What do you think about this Gaming Laptop?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Akarui_Hoshi
Akarui_Hoshi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Akarui_Hoshi
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

I was thinking of getting a gaming Laptop; since, it's my first time I have ever bought a pc (gaming computer) I was wondering if it could handle high end games; such as, Starcraft 2, Portal 2, or even a game like Battlefield 3... (idk if that's pushing it). Basically i want to know what it can handle on high (texture quality/resolution) with a good fps. Also it would be great to hear criticisms about the specs if there are any... thanks, and sorry if this thread has caused any trouble ^_^

here's the link to the laptop i intend to purchase

http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/searchtools/item-details.asp?EdpNo=7124324&csid=ITD&body=MAIN

More Versions

http://www.tigerdirect.ca/applications/SearchTools/search.asp?keywords=g73&image12.x=0&image12.y=0

KEEP IN MIND

I realize that a Desktop is a better choice (More Power/Cusomization/Upgradable Parts), but it specifically needs to be a Laptop. I picked this model specifically because it was the best I could get in my local computer parts store. Also the visual looks are irrelevant,I also don't mind the extra weight since it will only be moving from different work stations,but if there are any models out there with metal casing, decent sound systems, or better prices and specs at a better deal I will be open too hear it...

(metal casing is just a preference)

Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts
It should run Starcraft 2 and Portal 2 on high with ease, Battlefield 3 is a bit iffy as the recommended specs haven't been released yet. Most current games should be able to run smoothly on high settings though. Just keep two things in mind, this laptop is quite bulky, in terms of both size and weight, and the battery life will probably be 2 hours or less. Also, a desktop with similar performance can be bought for considerably less cash, and with the difference in price you can probably buy a netbook to carry on the go. It all comes down to what it's going to be used for.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#3 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

Ugly. Get a sager np8130 or np8150.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16898 Posts

i never understood the point in getting a gaming laptop with 1 hour battery life. Anyways, I would get a kik ass gaming pc for like 800, get a netbook for about 250 ( I recommend the acer aspire one with amd fusion c50)

Avatar image for Akarui_Hoshi
Akarui_Hoshi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Akarui_Hoshi
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

i never understood the point in getting a gaming laptop with 1 hour battery life. Anyways, I would get a kik ass gaming pc for like 800, get a netbook for about 250 ( I recommend the acer aspire one with amd fusion c50)

blaznwiipspman1

It's true that i could get a pc for less cash(with more customization and power)... but i personally wanted to get a gaming laptop for more of an "on the go" use. Seeing as i enjoy both my Dj -ing and gaming to be a bit closer to me as i do travel a lot and as you know a desktop isn't exactly the most convenient thing to carry; In addition, a subwoofer i think makes this a decent music station, if not a good gaming laptop.

Avatar image for Akarui_Hoshi
Akarui_Hoshi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Akarui_Hoshi
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
It should run Starcraft 2 and Portal 2 on high with ease, Battlefield 3 is a bit iffy as the recommended specs haven't been released yet. Most current games should be able to run smoothly on high settings though. Just keep two things in mind, this laptop is quite bulky, in terms of both size and weight, and the battery life will probably be 2 hours or less. Also, a desktop with similar performance can be bought for considerably less cash, and with the difference in price you can probably buy a netbook to carry on the go. It all comes down to what it's going to be used for.dk00111
Indeed BF3 will be a bit of guessing/estimating, but thanks for the thought, it's great to know that I can run most of the games out today with this model.
Avatar image for PBSnipes
PBSnipes

14621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 PBSnipes
Member since 2007 • 14621 Posts

I'd recommend either the Alienware M11x or Dell XPS 15, as they're far more balanced, portable-friendly models than the usual 7+ pound/17.3"/1 hour battery life gaming "laptops" out there while still providing solid gaming performance. Plus both were just updated to Sandy Bridge CPUs, so depending on how much power you think you need to can either get a shiny new CPU or a sweet deal on an older model.

Avatar image for Akarui_Hoshi
Akarui_Hoshi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 Akarui_Hoshi
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

Coincedently i was looking into a forum talking about both these Laptops and I gotta say that I'd go for the Asus. Not because it looks better, but because battery life is extended at about 2 1/2 hours making it around 4 1/2 hours in total. This is really convenient if not great since most gaming laptops barely pass the 2 hour mark with all there components running at a high rate. Either way both models are good, but im willing to pay more for that little extra kink if yah know what im saying XD

http://www.pchelpforum.com/laptop-support/105516-asus-g73-sager-np8130-clevo-p151hm1.html

Avatar image for crazymonkey092
crazymonkey092

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#9 crazymonkey092
Member since 2005 • 974 Posts

I have the G73SW, and you certainly will NOT see 4hts 37min of battery life. I and most others seem to avg around 3hrs.

However, with that said. This laptop is great, the CPU handles everything incredibly well, and overall cooling is good and not noisy.

If you want a bit cheaper than TigerDirect, amazon has the G73SW-XA1 for $1400. Only differences are:

XA1 = dvd burner, 750gb, 1yr warranty/ 1 accidental

XT1 = blueray, 500gb, and 2yr warranty/1year accidental

The GTX460m isnt the best mobile GPU, but it runs rather cool, in most cases I dont go above 70c in a 80f room. I prefer gaming laptops as well, less power, less heat expelled, and best of all, easy to move around. Checkout the Notebookreview.com forums if you want to read more about the G73, there is quite a large community over there.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#10 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

I have the G73SW, and you certainly will NOT see 4hts 37min of battery life. I and most others seem to avg around 3hrs.

However, with that said. This laptop is great, the CPU handles everything incredibly well, and overall cooling is good and not noisy.

If you want a bit cheaper than TigerDirect, amazon has the G73SW-XA1 for $1400. Only differences are:

XA1 = dvd burner, 750gb, 1yr warranty/ 1 accidental

XT1 = blueray, 500gb, and 2yr warranty/1year accidental

The GTX460m isnt the best mobile GPU, but it runs rather cool, in most cases I dont go above 70c in a 80f room. I prefer gaming laptops as well, less power, less heat expelled, and best of all, easy to move around. Checkout the Notebookreview.com forums if you want to read more about the G73, there is quite a large community over there.

crazymonkey092

How does the 460M stack up when it comes to modern games? I don't care about AA at all so ignore that.

Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts

How does the 460M stack up when it comes to modern games? I don't care about AA at all so ignore that.

Espada12

See this. Scroll down for avg fps on different games.

Avatar image for blaznwiipspman1
blaznwiipspman1

16898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 blaznwiipspman1
Member since 2007 • 16898 Posts

[QUOTE="blaznwiipspman1"]

i never understood the point in getting a gaming laptop with 1 hour battery life. Anyways, I would get a kik ass gaming pc for like 800, get a netbook for about 250 ( I recommend the acer aspire one with amd fusion c50)

Akarui_Hoshi

It's true that i could get a pc for less cash(with more customization and power)... but i personally wanted to get a gaming laptop for more of an "on the go" use. Seeing as i enjoy both my Dj -ing and gaming to be a bit closer to me as i do travel a lot and as you know a desktop isn't exactly the most convenient thing to carry; In addition, a subwoofer i think makes this a decent music station, if not a good gaming laptop.

I hope you work out, that laptop, like most gaming laptops are heavy as hell. Maybe consider something lighter? Check out dell.com

Avatar image for G13RainbowSix
G13RainbowSix

908

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 G13RainbowSix
Member since 2005 • 908 Posts

I got the dell xps15 and it runs most games on high even crysis with most settings on very high. only problems are when I try to go to my 1080p plasma, then I gotta scale down the graphics a little bit but only on the super high end games. I maxed portal 2 no problem in 1080p last night... I did OC my graphics car a lil bit though

Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts

I got the dell xps15 and it runs most games on high even crysis with most settings on very high. only problems are when I try to go to my 1080p plasma, then I gotta scale down the graphics a little bit but only on the super high end games. I maxed portal 2 no problem in 1080p last night... I did OC my graphics car a lil bit though

G13RainbowSix
Hmm, that's pretty good. Did you get the one with a Sandybridge i7 and a 540m?
Avatar image for wis3boi
wis3boi

32507

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 wis3boi
Member since 2005 • 32507 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

How does the 460M stack up when it comes to modern games? I don't care about AA at all so ignore that.

dk00111

See this. Scroll down for avg fps on different games.

:O wow, that actually fairs better than my 4870 in my desktop, I'd say. Impressive
Avatar image for crazymonkey092
crazymonkey092

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#16 crazymonkey092
Member since 2005 • 974 Posts
GTX460m seems to be doing pretty good in modern games. I get full steady 60fps in NFS Hot Pursuit 2010, with highest settings at 1080p. Same for Burnout Paradise, full 60fps, highest settings, at 1080p. I can't say I've tested in Crysis 1 or 2, but I havent read about any performance probs with those games on the forums. GTA4 runs pretty decent, at high settings, but I understand its not a very optimized game and its mostly CPU dependent which this 2630qm handles it well. I turn down the settings to medium, except for textures which i leave at high. Draw distance, etc at default but car density to 50 and leave res at 1080. I dont seem to dip below 30fps and easily hit 60-70+ fps when inside. Bioshock 1 seems to get a steady 60fps at 1080, all on highest settings. Rainbow 6 Vegas 2 steady 60fps at 1080, all highest settings + some AA. Hrm, can't think of any other games, I don't tend to play the latest and greatest games, so for me 460m is certainly all I needed. However, max temp I've gotten in furmark was 80c in a 75f room. Stock 3dmark06 score I got was 14,088, 3dmark vantage = p8285 and 3dmark 11 = p1826. When I ran all those test, the 460m didnt go past 68c, which was quite amazing. You can easily OC the core from 675 to 850mhz. Jumped the 3dmark06 score to 16,239. but in games you wont see that much of a significant boost.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#18 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

How does the 460M stack up when it comes to modern games? I don't care about AA at all so ignore that.

dk00111

See this. Scroll down for avg fps on different games.

Nice! Gonna wait till the 560M cards hit and I'll buy one then!

Avatar image for James161324
James161324

8315

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 James161324
Member since 2009 • 8315 Posts

GTX460m seems to be doing pretty good in modern games. I get full steady 60fps in NFS Hot Pursuit 2010, with highest settings at 1080p. Same for Burnout Paradise, full 60fps, highest settings, at 1080p. I can't say I've tested in Crysis 1 or 2, but I havent read about any performance probs with those games on the forums. GTA4 runs pretty decent, at high settings, but I understand its not a very optimized game and its mostly CPU dependent which this 2630qm handles it well. I turn down the settings to medium, except for textures which i leave at high. Draw distance, etc at default but car density to 50 and leave res at 1080. I dont seem to dip below 30fps and easily hit 60-70+ fps when inside. Bioshock 1 seems to get a steady 60fps at 1080, all on highest settings. Rainbow 6 Vegas 2 steady 60fps at 1080, all highest settings + some AA. Hrm, can't think of any other games, I don't tend to play the latest and greatest games, so for me 460m is certainly all I needed. However, max temp I've gotten in furmark was 80c in a 75f room. Stock 3dmark06 score I got was 14,088, 3dmark vantage = p8285 and 3dmark 11 = p1826. When I ran all those test, the 460m didnt go past 68c, which was quite amazing. You can easily OC the core from 675 to 850mhz. Jumped the 3dmark06 score to 16,239. but in games you wont see that much of a significant boost.crazymonkey092

Wow, those temps are very nice for a laptop

Avatar image for Akarui_Hoshi
Akarui_Hoshi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 Akarui_Hoshi
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

I have the G73SW, and you certainly will NOT see 4hts 37min of battery life. I and most others seem to avg around 3hrs.

However, with that said. This laptop is great, the CPU handles everything incredibly well, and overall cooling is good and not noisy.

If you want a bit cheaper than TigerDirect, amazon has the G73SW-XA1 for $1400. Only differences are:

XA1 = dvd burner, 750gb, 1yr warranty/ 1 accidental

XT1 = blueray, 500gb, and 2yr warranty/1year accidental

The GTX460m isnt the best mobile GPU, but it runs rather cool, in most cases I dont go above 70c in a 80f room. I prefer gaming laptops as well, less power, less heat expelled, and best of all, easy to move around. Checkout the Notebookreview.com forums if you want to read more about the G73, there is quite a large community over there.

crazymonkey092
Really? I got a friend who has got a G73 as well, although I'm not too sure about the model number... anyways I took his word for it, but if it lasts at least a good 2 and a half hours I'lll be good (plus it's gonna be hooked up to speakers and outlets)
Avatar image for Akarui_Hoshi
Akarui_Hoshi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Akarui_Hoshi
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts

Hey guys I already checked out the new laptops people have been suggesting and i compared theAlienware M11x, Dell XPS 15,Sagernp8130, to the Asus G73 models and I gotta say thanks for the great ones! After seeing all these models It's a bit hard too choose with all these great deals and similar specs. It was a rather high tie between the Sager and the Asus, but I am willing to pay that extra bit for a couple extra features the Asus has. I'm still gonna consider the Dell XPS 15 for its good performance even if there will be some OC. But hearing that the G73 can run while staying really cool with its large coolers at the back, which is gonna be a big bonus since I'll need too use mine constantly in my music office.

Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts
If you're looking at the XPS 15, you should also check out the Asus N53SV. They both have about the same specs depending on how you configure the Dell, but the Asus looks a bit nicer. However, keep in mind that the N53 and the XPS are in an entirely different league than the G73 and the 8130. The N53/XPS are multimedia laptops, so they're going to be a bit lighter, and will have a better battery life, but the 540m they come with is much weaker than the 460M on the higher end gaming laptops. The 460M will usually give you 20-30 fps more than the 540M, so keep that in mind.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

If you're looking at the XPS 15, you should also check out the Asus N53SV. They both have about the same specs depending on how you configure the Dell, but the Asus looks a bit nicer. However, keep in mind that the N53 and the XPS are in an entirely different league than the G73 and the 8130. The N53/XPS are multimedia laptops, so they're going to be a bit lighter, and will have a better battery life, but the 540m they come with is much weaker than the 460M on the higher end gaming laptops. The 460M will usually give you 20-30 fps more than the 540M, so keep that in mind.dk00111
They are both incredibly ugly, am I the only one with style? :P

Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts

[QUOTE="dk00111"]If you're looking at the XPS 15, you should also check out the Asus N53SV. They both have about the same specs depending on how you configure the Dell, but the Asus looks a bit nicer. However, keep in mind that the N53 and the XPS are in an entirely different league than the G73 and the 8130. The N53/XPS are multimedia laptops, so they're going to be a bit lighter, and will have a better battery life, but the 540m they come with is much weaker than the 460M on the higher end gaming laptops. The 460M will usually give you 20-30 fps more than the 540M, so keep that in mind.JigglyWiggly_

They are both incredibly ugly, am I the only one with style? :P

The N53? It looks decent in pictures, but it looks really nice in person. Haven't seen a Sager in person, but they look really bland/ugly in pictures too. :P
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#27 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

Wat, we are in a dilemma. I like to look professional because I am myself am awesome. Also laptops that are all curvy and fancy make you look like an ass.

I wuv the styling on the Sagers :) So sleek, rugged, and super nice build quality.

Avatar image for dk00111
dk00111

3123

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 dk00111
Member since 2007 • 3123 Posts
As far as the N53 goes, aluminum looks nicer than plastic, and the curve is there to make room for the speaker. The G73 is designed like that for cooling purposes. Sagers look like a generic laptop that took all but 5 minutes to design, but to each his own I guess.
Avatar image for Akarui_Hoshi
Akarui_Hoshi

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Akarui_Hoshi
Member since 2010 • 25 Posts
[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

[QUOTE="dk00111"]If you're looking at the XPS 15, you should also check out the Asus N53SV. They both have about the same specs depending on how you configure the Dell, but the Asus looks a bit nicer. However, keep in mind that the N53 and the XPS are in an entirely different league than the G73 and the 8130. The N53/XPS are multimedia laptops, so they're going to be a bit lighter, and will have a better battery life, but the 540m they come with is much weaker than the 460M on the higher end gaming laptops. The 460M will usually give you 20-30 fps more than the 540M, so keep that in mind.dk00111

They are both incredibly ugly, am I the only one with style? :P

The N53? It looks decent in pictures, but it looks really nice in person. Haven't seen a Sager in person, but they look really bland/ugly in pictures too. :P

Yah i agree the N53 looks pretty tight and clean compared to other laptops ESPECIALLY in person... you can only assume soo much when you look at it through a screenshot
Avatar image for colejd
colejd

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#31 colejd
Member since 2007 • 506 Posts

I recently got an Asus G73SW and I love it. I have to admit, Its been a long time since I've had a PC that I used for gaming. The only thing I wish it had was a Solid state drive. But I'll get one eventually. Other than that I've got no regrets getting it.