Use current USB headers for USB 3.0?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for chrissp26
chrissp26

3175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 chrissp26
Member since 2004 • 3175 Posts

Hi I have an Orign AE S14v media centre case with 2 USB headers on the front panel. If I replaced my motherboard with one supporting USB 3, would the header ports support USB 3 speeds?

I know USB3 is backwards compatible with USB2 but can existing IO Headers use USB to their full potential?

Many thanks.

Chris.

Avatar image for inggrish
inggrish

10503

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 inggrish
Member since 2005 • 10503 Posts

I may be wrong, but I have a feeling you would need new USB headers.

Avatar image for chrissp26
chrissp26

3175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 chrissp26
Member since 2004 • 3175 Posts

Thanks for the reply. That's what I thought but was holding out hope for compatibility.

Anyone else know for definete?

Avatar image for MaoTheChimp
MaoTheChimp

1727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 MaoTheChimp
Member since 2008 • 1727 Posts

USB 2.0 devices will work in 3.0 ports, and likewise USB 3.0 devices will function in 2.0 ports, though obviously the bandwidth will be limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

Avatar image for hrah
hrah

1375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 hrah
Member since 2003 • 1375 Posts

It seems it's compatible with older usb headers



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Avatar image for bigM10231
bigM10231

11240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#6 bigM10231
Member since 2008 • 11240 Posts

i might wait to upgrade my USBs until 3.0 comes out because all my current USBs are 1.0:(

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#7 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

i might wait to upgrade my USBs until 3.0 comes out because all my current USBs are 1.0:(

bigM10231
You're using usb 1.0? Is this 1999 :P?
Avatar image for bigM10231
bigM10231

11240

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#8 bigM10231
Member since 2008 • 11240 Posts
[QUOTE="bigM10231"]

i might wait to upgrade my USBs until 3.0 comes out because all my current USBs are 1.0:(

JigglyWiggly_
You're using usb 1.0? Is this 1999 :P?

its a 2004 computer
Avatar image for gameguy6700
gameguy6700

12197

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 gameguy6700
Member since 2004 • 12197 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="bigM10231"]

i might wait to upgrade my USBs until 3.0 comes out because all my current USBs are 1.0:(

bigM10231
You're using usb 1.0? Is this 1999 :P?

its a 2004 computer

Uh, USB 2.0 came out in 2000 dude. You must have bought a crappy computer even by 2004 standards.
Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

USB 2.0 devices will work in 3.0 ports, and likewise USB 3.0 devices will function in 2.0 ports, though obviously the bandwidth will be limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

MaoTheChimp
Umm, no they wont. 3.0 cables wont fit into 2.0 sockets... however 2.0 will fit in 3.0 http://64.202.120.86/upload/image/new-news/2008/december/usb-3-0-final/usb-3-final.jpg
Avatar image for Phoenix534
Phoenix534

17774

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Phoenix534
Member since 2008 • 17774 Posts

[QUOTE="MaoTheChimp"]

USB 2.0 devices will work in 3.0 ports, and likewise USB 3.0 devices will function in 2.0 ports, though obviously the bandwidth will be limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

Nibroc420

Umm, no they wont. 3.0 cables wont fit into 2.0 sockets... however 2.0 will fit in 3.0 http://64.202.120.86/upload/image/new-news/2008/december/usb-3-0-final/usb-3-final.jpg

That's the end that plugs into devices. The end that plugs into the computer ports is the same as other USBs.

Avatar image for Nibroc420
Nibroc420

13571

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 Nibroc420
Member since 2007 • 13571 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="MaoTheChimp"]

USB 2.0 devices will work in 3.0 ports, and likewise USB 3.0 devices will function in 2.0 ports, though obviously the bandwidth will be limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

Phoenix534

Umm, no they wont. 3.0 cables wont fit into 2.0 sockets... however 2.0 will fit in 3.0 http://64.202.120.86/upload/image/new-news/2008/december/usb-3-0-final/usb-3-final.jpg

That's the end that plugs into devices. The end that plugs into the computer ports is the same as other USBs.

umm, no it isn't?
Avatar image for MaoTheChimp
MaoTheChimp

1727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 MaoTheChimp
Member since 2008 • 1727 Posts

[QUOTE="MaoTheChimp"]

USB 2.0 devices will work in 3.0 ports, and likewise USB 3.0 devices will function in 2.0 ports, though obviously the bandwidth will be limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

Nibroc420

Umm, no they wont. 3.0 cables wont fit into 2.0 sockets... however 2.0 will fit in 3.0 http://64.202.120.86/upload/image/new-news/2008/december/usb-3-0-final/usb-3-final.jpg

You're partly correct. The image you linked is of a "SuperSpeed" standard-B plug which is designed for USB 3.0 ports, but as you said, it is incompatible with older USB 2.0 standard-B ports. On the other hard, the "SuperSpeed" standard-A receptacle is not only compatible with legacy standard-A connectors, but the SuperSpeed standard-A plug can fit in a legacy standard-A port and be compatible provided that the device does not require the extra bandwidth and the MFG goes the extra mile to allow for backwards-compatibility.

Avatar image for nintendog66
nintendog66

2300

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 nintendog66
Member since 2006 • 2300 Posts

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"][QUOTE="MaoTheChimp"]

USB 2.0 devices will work in 3.0 ports, and likewise USB 3.0 devices will function in 2.0 ports, though obviously the bandwidth will be limited to USB 2.0 speeds.

MaoTheChimp

Umm, no they wont. 3.0 cables wont fit into 2.0 sockets... however 2.0 will fit in 3.0 http://64.202.120.86/upload/image/new-news/2008/december/usb-3-0-final/usb-3-final.jpg

You're partly correct. The image you linked is of a "SuperSpeed" standard-B plug which is designed for USB 3.0 ports, but as you said, it is incompatible with older USB 2.0 standard-B ports. On the other hard, the "SuperSpeed" standard-A receptacle is not only compatible with legacy standard-A connectors, but the SuperSpeed standard-A plug can fit in a legacy standard-A port and be compatible provided that the device does not require the extra bandwidth and the MFG goes the extra mile to allow for backwards-compatibility.

Le wha? English please.
Avatar image for MaoTheChimp
MaoTheChimp

1727

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 MaoTheChimp
Member since 2008 • 1727 Posts

[QUOTE="MaoTheChimp"]

[QUOTE="Nibroc420"] Umm, no they wont. 3.0 cables wont fit into 2.0 sockets... however 2.0 will fit in 3.0 http://64.202.120.86/upload/image/new-news/2008/december/usb-3-0-final/usb-3-final.jpgnintendog66

You're partly correct. The image you linked is of a "SuperSpeed" standard-B plug which is designed for USB 3.0 ports, but as you said, it is incompatible with older USB 2.0 standard-B ports. On the other hard, the "SuperSpeed" standard-A receptacle is not only compatible with legacy standard-A connectors, but the SuperSpeed standard-A plug can fit in a legacy standard-A port and be compatible provided that the device does not require the extra bandwidth and the MFG goes the extra mile to allow for backwards-compatibility.

Le wha? English please.

Sorry.

The rectangular-box type connector is known as a "standard-A" connector, and an image of this was linked above by hrah.

A "standard-B" connector is the more squarish connector found on some USB devices. Here's an image to illustrate:

Since USB 3.0 requires the use of five extra pins for the extra bandwidth, a "hump" was added to the top of the standard-B port/receptacle, as there was simply not enough room to cram in the 5 other pins. I'll use the image Nibroc420 linked to illustrate:

Because of this added "hump", legacy standard-B connectors can fit AND function in the new USB 3.0 standard-B ports, but USB 3.0 plugs cannot physically fit in the older standard-B ports.

However, if you take a look at the new USB 3.0 standard-A connectors....

...you'll notice that the added pins do not interfere with the pins on legacy standard-A connectors, and this theoretically allows for two-way backwards compatibility.

There's one catch though: if a USB 3.0 device requires USB 3,0 speeds (such as a external BlueRay player, 1080P decoder etc), then it would be impossible for it to function in a USB 2.0 port due to lack of bandwidth. Also, a MFG must go the extra mile and include hardware for a USB 3.0 device to function in a USB 2.0 port, or otherwise the device will not recognize the port and render it incompatible.

Avatar image for chrissp26
chrissp26

3175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 chrissp26
Member since 2004 • 3175 Posts

There's one catch though: if a USB 3.0 device requires USB 3,0 speeds (such as a external BlueRay player, 1080P decoder etc), then it would be impossible for it to function in a USB 2.0 port due to lack of bandwidth. Also, a MFG must go the extra mile and include hardware for a USB 3.0 device to function in a USB 2.0 port, or otherwise the device will not recognize the port and render it incompatible.

MaoTheChimp

So basically I can't use the existing USB headers in my case to run with full USB capabilities. Bugger. Oh well. I shall contact OriginAE and see if they will be supplying a USB 3 replacement.

Thanks for all the detailed responses.

Chris

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#17 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Yay more pins to be bent.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="bigM10231"]

i might wait to upgrade my USBs until 3.0 comes out because all my current USBs are 1.0:(

bigM10231
You're using usb 1.0? Is this 1999 :P?

its a 2004 computer

no that's impossible unless you bought a old computer in 2004.
Avatar image for imprezawrx500
imprezawrx500

19187

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 imprezawrx500
Member since 2004 • 19187 Posts

[QUOTE="MaoTheChimp"]

There's one catch though: if a USB 3.0 device requires USB 3,0 speeds (such as a external BlueRay player, 1080P decoder etc), then it would be impossible for it to function in a USB 2.0 port due to lack of bandwidth. Also, a MFG must go the extra mile and include hardware for a USB 3.0 device to function in a USB 2.0 port, or otherwise the device will not recognize the port and render it incompatible.

chrissp26

So basically I can't use the existing USB headers in my case to run with full USB capabilities. Bugger. Oh well. I shall contact OriginAE and see if they will be supplying a USB 3 replacement.

Thanks for all the detailed responses.

Chris

why not just run some cable from the rear ports for when you need the speed?