Mine would have to be just under $900 for almost an almost entirely new system (kept my sound card, optical and hard drives.)
This topic is locked from further discussion.
$6000 on my current PC. To have an idea of how it works, it runs Crysis with everything maxed, except for the resolution and anti-aliasing.chesterocks7
You could have probably got the same performance for a $2000 system.
For me, I spent about $1000 putting my system together, probably over a 6 month period. My family spent about $3000 on an IBM PC when Intel Pentium just came out.
Just chucked a grand into my pc this month for a few upgrades. 600 for my monitor. I'd say by today's prices the pc would cost someone as a entire package just 2300usd.
As far as the 6000 pc and crysis max save for resolution and AA.. if its for workstation then I can see and understand it being worth it if you make money in that field. If its a gaming rig and you cant even manage 2560x1600 on very high with some AA then it is epic fail on many fronts. Unless its 4 years old.
The most I've ever spent at any one time is when I bought my basic system + monitor for $500 (Dell). I have since upgraded the video card twice (8600GT, 4850), bought 4GB Ram, a 640GB hard drive, and a PSU in the past 3 years. All the upgrades have cost me approximately $550.augustlight
How's your performance been with that 4850, by the way?
[QUOTE="augustlight"]The most I've ever spent at any one time is when I bought my basic system + monitor for $500 (Dell). I have since upgraded the video card twice (8600GT, 4850), bought 4GB Ram, a 640GB hard drive, and a PSU in the past 3 years. All the upgrades have cost me approximately $550.JP_Russell
How's your performance been with that 4850, by the way?
I was going to blog about that someday soon. My stinky Pentium D 2.8 isn't able to keep up, I think. Things did improve quite a bit, especially with GPU intensive games like Crysis. Before, I was playing 1280x1024, everything on high, no AA at approximately 10-15 frames per second, but now I'm playing 1280x1024, everything on high, 4X AA at approximately 20-30 frames per second. And I don't know about the performance on Team Fortress 2 before, but I know things got a bit choppy at times when I had everything maxed out with 2X AA, but now I can max everything (including AA), and I get somewhere between 30-40 frames per second. But I still can't max out Neverwinter Nights 2 without it becoming choppy in outdoor areas (while looking like crap at that!), and framerates drop to the teens in Team Fortress 2 when I try to record video clips. Oh, and I haven't seen much performance improvements on Mass Effect (had it maxed before, and performance pretty much remained the same), but I am using the 4850 to basically get rid of ALL jaggies, so the game does look noticeably better. So I'd like to upgrade my motherboard and CPU soon as well. Maybe I can get your help on that. :D And I might have to get a new monitor as well; my stupid 17" won't let me play at anything higher than 1280x1024 (I tried a bunch of things, but it just won't let me, that stupid thing).
And I might get another 4850 (since it's so pretty!) and crossfire the two along with the motherboard and CPU upgrade. But I probably won't upgrade for another 2 or 3 months.
I was going to blog about that someday soon. My stinky Pentium D 2.8 isn't able to keep up, I think. Things did improve quite a bit, especially with GPU intensive games like Crysis. Before, I was playing 1280x1024, everything on high, no AA at approximately 10-15 frames per second, but now I'm playing 1280x1024, everything on high, 4X AA at approximately 20-30 frames per second. And I don't know about the performance on Team Fortress 2 before, but I know things got a bit choppy at times when I had everything maxed out with 2X AA, but now I can max everything (including AA), and I get somewhere between 30-40 frames per second. But I still can't max out Neverwinter Nights 2 without it becoming choppy in outdoor areas (while looking like crap at that!), and framerates drop to the teens in Team Fortress 2 when I try to record video clips. So I'd like to upgrade my motherboard and CPU soon as well. Maybe I can get your help on that. :D And I might have to get a new monitor as well; my stupid 17" won't let me play at anything higher than 1280x1024 (I tried a bunch of things, but it just won't let me, that stupid thing).
augustlight
Hah, and here you were saying you wanted to wait a while before upgrading the mobo and processor. I knew you'd feel the urge to do it sooner rather than later as soon as you saw the performance increases of having a better video card. Anyway, yeah, I knew the Pentium D would hold you back, but I recommended the 4850 anyway because I knew that would give you the biggest performance improvement overall, and it's generally best when you're upgrading a little at a time to go for whatever will give the best increase first. Anyway, glad it gave you some noticeable increases. The slow-down while recording is undoubtedly due to the processor, as things like FRAPS task the CPU primarily.
As for the processor, I would recommend the E8500 the most right now at $190.
And I might get another 4850 (since it's so pretty!) and crossfire the two along with the motherboard and CPU upgrade. But I probably won't upgrade for another 2 or 3 months.
augustlight
If you're willing to wait that long (and spend that much money), then you might want to see what Intel's high-end Nehalem's coming out at the end of the year turn out like. The cheapest one is supposed to be for $284, so depending on how it performs, you may want to get that. Only thing is that the new motherboards that will come out for them (the Nehalems have a new LGA 1366 socket) will only be compatible with DDR3 memory, I think (which means you'd have to upgrade your RAM, too, and DDR3 is expensive). So I don't know, it depends on how much you want to spend. I, myself, am going to wait until the Nehalem 32nm die shrunken Westmeres and Clarkdales come out in the first half of 2010 before I upgrade my processor and motherboard.
If you do choose to get a C2D and not Nehalem, I'd highly recommend getting an X38 (or X48, doesn't really matter) chipset motherboard if you're wanting to do Crossfire. The older P35 and P45 chipsets don't run both PCI-E X16 slots in X16 bandwidth when you're running in Crossfire, which can limit performance of the cards.
Oh, and by the way, I bought a GTX 260 a little while ago. 8) It was on sale for only $230 with The Witcher for free. It's scheduled to arrive tomorrow; I can't wait to see how it performs. :D Hopefully I can get my Secret of Monkey Island review done by tomorrow, then I can blog about that and my two game impressions and my new video card.
My most expensive PC upgrade was back in 1992 or so.
CPU + mobo = $600 for a 386 DX 50 MHz
Memory = $400 for 4 MB of RAM
Video card = $200 for a 1 MB Super VGA card
HDD = $300 for a 40MB drive (that was huge)
Monitor = $350 for a 15" CRT VGA monitor
CDROM = $400 for a 4x speed CDROM
case + psu = $100 for a generic case
Reused my old periphals and DOS4.
Total was around $2,350 but it was a killer system at the time...
I used to play Geoff Crammond's F1 GP, F15 Strike Eagle III, X-Wing, Aces Over the Pacific and Flight Sim 5 on it. When Geoff Crammond's F1 GP 2 came out I had to upgrade to a 486 to play it...
$6000 on my current PC. To have an idea of how it works, it runs Crysis with everything maxed, except for the resolution and anti-aliasing.chesterocks7
So does my $650 NewEgg built computer. ^ ^
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]$6000 on my current PC. To have an idea of how it works, it runs Crysis with everything maxed, except for the resolution and anti-aliasing.flipin_jackass
You could have probably got the same performance for a $2000 system.
For me, I spent about $1000 putting my system together, probably over a 6 month period. My family spent about $3000 on an IBM PC when Intel Pentium just came out.
mine actually can run all of it including the AA, and resolution and i got it for 1,400 dollars, though i bought all the pieces and put it together myself, costs alot less that way. if i did have some company build one just like it for me it would of cost about 3-5grand.the first gaming rig i got, specifically mine and not family shared system, cost 1700 and was paying that off for about 8 months. it was good, but a rip off really.
last year i spent 800 on a pretty high spec rig which i built myself. it works like a dream and i would never go back to buying a pc rather than building one
oh and mrnacaa from sweeden i feel your pain. prices in the uk are also a LOT higher than in the US. i think my system could have been bought for about 800 usd over there when it cost me 800 gbp (bearing in mind the exchange rate is roughly about 2:1 in favour of the GBP)
[QUOTE="chesterocks7"]$6000 on my current PC. To have an idea of how it works, it runs Crysis with everything maxed, except for the resolution and anti-aliasing.RawTechnique
So does my $650 NewEgg built computer. ^ ^
Haha yeah right. The card and processor alone to max that game cost $650 together on newegg. Don't even try that junk.
Just chucked a grand into my pc this month for a few upgrades. 600 for my monitor. I'd say by today's prices the pc would cost someone as a entire package just 2300usd.
As far as the 6000 pc and crysis max save for resolution and AA.. if its for workstation then I can see and understand it being worth it if you make money in that field. If its a gaming rig and you cant even manage 2560x1600 on very high with some AA then it is epic fail on many fronts. Unless its 4 years old.
CreasianDevaili
My PC's specs exceed Crysis' recommended specs, so I don't know why I can't completely max it out. Anyways here's my PC's specs:
Network Gaming Card: K1 Killer NIC Card
Sound Card: Integrated Hi-Def Audio, Nvidia C55-MB
Video Cards: Dual Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB, SLI-Enabled
Physics Card: Ageia Physx PCI-Expresse X1
Processor: Pentium 4 Dual-Core 3.2GHz HSF Z9H741K011
RAM: 4GB DDR2 Low Latency PC-6400 AW108
Hard Drive: 1TB Seagate SATA 3G 7200RPM 16 MB Cache NCQ
Monitor: 22" Samsung 1680 X 1050 (2MS) 226BW
Again, I really should have no trouble maxing out Crysis, but when I put the resolution to 1680 X 1050 I can't use AA at all without it getting really choppy. Anyone know why, cause it kinda disappointed me. I'm currently running 1280 X 1040 with 8X AA.
[QUOTE="RawTechnique"][QUOTE="chesterocks7"]$6000 on my current PC. To have an idea of how it works, it runs Crysis with everything maxed, except for the resolution and anti-aliasing.fatzebra
So does my $650 NewEgg built computer. ^ ^
Haha yeah right. The card and processor alone to max that game cost $650 together on newegg. Don't even try that junk.
I agree. A lot of dual graphic card set-ups cost that much.
Personally I spent about $2300 on my current build but that includes monitor, case, and all new peripherals. For just the pc I probably spent about $1700 and yes it can play crysis on dx10 graphics maxed out with a decent frame rate at 1280x720 resolution. Never tried any higher rez.
$1,200 for me.
My dad had bought a home PC that had cost around $600. Next thing you know games like Call of Duty 2, Age of Empires III, and Guild Wars would not run all that beautifully on the PC. Then I heard of DirectX10. Games like Company of Heroes, Bioshock, Call of Duty 4, and Crysis were on the verge of being released.
I needed a better computer.
I had to upgrade my entire system which cost around $1,200. Just in time too, because Bioshock came out 3 weeks later.
[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"]Just chucked a grand into my pc this month for a few upgrades. 600 for my monitor. I'd say by today's prices the pc would cost someone as a entire package just 2300usd.
As far as the 6000 pc and crysis max save for resolution and AA.. if its for workstation then I can see and understand it being worth it if you make money in that field. If its a gaming rig and you cant even manage 2560x1600 on very high with some AA then it is epic fail on many fronts. Unless its 4 years old.
chesterocks7
My PC's specs exceed Crysis' recommended specs, so I don't know why I can't completely max it out. Anyways here's my PC's specs:
Network Gaming Card: K1 Killer NIC Card
Sound Card: Integrated Hi-Def Audio, Nvidia C55-MB
Video Cards: Dual Nvidia GeForce 8800 GTX 768MB, SLI-Enabled
Physics Card: Ageia Physx PCI-Expresse X1
Processor: Pentium 4 Dual-Core 3.2GHz HSF Z9H741K011
RAM: 4GB DDR2 Low Latency PC-6400 AW108
Hard Drive: 1TB Seagate SATA 3G 7200RPM 16 MB Cache NCQ
Monitor: 22" Samsung 1680 X 1050 (2MS) 226BW
Again, I really should have no trouble maxing out Crysis, but when I put the resolution to 1680 X 1050 I can't use AA at all without it getting really choppy. Anyone know why, cause it kinda disappointed me. I'm currently running 1280 X 1040 with 8X AA.
awsome pc chester! One thing people should keep in mind is that I am guessing you have options like an unlocked prcoessor which is over $1000 by itself. You might be able to overclock this system considerably. Also low latency ram offers little advantage with intel chips. Are you running vista 64 bit? If not 4 gig of ram won't work and if you are maybe crysis has a driver issue for vista 64. The physics card was probably a waste too but I think they are really cool to have as an extra.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment