were abit long but nothing annoying. The only think that let me down was the graphics options since there was only the option to set the game on low/medium/high instead of more options to do some tweaking
Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#27 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts
Ran perfectly fine for me. You seem to have a great deal of computer trouble with almost what seems like every game. I am pretty sure it is something on your end, maybe try troubleshooting your PC.
Avatar image for DigiTM73
DigiTM73

801

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 DigiTM73
Member since 2009 • 801 Posts

I haven't tried the demo so I can't comment. I avoid demos knowing that half the time they are unoptimised rubbish. Take for example ARMA2 demo, worst sample of play ever. Yet the full game patched runs nicely.
I am on the fence about Kane & Lynch 2, awaiting some reviews of the full game both from reviewers and the public.

Avatar image for TerrorRizzing
TerrorRizzing

4232

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#29 TerrorRizzing
Member since 2010 • 4232 Posts

its optimized fine, but even the console fans didnt like it much. It runs at some super low res on console, and looks horrible. The controls with a gamepad are also horrid. Game seeems unfinished on all platforms, a true multiplat, but unimpressive.

Avatar image for CHANCESUNDANCE
CHANCESUNDANCE

805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 CHANCESUNDANCE
Member since 2006 • 805 Posts

Badly optimised ?

Even my 2 year old laptop can run it maxed-out with aa off :


http://nl.tinypic.com/r/2vunij9/4