Windows Xp from Vista

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for AzA17
AzA17

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 AzA17
Member since 2006 • 286 Posts

Hi, I bought a new laptop from Dell today, one problem though, it came with Windows Vista, I want Windows Xp.

How do I uninstall windows so I can put Xp onto it?

Thanks

Avatar image for 353535355353535
353535355353535

4424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 353535355353535
Member since 2005 • 4424 Posts

go find a copy of windows xp and put it in the CD drive.

I dont know much about laptops, but im pretty sure that you can set the boot device priority to the CD drive.

do that, and put the windows xp disk in the drive

Avatar image for theragu40
theragu40

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#3 theragu40
Member since 2005 • 3332 Posts
Yup, he's right. You don't "uninstall" windows, you just install over it.
Avatar image for pbkick1
pbkick1

909

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 pbkick1
Member since 2003 • 909 Posts
Another option is to keep Vista.  I installed it the day it came out and I love it. 
Avatar image for Kujectez
Kujectez

501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Kujectez
Member since 2004 • 501 Posts
windows can moan about installing over newer versions of windows
Avatar image for theragu40
theragu40

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#6 theragu40
Member since 2005 • 3332 Posts
windows can moan about installing over newer versions of windows
Kujectez
Have you tried it? If you let the computer boot to the installation disk, then you can just format the disk. Then there's no 'newer version' to worry about.
Avatar image for bwatsonz
bwatsonz

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 bwatsonz
Member since 2006 • 395 Posts

You don't actually install "over" Vista. That would be a horrible thing to do and most likely would not work.

You blow away the partiton that Vista is installed on, reformat, and then install on the new blank partition. You don't install "over" anything.

Avatar image for theragu40
theragu40

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 theragu40
Member since 2005 • 3332 Posts
[QUOTE="bwatsonz"]You don't actually install "over" Vista. That would be a horrible thing to do and most likely would not work. You blow away the parttion that Vista is installed on, reformat, and then install on the new blank partition. You don't install "over" anything.

Be serious...that's semantics. It's essentially the same thing. When you reformat, you don't think it's actually erasing, do you? It just marks all the sectors as writable, and then the new OS is installed "over", if you will, the old one.
Avatar image for bwatsonz
bwatsonz

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 bwatsonz
Member since 2006 • 395 Posts
[QUOTE="theragu40"][QUOTE="bwatsonz"]You don't actually install "over" Vista. That would be a horrible thing to do and most likely would not work. You blow away the parttion that Vista is installed on, reformat, and then install on the new blank partition. You don't install "over" anything.

Be serious...that's semantics. It's essentially the same thing. When you reformat, you don't think it's actually erasing, do you? It just marks all the sectors as writable, and then the new OS is installed "over", if you will, the old one.

It's not semantics when you literally can install on the same partiiton as your currently installed Windows partition without having to format first. I've seen people do it, and it's not pretty. I would agree that I would be simply nitpicking at your wording if it were not possible to do as I suggest, but it is possible unfortunately. So I wanted to make it clear to the OP since he clearly hasn't done this before.
Avatar image for theragu40
theragu40

3332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#10 theragu40
Member since 2005 • 3332 Posts
I still think it's nitpicking, but I see your point. Probably best to be as specific as possible.
Avatar image for AzA17
AzA17

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 AzA17
Member since 2006 • 286 Posts
So is there anything "wrong" about what I'm going to do? And is this going to cause problems with the laptop?
Avatar image for Shadow_Chicken
Shadow_Chicken

142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 Shadow_Chicken
Member since 2006 • 142 Posts
Theres absolutely no reason your laptop should have any problems. Just pop in the XP disc, boot from it, format your HDD and install XP. Should work like a charm :D
Avatar image for re-raid
re-raid

1712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 re-raid
Member since 2005 • 1712 Posts
I want to upgrade to vista and my dvd should be here on monday. Listed on microsofts site are 2 upgrade options "in-place" and "clean installation" upgrades. I would like to know if what they mean by clean instilation is that I need a copy of vista (not an upgrade copy) because I just upgraded some software and ran vista upgrade advisor and now only 1 program "needs" to be uninstalled and about 6 "might have minimal" compatability issues so it seems I can do an in-place upgrade. from what I hear, a clean install upgrade is the best way to go... I dont actually understand what happens in an "in-place" upgrade but it sounds like in a clean instilation upgrade, you take all ur files and stuff off ur machine and then vista overwrites xp. Can someone clarify this for me please?
Avatar image for re-raid
re-raid

1712

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 re-raid
Member since 2005 • 1712 Posts
bump
Avatar image for bwatsonz
bwatsonz

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 bwatsonz
Member since 2006 • 395 Posts
A clean install is always the way to go. When you do an upgrade, you leave alot of remenants of Windows XP laying around your file system that can cause issues.
Avatar image for TheLiberal
TheLiberal

294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 TheLiberal
Member since 2007 • 294 Posts
So is there anything "wrong" about what I'm going to do? And is this going to cause problems with the laptop?AzA17


Make sure dell has drivers for XP for your machine.
Avatar image for andrewkozis
andrewkozis

3336

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 37

User Lists: 0

#17 andrewkozis
Member since 2005 • 3336 Posts
what? why would you do that, i would love to get my hands on Vista!
Avatar image for keymaster7
keymaster7

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#18 keymaster7
Member since 2006 • 435 Posts
what? why would you do that, i would love to get my hands on Vista! andrewkozis


i agree...why would u do that?...vista is very good...you'll get vista in the future anyway might as well get it now...
Avatar image for Cyborg-21
Cyborg-21

2700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 Cyborg-21
Member since 2007 • 2700 Posts
[QUOTE="AzA17"]So is there anything "wrong" about what I'm going to do? And is this going to cause problems with the laptop?TheLiberal


Make sure dell has drivers for XP for your machine.

They should have. Just go to dell.com and enter your service tag, and all the drivers will show.
Avatar image for TheLiberal
TheLiberal

294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 TheLiberal
Member since 2007 • 294 Posts
[QUOTE="andrewkozis"]what? why would you do that, i would love to get my hands on Vista! keymaster7


i agree...why would u do that?...vista is very good...you'll get vista in the future anyway might as well get it now...



Here's why: having vista now is tantamount to paying to be a beta tester.  Also, there are many compatibility issues with the 64 bit version, which is really the only one worth getting, since there's really no benefit to the 32 bit.  The only thing you get now is a "pretty" interface.  Might as well wait until they get at least a few of the security flaws fixed, too.
Avatar image for keymaster7
keymaster7

435

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#21 keymaster7
Member since 2006 • 435 Posts
oooo...ok i see...but vista will get better...
Avatar image for AzA17
AzA17

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 AzA17
Member since 2006 • 286 Posts

I don't like it to be honest, I've had Windows 95/98/ME/XP. This Vista just seems different and takes a lot of getting used to, I want to stay in my home territory of things I know about.

Plus, I've heard the framerate on Vista is more than a half slower than on XP meaning gaming isn't going to be as good.

Avatar image for shooly_76
shooly_76

81

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 shooly_76
Member since 2006 • 81 Posts
I am not a PC gamer (yet), so this might seem like a total noob ?>> but, do PC games that came out before vista even run on vista? 
Avatar image for AzA17
AzA17

286

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 AzA17
Member since 2006 • 286 Posts
I'm not a huge gamer so this is a slight guess. I think Vista changes the format of something so that the games do play, it's just that they're slower on it than they would be on XP.
Avatar image for shooly_76
shooly_76

81

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 shooly_76
Member since 2006 • 81 Posts
thanks- that blows if they dont run as good as on XP.
Avatar image for Gimli64
Gimli64

865

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#26 Gimli64
Member since 2002 • 865 Posts
[QUOTE="keymaster7"][QUOTE="andrewkozis"]what? why would you do that, i would love to get my hands on Vista! TheLiberal


i agree...why would u do that?...vista is very good...you'll get vista in the future anyway might as well get it now...



Here's why: having vista now is tantamount to paying to be a beta tester. Also, there are many compatibility issues with the 64 bit version, which is really the only one worth getting, since there's really no benefit to the 32 bit. The only thing you get now is a "pretty" interface. Might as well wait until they get at least a few of the security flaws fixed, too.

There will be no benefit for the 64 bit version for a couple of years, for there are a lot of companies not writing 64 bit code for their software (Adobe Suite CS3 comes to mind...32 bit). Heck there are a lot of game developers not taking advantage of the today's graphic cards, so why should Vista 64 bit version be any different?
Avatar image for TemplaerDude
TemplaerDude

15254

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#27 TemplaerDude
Member since 2003 • 15254 Posts
Games do NOT run slower on Vista because of Vista, they run slower because of driver issues. Vista Drivers are still mostly beta and being worked on. Gaming performance WILL improve.
Avatar image for shooly_76
shooly_76

81

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 shooly_76
Member since 2006 • 81 Posts
when will it improve?

I was thinking about getting a gaming laptop from ibuypower that can have vista pre-installed. should I get vista, or opt for the XP media center OS?
Avatar image for TheLiberal
TheLiberal

294

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 TheLiberal
Member since 2007 • 294 Posts
[QUOTE="TheLiberal"]
Here's why: having vista now is tantamount to paying to be a beta tester. Also, there are many compatibility issues with the 64 bit version, which is really the only one worth getting, since there's really no benefit to the 32 bit. The only thing you get now is a "pretty" interface. Might as well wait until they get at least a few of the security flaws fixed, too.
Gimli64
There will be no benefit for the 64 bit version for a couple of years, for there are a lot of companies not writing 64 bit code for their software (Adobe Suite CS3 comes to mind...32 bit). Heck there are a lot of game developers not taking advantage of the today's graphic cards, so why should Vista 64 bit version be any different?



Yeah, the 64bit version doesn't have much benefit now, but why buy the 32 bit version now, just to buy the 64bit later on when you decide to upgrade to >3 GB?
I say don't buy either right now and stick with XP until Vista's SP1 comes out.
As for "developers not taking advantage" of graphics cards, they are.  Start playing a recently released game with the image quality settings turned up.  If you have a temperature monitoring program, you'll notice that your graphics core temp will go up.  That's because the game is "taking advantage" of it.