Very Disappointed in COH: Tales of Valor

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for eclarkdog
eclarkdog

1310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#1 eclarkdog
Member since 2004 • 1310 Posts

What a complete rip-off! First, I don't give a rats ass about multiplayer. I bought this game expecting a satisfying single player campaign to rival Opposing Fronts, which I thought was great. Tales of Valor is barely 3 hours long. I was like completely shocked when the first campaign ended thinking "This is it!". Furthermore, they changed the gameplay considerably - it's totally different. No unit and base building or resource gathering and half the missions were like watching a movie as the AI did half the work for you. The two or three missions in each campaign were extremely fast paced too with some running into each other that they wouldn't add up to one mission in COH or OP.

Man, I was so excited to get some new COH stuff to play and now I'm very disappointed. I even sent an email to THQ. I'm freakin' pissed.

At most, this should have been like a $10 downloadable content deal and marketed for additional multiplayer content.

Avatar image for aura_enchanted
aura_enchanted

7942

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#2 aura_enchanted
Member since 2006 • 7942 Posts

What a complete rip-off! First, I don't give a rats ass about multiplayer. I bought this game expecting a satisfying single player campaign to rival Opposing Fronts, which I thought was great. Tales of Valor is barely 3 hours long. I was like completely shocked when the first campaign ended thinking "This is it!". Furthermore, they changed the gameplay considerably - it's totally different. No unit and base building or resource gathering and half the missions were like watching a movie as the AI did half the work for you. The two or three missions in each campaign were extremely fast paced too with some running into each other that they wouldn't add up to one mission in COH or OP.

Man, I was so excited to get some new COH stuff to play and now I'm very disappointed. I even sent an email to THQ. I'm freakin' pissed.

At most, this should have been like a $10 downloadable content deal and marketed for additional multiplayer content.

eclarkdog

and again threquels/2nd expansions proove that they suck. (exceptions to every rule of course)

Avatar image for kozzy1234
kozzy1234

35966

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 86

User Lists: 0

#3 kozzy1234
Member since 2005 • 35966 Posts

Thanks for the heads up

Avatar image for coolmonkeykid
coolmonkeykid

3276

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 coolmonkeykid
Member since 2004 • 3276 Posts
I decided not to get it when I found that the missions were short and that the MP maps would be given out free in a patch. The game is DEFINIETLY not worth $30!!
Avatar image for arijit_2404
arijit_2404

1558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#5 arijit_2404
Member since 2006 • 1558 Posts
I must remove this game from my wishlist. .. . ASAP. Thanks for the heads up.
Avatar image for naval
naval

11108

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 naval
Member since 2003 • 11108 Posts
I knew this from a long long time and the fact that this is a multiplayer oriented was also known. I don't know why people don't do proper research before buying a game and then get dissapointed
Avatar image for wigginender
wigginender

644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 wigginender
Member since 2003 • 644 Posts

I got the same feeling from the reviews, the SP is very short and doesn't add alot. I will also be passing on this one since I don't play MP and will pick up Men of War.

Avatar image for visceron
visceron

2160

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 1

#8 visceron
Member since 2005 • 2160 Posts
3hrs for $30?? Ouch. I only have the original game. How long was Opposing Fronts?
Avatar image for eclarkdog
eclarkdog

1310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#9 eclarkdog
Member since 2004 • 1310 Posts

3hrs for $30?? Ouch. I only have the original game. How long was Opposing Fronts?visceron

Opposing Fronts two campaigns (British and German) are about as long as the original and very cool. I recommend getting that one.

Avatar image for deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4
deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4

10077

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-60678a6f9e4d4
Member since 2007 • 10077 Posts

I knew this would happen. ;)

Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#11 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
damn we have been flooded with real stinkers of late haven't we? I was extremely annoyed that Steam priced the game at $50 USD for me, most of you get it for $30. sigh.
Avatar image for Dark_prince123
Dark_prince123

1149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#12 Dark_prince123
Member since 2008 • 1149 Posts
guys i loke COH so i will buy it but not now maybe when the price drop to 10 $
Avatar image for Precyse
Precyse

487

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Precyse
Member since 2007 • 487 Posts

I just picked up the gold edition(COH,+ opposing fronts) and am extremely inpressed with the game and was wondering whether or not tov was good glad to know that i should wait till it drops to $10 or so.

Avatar image for wigginender
wigginender

644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 wigginender
Member since 2003 • 644 Posts

If anyone wants it, I have an extra copy of COHOF (bundled version, no box) that I can trade.

Avatar image for rmfd341
rmfd341

3808

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#15 rmfd341
Member since 2008 • 3808 Posts
Damn...Thanks for the heads up, i'm not getting this game then...
Avatar image for Enosh88
Enosh88

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Enosh88
Member since 2008 • 1728 Posts

they said a lot of time that the game is aimed at MP people and people who never buyed a coh game before.

if you don't have CoH already, you get 3 short SP missions, all 4 factions, all maps including the ToV only ones and 3 new operations

if you have coh+OF already, yeah ToV isn't worth it unless you realy want to play the new MP things

Avatar image for chandu83
chandu83

4864

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#17 chandu83
Member since 2005 • 4864 Posts
Damn. this is not good.
Avatar image for Shadowhawk000
Shadowhawk000

3453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Shadowhawk000
Member since 2007 • 3453 Posts
Having just got COH GE there is not really much in TOV that I would want.. as I get all the new maps anyway :P and it would probably be around 60 bucks for like pretty much no new features..
Avatar image for Enosh88
Enosh88

1728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Enosh88
Member since 2008 • 1728 Posts

tov is 30$

Avatar image for gamerguy845
gamerguy845

2074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 gamerguy845
Member since 2007 • 2074 Posts
I would disagree. If you would have done some research, ( it was pretty clear to me I wasn't getting that much content) you would have known that te focus was on the new operations. I do agree it lacks content, and you should only buy if you really enjoy CoH multiplayer
Avatar image for Charles_Dickens
Charles_Dickens

1693

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Charles_Dickens
Member since 2009 • 1693 Posts

I disliked the first game, and couldn't figure out why it was so well received by the critics - graphically it just wasn't sharp or awe inspiring in any way, and gameplay-wise it was far too busy.

Avatar image for eclarkdog
eclarkdog

1310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#22 eclarkdog
Member since 2004 • 1310 Posts

I disliked the first game, and couldn't figure out why it was so well received by the critics - graphically it just wasn't sharp or awe inspiring in any way, and gameplay-wise it was far too busy.

Charles_Dickens

graphics were sharp and spectacular as well as the gameplay...sory you didn't like it - you are very much in the minority.