What if Crytek made Far Cry 3?

Even being one of the few people on this board who thought Far Cry 2 was good, I realize that Crytek would've done EXPONENTIALLY better with the game. What do you think?

And how awesome would Far Cry 3 be if it was set in somewhere snowy and forested...like Canada, or Russia?

And how awesome would Far Cry 3 be if it was set in somewhere snowy and forested...like Canada, or Russia?

IMaBIOHAZARD

[QUOTE="IMaBIOHAZARD"]

And how awesome would Far Cry 3 be if it was set in somewhere snowy and forested...like Canada, or Russia?

om3ga_storm

monsters, aliens and mutants >> regular ol' humans.

monsters, aliens and mutants >> regular ol' humans.

Filthybastrd

well you can say that crysis is the real far cry 2 , cuz it was made by the same people they just changed the name and the story because the name and (thus) the story is owned by UBsoft ,, so if you wanted to see what farCry 2 would be like if it was don by Crytek then look at crysis and if you want to know what farCry 3 would be like if it was done by Crytek then look at Crysis 2 when it go up ,,,, but mind you , you should give a lot of credit to UBsoft monterial this company was able to make a very powerful engine that is very close to crytek engine in no time and at the same time they was makeing a lot of other games (assassins creed , splinter cell , prince of persia ....!?) while Crytek only focus on one engine and one game that's why IMO crysis beat farCry 2 ,,,,, if only UBsoft focused on one game at a time like farCry then they would beat any other game easily

then it might not be fail?

idk i played the first far cry and thought it was amazing ( MP and SP), but i didnt even play a couple hours into Farcry2. I thought it was stupid how they strayed away from jack carver( if thats the main guy from FC1). I think they shouldve stuck with that story cuz u ended up being sum mercenary (not really) in farcry 2. I really shouldnt've been named far cry 2 since it was completely different from the first.

[QUOTE="IMaBIOHAZARD"]

And how awesome would Far Cry 3 be if it was set in somewhere snowy and forested...like Canada, or Russia?

om3ga_storm

Eskimos, those terrrorist SOBs.

awhile back, the setting for farcry 3 was hinted to remain in africa.. dont know if that changed

awhile back, the setting for farcry 3 was hinted to remain in africa.. dont know if that changed

nightmarish1

It is plausable. Taking out one arms dealer won't solve any problems there.

no thanks after crysis, which was nothing like my favorite far cry .... ill leave it at ubisoft, at least far cry 2 felt similar.dakan45

no thanks after crysis, which was nothing like my favorite far cry .... ill leave it at ubisoft, at least far cry 2 felt similar.dakan45

How is far cry 2 similar to far Cry ?

Far Cry 2 had respawning enemies

Far Cry 2 played more like GTA

In Far Cry 2 you could repair cars

In Far Cry 2 you could buy guns

In Far Cry 2 you had friends who helped you out

Crysis was a lot closer to Far Cry.

[QUOTE="dakan45"]no thanks after crysis, which was nothing like my favorite far cry .... ill leave it at ubisoft, at least far cry 2 felt similar.PublicNuisance

How is far cry 2 similar to far Cry ?

Far Cry 2 had respawning enemies

Far Cry 2 played more like GTA

In Far Cry 2 you could repair cars

In Far Cry 2 you could buy guns

In Far Cry 2 you had friends who helped you out

Crysis was a lot closer to Far Cry.

i'd say that the only thing that was similar to farCry in farCry2 is that both games are too damn long and both have great environments , but over all Crysis more similar to farCry than farCry2split-moment

[QUOTE="split-moment"]i'd say that the only thing that was similar to farCry in farCry2 is that both games are too damn long and both have great environments , but over all Crysis more similar to farCry than farCry2johnny27

I can see being too long a problem in bad games. If the game you are playing is bad who wants it to be a 60 hour game. I would much rather it be 5 hours and I can say I beat it and move on.

[QUOTE="johnny27"][QUOTE="split-moment"]i'd say that the only thing that was similar to farCry in farCry2 is that both games are too damn long and both have great environments , but over all Crysis more similar to farCry than farCry2PublicNuisance

I can see being too long a problem in bad games. If the game you are playing is bad who wants it to be a 60 hour game. I would much rather it be 5 hours and I can say I beat it and move on.

i'd rather not be playing a bad game anyways and you don't have to complete a game if its bad just play for a few hours and decide you don't like it and stop playingl like i did with farcry 2johnny27

I know I am not forced to complete a bad game but I do like to finish what I start. I also believe that to properly bash a game I should actually play through it. What can I say, I am a little weird that way.

Then it would be just another mundane alien shooter that is overrated by the media.

I sorta prefer the African setting as not many games would go into such lengths as to coreograph africa like that.

very true but "Following the last leg of the tour promoting Stadium Arcadium, the band members have been on a break. Kiedis attributes this to the band being worn out from their years of nonstop work since Californication. Kiedis explained that he is currently preoccupied with taking care of his new son and possibly creating a short television series called "Spider and Son" which is set to be a recap of his autobiography, while Flea is experimenting with new musical ideas, Frusciante is continuing his solo career, and Chad Smith is currently working with Sammy Hagar, Joe Satriani, and Michael Anthony in the supergroup Chickenfoot. The band plans to remain on hiatus for "a minimum of one year." The band's newest recording was in 2008 with George Clinton (who also produced 1985's Freaky Styley) on his latest album "George Clinton and His Gangsters of Love". Accompanied by Kim Manning, the band recorded a new version of Shirley and Lee's classic "Let the Good Times Roll".

Three members of the band (Kiedis, Flea, and Smith) performed at the fifth annual MusiCares event honoring Kiedis on May 8, 2009. He was honored with the Stevie Ray Vaughan Award for his dedication and support of the MusiCares MAP Fund and for his commitment to helping other addicts with the addiction and recovery process. John Frusciante was unable to attend due to commitments in Europe at the time.

Drummer Chad Smith has recently stated that the band plans on gathering at the studio in the coming months to work on new material. Although Anthony Kiedis says the same, the September-October deadline may be pushed back due to guitarist John Frusciante, who has been quoted as saying he has no immediate plans to return.[citation needed] In July 2009, Frusciante denied rumours that he has left the band."

it would be awesome thats what would happen

I know I am not forced to complete a bad game but I do like to finish what I start. I also believe that to properly bash a game I should actually play through it. What can I say, I am a little weird that way

[QUOTE="PublicNuisance"]

[QUOTE="dakan45"]no thanks after crysis, which was nothing like my favorite far cry .... ill leave it at ubisoft, at least far cry 2 felt similar.johnny27

How is far cry 2 similar to far Cry ?

Far Cry 2 had respawning enemies

Far Cry 2 played more like GTA

In Far Cry 2 you could repair cars

In Far Cry 2 you could buy guns

In Far Cry 2 you had friends who helped you out

Crysis was a lot closer to Far Cry.

[QUOTE="johnny27"][QUOTE="PublicNuisance"]

How is far cry 2 similar to far Cry ?

Far Cry 2 had respawning enemies

Far Cry 2 played more like GTA

In Far Cry 2 you could repair cars

In Far Cry 2 you could buy guns

In Far Cry 2 you had friends who helped you out

Crysis was a lot closer to Far Cry.

dakan45

..... Crysis was Farcry 3 with the bells and whistles added to it.. Farcry is renowned for its open world stuff and common gun play that is it.. You guys make it sound like there was a story to be followed.. When Farcry 2 actually had little to do with the first as well.sSubZerOo

[QUOTE="dakan45"][QUOTE="johnny27"] this if you took the nano suit powers out of Crysis its very similar to farcry and if you wanted to know if crytek had made farcry 3 then just wait for crysis 2 to comeout.sSubZerOo

[QUOTE="dakan45"]no thanks after crysis, which was nothing like my favorite far cry .... ill leave it at ubisoft, at least far cry 2 felt similar.johnny27

agreed, fc2 was nothing like the original. whichever ubisoft studio made fc2 royally made a mess of it and dont deserve another chance. crytek would have done much, much better

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]..... Crysis was Farcry 3 with the bells and whistles added to it.. Farcry is renowned for its open world stuff and common gun play that is it.. You guys make it sound like there was a story to be followed.. When Farcry 2 actually had little to do with the first as well.dakan45

how about similar weapons, wide enviroments and not just paths trying to look like an island...ohh and no nanosuit, another thing is that the weapons in both far cry games are accurate unliike crysis and there is no health regenaration, sorry guys but switching nanosuit functions and weapon mods are not what far cry is.... far cry is no nanosuit, spring machete mp5 ssd no invisiblity and a damn good sniper rilfe that has a scope by the time you get it and you use it in the entire game.dakan45

Even being one of the few people on this board who thought Far Cry 2 was good, I realize that Crytek would've done EXPONENTIALLY better with the game. What do you think?

And how awesome would Far Cry 3 be if it was set in somewhere snowy and forested...like Canada, or Russia?

IMaBIOHAZARD

There are times I feel I was the only person who enjoyed Far Cry 2. Anyways, yeah Crysis - Nanosuit: Far Cry. It's really not that hard. Crysis is the evolution of the original Far Cry Concept. Far Cry 2 shared little with Far Cry. psn8214

[QUOTE="psn8214"]There are times I feel I was the only person who enjoyed Far Cry 2. Anyways, yeah Crysis - Nanosuit: Far Cry. It's really not that hard. Crysis is the evolution of the original Far Cry Concept. Far Cry 2 shared little with Far Cry. sSubZerOo

Even being one of the few people on this board who thought Far Cry 2 was good, I realize that Crytek would've done EXPONENTIALLY better with the game. What do you think?

And how awesome would Far Cry 3 be if it was set in somewhere snowy and forested...like Canada, or Russia?

IMaBIOHAZARD

It would be nice on the graphics side BUT the optimizations they make are pretty bad, I mean looking at theyr Crysis Warhead and comparing it to FarCry 2 then I would say the fps difference is HUGE.And what I mean, is that FarCry 2 is made by Ubisoft or someone else, I don't remember exactly and when I put fullest and maximum settings in FarCry 2 with 1680x1050 resolution,4x AA DirectX 10 and same in Crysis Warhead then my fps in warhead is 30-60 and in FarCry 2 it's 60-100.I don't know, maybe someone else has that thing opposite but I really don't like Crytek games like Crysis and Crysis Warhead or Crysis Wars because they really need to optimize them.

[QUOTE="IMaBIOHAZARD"]

Even being one of the few people on this board who thought Far Cry 2 was good, I realize that Crytek would've done EXPONENTIALLY better with the game. What do you think?

And how awesome would Far Cry 3 be if it was set in somewhere snowy and forested...like Canada, or Russia?

PanDa_Gaming

It would be nice on the graphics side BUT the optimizations they make are pretty bad, I mean looking at theyr Crysis Warhead and comparing it to FarCry 2 then I would say the fps difference is HUGE.And what I mean, is that FarCry 2 is made by Ubisoft or someone else, I don't remember exactly and when I put fullest and maximum settings in FarCry 2 with 1680x1050 resolution,4x AA DirectX 10 and same in Crysis Warhead then my fps in warhead is 30-60 and in FarCry 2 it's 60-100.I don't know, maybe someone else has that thing opposite but I really don't like Crytek games like Crysis and Crysis Warhead or Crysis Wars because they really need to optimize them.

[QUOTE="PanDa_Gaming"]

[QUOTE="IMaBIOHAZARD"]

Even being one of the few people on this board who thought Far Cry 2 was good, I realize that Crytek would've done EXPONENTIALLY better with the game. What do you think?

And how awesome would Far Cry 3 be if it was set in somewhere snowy and forested...like Canada, or Russia?

psn8214

It would be nice on the graphics side BUT the optimizations they make are pretty bad, I mean looking at theyr Crysis Warhead and comparing it to FarCry 2 then I would say the fps difference is HUGE.And what I mean, is that FarCry 2 is made by Ubisoft or someone else, I don't remember exactly and when I put fullest and maximum settings in FarCry 2 with 1680x1050 resolution,4x AA DirectX 10 and same in Crysis Warhead then my fps in warhead is 30-60 and in FarCry 2 it's 60-100.I don't know, maybe someone else has that thing opposite but I really don't like Crytek games like Crysis and Crysis Warhead or Crysis Wars because they really need to optimize them.

True and I don't really like Alien stuff like in Crysis.In FarCry 2 no aliens no more! Yay! :D