This topic is locked from further discussion.
Machinarium might still need an alright computer to run. I know it wouldn't run smoothly on my notebook laptop with an integrated card.
As stated before, Valve games (source engine ones) should run fine (low video settings though). If you don't mind graphics than Counter-Strike 1.6 can still be fun (it is quite outdated now with games like MW2 and such which makes it odd to recommend). More RAM and a new video card are all you really need right now, your processor isn't very good but it should meet the minimum of a reasonable fraction of games right now.
Unreal Tournament should run just fine as well. You could probably run that one on max settings. My laptop has almost the same specs, except that the cpu is a duel core, and two gigs ram. Spore MIGHT run on minimum settings. It runs fine on my laptop on minimum settings.
So, I have a really, really bad PC. I don't have the money to update it, but I'd like to get some good games for it. Heck, it can't even read San Andreas properly... I was wondering if anyone knows about any good games that this crappy PC can handle: CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2160 @ 1.80GHz; CPU Speed: 1.79 GHz | Performance rated at: 2.685 GHz; RAM: 1015.4 MB; Video Card (the only thing keeping me from playing better games...): Inter(R) 82945G Express Chipset Family; OS: Microsoft Windows XP Professional Service Pack 3 (build 2600); Sound Card: Realtek High Definition. Thanks in advance.Brains101
Stick to older games like Red Alert 2, Vampire: The Masquerade - Redemption, or perhaps Battlefield 1942 with the Desert Combat mod. All three worked fine with my old P-4 2.4ghz HP laptop/512mb RAM/ATI IGP345 video.
Anything newer that is 3D is bound to chug.
You're asking about games on a clearly non-gaming machine.
The best you'll get, for the most part, is just finding older games that were released many, many years ago. Other than that, you could try things like Plants and Zombies and other games that aren't 3D intensive.
you dont have like 35 dollars to get a nvidia 8600 graphics card? Rahnyc4
This. Spend a bit on a GPU, and your options will open up dramatically.
[QUOTE="Rahnyc4"]you dont have like 35 dollars to get a nvidia 8600 graphics card? True_Sounds
This. Spend a bit on a GPU, and your options will open up dramatically.
Um...you're pretty much going to be limited to games before 2002/2003. Let's see.
There's Starcraft, Diablo 1/2, Counter-Strike 1.6, maybe Day of Defeat, I think you can get by with the Source version, but on the lowest possible settings. Half Life 1, Team Fortress Classic...yeah. Not very many games.
If you can't run GTA: San Andreas, I'd say you're in pretty bad shape there, buddy. Get a desktop PC. Laptops are HORRIBLE for gaming.
He has a desktop, why do peole keep saying that he has a laptop?
sammysalsa
My bad. I read other people's comments so I just assumed it was a laptop.
Anyways, you need to buy a desktop and put in a dedicated graphic card. Your computer has integrated graphics. Not many games newer than 2004 support integrated graphics.
[QUOTE="marcogamer07"]No, they're not. Well, some are, but not all of them. ;) And OP, if you're not on a laptop, buy a video card before you buy anything else.Laptops are HORRIBLE for gaming.
w4rrior17
Many elder RPG game are very classic ~you can try baldur's gate,Icewind dale ~~or other RPG games in that time~your PC definite can run those game very well~
Many elder RPG game are very classic ~you can try baldur's gate,Icewind dale ~~or other RPG games in that time~your PC definite can run those game very well~
I ran Unreal Tournament 2004 nicely with an Intel 945 on a laptop, and the other specs were similar. I don't know if your graphics chip is better (or it's the same one), but you can give it a try. If that works, also try:
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment