What's in your rig?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Rainbow_Lion
Rainbow_Lion

1771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 Rainbow_Lion
Member since 2007 • 1771 Posts

I have a single Nvidia card at the mo'

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#2 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

You should have the option of Nvidia AND ATI, thoose could be in the same PC!

(ATI as Main GPU and Nvidia as a physx card, this is a common setup.)

Avatar image for powerwolff
powerwolff

686

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 powerwolff
Member since 2004 • 686 Posts

You should have the option of Nvidia AND ATI, thoose could be in the same PC!

(ATI as Main GPU and Nvidia as a physx card, this is a common setup.)

swehunt
How recent of a card to you need in order to do this? I mean I have a 4890 at the moment, and a 7600GT in my old system...so could I stick that 7600GT in my new system as a physx card or is it too old?
Avatar image for Rainbow_Lion
Rainbow_Lion

1771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#4 Rainbow_Lion
Member since 2007 • 1771 Posts
[QUOTE="swehunt"]

You should have the option of Nvidia AND ATI, thoose could be in the same PC!

(ATI as Main GPU and Nvidia as a physx card, this is a common setup.)

That sounds sweet :) best of both worlds
Avatar image for marcthpro
marcthpro

7927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#5 marcthpro
Member since 2003 • 7927 Posts

[QUOTE="swehunt"]

You should have the option of Nvidia AND ATI, thoose could be in the same PC!

(ATI as Main GPU and Nvidia as a physx card, this is a common setup.)

powerwolff

How recent of a card to you need in order to do this? I mean I have a 4890 at the moment, and a 7600GT in my old system...so could I stick that 7600GT in my new system as a physx card or is it too old?

You can't use PhysX with ATI setup and will never be able wit offical driver you may be able with 1.80 & older & ATI CCC 9.1 in a big Word. outdated driver And any OutDated Driver you will see a dramatic FPS Lose in Recent Game played they usally focus only on title that people really care for such as GTA IV / Far cry 2 / Fallout 3/ Cryisis & Warhead / Dead space / Left 4 Dead /

So I repeat you can't use PhsyX with ATI Radeon HD 5000 : and maybe with HD4000 but only if you liked Driver 2009 First month which is Very outdated compare to today 9.9 and 9.10 coming soon then it 9.11 / 9.12 / 10.0 / 10.1 ect. it go like that every year ;)


so Sorry rainbowLion but you can't have best of both world Nvidia just refuse Categorically to allow you to use there Ageia Franchise that is there Trump card

but a bad new For Both PhsyX & Havok cause of DX11 OPEN CL & Bullet (ATI Radeon HD5000 feature) it what say Bright side of news
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/9/17/amd-supports-opencl-bullet3b-are-havok-and-physx-in-trouble.aspx
tough that not sure that PhsyX will stop and just being useless before a good 2-3 year so is Havok perhap havok will survive it old and good

Avatar image for broken_bass_bin
broken_bass_bin

7515

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#6 broken_bass_bin
Member since 2009 • 7515 Posts

I have a single GeForce 9800GTX+.

[QUOTE="swehunt"]

You should have the option of Nvidia AND ATI, thoose could be in the same PC!

(ATI as Main GPU and Nvidia as a physx card, this is a common setup.)

powerwolff

How recent of a card to you need in order to do this? I mean I have a 4890 at the moment, and a 7600GT in my old system...so could I stick that 7600GT in my new system as a physx card or is it too old?

It's too old, PhysX is only supported on Nvidia GeForce 8 series and above.

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#7 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

[QUOTE="powerwolff"][QUOTE="swehunt"]

You should have the option of Nvidia AND ATI, thoose could be in the same PC!

(ATI as Main GPU and Nvidia as a physx card, this is a common setup.)

marcthpro

How recent of a card to you need in order to do this? I mean I have a 4890 at the moment, and a 7600GT in my old system...so could I stick that 7600GT in my new system as a physx card or is it too old?

You can't use PhysX with ATI setup and will never be able wit offical driver you may be able with 1.80 & older & ATI CCC 9.1 in a big Word. outdated driver And any OutDated Driver you will see a dramatic FPS Lose in Recent Game played they usally focus only on title that people really care for such as GTA IV / Far cry 2 / Fallout 3/ Cryisis & Warhead / Dead space / Left 4 Dead /

So I repeat you can't use PhsyX with ATI Radeon HD 5000 : and maybe with HD4000 but only if you liked Driver 2009 First month which is Very outdated compare to today 9.9 and 9.10 coming soon then it 9.11 / 9.12 / 10.0 / 10.1 ect. it go like that every year ;)


so Sorry rainbowLion but you can't have best of both world Nvidia just refuse Categorically to allow you to use there Ageia Franchise that is there Trump card

but a bad new For Both PhsyX & Havok cause of DX11 OPEN CL & Bullet (ATI Radeon HD5000 feature) it what say Bright side of news
http://www.brightsideofnews.com/news/2009/9/17/amd-supports-opencl-bullet3b-are-havok-and-physx-in-trouble.aspx< /a>
tough that not sure that PhsyX will stop and just being useless before a good 2-3 year so is Havok perhap havok will survive it old and good

Hi marcthpro, well you can still use any ATI card as main gfx card, the diffrence from this month is that the latest Nvidia driver have made impossible for an phsx card working together with anything else than a Nvidia card, this is a foul and nasty tactic from Nvidia, ATI has nothing to do with that. Older than the latest nvidiadriver does still work! But as we all know physx are just a few (handfull) game titles who support, and the driver diffrence with physx hasnt changed that much, even old phsx driver will work, that being sad you can still use an ATI as main and Nvidia as Physx, You are correct on the 7600 card, yes that wont work since it dont support it! (cards from the G80 and later are supported such as 8xxx/96xx/98xx and so on..) If im correct the ageia physx card are a gf8600 sligthly modifyed. (not to sure about this tho, new games migth want a better card anyway.)

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#8 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

8800GT

Avatar image for marcthpro
marcthpro

7927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#9 marcthpro
Member since 2003 • 7927 Posts

well from forum and people who tested they where unable to run ATI CCC + Nvidia Phsy X with any other Driver then 9.1 which did include Ageia Phsy X Driver : after that it was said to being made impossible because of Legal Issue they removed it and that since without run ATI CCC 9.1 you can't use it

perhap on window 7 you can but i haven't heard of it of anyone who did run a Version higher then ATI CCC 9.1 With HD4000 with PhsyX such as in the game game Batman AA : if one as benchmark / picture of them running PhsyX inside newest PhsyX game with ATI CCC 9.9 & Nvidia Lastest Driver id be impress ;)

Cause as of now it running outdated Driver to run it and it not good for game fps : i even remember a Discussion about it with LordEc911 and mike4realz
But he said (185 or below) or else it don't work tough i wonder what veriosn of ATI CCC he use it haven't gone further the discussion

and well as it going the Driver are just getting more oudated like if you compare ATI CCC 8.12 to 9.9 For Fallout 3 & Cryisis Warhead there a huge increase in fps for over 20 game as well

Avatar image for Buttons1990
Buttons1990

3167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 Buttons1990
Member since 2009 • 3167 Posts

Single GTX260 Core 216 at the moment... Will upgrade to a GT300 series when they are released though...

Avatar image for swehunt
swehunt

3637

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#11 swehunt
Member since 2008 • 3637 Posts

well from forum and people who tested they where unable to run ATI CCC + Nvidia Phsy X with any other Driver then 9.1 which did include Ageia Phsy X Driver : after that it was said to being made impossible because of Legal Issue they removed it and that since without run ATI CCC 9.1 you can't use it

perhap on window 7 you can but i haven't heard of it of anyone who did run a Version higher then ATI CCC 9.1 With HD4000 with PhsyX such as in the game game Batman AA : if one as benchmark / picture of them running PhsyX inside newest PhsyX game with ATI CCC 9.9 & Nvidia Lastest Driver id be impress ;)

Cause as of now it running outdated Driver to run it and it not good for game fps : i even remember a Discussion about it with LordEc911 and mike4realz
But he said (185 or below) or else it don't work tough i wonder what veriosn of ATI CCC he use it haven't gone further the discussion

and well as it going the Driver are just getting more oudated like if you compare ATI CCC 8.12 to 9.9 For Fallout 3 & Cryisis Warhead there a huge increase in fps for over 20 game as well

marcthpro

Here you go:Here you can read on exactly what i mentioned:D

Avatar image for KBFTodd
KBFTodd

342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 KBFTodd
Member since 2006 • 342 Posts

9600 GT OC'd

Avatar image for flyingsnail
flyingsnail

793

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 flyingsnail
Member since 2009 • 793 Posts
3850 for now, probably upgrade around Christmas time.
Avatar image for C2C_Moltar
C2C_Moltar

156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#14 C2C_Moltar
Member since 2008 • 156 Posts

Running 2 9800 GX2's in Quad SLI. Waiting for nVidia to release their new gt300 line before I make a decision on weather to upgrade to ATI or stay with nVidia.

Avatar image for Slig0
Slig0

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 Slig0
Member since 2009 • 2072 Posts

My lovely 4890. I recommend it to everyone, it is really good for placing under doors of shacks to keep them still... JK :D Good card.

Avatar image for Rickylee
Rickylee

1342

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Rickylee
Member since 2002 • 1342 Posts

At this time the Nvidia is 21 to 9 over ATI. I'm very surprised. I would have thought that with what I read on these forums ATI would have out stripped Nvidia by alot. Maybe it still will but I'm non the less surprised.

MSi N275 GTX.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#17 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

5870 force-fed by a 3.8ghz E8400. Muahahahahaha

Avatar image for Slig0
Slig0

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 Slig0
Member since 2009 • 2072 Posts

5870 force-fed by a 3.8ghz E8400. Muahahahahaha

hartsickdiscipl


Wait till I get GT300 based card force fed by a 3.744GHz (3.8 coming soon!) Phenom II!

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#19 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

5870 force-fed by a 3.8ghz E8400. Muahahahahaha

Slig0


Wait till I get GT300 based card force fed by a 3.744GHz (3.8 coming soon!) Phenom II!

I guess I'll be waiting for awhile ;)

Avatar image for Slig0
Slig0

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#20 Slig0
Member since 2009 • 2072 Posts

[QUOTE="Slig0"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

5870 force-fed by a 3.8ghz E8400. Muahahahahaha

hartsickdiscipl


Wait till I get GT300 based card force fed by a 3.744GHz (3.8 coming soon!) Phenom II!

I guess I'll be waiting for awhile ;)

Well I'm rebooting now to get 3.8 by just increasing CPU/NB frequency by a little bit so you'll wait a few minutes for that ;). For GT300 though, it's up to nvidia.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#21 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="Slig0"]
Wait till I get GT300 based card force fed by a 3.744GHz (3.8 coming soon!) Phenom II!

Slig0

I guess I'll be waiting for awhile ;)

Well I'm rebooting now to get 3.8 by just increasing CPU/NB frequency by a little bit so you'll wait a few minutes for that ;). For GT300 though, it's up to nvidia.

It's up to Nvidia now.. Im sure that's a comfort to us all :roll:

Avatar image for NamelessPlayer
NamelessPlayer

7729

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 NamelessPlayer
Member since 2004 • 7729 Posts
Depends. My sigged flagship desktop? NVIDIA now (8800 GT), and likely NVIDIA for my next upgrade since their drivers tend to suck less for modern cards. (Also, CUDA and PhysX. What happened to nView, though? Handy for multiple display management.) My TC1100? NVIDIA GeForce 4 Go 420. Weak sauce, but I'll take it over an Intel GMA950 any day. My older desktops? ATI AIW Radeon 8500 128 MB and Radeon 9600 XT 128 MB, with a Radeon 9800 Pro 128 MB I'm going to pick up tomorrow as well. (Let's face it, ATI was simply better then-the GeForce FX cards just sucked when it came to SM 2.0. No vendor-specific APIs then, either, unless you mean the little-used TRUFORM, and that was ATI-only!) Basically, it all boils down to what generation of games I'm going to be playing on a certain setup (some are really finicky Win9x titles that really broke with DX10-capable cards at the driver level, but work fine with the same driver revisions on older hardware), then which cards offer the best features and performance for those titles.
Avatar image for HaLoMaStErJT
HaLoMaStErJT

1380

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 HaLoMaStErJT
Member since 2008 • 1380 Posts

a single 9800gtx+

Avatar image for GTR12
GTR12

13490

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 GTR12
Member since 2006 • 13490 Posts

Well mine says "Intel Inside" is that what you were talking about?

Nah sorry TC, I just had to say that, I couldn't help myself, :p

Avatar image for DieselCat18
DieselCat18

3008

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 DieselCat18
Member since 2002 • 3008 Posts

HIS 4890 @ 925/1050MHz

*+

Avatar image for angel_14
angel_14

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 angel_14
Member since 2005 • 217 Posts
A 4850 that is perfect for 1280x720.
Avatar image for -GeordiLaForge-
-GeordiLaForge-

7167

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 -GeordiLaForge-
Member since 2006 • 7167 Posts
SLI eVGA 512MB 8800GTS's (G92) @ 788/1970/2158
Avatar image for Too_tight_shoes
Too_tight_shoes

2486

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Too_tight_shoes
Member since 2009 • 2486 Posts
AMD/ATI setup got a stock XFX 4890 along with a 790X motherboard and a Phenom X2 550 unlocked to 4 cores and overclocked to 3.6ghz. When/If the HD 5890 comes out it will be my next GPU depending on the price and performance from a 5870.
Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts
nvidia 880gt at the moment. rig in sig has been sold
Avatar image for crazymonkey092
crazymonkey092

974

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#32 crazymonkey092
Member since 2005 • 974 Posts
Both, my desktop has a 4850, while my gaming lappy has a 8800m gts.
Avatar image for Snorbly
Snorbly

29

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 Snorbly
Member since 2009 • 29 Posts

ASUS ATI 4770

Avatar image for Duckman5
Duckman5

18934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 Duckman5
Member since 2006 • 18934 Posts
I have a 9600GT at the moment.
Avatar image for OKickenwingO
OKickenwingO

63

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 OKickenwingO
Member since 2006 • 63 Posts

Sparkle GTX 275

Avatar image for Staryoshi87
Staryoshi87

12760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#36 Staryoshi87
Member since 2003 • 12760 Posts

GTX 285 SLI. Rediculous performance at a reasonable price.

9800GTE (No 6-pin PCIE) in my mini-ITX build

4500MHD in my notebook.

Avatar image for KHAndAnime
KHAndAnime

17565

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#37 KHAndAnime
Member since 2009 • 17565 Posts
I have two rigs, one with NVIDIA, and the other with ATI. The computer I do the most gaming on has a 9800GTX, while my secondary computer has an HD4850.
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#38 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

GTX 285 SLI. Rediculous performance at a reasonable price.

Staryoshi87
ummm, i think "reasonable" differs from person to person, especially when your refering to having 2x GTX285's!
Avatar image for Slig0
Slig0

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#39 Slig0
Member since 2009 • 2072 Posts

[QUOTE="Staryoshi87"]

GTX 285 SLI. Rediculous performance at a reasonable price.

Daytona_178

ummm, i think "reasonable" differs from person to person, especially when your refering to having 2x GTX285's!

Nah everyone is Bill Gates in his opinion.

Avatar image for Staryoshi87
Staryoshi87

12760

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#40 Staryoshi87
Member since 2003 • 12760 Posts

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"][QUOTE="Staryoshi87"]

GTX 285 SLI. Rediculous performance at a reasonable price.

Slig0

ummm, i think "reasonable" differs from person to person, especially when your refering to having 2x GTX285's!

Nah everyone is Bill Gates in his opinion.

Reasonable meaning I work for a living and can afford to invest a few hundred dollars in an activity that's important to me.

I forgot that this board is primarily populated by young pups who have not begun their soul-crushing adventure into the working world yet.

Avatar image for Slig0
Slig0

2072

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#41 Slig0
Member since 2009 • 2072 Posts

[QUOTE="Slig0"]

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"] ummm, i think "reasonable" differs from person to person, especially when your refering to having 2x GTX285's!Staryoshi87

Nah everyone is Bill Gates in his opinion.

Reasonable meaning I work for a living and can afford to invest a few hundred dollars in an activity that's important to me.

I forgot that this board is primarily populated by young pups who have not begun their soul-crushing adventure into the working world yet.

Nice day for trolling, isn't it? Now if you don't have anything to contribute to the topic save for insulting the posters please don't post.

Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts

[QUOTE="Slig0"]

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"] ummm, i think "reasonable" differs from person to person, especially when your refering to having 2x GTX285's!Staryoshi87

Nah everyone is Bill Gates in his opinion.

Reasonable meaning I work for a living and can afford to invest a few hundred dollars in an activity that's important to me.

I forgot that this board is primarily populated by young pups who have not begun their soul-crushing adventure into the working world yet.

easy man easy :P 285 SLI whichever way you look at it is a lot of money investing a few hundred in a pc out of all things is not the most intelligent thing to do
Avatar image for polarwrath11
polarwrath11

1676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 polarwrath11
Member since 2006 • 1676 Posts
4850. Not insanely powerful. But first PC build so its all good.
Avatar image for RobboElRobbo
RobboElRobbo

13668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#44 RobboElRobbo
Member since 2009 • 13668 Posts

ATI cause I'm cheap.

Avatar image for SinfulPotato
SinfulPotato

1381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 SinfulPotato
Member since 2005 • 1381 Posts
ATI + Nvidia is still possible there are now hacked nvidia drivers out that give nvidia the middle finger on the new PhysX changes. A lot of people are using ATI + Geforce 8000/9000.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#46 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="Slig0"]

[QUOTE="Daytona_178"] ummm, i think "reasonable" differs from person to person, especially when your refering to having 2x GTX285's!Staryoshi87

Nah everyone is Bill Gates in his opinion.

Reasonable meaning I work for a living and can afford to invest a few hundred dollars in an activity that's important to me.

I forgot that this board is primarily populated by young pups who have not begun their soul-crushing adventure into the working world yet.

I've been on the "soul-crushing adventure" for some time now, and I still think that a system with an i7 and 2 GTX285's is a little more than "reasonable" to most working adults. My own GPU isn't what I'd call "reasonable," and it costs considerably less than 2 285's. Most people who make an average income, and want to spend on some other nice things other than their computers will agree with me, I have no doubt.

Avatar image for NSR34GTR
NSR34GTR

13179

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 NSR34GTR
Member since 2007 • 13179 Posts

[QUOTE="Staryoshi87"]

[QUOTE="Slig0"]

Nah everyone is Bill Gates in his opinion.

hartsickdiscipl

Reasonable meaning I work for a living and can afford to invest a few hundred dollars in an activity that's important to me.

I forgot that this board is primarily populated by young pups who have not begun their soul-crushing adventure into the working world yet.

I've been on the "soul-crushing adventure" for some time now, and I still think that a system with an i7 and 2 GTX285's is a little more than "reasonable" to most working adults. My own GPU isn't what I'd call "reasonable," and it costs considerably less than 2 285's. Most people who make an average income, and want to spend on some other nice things other than their computers will agree with me, I have no doubt.

yep true this. well said mate
Avatar image for mike4realz
mike4realz

2577

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 mike4realz
Member since 2003 • 2577 Posts
u should put ATI + Nvidia cuz some people are runnin those kind of setup like me