S.T.A.L.K.E.R which one?

Which one u like more?I love the original and finished it several time,but clear sky is a different stories.It has bad ai and very very buggy(fully patched) like loading a save game and all of a sudden npc attacks u for no reason(Happen 3 time).Its almost intolerable.

The first one, Clear Sky is unplayable.

Shadow of Cherynobyl

Clear Sky theoretically makes a number of improvements, but also makes some bad design decisions. Also, in spite of several patches it remains unplayable performance wise and bug wise.

STALKER SoC is not without flaws, but it is a better overall game. I would wait for STALKER CoP.

Both of them are great.

I have never had a problem with clear sky (except for faction wars where they wouldn't send a sqaud to you) It is very good with the latest patches. I think most people played it when it first came out and now say it is unplayable when in fact, it is very playable with all of the patches.

Both of them are great.

I have never had a problem with clear sky (except for faction wars where they wouldn't send a sqaud to you) It is very good with the latest patches. I think most people played it when it first came out and now say it is unplayable when in fact, it is very playable with all of the patches.

SF_KiLLaMaN

I have both games but Stalker Shadow Of Chernobyl is the better game, can't wait till Stalker Call Of Pripyat comes out :D

I have both games but Stalker Shadow Of Chernobyl is the better game, can't wait till Stalker Call Of Pripyat comes out :D

rrhrle6

What he says :D

They are both fantastic and it kinda annoys me when people bash CS because I'm playing thought it right now and have not had a single negative experience. Its almost as if we are playing different games... I will give the slight edge to SoC but only because it has more mods and it was the first one I played.

I really like how Clear skys had the weapon upgrade, that artifacts werent so easy to get (which reminds me of the book), but both were very good games, i couldnt decide between the two.

i like clear sky better because of the upgrade weapons and faction war. It has only crashed twice in my 20 hours of gameplay so its alright. theres some buggy npc though

SOC is moody and atmospheric and has somewhat of a decent story. An FPS without mindless shooting; who'd have thunk it?

soc, but clear sky isnt that bad anymore

...well, clear sky is better but more buggy and has bad combat, however soc is much more linear and pretty specifc in gear, eg no upgrades... but again the end of clear sky makes it look like the game aint complete...

I cant really say however i had much more fun with oblivion lost mod, on soc, so i guess its soc.

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"]

Both of them are great.

I have never had a problem with clear sky (except for faction wars where they wouldn't send a sqaud to you) It is very good with the latest patches. I think most people played it when it first came out and now say it is unplayable when in fact, it is very playable with all of the patches.

Zillaschool

Shadow of Chernobyl is better.

SoC is far better, if fact D2D is having a sale for SoC for 5 bucks!

Which is an awesome deal for one of the best shooters this gen. Just get OL and 2009 complete with it.