The most crappy rig that can run Crysis in the world!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for andywongusa
andywongusa

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#1 andywongusa
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

FROM THIS ON, You will see how a 2004 SONY S26C Notebook runs CRYSIS?

SONY S26C RIG:

CPU1.5GHz, RAM 512MB, ATI MOBILITY 9700 64MB, 40GB Hard Drive

Can anyone explain how CRYSIS runs at such a rig?

PICS! Absolutely true and real:

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#2 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
the mobilitiy 9700 is a pretty good laptop chip, or was back in the day.
Avatar image for NoAssKicker47
NoAssKicker47

2855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#3 NoAssKicker47
Member since 2004 • 2855 Posts
It looks a whole lot like Far Cry that way.
Avatar image for kort-nilsen
kort-nilsen

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 kort-nilsen
Member since 2004 • 1161 Posts

the mobilitiy 9700 is a pretty good laptop chip, or was back in the day.nutcrackr

That may be, but look at his cpu...

Avatar image for n00b_bi22o
n00b_bi22o

168

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 n00b_bi22o
Member since 2006 • 168 Posts
yeah at 10 fps i see...
Avatar image for funnybunny12
funnybunny12

548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#6 funnybunny12
Member since 2006 • 548 Posts
Oh please get over it. So what? 10fps? That's perfectly fine. Why does everyone want every game to run on all high at freakin' 60fps? You freakin' graphics whores. It plays the game, eh??? Ok... That's the point of the thread. Not getting the performance of a fully loaded desktop...
Avatar image for Baron_14
Baron_14

1771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 Baron_14
Member since 2007 • 1771 Posts

Either you one of the best liers iv ever seen,or my eyes are playing games with me.

It looks really nice.

Avatar image for bloodstained-
bloodstained-

81

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 bloodstained-
Member since 2007 • 81 Posts
Woah, that looks like a PS2 game.
Avatar image for Colonel_Cool
Colonel_Cool

1335

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Colonel_Cool
Member since 2006 • 1335 Posts
Oh please get over it. So what? 10fps? That's perfectly fine. Why does everyone want every game to run on all high at freakin' 60fps? You freakin' graphics whores. It plays the game, eh??? Ok... That's the point of the thread. Not getting the performance of a fully loaded desktop...funnybunny12
Umm...10 fps is not perfectly fine. Why do we want to run the game on high at 60 fps? Well, why not? I have to have my games run at at least 30 fps in order for it to be even playable.
Avatar image for BLKR4330
BLKR4330

1698

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 BLKR4330
Member since 2006 • 1698 Posts
That is amazing.. the 512 mb ram surprises me the most actually. I have had it crash to desktop a couple of times when I hadn't closed all background applications to free up ram (with 1gb ram but somewhat higher settings..) . You should use the ingame fps indicator though (type r_displayinfo 1 in console). You might win a couple of frames here and there without fraps using resources :)
Avatar image for fynne
fynne

8078

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 fynne
Member since 2002 • 8078 Posts
Yayyyy!! If it'll run on that, my comp should be able to handle it too :D
Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#12 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60779 Posts
It looks a whole lot like Far Cry that way.NoAssKicker47
Ya, and that isnt a bad thing
Avatar image for funnybunny12
funnybunny12

548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 funnybunny12
Member since 2006 • 548 Posts
30 fps to be playable..? Wow... -.-" I play WoW at like 20 all the time. 30 fps is too freakin' high as a mark for playability since the human eye can only see 24 frames per second anyway...10 fps is fine for Cyrsis on a laptop. I've said that before. Sure on a desktop PC I can understand wanting like 20 or so, but it'slaptop, and 10 is semi-playable.
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Most PCs today are running it crappy :lol: This is more the fault of the devs than the hardware.
Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
Hmmm...guess I might as well try it on this old hunk of junk if your PC can run it: -AMD Athlon XP 1800+ Palomino -512 MB DDR-266 SDRAM (single-channel) -ATI Radeon 9600 XT 128 MB (4x AGP) -Creative Sound Blaster Live! Value Oh, and as far as FPS goes, I want at least 30 FPS constant, 60 if it's a fast-paced title like Unreal Tournament. Not only does the game look better because it's running smoother, but let's say that someone's about to pop out of a corner to shoot you in the face. At lower FPS rates, you may not notice him coming around the corner until a bit later due to the frames not updating fast enough-a delay that could get you killed.
Avatar image for Primevil702
Primevil702

911

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Primevil702
Member since 2005 • 911 Posts

I can explain it too you - it looks like pure garbage :). I personally couldn't even play it at those settings, I'd rather not even play it.

30 fps to be playable..? Wow... -.-" I play WoW at like 20 all the time. 30 fps is too freakin' high as a mark for playability since the human eye can only see 24 frames per second anyway...10 fps is fine for Cyrsis on a laptop. I've said that before. Sure on a desktop PC I can understand wanting like 20 or so, but it'slaptop, and 10 is semi-playable.funnybunny12

10FPS is playable? I really don't see how that could be enjoyable, but that's just me.

Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
Okay, I can now post my experiences. First off, the FPS doesn't seem all that bad, though I do have to make the game look like complete ass and run at 800x600 to keep things smooth. The main problem is that the game likes to suddenly pause on me for excruciating amounts of time. I blame this on having only 512 MB of RAM and a 5,400 RPM hard drive. In any case, I can't wait until I get that new PC...