This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for captalchol
captalchol

643

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 captalchol
Member since 2006 • 643 Posts

I know they are two completely different genres but I'm buying a new game tomorrow and it's between these two.  Played wow for a few months since the expansion came I'm already sick of it again.

Anywho, I'm looking more at CnC for the multiplayer aspect moreso than the singleplayer.  It looks like it will be fast paced and fun one of the things i liked about WC3.(Oh yeah, I was in the SupCom beta and am already sick of that title so don't mention that)

Stalker on the otherhand seems to be an interesting open ended FPS with a decent story.

 

Which one should i Choose?

 One last thing, I'm using Vista and have heard Stalker has issues with Vista so if anyone could elaborate on that too that would be good.

 

Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
C&C 3 first.
Avatar image for SLandeRR
SLandeRR

301

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 SLandeRR
Member since 2007 • 301 Posts
I've heard that the multiplayer in C&C3 is a bit dodgy at the moment, but they might have patched it, but I would still have to say get C&C3.
Avatar image for Samulies
Samulies

1658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Samulies
Member since 2005 • 1658 Posts
Well ive only got STALKER. which i do not recomend unless you play a stack of FPS. It's hard stuff, you could just get agrovated by how hard it is, not fun. On the other hand if you play alot of FPS STALKER is a breath of fresh air into the genre. I didnt vote in the poll.
Avatar image for rusty_duck
rusty_duck

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 rusty_duck
Member since 2004 • 763 Posts
i spent years waiting for stalker. im unimpressed.
Avatar image for oscar530
oscar530

4430

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 oscar530
Member since 2005 • 4430 Posts
i spent years waiting for stalker. im unimpressed.rusty_duck
same here i played it at my friends and i was highly disappointed so go with CnC3
Avatar image for Einhanderkiller
Einhanderkiller

13259

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#7 Einhanderkiller
Member since 2003 • 13259 Posts
Personally, I'd go with S.T.A.L.K.E.R. because it's a fantastic game, but it's really up to you, not us.
Avatar image for toad1956
toad1956

1127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#8 toad1956
Member since 2004 • 1127 Posts

[QUOTE="rusty_duck"]i spent years waiting for stalker. im unimpressed.oscar530
same here i played it at my friends and i was highly disappointed so go with CnC3

I agree, though I have yet to play Stalker.  CnC 3, is not that exciting and if you have played other CnC games you can beat the campaign on the hardest level easily, except a few missions.

Avatar image for Mis_Led_Madman
Mis_Led_Madman

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#9 Mis_Led_Madman
Member since 2006 • 48 Posts
I would say Command and Conquer 3. Stalker was a huuuge let down.
Avatar image for A-S_FM
A-S_FM

2208

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 A-S_FM
Member since 2004 • 2208 Posts

i'd say c&c3 probably - stalker is an awesome game for the first few hours but it really goes downhill later on and while you can easily play it for twenty-something hours without finishing it, you'll probably end up burning yourself out doing side-missions which, frankly, are pointless to begin with - and the plot is pretty much generic fps stuff

it definitely doesn't have the reported staying power, the world isn't interesting enough or explorable enough and the whole open-ended world is a bit of a lie, you've just got a series of connected areas that are bordered by fences or walls

don't get me wrong, i do think stalker is a great game - if only for the first few hours when every firefight is a fight for your life, and the coolness and uniqueness of the chernoyble world - but it's a deeply flawed game and if i had nothing to play but stalker, i'd probably finish it as quickly and put it back on the shelf, or get burned out trying to make it a long game and just end up quitting before the end - and while online is okay, there's already way better out there

c&c3 though - and i don't even like c&c any more - has serious staying power, you could easily still be playing it this time next year and not be sick of it just because that's how rts games are online, and it's a fast paced and fun rts

check out the c&c3 demo, if you like what you see, buy it - if you don't, get stalker... both are fine purchases, just be sure you know what you're purchasing or you could be very disappointed with either game 

  

Avatar image for skyyfox1
skyyfox1

13015

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#11 skyyfox1
Member since 2003 • 13015 Posts
i think stalker is the better game and here's why.  i generally prefer fps over rts.  stalker has been in develeopment since 2001 and it has depth.  this game has alot to it.  it looks great and there is alot of stuff to do in the game.  i played a demo of c&c 3 and was not impressed.  the game just seems to rehash all the old graphics we have already seen.  i have played dawn of war and act of war and company of heroes.  iand i have found very little new in c&c 3.  it is just un-impressive.  i don't like it and i am not buying it.  stalker is a cool as hell fps.  i have been playing it since the day it was released and i love it.  lots of action.  killing bandits is fun!  LOL!  so if you are stuck between these games, i recommend STALKER.  it is alot of fun.  with lots of replay value.
Avatar image for majinfaisal
majinfaisal

169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 majinfaisal
Member since 2005 • 169 Posts
Play both demos and you decide based on that (i think stalker has a demo :s) Personally i prefer Command and Conquer 3 to Stalker mainly because ive played so many fps that are better than stalker and not many RTSs recently, it really depends on your personal preference anyways, Stalker is ok, rather overrated in my opinion.
Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
Stalker if you're looking for something a little different. The game isn't as hard as people are leading you to believe, it's just not a run & gun type game. Once you get a decent assault rifle later in the game, guys go down like flies. Also the atmosphere and setting for Stalker are really immersive. It has a very Silent Hill feel to it. Haven't played C&C3 yet, so I can't comment on that , but Stalker is definitely worth the $40.
Avatar image for funkmail
funkmail

50

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 funkmail
Member since 2005 • 50 Posts

I was sitting in the same position you are now, I chose Stalker and I'm happy I did, the game is a bit hard in the beginning as you need to get better weapons and armour, but what truly made me chose it is the fact it's a non-linear game which means you get to do what you want. The AI on the NPC's is awsome outdoors, could be better indoors. If you do deside to get it see if you can get the one with the Radiation Pack, the bonus disk has some awsome pics to check out!!! Take a look at my profile if you like the games I like you should like it too. ;)

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#15 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60746 Posts

As fun as STALKER is, the ending comes way too fast and is very disappointing.  As for the multiplayer, its pretty awful.

C&C 3 may not be as original as STALKER, but its fun singleplayer goodness and the multiplayer is awesome despite some balance issues.

Avatar image for llakallaka
llakallaka

1230

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 llakallaka
Member since 2006 • 1230 Posts
they r totaly different genre but it seems u play a lot of strategy so choose what u want not what we want
Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts

As fun as STALKER is, the ending comes way too fast and is very disappointing.  As for the multiplayer, its pretty awful.

C&C 3 may not be as original as STALKER, but its fun singleplayer goodness and the multiplayer is awesome despite some balance issues.

mrbojangles25
You did get the true ending, right Mr.Bo? Because I was really dissapointed in my " I wanna be Rich" ending until I figured out it wasn't really the end.
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60746 Posts
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

As fun as STALKER is, the ending comes way too fast and is very disappointing.  As for the multiplayer, its pretty awful.

C&C 3 may not be as original as STALKER, but its fun singleplayer goodness and the multiplayer is awesome despite some balance issues.

TheCrazed420

You did get the true ending, right Mr.Bo? Because I was really dissapointed in my " I wanna be Rich" ending until I figured out it wasn't really the end.

lol actually I just looked that up now.  Looks like I am going to the secret lab (beneath the monolith, right?) when I am done with school.  Thanks.

Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

As fun as STALKER is, the ending comes way too fast and is very disappointing.  As for the multiplayer, its pretty awful.

C&C 3 may not be as original as STALKER, but its fun singleplayer goodness and the multiplayer is awesome despite some balance issues.

mrbojangles25

You did get the true ending, right Mr.Bo? Because I was really dissapointed in my " I wanna be Rich" ending until I figured out it wasn't really the end.

lol actually I just looked that up now.  Looks like I am going to the secret lab (beneath the monolith, right?) when I am done with school.  Thanks.

Expect a much better end. And make sure you say yes to the final question, and then reload and say no. Saying yes gets you a cutscene. Saying no leads to another level, cutscene and the true final ending.
Avatar image for chandu83
chandu83

4864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#20 chandu83
Member since 2005 • 4864 Posts
Stalker all the way my friend.
Avatar image for greatmax1
greatmax1

1868

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 greatmax1
Member since 2006 • 1868 Posts
[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"][QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

As fun as STALKER is, the ending comes way too fast and is very disappointing.  As for the multiplayer, its pretty awful.

C&C 3 may not be as original as STALKER, but its fun singleplayer goodness and the multiplayer is awesome despite some balance issues.

TheCrazed420

You did get the true ending, right Mr.Bo? Because I was really dissapointed in my " I wanna be Rich" ending until I figured out it wasn't really the end.

lol actually I just looked that up now.  Looks like I am going to the secret lab (beneath the monolith, right?) when I am done with school.  Thanks.

Expect a much better end. And make sure you say yes to the final question, and then reload and say no. Saying yes gets you a cutscene. Saying no leads to another level, cutscene and the true final ending.

is that the ending where you can keep on playing after you beat the game? And what do you mean reload, reload the saved game? Im far from the end but i would like to get the best ending.

Avatar image for TheCrazed420
TheCrazed420

7661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 TheCrazed420
Member since 2003 • 7661 Posts
[QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"][QUOTE="TheCrazed420"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

As fun as STALKER is, the ending comes way too fast and is very disappointing.  As for the multiplayer, its pretty awful.

C&C 3 may not be as original as STALKER, but its fun singleplayer goodness and the multiplayer is awesome despite some balance issues.

greatmax1

You did get the true ending, right Mr.Bo? Because I was really dissapointed in my " I wanna be Rich" ending until I figured out it wasn't really the end.

lol actually I just looked that up now.  Looks like I am going to the secret lab (beneath the monolith, right?) when I am done with school.  Thanks.

Expect a much better end. And make sure you say yes to the final question, and then reload and say no. Saying yes gets you a cutscene. Saying no leads to another level, cutscene and the true final ending.

is that the ending where you can keep on playing after you beat the game? And what do you mean reload, reload the saved game? Im far from the end but i would like to get the best ending.

All I mean is save your game before talking with the last guy, because saying yes to his question ends the game with a cutscene, but saying no gives you one last level and then a different final cutscene. So say yes, watch that ending,reload then say no and do the other way.

Avatar image for crapdog
crapdog

427

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 crapdog
Member since 2006 • 427 Posts
i haven´t played stalker yet but im extremly dissapointed with c&c3. its a step back in rts developement. every mission is just to build some tanks as fast as possible and rush for the enemy base. the only good thing about this game are the nice movies but the gameplay is horrible.