[QUOTE="Nuke2690"]I would recommend at least a 512mb video card. Games nowadays, and moreso in the near future, will have more detailed textures and will require more memory even at low resolutions.
Kiwi_1
BAD SUGGESTION WITHOUT SUPPORT!
For ATI, look at the 3850 or 3870. A 3850 can be found for around $150 now and they perform well. I have a 3850 and I can run Crysis on all high at 1280x1024 and it's nice and smooth. On the nVidia side, the 9600GT is a great card and goes for about $170-180. One of the best band for the buck performers is the 8800GT 512mb. Can be found for around $200 now.
Nuke2690
There are tens of thousands of SCAM video cards in the marketplace with unusable VRAM attached to slow cards than are limited to only 256 MBs' worth in games, or even less, to 128 MBs for the shoddy junk like the 8400 GS, with its miniscule 64 Bit memory system. Any time you make the claim that 512 MBs is a good thing, you have no choice but to SUPPORT that claim by naming the "High Quality Level" as the only price point at which that much is ever going to be used ("800 Level" and upward, not merely "600 / 650" or lesser VGA cards).
I'm not even sure what you're arguing here. Do I have to "support" that 512mb is only worthwhile on "high quality level" cards that have a 256bit memory interface or higher, when that's exactly what you're saying?
That's the very reason that I specifically listed the midrange cards worth looking at, going on the assumption that the OP doesn't want to spend a whole lot of money of course.
Log in to comment