The Last Remnant: Benchmark Tool.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Krayzie_3334
Krayzie_3334

1303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Krayzie_3334
Member since 2006 • 1303 Posts

I'm honestly not really looking forward to this, But for the people that are here's a Benchmark tool so you can see if you can run the game.;)

From what I get Average of 92fps The game seems to run well on PC so it looks like it might be a good port for once.:P

-

[Link] To the Benchmark Tools.

-

PS: I haven't seen this be posted yet so sorry if Old News.

Avatar image for G-Lord
G-Lord

2141

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 G-Lord
Member since 2004 • 2141 Posts
Thank you for the notification, I will give it a try
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts
I love messing around with benchmark tools :D downloading now.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Eh it was a bit disappointing, there are no scalable options other than resolution. Hopefully the released game won't be like this but with SE it is a possibility, there better not be boarders in the full game let's put it that way. There was no mouse support in the menu, that is concerning.

The game loves CPU, my dual core was around 90% constant. When recording with fraps it severely cut my frame rate so anyone looking into this game will have to make sure their CPU is decent. That said frame rate also changes significantly with changes in resolution.

Overall the optimization is ok but could be better, my average frame rate was 55 but it dipped into the 20s during the gun firing scene.

In terms of graphics it is below average for a console game, the textures are ok (well not horrible) but the motion blur tends to cover them up at times. You can get away with lowering the res quite a bit, since it is console orientated the visuals aren't that affected.

Will I get it? Still up in the air, I'd like to support a JRPG coming to PC but only if the purchase is actually worth it.

Avatar image for Timbury
Timbury

552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Timbury
Member since 2005 • 552 Posts
just gave this this a quick blast got a nice average framerate of 118.9 frames per second. Shame there is no scalable options for this benchmark dont know if its running low,medium or high looks nice though.
Avatar image for ssvegeta555
ssvegeta555

2448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 ssvegeta555
Member since 2003 • 2448 Posts
Cool, I'm going to try this out. *donwloads* I'm hoping my rig cna play this at decent levels, I rather not have this for Xbox if my PC can run it.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

Cool, I'm going to try this out. *donwloads* I'm hoping my rig cna play this at decent levels, I rather not have this for Xbox if my PC can run it.ssvegeta555

Don't be afraid to turn down the res, since these are 720p orientated graphics resolution changes have minimal visual impact.

Avatar image for JangoWuzHere
JangoWuzHere

19032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 JangoWuzHere
Member since 2007 • 19032 Posts

Eh it was a bit disappointing, there are no scalable options other than resolution. Hopefully the released game won't be like this but with SE it is a possibility, there better not be boarders in the full game let's put it that way. There was no mouse support in the menu, that is concerning.

The game loves CPU, my dual core was around 90% constant. When recording with fraps it severely cut my frame rate so anyone looking into this game will have to make sure their CPU is decent. That said frame rate also changes significantly with changes in resolution.

Overall the optimization is ok but could be better, my average frame rate was 55 but it dipped into the 20s during the gun firing scene.

In terms of graphics it is below average for a console game, the textures are ok (well not horrible) but the motion blur tends to cover them up at times. You can get away with lowering the res quite a bit, since it is console orientated the visuals aren't that affected.

Will I get it? Still up in the air, I'd like to support a JRPG coming to PC but only if the purchase is actually worth it.

AnnoyedDragon
I think its pretty well optimized. I got 138 FPS average on my HD 4870 and E8400 duel core 3.0ghz. And ya my FPS dipped alot when it went to the gun firing scene. I was getting 150 but then it dipped to 80's. I think it has something to do with Square. They never optimize their special ingame effects pretty much.
Avatar image for ssvegeta555
ssvegeta555

2448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 ssvegeta555
Member since 2003 • 2448 Posts

[QUOTE="ssvegeta555"]Cool, I'm going to try this out. *donwloads* I'm hoping my rig cna play this at decent levels, I rather not have this for Xbox if my PC can run it.AnnoyedDragon

Don't be afraid to turn down the res, since these are 720p orientated graphics resolution changes have minimal visual impact.

I get around 40fps at my native res (1280 x 1024), and I lowered it one notch down and I noticed that the graphics weren't that badly squashed. It all depends on the menu screens, character and whatnot get a little fuzzy for me when it's not my native res. But, with 40fps, that should suffice anyways. :)
Avatar image for maden2004
maden2004

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 maden2004
Member since 2004 • 688 Posts

Well i ran it :S : I got 23 1280 x 800 on my laptop which get 90 in cod 4 /5 , and 30-60 in crysis wars.

Intel C2D 2.2

2.0 gb of ram

8600 gt 512 M

Windows xp 32 bit. Ill try different drivers, see if anything effects fps at 1280 by 800. I think i might get just because it will be playable and ill do anythin to get more jrpgs on the pc. Kind of wish lost oddyssey would make its way here and ff13 :).

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#11 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts
good find krazy, i enjoyed the game alot on 360 and i might get it on pc aswell, as it looks to be optimized alot better on pc then it was on 360 ala Bioshock and Mass Effect. And who knows, might be some mods for this one day, the gameplay especially and also the story where good in this game.
Avatar image for AnnoyedDragon
AnnoyedDragon

9948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 AnnoyedDragon
Member since 2006 • 9948 Posts

I had a look at their website for some PC screens, they are all 16:9 and seem to lack mouse pointer support in the menus.

Look at the options menu.

Anyone know if those other options have to do with graphics or is there only a resolution option? I swear Square Enix is one of the worst companies for PC ports, Spark Unlimited is more competent than them when developing PC versions and that says something. SE games tend to feel like back in the PS1 days when a console to PC port tended to rarely utilize the mouse and graphics options were fixed.

Hopefully I'm wrong in this case and SE has gotten with the times.

Avatar image for Staryoshi87
Staryoshi87

12760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#13 Staryoshi87
Member since 2003 • 12760 Posts

E6600 @ 3.0Ghz, GTX 260, 3GB DDR2-800, Vista 32bit

@ 1920x1200 I averaged 78 FPS and dropped as low as the mid 30's at one point. I too would have liked more options then just resolution. Also, I can see why the 360 version has such shotty framerates.

Stock:

720p: 88FPS
1920x1200: 78FPS

OC'd to 700/1100:

1920x1200: 83FPS

Avatar image for ssvegeta555
ssvegeta555

2448

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 ssvegeta555
Member since 2003 • 2448 Posts
I hope there is mouse support in menues. Final Fantasy VII and VIII for the PC had no mouse support. I had to plug in a controller and run with it. Might do the same with Last Remnant. At least I can use the 360 controller, so it wouldn't feel that wierd. :P
Avatar image for DGFreak
DGFreak

2234

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 DGFreak
Member since 2003 • 2234 Posts

I have no problem using my gamepad for this game if it is decent. I'd love to see Squeenix show some love for the PC, as I do not intend to buy a 360 or a ps3 any time soon.

EDIT: 109.06, not bad at all!

Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#16 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts

Well i ran it :S : I got 23 1280 x 800 on my laptop which get 90 in cod 4 /5 , and 30-60 in crysis wars.

Intel C2D 2.2

2.0 gb of ram

8600 gt 512 M

Windows xp 32 bit. Ill try different drivers, see if anything effects fps at 1280 by 800. I think i might get just because it will be playable and ill do anythin to get more jrpgs on the pc. Kind of wish lost oddyssey would make its way here and ff13 :).

maden2004
at what settings and rez are u running those games low ?640x480
Avatar image for maden2004
maden2004

688

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 maden2004
Member since 2004 • 688 Posts
at 1280 x 800. But for something like crysis i have basically everything on low except high for texture, medium shares/medium water and Crysis wars so dont mistake the fps for crysis warhead or 1.But i just editing my cod 5 config now im gettin 125 fps on high except for aa, ragdoll, glow, and couple other things to off.