What quality is this resolution?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for speedysam123
speedysam123

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 speedysam123
Member since 2012 • 124 Posts

What quality is 1280x1024? I know 1280x740 is 740p and 1900x1080 is 1080p but what is 1280x1024?

Avatar image for KABCOOL
KABCOOL

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KABCOOL
Member since 2009 • 1147 Posts

1440p im pretty sure

Avatar image for DanielDust
DanielDust

15402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 DanielDust
Member since 2007 • 15402 Posts

1440p im pretty sure

KABCOOL
Umm...2640 x 1440? No idea, not sure why it'd matter, it's not one of the conventionally named "advertised" resolutions.
Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

What quality is 1280x1024? I know 1280x740 is 740p and 1900x1080 is 1080p but what is 1280x1024?

speedysam123

I guess it would be 1024p? not that it really matters. Things like 720p andn 1080p are usually only used for marketing or simplification

Avatar image for NoAssKicker47
NoAssKicker47

2855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#5 NoAssKicker47
Member since 2004 • 2855 Posts

Well, 1280x1024 is a pretty low 4:3 resolution which is still supported by games today, though it is my belief that most gamers today standardize at least 1920x1080

Avatar image for Bieberfan147
Bieberfan147

106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Bieberfan147
Member since 2012 • 106 Posts
That's 1440p I have one
Avatar image for speedysam123
speedysam123

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 speedysam123
Member since 2012 • 124 Posts

Well, 1280x1024 is a pretty low 4:3 resolution which is still supported by games today, though it is my belief that most gamers today standardize at least 1920x1080

NoAssKicker47

Unfortunely i have a very small moniter and 1280x1024 is my native resolution.

Avatar image for NoAssKicker47
NoAssKicker47

2855

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 28

User Lists: 0

#8 NoAssKicker47
Member since 2004 • 2855 Posts

[QUOTE="NoAssKicker47"]

Well, 1280x1024 is a pretty low 4:3 resolution which is still supported by games today, though it is my belief that most gamers today standardize at least 1920x1080

speedysam123

Unfortunely i have a very small moniter and 1280x1024 is my native resolution.

Yeah I feel you, I was there. Was happy about it as my 8800GT back then ran games perfectly on that, but at some point about two years ago I finally decided to go 1080p and bought a 24" Samsung display which I adore.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9
deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9

7779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9
Member since 2009 • 7779 Posts

A terrible one.

Avatar image for KABCOOL
KABCOOL

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 KABCOOL
Member since 2009 • 1147 Posts
That's 1440p I have oneBieberfan147
Yea thats what I thought I have one as well.
Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#11 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.

Avatar image for randmonds4
randmonds4

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 randmonds4
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
vertical because it dont fit horizontal.
Avatar image for Inconsistancy
Inconsistancy

8094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Inconsistancy
Member since 2004 • 8094 Posts

It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.

the_bi99man
Correction, it is 5:4. I used to have a lovely 1280x1024 monitor, it died on me.
Avatar image for nutcrackr
nutcrackr

13032

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 72

User Lists: 1

#14 nutcrackr
Member since 2004 • 13032 Posts
since quality is really the number of pixels 1280x1024 is 42% "better" than 720p 1080p is 58% "better" than 1280x1024 So basically between HD and Full HD.
Avatar image for _SKatEDiRt_
_SKatEDiRt_

3117

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 _SKatEDiRt_
Member since 2007 • 3117 Posts

if i still had my KDS rad 9 which got stolen by KDS when they went out of business and never returned it to me!!!! i would have no problem putting my samsung aside to use it 24/7 1280x1024 FTW.. but only on my RAD 9. 

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
[QUOTE="Bieberfan147"]That's 1440p I have oneKABCOOL
Yea thats what I thought I have one as well.

In order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3.
Avatar image for KABCOOL
KABCOOL

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 KABCOOL
Member since 2009 • 1147 Posts
[QUOTE="KABCOOL"][QUOTE="Bieberfan147"]That's 1440p I have oneMarfoo
Yea thats what I thought I have one as well.

In order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3.

Are you sure cause one of my friends who is a IT guy said that he got me a great deal on a 1440p monitor. He said they usually go for like 1000 dollars but i got it for only 600.
Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
All you have to do is multiply out the pixels and compare. :P
Avatar image for Travis_Odell
Travis_Odell

1775

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 Travis_Odell
Member since 2008 • 1775 Posts
[QUOTE="KABCOOL"][QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="KABCOOL"] Yea thats what I thought I have one as well.

In order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3.

Are you sure cause one of my friends who is a IT guy said that he got me a great deal on a 1440p monitor. He said they usually go for like 1000 dollars but i got it for only 600.

Your friend ripped you off go get your money back.
Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="KABCOOL"] Yea thats what I thought I have one as well.KABCOOL
In order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3.

Are you sure cause one of my friends who is a IT guy said that he got me a great deal on a 1440p monitor. He said they usually go for like 1000 dollars but i got it for only 600.

Sounds about right. Yeah, 1440p is a 16:9 aspect ratio at 2560x1440. Just looked on newegg, and the cheapest 1440p monitors are in the 600-700 dollar range, and bigger, nicer, brand name ones are over $1000.

Edit: Oh wait, you were saying your res is 1280x1024? That's definitely not 1440p. Nowhere near it.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#21 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.

Inconsistancy

Correction, it is 5:4. I used to have a lovely 1280x1024 monitor, it died on me.

Ah, 5:4. Whatever. Closer to 4:3 than it is to 16:9. :P

Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
[QUOTE="KABCOOL"][QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="KABCOOL"] Yea thats what I thought I have one as well.

In order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3.

Are you sure cause one of my friends who is a IT guy said that he got me a great deal on a 1440p monitor. He said they usually go for like 1000 dollars but i got it for only 600.

They can be expensive. HP and some other brands are introducing budget models and you can definitely get some sketchier Korean models off of eBay. You'd better hope your monitor is doing 2560x1440 and not 1280x1024 or you got ripped off bad.
Avatar image for speedysam123
speedysam123

124

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 speedysam123
Member since 2012 • 124 Posts

It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.

the_bi99man

For me it does not have the sides cut off. I have a really small moniter.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#24 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

[QUOTE="the_bi99man"]

It's a 4:3 aspect ratio, so it's not widescreen, like 1080p and 720p. But you can tell just from the pixel counts what kind of quality it will be comparable to. It's the same number of horizontal pixels as 720p (1280), and the vertical pixel count is just a little shy of 1080p (1024, rather than 1080). So, you could think of it as 720p, with more vertical viewing area, or as 1080p with the sides cut off. It's still a decent looking resolution, for 4:3 ratio. My roommate's got a 1280x1024 monitor currently, because he got it free and was putting the extra money toward the new system. I've played loads of high end graphics intensive games on it, and they look great. The reason I would prefer 1080p, is just because of the widescreen.

speedysam123

For me it does not have the sides cut off. I have a really small moniter.

Well yeah, it's probably pretty small if it's that resolution. My roommate's is 17 inches. What i mean though, is that it's the old-school standard TV shape, rather than the modern widescreen that's become standard for HDTVs. So, the vertical pixel count is just a couple dozen pixels shy of the vertical count of 1080p, but 1080p is wider. So, for a rough guess of the relative picture quality, it'll be similar to 1080p, if the sides were cut off, so it wasn't widescreen. 

Avatar image for KABCOOL
KABCOOL

1147

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 KABCOOL
Member since 2009 • 1147 Posts
[QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="KABCOOL"][QUOTE="Marfoo"] In order to be 1440p, you need 1440 "scanlines", or 1440 pixels of vertical resolution. At 16:9 that is 2560x1440 and at 4:3 that is 1920x1440. You do not have 1440p, you are running 1024p at 4:3.

Are you sure cause one of my friends who is a IT guy said that he got me a great deal on a 1440p monitor. He said they usually go for like 1000 dollars but i got it for only 600.

They can be expensive. HP and some other brands are introducing budget models and you can definitely get some sketchier Korean models off of eBay. You'd better hope your monitor is doing 2560x1440 and not 1280x1024 or you got ripped off bad.

Lol im just trollin. I have an Asus 1080p monitor I got for like 160$.
Avatar image for Marfoo
Marfoo

6006

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Marfoo
Member since 2004 • 6006 Posts
[QUOTE="KABCOOL"][QUOTE="Marfoo"][QUOTE="KABCOOL"] Are you sure cause one of my friends who is a IT guy said that he got me a great deal on a 1440p monitor. He said they usually go for like 1000 dollars but i got it for only 600.

They can be expensive. HP and some other brands are introducing budget models and you can definitely get some sketchier Korean models off of eBay. You'd better hope your monitor is doing 2560x1440 and not 1280x1024 or you got ripped off bad.

Lol im just trollin. I have an Asus 1080p monitor I got for like 160$.

I was gonna say, with a PC like yours there is no way you would have let something like that slide.