This topic is locked from further discussion.
but in performance (and IMO value for money) 8800GT
noswear
The 8800GT is around 25% more expensive than the 9600GT (on average). Show me a benchmark that consistantly shows the 8800GT 25% ahead of the 9600GT. I'm not saying that the 8800GT is a bad purchase or anything, but on a somewhat strict budget, the 9600GT is definitely the better buy, especially at lower resolutions.
It's sorta unfair to say that since it costs 25% more, it should perform 25% better. I'd say that if it performed 10% better, I'd be happy spending extra.
After all, when it comes to computer parts, you usually get what you pay for. (usually)
It's sorta unfair to say that since it costs 25% more, it should perform 25% better. I'd say that if it performed 10% better, I'd be happy spending extra.
After all, when it comes to computer parts, you usually get what you pay for. (usually)
luckyfortune7
Perhaps, but I'd still say that the 9600GT is of at least equal value for the money.
The 8800GT is around 25% more expensive than the 9600GT (on average). Show me a benchmark that consistantly shows the 8800GT 25% ahead of the 9600GT. I'm not saying that the 8800GT is a bad purchase or anything, but on a somewhat strict budget, the 9600GT is definitely the better buy, especially at lower resolutions.
RayvinAzn
Here's some benchmarks.
The 8800GT (512MB) performs better than the 9600GT by a few frames, however the 9600GT has less power consumption.
Here's some 9600GT prices.
Here's some 8800GT prices
RayvinAzn is right, the 9600GT is a better buy if you're on a stricter budget. The 8800GT is better if you have an extra $40 to blow.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment