Update on vista performance ?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nooblet69
nooblet69

5162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#1 nooblet69
Member since 2004 • 5162 Posts
Hello, all. I have been waiting for vista to improve before purchasing a new rig. Anyone know how well it is performing now and if Microsoft has mentioned release date for service pack 1 or any dramatic changes ? Thanks for the update :).
Avatar image for GANGSTA287
GANGSTA287

967

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 GANGSTA287
Member since 2005 • 967 Posts

i just bought a new rig as listed in my Sig...

so far, i have nothing to complain about that isn't connection related :D

Avatar image for SHAWNSHAMROCK
SHAWNSHAMROCK

38

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 SHAWNSHAMROCK
Member since 2004 • 38 Posts
i just got a new computer and installed 32 bit vista. So far only one problem, wmp 11 wont play my songs i have in my library. other than that everything seems fine performance and driver wise, although i cant directly comparethe performanceto xp since the computer is new. It will just keep getting better performance with each release of drivers probably.
Avatar image for asdf42asdf
asdf42asdf

76

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 asdf42asdf
Member since 2005 • 76 Posts
Everything works great for me on Vista. I just hate the security pop-ups; but someone showed me how to turn those off.
Avatar image for lol_waffles
lol_waffles

1826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 lol_waffles
Member since 2006 • 1826 Posts
Windows Vista is great, I haven't had a single crash yet. It does reduce gaming performance, though. I'm getting about 10 less frames per second in CS:S.
Avatar image for BounceDK
BounceDK

7388

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#6 BounceDK
Member since 2005 • 7388 Posts
It's still choppy and has horrible sound.
Avatar image for smoothanddeadly
smoothanddeadly

59

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 smoothanddeadly
Member since 2004 • 59 Posts
I've been running Vista 64-bit since the day it was released and the only problems I've had have been driver-related, which is not Vista's fault; to this day, Creative still hasn't released a full-function driver for the Audigy ZS sound card. I'm currently playing Halo 2 for Vista at 1600 x 1200 and so far the game has played very smoothly, although I had to turn off anti-aliasing to get a constant frame rate. I've also played games as far back as Serious Sam and Jedi Outcast and have had no problems.
Avatar image for rimnet00
rimnet00

11003

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 rimnet00
Member since 2003 • 11003 Posts
Vista has been pwning for a few months now IMO. Yah, the only issue people will tend to come into will be getting their sound cards to work. This is because Vista has added UAA which is a software based decoder as opposed to a hardware based decoder (ie: sound cards). The software decoder is really amazing to say the least, since it is pretty much makes onboard sound on par with even the X-Fi. However, for those who migrated over to vista with their own sound cards they have to jump through the loopholes since Creative has one of the worst driver teams ever.
Avatar image for The_PC_Gamer
The_PC_Gamer

2910

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 The_PC_Gamer
Member since 2003 • 2910 Posts
good to hear, i'll be getting the 64bit version in the near future
Avatar image for lol_waffles
lol_waffles

1826

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 lol_waffles
Member since 2006 • 1826 Posts
good to hear, i'll be getting the 64bit version in the near futureThe_PC_Gamer
Unless you're going to need more than 4 gigs of RAM, don't bother with Vista 64 bit. Right now, barely anything uses a 64-bit OS, and you'll have to deal with tons of incompatibility issues.
Avatar image for thanatose
thanatose

2465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 thanatose
Member since 2003 • 2465 Posts

It's still choppy and has horrible sound.BounceDK

Ignore this person, they've been hating on Vista in every post even related to it. Vista runs great but if you do buy it you'd do better getting the 32bit version over the 64bit version because of compatability issues with the 64bit version.

Avatar image for delirin
delirin

745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 delirin
Member since 2003 • 745 Posts

[QUOTE="The_PC_Gamer"]good to hear, i'll be getting the 64bit version in the near futurelol_waffles
Unless you're going to need more than 4 gigs of RAM, don't bother with Vista 64 bit. Right now, barely anything uses a 64-bit OS, and you'll have to deal with tons of incompatibility issues.

This whole statement is false. First off, 32 bit platforms can't use more than around 3GB of memory.With superfetch, Vista will use 1gb+ of memory just on idle. Having more than 3GB of memory is the new 2gb and starting to show advantages in several games. If you have or plan on having 4gb of memory any time soon, this is one advantage of moving to 64 bit. Another advantage would be that more and more applications/games will be coming with 64 bit advantages. There is no sure way to futureproof your computer, but going 64 bit will save you some trouble upgrading and possibly money (oem versions don't allow you to switch between 32 and 64 so if you buy one, you're stuck with it).

As for "tons of incompatibility issues", this is just not true. Microsoft is requiring hardware vendors to submit 64 bit driver submissions along with any 32 bit for WHQL certification. This effectivley forces 64 bit into the mainstream. Any hardware with vista 32 bit drivers is going to have vista 64 bit drivers. There is absolutley no difference in hardware compatability when moving from vista 32 to 64.

I switched to vista upon release (32 bit) and a month later moved to 64 bit. I can honestly say that you won't notice any difference in compatability, stability, or performance. You'll just get to play steam games in 64 bit mode and possibly notice a little better performance in apps that utilize 64 bit technology.... while fully taking advantage of 4gb of memory or more.

Avatar image for TheUberKnight
TheUberKnight

847

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 TheUberKnight
Member since 2007 • 847 Posts

[QUOTE="lol_waffles"][QUOTE="The_PC_Gamer"]good to hear, i'll be getting the 64bit version in the near futuredelirin

Unless you're going to need more than 4 gigs of RAM, don't bother with Vista 64 bit. Right now, barely anything uses a 64-bit OS, and you'll have to deal with tons of incompatibility issues.

This whole statement is false. First off, 32 bit platforms can't use more than around 3GB of memory.With superfetch, Vista will use 1gb+ of memory just on idle. Having more than 3GB of memory is the new 2gb and starting to show advantages in several games. If you have or plan on having 4gb of memory any time soon, this is one advantage of moving to 64 bit. Another advantage would be that more and more applications/games will be coming with 64 bit advantages. There is no sure way to futureproof your computer, but going 64 bit will save you some trouble upgrading and possibly money (oem versions don't allow you to switch between 32 and 64 so if you buy one, you're stuck with it).

As for "tons of incompatibility issues", this is just not true. Microsoft is requiring hardware vendors to submit 64 bit driver submissions along with any 32 bit for WHQL certification. This effectivley forces 64 bit into the mainstream. Any hardware with vista 32 bit drivers is going to have vista 64 bit drivers. There is absolutley no difference in hardware compatability when moving from vista 32 to 64.

I switched to vista upon release (32 bit) and a month later moved to 64 bit. I can honestly say that you won't notice any difference in compatability, stability, or performance. You'll just get to play steam games in 64 bit mode and possibly notice a little better performance in apps that utilize 64 bit technology.... while fully taking advantage of 4gb of memory or more.

Wow thanks for that, good job. I know what I'm getting now with my new PC. ;)

Avatar image for Ade_Newman
Ade_Newman

1059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Ade_Newman
Member since 2005 • 1059 Posts

It's still choppy and has horrible sound.BounceDK

Yup unless u got a creative x-fi card. My Aud2ZS still has no hardware drivers :(

Ade.

Avatar image for PikaPichu
PikaPichu

17813

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 PikaPichu
Member since 2003 • 17813 Posts

[QUOTE="The_PC_Gamer"]good to hear, i'll be getting the 64bit version in the near futurelol_waffles
Unless you're going to need more than 4 gigs of RAM, don't bother with Vista 64 bit. Right now, barely anything uses a 64-bit OS, and you'll have to deal with tons of incompatibility issues.

I've been using WinVista 64 for about a month or so now and have not had any compatibility issues whatsoever. All my peripherals and software have been working fine.

Avatar image for Zero_Space
Zero_Space

659

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 Zero_Space
Member since 2007 • 659 Posts
Vista Home Premium 32 bit. No problems for me.