This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for timma25
timma25

1131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 timma25
Member since 2005 • 1131 Posts

So alot of people are having trouble with Vista, and a surprisingly high amount of people have gone back to xp. My question for those that have tried both, which is better overall (regardless of system specs, i mean features, programs, compatibility, and ease of use)

Avatar image for henri1960
henri1960

2755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 henri1960
Member since 2005 • 2755 Posts
Old skool 98 baby
Avatar image for irelevent
irelevent

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#3 irelevent
Member since 2005 • 1497 Posts
i think the people who r having trouble with vista are well, as Carlos mencia puts it " DURR DURR DURR"
Avatar image for krazumbi
krazumbi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 krazumbi
Member since 2007 • 25 Posts

So alot of people are having trouble with Vista, and a surprisingly high amount of people have gone back to xp. My question for those that have tried both, which is better overall (regardless of system specs, i mean features, programs, compatibility, and ease of use)

timma25

i have Vista and honestly the only diference i have noticed is a slight extra use of ram in Vista, which can be nullified if you change the desktop theme to Classic instead of aero.

Avatar image for Xraydon
Xraydon

1227

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Xraydon
Member since 2005 • 1227 Posts

XP ftw

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

With very few games being released with DX10 for it in the next couple months, Vista having trouble with numerous hardware drives giving lackluster performance, adding nothing really needed or new in the interface, and along with $100 price tag for upgrade doesn't seem like its worth it.

All benchmarks have lead to show me that Vista still has a relevent performance hit in games over XP.. This is the complete opposite Microsoft promised by claiming a unheard of 60% increase in performance in som eplaces.

Avatar image for irelevent
irelevent

1497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#7 irelevent
Member since 2005 • 1497 Posts
i would say if you bought a new PC you are retarted if you downgrade to Xp, however, if you allready have XP wait acouple monthsto upgrade.
Avatar image for FPSGunnerDude
FPSGunnerDude

948

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#8 FPSGunnerDude
Member since 2006 • 948 Posts
I have absolutely no need for any new bells and whistles, so I'll wait untill I really want the games on Vista and DX10. Which probably won't happen for a good while. I'll take the DX9 and better performance until then.
Avatar image for guylapierre
guylapierre

697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#9 guylapierre
Member since 2005 • 697 Posts
I use Vista for work and XP for gaming. I love Vista but there are numerous issues with it. It is more problematic for some more than others. In my opinion, it sucks for gaming and until some compelling DX10 games come out I'm going to stick with XP. I've had a few hardware issues and some software incompatibilities so far. That is not Mircosoft's fault but it is still a pain.
Avatar image for Valkyrie_44
Valkyrie_44

898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 46

User Lists: 0

#10 Valkyrie_44
Member since 2004 • 898 Posts

With very few games being released with DX10 for it in the next couple months, Vista having trouble with numerous hardware drives giving lackluster performance, adding nothing really needed or new in the interface, and along with $100 price tag for upgrade doesn't seem like its worth it.

All benchmarks have lead to show me that Vista still has a relevent performance hit in games over XP.. This is the complete opposite Microsoft promised by claiming a unheard of 60% increase in performance in som eplaces.

sSubZerOo

Most of that lackluster performance you speak of is mostly confined to certain devices as of right now. Most of the problems encountered have been mostly driver, and as of late they are pretty much an Nividia problem not Microsofts.

Creative has done some good things with thier release of the ALchemy set, and ATI has been on the ball releasing drivers monthly, and doing a remarkable job at the level of quality of thier releases. Logitech, has released thier G15 keyboard 32 and 64 bitdrivers so the LCD miniscreen and hotkeys setups now work flawlessly.

I will agree with you that Microsoft didnot complete thier endandther is not that 60% performance increase, but Vista even with AERO has not given me any degradation in performance, in fact my games do load up a bit faster, and I don't have any problems running my games, even in a 64 bit OS.

I have never took stock into any company's promises until I see the actual results upon release, its foolish to take anything at face value especially when there is a price affixed to it. That's why I am not really going to put all my eggs in one basket for Crysis, Quake Wars, or any exceptional new release. When those products come out then it will be noted whether or not they accomplished all they promised.

Avatar image for thanatose
thanatose

2465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#11 thanatose
Member since 2003 • 2465 Posts
I've been running Vista since shortly after it's release. Personally I haven't seen very many issues with it other than the ammount of memory it uses. There are some compatability issues with games from the 95/98 era but I think most of those were issues with running them in XP also.
Avatar image for pco_rainmaster
pco_rainmaster

275

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 pco_rainmaster
Member since 2007 • 275 Posts
XP for gaming
Avatar image for tonnytok
tonnytok

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 tonnytok
Member since 2005 • 25 Posts

Hello, Friends ?

I have few game purchased a year ago. Without noticing that my laptop vga card is only 32MB dedicated shared up to 64MB VRAM. but iam going to change my laptop, original OS is windows vista

Can these game compatible with Vista : FEAR, Splinter Cell, GTA:San Andreas ?? Need your comment

Thank you :)

Avatar image for thanatose
thanatose

2465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#14 thanatose
Member since 2003 • 2465 Posts

Can these game compatible with Vista : FEAR, Splinter Cell, GTA:San Andreas ?? Need your comment

tonnytok

I have ran FEAR with it's expansion, Splinter Cell (all but the first one), and GTA SA on Vista with no problems.

Avatar image for stif42
stif42

110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#15 stif42
Member since 2004 • 110 Posts
If you got new hardware then you have to install Vista because it's a good OS made for recent hardware. For exemple the way that vista manage memory is much better than XP do.
Avatar image for Sleepyz
Sleepyz

3805

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Sleepyz
Member since 2003 • 3805 Posts

I have Vista premium and already encountering problems with some games. I have to Alt-shift-print to disable the color scheme in vista if i don't want Titan quest to freeze on me and some of my old (Used to them) utilities don't work on Vista.

And don't own Xp was pre-installed on my last computer so stuck with Vista.

Avatar image for Old_Gooseberry
Old_Gooseberry

3958

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 76

User Lists: 0

#17 Old_Gooseberry
Member since 2002 • 3958 Posts

Old skool 98 babyhenri1960

hahah totally

Avatar image for jrhawk42
jrhawk42

12764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#18 jrhawk42
Member since 2003 • 12764 Posts

LOL at all the people who expected Vista to be awesome right out the box. Don't you remember all the problems XP had??

I'll wait till I'm forced to upgrade.

Avatar image for Ratchet3000
Ratchet3000

131

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 Ratchet3000
Member since 2005 • 131 Posts

I recently got a new PC with XP & there is no way I'm gonna upgrade it to vista. Yet again I'm gonna say: THINGS TAKE TIME!
That goes for software too, so no wonder it has a **** load of problems & u can only play a small number of games. But over time it will surelyget better for gameing thanXP.
Would every1 just chill & not go crazy over software!:)

Avatar image for _Miguel_
_Miguel_

118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#20 _Miguel_
Member since 2006 • 118 Posts
VISTA is a very nice program but Xp is also a nice program .In my opinion I prefer Vista
Avatar image for Staryoshi87
Staryoshi87

12760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#21 Staryoshi87
Member since 2003 • 12760 Posts
After using Vista, I could never go back to XP. Despite its occasional (not common) problems, I think it's much better than XP.
Avatar image for immortality20
immortality20

8546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#22 immortality20
Member since 2005 • 8546 Posts

I love Vista :oops:

Avatar image for wargasm666
wargasm666

579

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#23 wargasm666
Member since 2003 • 579 Posts

as do I, I still love XP but there's something about Vista that just flows better to me. My "issues" are almost non existant at this point after a little research and some digging into the OS to make some slight adjustments.

If I hadn't bought a new rig then I would have just kept good 'ol XP but what's the point of spending a ton of money for the new stuff and not put the new OS on it.

Avatar image for GodLovesDead
GodLovesDead

9755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 GodLovesDead
Member since 2007 • 9755 Posts

I have Vista and I'm not going to pretend like it's fine just so I can justify my purchase. It's crap. Not only it's not worth 100 freakin dollars, it isn't worth 5 dollars. A clean bootup with no anti-virus or anything of the sort - you start out with 40 background processes. "Switching the scheme back to Classic" doesn't nullify crap.

But.... there's always DirectX10. People are already making judgements on PATCHES that were released that just use up more resources. Atleast wait until there's DX10 based games before you start to judge it.

Avatar image for -AK47-
-AK47-

3277

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 -AK47-
Member since 2007 • 3277 Posts
XP for gamingpco_rainmaster
Avatar image for Theibault
Theibault

606

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Theibault
Member since 2007 • 606 Posts
I have 2 rigs, newer one runs Vista and older XP. I have no issues with either.
Avatar image for VaioAS
VaioAS

120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 VaioAS
Member since 2004 • 120 Posts

Vista is a difrent OS, and 40 processes is not alot of Vista at all. I have 60 and my PC runs perfect. It's smooth as silk and faster then a viper.

And it was only 600 dollars. Now 40 processes in XP I would start to worry.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

Vista is a difrent OS, and 40 processes is not alot of Vista at all. I have 60 and my PC runs perfect. It's smooth as silk and faster then a viper.

And it was only 600 dollars. Now 40 processes in XP I would start to worry.

VaioAS

Regardless Vista has been shown to have lower performance then Xp when it comes to games.. And with such few DX10 games releasing with the fact that they may not look as different as DX9 I do not see a point of buying it now.. I will only get the OS when performance is the same or increased like they said it would.

Avatar image for piecka32
piecka32

81

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 piecka32
Member since 2005 • 81 Posts

XP FTW. I just get too hard of a performance hit by using vista so i gave up on it.