What quality is 1280x1024? I know 1280x740 is 740p and 1900x1080 is 1080p but what is 1280x1024?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Umm...2640 x 1440? No idea, not sure why it'd matter, it's not one of the conventionally named "advertised" resolutions.1440p im pretty sure
KABCOOL
Well, 1280x1024 is a pretty low 4:3 resolution which is still supported by games today, though it is my belief that most gamers today standardize at least 1920x1080
Well, 1280x1024 is a pretty low 4:3 resolution which is still supported by games today, though it is my belief that most gamers today standardize at least 1920x1080
NoAssKicker47
Unfortunely i have a very small moniter and 1280x1024 is my native resolution.
[QUOTE="NoAssKicker47"]
Well, 1280x1024 is a pretty low 4:3 resolution which is still supported by games today, though it is my belief that most gamers today standardize at least 1920x1080
speedysam123
Unfortunely i have a very small moniter and 1280x1024 is my native resolution.
Yeah I feel you, I was there. Was happy about it as my 8800GT back then ran games perfectly on that, but at some point about two years ago I finally decided to go 1080p and bought a 24" Samsung display which I adore.It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.
Correction, it is 5:4. I used to have a lovely 1280x1024 monitor, it died on me.It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.
the_bi99man
if i still had my KDS rad 9 which got stolen by KDS when they went out of business and never returned it to me!!!! i would have no problem putting my samsung aside to use it 24/7 1280x1024 FTW.. but only on my RAD 9.Â
[QUOTE="Bieberfan147"]That's 1440p I have oneKABCOOLYea thats what I thought I have one as well. In order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3.
[QUOTE="KABCOOL"][QUOTE="Bieberfan147"]That's 1440p I have oneMarfooYea thats what I thought I have one as well. In order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3. Are you sure cause one of my friends who is a IT guy said that he got me a great deal on a 1440p monitor. He said they usually go for like 1000 dollars but i got it for only 600.
[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="KABCOOL"] Yea thats what I thought I have one as well.KABCOOLIn order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3. Are you sure cause one of my friends who is a IT guy said that he got me a great deal on a 1440p monitor. He said they usually go for like 1000 dollars but i got it for only 600.
Sounds about right. Yeah, 1440p is a 16:9 aspect ratio at 2560x1440. Just looked on newegg, and the cheapest 1440p monitors are in the 600-700 dollar range, and bigger, nicer, brand name ones are over $1000.
Edit: Oh wait, you were saying your res is 1280x1024? That's definitely not 1440p. Nowhere near it.
[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]Correction, it is 5:4. I used to have a lovely 1280x1024 monitor, it died on me.It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.
Inconsistancy
Ah, 5:4. Whatever. Closer to 4:3 than it is to 16:9. :P
It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.
the_bi99man
For me it does not have the sides cut off. I have a really small moniter.
[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]
It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.
speedysam123
For me it does not have the sides cut off. I have a really small moniter.
Well yeah, it's probably pretty small if it's that resolution. My roommate's is 17 inches. What i mean though, is that it's the old-school standard TV shape, rather than the modern widescreen that's become standard for HDTVs. So, the vertical pixel count is just a couple dozen pixels shy of the vertical count of 1080p, but 1080p is wider. So, for a rough guess of the relative picture quality, it'll be similar to 1080p, if the sides were cut off, so it wasn't widescreen.Â
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment