This topic is locked from further discussion.
There are only two people on the board that feel the need to point out every single thread resurrection. If it starts something vaguely resembling a conversation, what difference does it make to you?I'm surprised noone mentioned the blatant thread resurrection.
THA-TODD-BEAST
Well, the second post came in more than 2 years after the TS made this thread. I'm thinking it was rumored back then but has since been squashed as non-existent.futs22Not quite. The game was announced, and platforms were not revealed. Then Free Radical died, Crytek scooped up the remains, and now we have no idea. I think that Crytek owning them makes it more likely that we'll see TS on the PC.
[QUOTE="futs22"]Well, the second post came in more than 2 years after the TS made this thread. I'm thinking it was rumored back then but has since been squashed as non-existent.kieranb2000Not quite. The game was announced, and platforms were not revealed. Then Free Radical died, Crytek scooped up the remains, and now we have no idea. I think that Crytek owning them makes it more likely that we'll see TS on the PC. Sounds good to me then.
[QUOTE="THA-TODD-BEAST"]There are only two people on the board that feel the need to point out every single thread resurrection. If it starts something vaguely resembling a conversation, what difference does it make to you?I'm surprised noone mentioned the blatant thread resurrection.
kieranb2000
Well, considering TimeSplitters has been quite irrelevant for a long period of time and many of its developers bit the dust a good while ago, it's fairly pointless to be having this conversation. As it stands, TimeSplitters is a dead franchise. Why talk about having it on PC if the series of games is dead in the water at this point?
There are only two people on the board that feel the need to point out every single thread resurrection. If it starts something vaguely resembling a conversation, what difference does it make to you?[QUOTE="kieranb2000"][QUOTE="THA-TODD-BEAST"]
I'm surprised noone mentioned the blatant thread resurrection.
THA-TODD-BEAST
Well, considering TimeSplitters has been quite irrelevant for a long period of time and many of its developers bit the dust a good while ago, it's fairly pointless to be having this conversation. As it stands, TimeSplitters is a dead franchise. Why talk about having it on PC if the series of games is dead in the water at this point?
Because wherever is hope there is life, and the dead franchise can be easily become active again via sequel, all we need is a little populartiy to reach to the developers ears.[QUOTE="THA-TODD-BEAST"][QUOTE="kieranb2000"] There are only two people on the board that feel the need to point out every single thread resurrection. If it starts something vaguely resembling a conversation, what difference does it make to you?dakan45
Well, considering TimeSplitters has been quite irrelevant for a long period of time and many of its developers bit the dust a good while ago, it's fairly pointless to be having this conversation. As it stands, TimeSplitters is a dead franchise. Why talk about having it on PC if the series of games is dead in the water at this point?
Because wherever is hope there is life, and the dead franchise can be easily become active again via sequel, all we need is a little populartiy to reach to the developers ears.TimeSplitters was never an incredibly popular franchise, and a few message board scrubs - myself included - certainly aren't going to change that.
I really, really liked TimeSplitters. I purchased the second one and fell in love with its map editor, and Future Perfect really perfected the formula and had some awesome multiplayer. The games were never on par (in terms of popularity) with Halo or any of the other top shooters at the time, however. It was really destined to fail. The marketing of the games was always piss poor, too.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment