Who is getting Red Alert 3?

Me. I don't particularly like EA's approach to the copy protection issue, but that won't stop me from enjoying what looks to be a great extension to the franchise. The cartoon-esquegraphics, humor and fast paced action is what actually draws me to RA3. Obviously it's all about having a blast.

i'll definitely get it. from what i know, RA3 would be the most daring, imaginative and technologically impressive title to the decade old franchise. i'm not saying it can't fail -- obviously everything can -- but it's looking fantastic so far. gosh, i haven't been this excited about a RTS for years. :D

Me.

Simply because it actually looks like an RTS where they put the singleplayer in the forefront. And, of course, the FMVs.

I am tired of these RTSs that follow in Starcrafts "might-as-well-be-multiplayer-only" footprint, i.e. Supreme Commander. They might as well call th ese types "Battlefield: RTS" since their singleplayer games are so moot.

If any genre deserves an epic story and singleplayer experience, its the RTS genre...you get to command armies battling out in war across vast landscapes. MP is fine and all, but the "epic" feeling goes away when you reach a stalemate with some 13 year old for two hours.

and becoz multiplayer has gone through substantial beta-testing, i think we can count on that portion being well-executed. so on paper, RA3 has the potential to do very well both online and off. :)

Hey, I was just wondering who is going to get the game? I might...SimplyFatal

I plan on buying it in December whe I can fit it into my budget.

Me will get it. A good addition to my collection.

I might get it. I loved the original RA, this one looks kinda funky, especially graphics, but it might be fun for a while.Creative

I loved the first Red Alert hehe, def will try this new one out sometime.

preordered, I'm craving for co-op

C&C Red Alert 3, Left 4 Dead, Diablo 3

oh, yeah, keep em coming

Me.

Simply because it actually looks like an RTS where they put the singleplayer in the forefront. And, of course, the FMVs.

I am tired of these RTSs that follow in Starcrafts "might-as-well-be-multiplayer-only" footprint, i.e. Supreme Commander. They might as well call th ese types "Battlefield: RTS" since their singleplayer games are so moot.

If any genre deserves an epic story and singleplayer experience, its the RTS genre...you get to command armies battling out in war across vast landscapes. MP is fine and all, but the "epic" feeling goes away when you reach a stalemate with some 13 year old for two hours.

mrbojangles25

Excuse me, Stacraft's campaign is considered superior to those you find in the average C&C game. :|

Besides, next year we're seeing three RTSs with campaign designs more ambitious than RA3's linear, old-school type......

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

Me.

Simply because it actually looks like an RTS where they put the singleplayer in the forefront. And, of course, the FMVs.

I am tired of these RTSs that follow in Starcrafts "might-as-well-be-multiplayer-only" footprint, i.e. Supreme Commander. They might as well call th ese types "Battlefield: RTS" since their singleplayer games are so moot.

If any genre deserves an epic story and singleplayer experience, its the RTS genre...you get to command armies battling out in war across vast landscapes. MP is fine and all, but the "epic" feeling goes away when you reach a stalemate with some 13 year old for two hours.

aliblabla2007

Excuse me, Stacraft's campaign is considered superior to those you find in the average C&C game. :|

Besides, next year we're seeing three RTSs with campaign designs more ambitious than RA3's linear, old-school type......

even though you may have numbers on your side to support your claim... thats social authentication, (and most people do confuse that for truth)

i liked starcraft.. but i consider C&C to be far superior in most aspects.... but this is all opinionated.

[QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

Me.

Simply because it actually looks like an RTS where they put the singleplayer in the forefront. And, of course, the FMVs.

I am tired of these RTSs that follow in Starcrafts "might-as-well-be-multiplayer-only" footprint, i.e. Supreme Commander. They might as well call th ese types "Battlefield: RTS" since their singleplayer games are so moot.

If any genre deserves an epic story and singleplayer experience, its the RTS genre...you get to command armies battling out in war across vast landscapes. MP is fine and all, but the "epic" feeling goes away when you reach a stalemate with some 13 year old for two hours.

Lach0121

Excuse me, Stacraft's campaign is considered superior to those you find in the average C&C game. :|

Besides, next year we're seeing three RTSs with campaign designs more ambitious than RA3's linear, old-school type......

even though you may have numbers on your side to support your claim... thats social authentication, (and most people do confuse that for truth)

i liked starcraft.. but i consider C&C to be far superior in most aspects.... but this is all opinionated.

I agree C&C > starcraft. Starcraft is good and all but I think what makes me not like it to its full potential is its way overhyped on how "great" it is. I'll get Sc2 but i'm not going at it with extreme excitment I don't care when it comes out i'll just go because I know it'll be competetive and should be pretty fun.

I'm getting RA3 can'tw ait for it tbh :D.

[QUOTE="Lach0121"][QUOTE="aliblabla2007"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

Me.

Simply because it actually looks like an RTS where they put the singleplayer in the forefront. And, of course, the FMVs.

I am tired of these RTSs that follow in Starcrafts "might-as-well-be-multiplayer-only" footprint, i.e. Supreme Commander. They might as well call th ese types "Battlefield: RTS" since their singleplayer games are so moot.

If any genre deserves an epic story and singleplayer experience, its the RTS genre...you get to command armies battling out in war across vast landscapes. MP is fine and all, but the "epic" feeling goes away when you reach a stalemate with some 13 year old for two hours.

blade55555

Excuse me, Stacraft's campaign is considered superior to those you find in the average C&C game. :|

Besides, next year we're seeing three RTSs with campaign designs more ambitious than RA3's linear, old-school type......

even though you may have numbers on your side to support your claim... thats social authentication, (and most people do confuse that for truth)

i liked starcraft.. but i consider C&C to be far superior in most aspects.... but this is all opinionated.

I agree C&C > starcraft. Starcraft is good and all but I think what makes me not like it to its full potential is its way overhyped on how "great" it is. I'll get Sc2 but i'm not going at it with extreme excitment I don't care when it comes out i'll just go because I know it'll be competetive and should be pretty fun.

I'm getting RA3 can'tw ait for it tbh :D.

No matter how you look at it , I'm guessing quite a few whos will be getting Red Alert 3.

On a more serious note, this game was nearly pre-order worthy, but alas the DRM will most likely relegate it to a used game purchase for me. Regardless of that, I'm still looking forward to it!

No matter how you look at it , I'm guessing quite a few whos will be getting Red Alert 3.

Nitrous2O

I was most likely going to pass on this game before, but after seeing that pic.... :shock: wowza! Advertising at its best! ;)

[QUOTE="Nitrous2O"]

No matter how you look at it , I'm guessing quite a few whos will be getting Red Alert 3.

Forerunner-117

I was most likely going to pass on this game before, but after seeing that pic.... :shock: wowza! Advertising at its best! ;)

i just watched the 3 videos for it, the empire, Allies, Soviets... and im even more excited, 28th ok thats like 3-4 days from now, given the time.

ive been playing c&c since 1995, i think it was 95, anyway, and its been one of my favorite gaming franchises.

No matter how you look at it, I'm guessing quite a few whos will be getting Red Alert 3.

On a more serious note, this game was nearly pre-order worthy, but alas the DRM will most likely relegate it to a used game purchase for me. Regardless of that, I'm still looking forward to it!

Nitrous2O

now that's what i call a compelling advertisement. :D

[QUOTE="Forerunner-117"][QUOTE="Nitrous2O"]

No matter how you look at it , I'm guessing quite a few whos will be getting Red Alert 3.

Lach0121

I was most likely going to pass on this game before, but after seeing that pic.... :shock: wowza! Advertising at its best! ;)

Hehe. I think I've been suckered in and going for the preorder offer on this one after all :P

Oh man, I have to wait six days until it comes out here in Finland... What do I do on that overlong spare time...??

[QUOTE="Lach0121"][QUOTE="Forerunner-117"][QUOTE="Nitrous2O"]

No matter how you look at it , I'm guessing quite a few whos will be getting Red Alert 3.

Nitrous2O

I was most likely going to pass on this game before, but after seeing that pic.... :shock: wowza! Advertising at its best! ;)

Hehe. I think I've been suckered in and going for the preorder offer on this one after all :P

:lol: i had it pre orderd a month ago

Well the girlfriend just dumped me, so I'll def be getting it =P

Hopefully, they will make the SP a little bit stronger than Generals and Tiberium Wars

Well the girlfriend just dumped me, so I'll def be getting it =P

Hopefully, they will make the SP a little bit stronger than Generals and Tiberium Wars

Amigro

I am getting it regardless of the DRM. No sense avoiding something I really digg just because of the copy-protection... if it is too annoying, there is always a fix...wigginender

I agree if I want it DRM will not stop me even if thats the goal :P

Me...but not until Dec.

If hadn't bought Farcry 2, I would have gotten it this month ( the 28th that is ) But no I had to fall for the hype that was FC2.

Man...!!! Farcry 2 is just boring....! I'd rather be unleashing mutated russian bears then driving back and forth, killing the same dudes every five minutes....ad naueseum.

I wish I had gotten RA3 instead of FC2 thats for sure...!!

So it's Dec for me now...of course I'll have FO3 to keep me company.

everyone thinks that RE 3 is bad or not great he is not Hardcore PC gamer the game deserve 10/10 and ther si air water and ground units there is no water units in other RTS games so if anyone thinks the game is not great Give me reasonsDark_prince123

:lol:

1. Your opinion is not fact.
2. Red Alert 2? Total War series? Age of Empires series? Clueless, it seems like you haven't played many RTSs at all, including the previous C&C games. "Hardcore PC Gamer" my ass.

everyone thinks that RE 3 is bad or not great he is not Hardcore PC gamer the game deserve 10/10 and ther si air water and ground units there is no water units in other RTS games so if anyone thinks the game is not great Give me reasonsDark_prince123

Age of empires 3 water is often a deciding factor for a game. The person who wins on a water map is normally the person controlling water unless they suck. So your wrong there son.

but RA3 will be good that is true :)

That is the best part of the C&C RA series! Being memorized by Natasha Henstridge's clevage was half the fun in Command & Conquer 3: Kane's Wrath. ;)

I doubt it, I'm skeptical of games that use females in short skirts and tight boob-filled tops for advertising purposes.claytoma

so if anyone thinks the game is not great Give me reasons

Here's a reason. The game is not out yet. You don't know if a game is any good until you play it.