I was just taking a look at gamespots PC forums & i just saw topics about the "UNREAL engine 3 vs Cryengine 2" ...." what engine is better ? " ..... "what's the best in the UNREAL 3 that Crysis do not have " " how will the next VALVe engine perform " etc .etc. so by their judgment a game like TimeShift , Kane & Lynch , Blacksite & many others aren't good ...why "because they don't have graphics DUDE!!! " ..... some HL fans evan turned theyr back on the franchise because VALVE whants to end the episodic trilgy with the source engine ... will sure use a new engine in theyr new HL game .... so why is it that graphics control a gamers freedom of choise & reasson to select the game with better graphics & predicteble story & stolen gameplay in most cases, than to pich the game that is done in the most innovative way ( from gameplay to story )??? & there are some rare cases where a game has it all like Assassins Creed , HALF-LIFE(back in 1998-2004) etc. !
I dont care much about graphics as long as the story and gameplay are good, I voted for all the factors though since i couldnt just vote for good story and gameplay.
I never get a game just because Im hyped about it, usually need a demo or good reviews.
Log in to comment