http://kotaku.com/5895898/childs-play-doesnt-appreciate-being-used-to-retake-mass-effect
I am sure that people might have already read this article, it is a few days old, but for those who haven't take a look.
This charity that Retake Mass Effect latched itself onto has had to deal with people who thought they were sponsors but most significantlypeople asking for refunds because they thought that their money would buy them an ending.
So much for the people who said 'Oh but its helping sick kids'
Self-entitlement reigns again here. How bad does it look for this charity, who never asked for this, to have to give donations back?
This whole thing is sickening. This is BEFORE the cupcakes.
biggest_loser
I disagree with you when it comes to ME3 and the whole ending mess. While I think there's far too much entitlement and poor behavior among gamers nowadays, I actually think that the ME3 situation has (for the most part) been different.
While I'm 100% sure that there's been plenty of 'fans' that's been behaving poorly, the organized initiatives have (in my opinion) been completely different. I think it's completely fair for consumers to ask a company for something. Whether it's requesting improvements in services, asking for different products, reduced prices or a different ending to a computer game, I believe consumers should be able to request these things. I also believe that it's up to the company to decide how to address those requests.
The reason why I think this situation has been handled uncommonly well by a lot of the fans is because it haven't been primarily hostile or negative. I think the charity collection was a perfect example. Instead of simply making angry posts, they made a charity drive. Lately, instead of raging at BioWare, they've sent BioWare a bunch of cupcakes. Regarding the Kotaku article, if you read the statements made by the actual charity they didn't have a problem with the 'Retake Mass Effect fans starting the collection when it started, they even made public statements explaining that donations was given directly to the charity and that donations was not 'held hostage'. They didn't mind keeping the collection running for a week or two, knowing what the situation was. After a couple of weeks they simply decided that going forward they'd change the rules to make sure that there was no confusion. As for people asking for money back, they are obviously fools who didn't bother spending 2 minutes looking at where they were sending their money or reading the very clear instructions that went with the whole thing. However at the end of the day, it's the first time I've seen video games actually raise thousands of dollars for a good cause as a way to raise an issue.
So basically, I don't think there's anything wrong in asking, as long as it's done in a polite and mature fashion. And I think the ME3 fans have (for the most part) done that, unlike the type of behavior you'd often see from gamers when they decide to lash out.
Personally I'm not sure what I think BW should do. I thought the ending was a mess and not up to BioWares standards (not even the Dragon Age 2 standard). On one hand I can understand the concern about asking authors to change their work to fit what fans want, on the other hand, games have a long history of changing games to fit demands and fix bad game play mechanics.
Log in to comment