Which is the better Monitor?

I need a new monitor for my pc, since i have a cheap stock one thats not even widescreen and has a max res of 1280 x 1020. I don't care if these 2 monitors are bad choices, these are still better than my current one and I already have a HD TV for my room, this monitor is just for my pc and new ATI 4850 card i got for christmas so i can use it's full potential. These are the 2 monitors im looking at. One has a better contrast ratio, and the other has a better response time. Thanks!

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824236051

http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16824009157

From AnandTechs: http://www.anandtech.com/guides/showdoc.aspx?i=3480

There are plenty of options under $200 these days, but we tend to have a philosophy of "go big or go home" when it comes to LCDs. Do you really want to get a slightly better quality 19" LCD when $20 more will get you a 22" LCD? We certainly don't, and thus our recommendation ends up going to one of the many 22" LCDs currently priced under $200. Acer is more of a value brand in the LCD market, but that doesn't mean the LCDs aren't good. In fact, other than flimsy base stands we've never had a complaint with any of the Acer LCDs we've used. Specifications are pretty much meaningless at this price point -- all of the 22" LCDs that cost under $200 will be very similar, i.e. TN panel, 1680x1050, 5ms response times, HDMI and/or DVI -- so it really comes down to price and availability. Acer is a global company so their products are available around the world, and their prices are also very good. The Acer X223Wbd won't be the best LCD around, but for only $170 it's hard to complain. It is missing HDMI support, however, so if that's important we would recommend the ASUS VH226H, which also happens to bump up the resolution to 1920x1080 and only costs $40 more.