This topic is locked from further discussion.
I think Cry Engine 2 is awesome, if you have the power to run it well then it's a real treat and runs nicely. Once it's better optimized, it'd devour anything else on the market.
Source. Great-looking with very low requirements and great physics.
Unreal Engine 3 - looks extremely good, plays well and runs very smoothly. Me likes.
Well, I've read that most of you agree with source to be the best engine...
I do not agree because the things which define the quality and the reliability of an engine are the possibility to fit with the largest number of pcs of different "generations" and the fact that the game runs with an average amount of fps even though you're not using a top level machine or an high detail configuration.
There are three engines which are really able to manage this task:
- PAIN 3D, used in Painkiller
- Unreal 3 (don't need to say where it's been used, do I?:D )
- Serious engine, used in Serious Sam games.
And, if I have to choose, I would definitely choose Serious engine because the effects are shown in such a realistic way that I've never seen before and it's REALLY a very versatile engine (meaning that it's the only one which allows you to set so much variables in order to make it work with every kind of machine!) ...
..DEFINITELY the best ever!
The Source engine runs smoothly on five year old computers. Just look at TF2 or Half-Life 2.
Of course without a doubt cryengine 2 is the most graphically realistic/advanced, but Source has the optimal balance between hardware stress and good gameplay/graphics.
The Source engine runs smoothly on five year old computers. Just look at TF2 or Half-Life 2.
Of course without a doubt cryengine 2 is the most graphically realistic/advanced, but Source has the optimal balance between hardware stress and good gameplay/graphics.
siddhartha211
I agree.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment