Wireless routers vs gaming routers

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for OSJ-1987
OSJ-1987

205

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 OSJ-1987
Member since 2008 • 205 Posts

I just moved into a new apartment and will be getting my internet connection hooked up on Tuesday (leeching off someone else's right now) and I was just wondering if there would be any benefit of spending an extra $50+ on a gaming router versus just having a normal wireless router. I do a lot of online gaming on my PS3 so that would come into play as well. What are the main differences between the two and is spending the extra money worth it?

Avatar image for bunny569
bunny569

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 bunny569
Member since 2007 • 1181 Posts

I just moved into a new apartment and will be getting my internet connection hooked up on Tuesday (leeching off someone else's right now) and I was just wondering if there would be any benefit of spending an extra $50+ on a gaming router versus just having a normal wireless router. I do a lot of online gaming on my PS3 so that would come into play as well. What are the main differences between the two and is spending the extra money worth it?

OSJ-1987
Faster router, more features, can have more computers/consoles ect. in the network without slowing down ( dont cofuse this with bandwidth) also improved range/performance
Avatar image for HotRevolver
HotRevolver

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 HotRevolver
Member since 2009 • 532 Posts

Not worth the price. A generic router from Linksys (either G or N) will do gaming perfectly.

Avatar image for bunny569
bunny569

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 bunny569
Member since 2007 • 1181 Posts

Not worth the price. A generic router from Linksys (either G or N) will do gaming perfectly.

HotRevolver
Not always, that will be determined on how the network is set up to be and bandwidth.
Avatar image for bunny569
bunny569

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 bunny569
Member since 2007 • 1181 Posts

If you have DSL then obviously going from a genric to a Gaming Router wouldnt do anything.

However for me having FIOS (Fiber Optics) 25Mbps Download and 15Mbps Upload. I disabled routing on the router provided and got myself a Linksys WRT310N, and a Linksys Gigabit Switch in every room in the house. My connection was much more responsive after, i spent about $75 for each switch (total being4 switches) Plus $125 for the router. I would say for me it was worth it. Web pages loaded as soon as i clicked them. My wireless range increased to 250FT (custom firmware for further signal enhancements) Also on wireless notebooks, web pages loaded as if i was on a wired connection. Also high signal strength everywhere in my house.

However, As far as gaming goes, there is no real world performance increase. You wouldnt be able to tell if your gaming is smoother. Unless you have many computers and consoles being used simultaniously all the time which is in my case i would upgrade to a gaming router, unless you want it for the extra range. Other than that a generic would be ok, it is up to you. Also again this does not mean that it will give you more bandwidth either. If you download a lot of torrents for example and every computer in the house has trouble loading web pages, then it will continue to do so,

Avatar image for HotRevolver
HotRevolver

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 HotRevolver
Member since 2009 • 532 Posts

I could get 2.5 MB/s on my generic WRT54G, maxed out my connection. A WRT54G could handle FiOS. There's no need to have higher bandwidth routers unless you're doing a lot of file transfers over a wired network.

Avatar image for bunny569
bunny569

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 bunny569
Member since 2007 • 1181 Posts

I could get 2.5 MB/s on my generic WRT54G, maxed out my connection. A WRT54G could handle FiOS. There's no need to have higher bandwidth routers unless you're doing a lot of file transfers over a wired network.

HotRevolver

I do. and I am also upgrading to the 50Mbps Download / 20Mbps Upload

I also had a WRT54GS before the WRT310N

Avatar image for millerlight89
millerlight89

18658

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#8 millerlight89
Member since 2007 • 18658 Posts

Not worth the price. A generic router from Linksys (either G or N) will do gaming perfectly.

HotRevolver

This is the real truth. Anyone that thinks otherwise is blind.

Avatar image for HotRevolver
HotRevolver

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 HotRevolver
Member since 2009 • 532 Posts

[QUOTE="HotRevolver"]

I could get 2.5 MB/s on my generic WRT54G, maxed out my connection. A WRT54G could handle FiOS. There's no need to have higher bandwidth routers unless you're doing a lot of file transfers over a wired network.

bunny569

I do. and I am also upgrading to the 50Mbps Download / 20Mbps Upload

I also had a WRT54GS before the WRT310N

Well for you, it is beneficial to have a high performance router. Especially since its 50 Mbps download (which to me, is overkill, but it's your money).

But for gaming? A gerneic router for around $50 will handle it perfectly. Games do not use much bandwidth at all, mostly under 1 Mbps.

Avatar image for bunny569
bunny569

1181

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 bunny569
Member since 2007 • 1181 Posts
[QUOTE="HotRevolver"]

[QUOTE="bunny569"]

[QUOTE="HotRevolver"]

I could get 2.5 MB/s on my generic WRT54G, maxed out my connection. A WRT54G could handle FiOS. There's no need to have higher bandwidth routers unless you're doing a lot of file transfers over a wired network.

I do. and I am also upgrading to the 50Mbps Download / 20Mbps Upload

I also had a WRT54GS before the WRT310N

Well for you, it is beneficial to have a high performance router. Especially since its 50 Mbps download (which to me, is overkill, but it's your money).

But for gaming? A gerneic router for around $50 will handle it perfectly. Games do not use much bandwidth at all, mostly under 1 Mbps.

i never said it would perform better having a better router. when it comes to gaming.
Avatar image for wurd
wurd

634

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#11 wurd
Member since 2003 • 634 Posts
the fact that it's classed as a 'gaming' router means nothing. At the end of the day you get what you pay for and a $50+ router is obviously going to be better but if you're that concerned then go wired... cheaper, more reliable and more secure. You can get a 25m cable for nothing these days.
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Not worth the price. A generic router will do gaming perfectly.HotRevolver
This
Avatar image for YoungSinatra25
YoungSinatra25

4314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13 YoungSinatra25
Member since 2009 • 4314 Posts

[QUOTE="HotRevolver"]

I could get 2.5 MB/s on my generic WRT54G, maxed out my connection. A WRT54G could handle FiOS. There's no need to have higher bandwidth routers unless you're doing a lot of file transfers over a wired network.

bunny569

I do. and I am also upgrading to the 50Mbps Download / 20Mbps Upload

I also had a WRT54GS before the WRT310N

Where do you live? Fiber optics for home use? 50Mbps speeds where your located? These things dont exist in my area. Regular cables and 22Mbps max. With 50Mbps DL/ 20Mbps UL I'd be a hosting/gaming god.
Avatar image for marcthpro
marcthpro

7927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#14 marcthpro
Member since 2003 • 7927 Posts

also keep in mind Mbps are mega-bites Mb&MB are different so it not the same thing per second and not MegaBytes : so 25Mb/s is about 2.5MB/S Brute Strength for daily download even tough i have 10Mb/s i hardly reach anything higher then 700KB/s to 1,100KB/S so it 1MB & 100KB on both steam download / gamespot / ign / rapid-share and other thing

But i tested few thing such as my Ps3 Via the DIR-655 which only support G for my Ps3 Not The N feature did give about on there connection test merely a 3.0mb/s while if i plugged my Ethernet Cable (It a 50 Ft long) it reached 9.80Mb/s (typically what i get from my 10Mb/s Internet speed)

if you get a router you would likely want a Gigabyte & put Ethernet when gaming : while on portable/Laptop you feel more comfortable to not have the very best MS response : I do a Speedtest With my Dad Laptop it seem to give sometime a -5-20 in response time to the Server test but the very same speed 9.8mb/s and 850KB/s upload of 900KB/s and we are about at 30 feet of the router in so and it was receiving 99-100%

I wish our internet in Canada was better for money for what we pay we should receive 25Mb/s or even 50Mb/s but will take probably 5 year before we taste it for that money value :P

Avatar image for marcthpro
marcthpro

7927

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#16 marcthpro
Member since 2003 • 7927 Posts

nice a little faster then tough :)

Avatar image for MrHun73r
MrHun73r

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 MrHun73r
Member since 2010 • 56 Posts

A Switch is the best route for gaming, plus there is alot of interference in apartments...., if you live in an apartment by a router or switch and just hardwire everything, more secure faster less ping etc, i only game with Hardwired now and i have a ridiculousy fast internet connection and a good router and wireless card and i noticed a huge difference switching from wireless to wired, although wireless is cool if you use it for streaming etc :) save yourself the money use a generic router and ethernet that mofo up

Avatar image for simplyderp
simplyderp

266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 simplyderp
Member since 2009 • 266 Posts

Wireless is just bad for gaming. It's unstable, causes higher ping, and will be affected by interference in crowded areas such as your apartment. A gaming router is like a discrete NIC gaming card. It doesn't do **** but you pay $50 more for it anyway. If you want a real gaming router, buy a WRT54GL and put Tomato or dd-wrt (I prefer Tomato, especially for a linux-compatible router) on it. That way, you can set up QoS exactly how you want it and have features that beat almost all consumer routerrs, such as bandwidth monitoring.

Avatar image for ermPSPgamer
ermPSPgamer

382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 ermPSPgamer
Member since 2009 • 382 Posts
it's funny how my Netgear 54 G works completely fine with my PS3, Wii, PSP, PC and my next door neighbours laptop,
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#20 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
Routers so do matter for everything. People here are blinds. Setting up QOS for your sexy gameservers makes a good dif, same for playing games. Of course all consumer routers suck, no vlan, no ssh, maybe vpn, no good QOS, no snort, no good cpus... Yeah.... http://pfsense.com/
Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#21 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

Routers so do matter for everything. People here are blinds. Setting up QOS for your sexy gameservers makes a good dif, same for playing games. Of course all consumer routers suck, no vlan, no ssh, maybe vpn, no good QOS, no snort, no good cpus... Yeah.... http://pfsense.com/JigglyWiggly_
K, so how bout it?? Any suggestions of a specific type ? ?

Avatar image for Hekynn
Hekynn

2164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Hekynn
Member since 2003 • 2164 Posts
Wireless G is not a good speed for gaming I tried it on an old g wireless access point I had before and my ping was terrible in EQ2. But ever since we switched to the D-Link Dir 655 Extreme WIreless N router connection has been AWSOME! Even my uncle bought the same router we got and he got 2mbps downloading from Steam on his laptop when he was at our house.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#23 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts
You build a pfsense router, it's just a computer. You typically just put it inbetween your modem and then to a switch. Though you don't have to if you are confident at networking subnetting and that fun stuff. As in you could theoritically do an awesome vlan setup. Modem to layer 2 managed switch then goes to pfsense. Then connect additional layer 2 switches to the managed layer 2 switch and let pfsense control them via a vlan.
Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#24 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

You build a pfsense router, it's just a computer. You typically just put it inbetween your modem and then to a switch. Though you don't have to if you are confident at networking subnetting and that fun stuff. As in you could theoritically do an awesome vlan setup. Modem to layer 2 managed switch then goes to pfsense. Then connect additional layer 2 switches to the managed layer 2 switch and let pfsense control them via a vlan.JigglyWiggly_
Ah-it's that simple, kewl haha. thx I'll look in to it...really I will - :)

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]You build a pfsense router, it's just a computer. You typically just put it inbetween your modem and then to a switch. Though you don't have to if you are confident at networking subnetting and that fun stuff. As in you could theoritically do an awesome vlan setup. Modem to layer 2 managed switch then goes to pfsense. Then connect additional layer 2 switches to the managed layer 2 switch and let pfsense control them via a vlan.Xsan3

Ah-it's that simple, kewl haha. thx I'll look in to it...really I will - :)

Do it :P It's the bestest. It is based on FreeBSD, so then you can be cool like me and buy one of these: http://www.cafepress.com/FreeBSD_Users.317118537
Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#26 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="Xsan3"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]You build a pfsense router, it's just a computer. You typically just put it inbetween your modem and then to a switch. Though you don't have to if you are confident at networking subnetting and that fun stuff. As in you could theoritically do an awesome vlan setup. Modem to layer 2 managed switch then goes to pfsense. Then connect additional layer 2 switches to the managed layer 2 switch and let pfsense control them via a vlan.JigglyWiggly_

Ah-it's that simple, kewl haha. thx I'll look in to it...really I will - :)

Do it :P It's the bestest. It is based on FreeBSD, so then you can be cool like me and buy one of these: http://www.cafepress.com/FreeBSD_Users.317118537

Can't I just buy the mug and pretend I know what BSD really is ? ? And I'll wear a shirt tht says "I Pwn Noobs" - I'd be kewl then right ?? lol :P

Avatar image for KLONE360
KLONE360

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 KLONE360
Member since 2007 • 1119 Posts

Wireless is just bad for gaming. It's unstable, causes higher ping, and will be affected by interference in crowded areas such as your apartment. A gaming router is like a discrete NIC gaming card. It doesn't do **** but you pay $50 more for it anyway. If you want a real gaming router, buy a WRT54GL and put Tomato or dd-wrt (I prefer Tomato, especially for a linux-compatible router) on it. That way, you can set up QoS exactly how you want it and have features that beat almost all consumer routerrs, such as bandwidth monitoring.

simplyderp

Stop throwing out BS. I used wired for ever with my ps3 then switched to wireless recently and noticed NO diffrence still good pings and everything. And thats with a cheap router and the PS3 wireless NIC which uses the b or g standard cant remember which i use though.

Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#28 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

U Pwn Klone ! Thats why u didn't see a difference ! ! 8)

Avatar image for KLONE360
KLONE360

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 KLONE360
Member since 2007 • 1119 Posts

There really isnt a reason to buy gaming routers unless you host big lan tournaments a crap router will work as good as an expensive one if you just want to play games the only reason there is expensive ones is becuase some poor sap will pay for them thinking that it will speed up their ISPs speed which it CANT. PS The reason I didnt see a difference is because all my pings are all very good and probably cant get better. S

Avatar image for MrHun73r
MrHun73r

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 MrHun73r
Member since 2010 • 56 Posts

Would you like a sticker :) for all of those that have luck with wireless gratz. i live next to an exchange have an awesome wireless setup and i still get rubbish ping etc, do you even know the difference between N and G etc..... they all have there disadvantages... obviously depending on where you are compared to the router depends on which frequency to use.... N is actually poorer at further ranges, where as others perform well at lower speeds for longer distances (dont know the specifics gave up wireless a long time ago... WIRED FTW ! Once you have had a gigabit switch you never go back : ) oh yea.... PS3 Probably does not support gigabit :( Awesome NIC there xD

Avatar image for KLONE360
KLONE360

1119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 KLONE360
Member since 2007 • 1119 Posts

Would you like a sticker :) for all of those that have luck with wireless gratz. i live next to an exchange have an awesome wireless setup and i still get rubbish ping etc, do you even know the difference between N and G etc..... they all have there disadvantages... obviously depending on where you are compared to the router depends on which frequency to use.... N is actually poorer at further ranges, where as others perform well at lower speeds for longer distances (dont know the specifics gave up wireless a long time ago... WIRED FTW ! Once you have had a gigabit switch you never go back : ) oh yea.... PS3 Probably does not support gigabit :( Awesome NIC there xD

MrHun73r
Why would ps3 need gigabit? Well i live in the boonies and get no interference so i understand in heavily populated areas wireless is useless. It actually depends on alot of things wireless does and its up to the person setting it up to troubleshoot everything.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#32 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="Xsan3"]Ah-it's that simple, kewl haha. thx I'll look in to it...really I will - :)

Can't I just buy the mug and pretend I know what BSD really is ? ? And I'll wear a shirt tht says "I Pwn Noobs" - I'd be kewl then right ?? lol :P

Xsan3

I eat posers :P But in seriousness pfsense isn't really hard to use, though it is certainly much more intiutive than a normal router. FreeBSD however, well since it's an operating system with no gui, I guess it's hard. I mean I like operating systems like FreeBSD but they can become a pain to live with them, eg on a laptop. Ubuntu does most of everything for you, except it's linux and for noobs. Too bad I use it on my laptops lol.

Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#33 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="Xsan3"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="Xsan3"]Ah-it's that simple, kewl haha. thx I'll look in to it...really I will - :)

Can't I just buy the mug and pretend I know what BSD really is ? ? And I'll wear a shirt tht says "I Pwn Noobs" - I'd be kewl then right ?? lol :P

JigglyWiggly_

I eat posers :P But in seriousness pfsense isn't really hard to use, though it is certainly much more intiutive than a normal router. FreeBSD however, well since it's an operating system with no gui, I guess it's hard. I mean I like operating systems like FreeBSD but they can become a pain to live with them, eg on a laptop. Ubuntu does most of everything for you, except it's linux and for noobs. Too bad I use it on my laptops lol.

Okay - Noob input for ya Jiggly...My Mobo has 4 different (onboard) NIC's. 2 Wired and 2 wireless. Is there some way of utilizing this as a server, input the Internet and having some sort of Buffer-like properties and then resending data to increase my Latency?

See, before the New year, I switched to *Cough-"Clearwire"**Cough,Cough**.To save a little bit of money, and didn't even stop to think about Latency in gaming .If ur not familiar with that internet company, its basically a wireless company for net. It's killing my Ping--between 73 and 88ms. Eesh. I'd like to somehow try and improve that?

Avatar image for HotRevolver
HotRevolver

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 HotRevolver
Member since 2009 • 532 Posts

So much work for such a small outcome - I would just buy a WRT54G and have been good. It's up to you, really. If you really think you need all the bullcrap stated earlier + gigabit speeds, then more power to you.

Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#35 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"]

[QUOTE="Xsan3"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"][QUOTE="Xsan3"]Ah-it's that simple, kewl haha. thx I'll look in to it...really I will - :)

Can't I just buy the mug and pretend I know what BSD really is ? ? And I'll wear a shirt tht says "I Pwn Noobs" - I'd be kewl then right ?? lol :P

Xsan3

I eat posers :P But in seriousness pfsense isn't really hard to use, though it is certainly much more intiutive than a normal router. FreeBSD however, well since it's an operating system with no gui, I guess it's hard. I mean I like operating systems like FreeBSD but they can become a pain to live with them, eg on a laptop. Ubuntu does most of everything for you, except it's linux and for noobs. Too bad I use it on my laptops lol.

Okay - Noob input for ya Jiggly...My Mobo has 4 different (onboard) NIC's. 2 Wired and 2 wireless. Is there some way of utilizing this as a server, input the Internet and having some sort of Buffer-like properties and then resending data to increase my Latency?

See, before the New year, I switched to *Cough-"Clearwire"**Cough,Cough**.To save a little bit of money, and didn't even stop to think about Latency in gaming .If ur not familiar with that internet company, its basically a wireless company for net. It's killing my Ping--between 73 and 88ms. Eesh. I'd like to somehow try and improve that?

Uh, I am confused, you won't be using more than 2 nics lol. Also, you can't get less ping if your internet itself is wireless, I mean it might help a bit, but not a lot if your actual connection to your isp is shat.
Avatar image for Xsan3
Xsan3

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#36 Xsan3
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="Xsan3"]

[QUOTE="JigglyWiggly_"] I eat posers :P But in seriousness pfsense isn't really hard to use, though it is certainly much more intiutive than a normal router. FreeBSD however, well since it's an operating system with no gui, I guess it's hard. I mean I like operating systems like FreeBSD but they can become a pain to live with them, eg on a laptop. Ubuntu does most of everything for you, except it's linux and for noobs. Too bad I use it on my laptops lol.

JigglyWiggly_

Okay - Noob input for ya Jiggly...My Mobo has 4 different (onboard) NIC's. 2 Wired and 2 wireless. Is there some way of utilizing this as a server, input the Internet and having some sort of Buffer-like properties and then resending data to increase my Latency?

See, before the New year, I switched to *Cough-"Clearwire"**Cough,Cough**.To save a little bit of money, and didn't even stop to think about Latency in gaming .If ur not familiar with that internet company, its basically a wireless company for net. It's killing my Ping--between 73 and 88ms. Eesh. I'd like to somehow try and improve that?

Uh, I am confused, you won't be using more than 2 nics lol. Also, you can't get less ping if your internet itself is wireless, I mean it might help a bit, but not a lot if your actual connection to your isp is shat.

Umm--NM is probably my best retort :D

Avatar image for MrHun73r
MrHun73r

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 MrHun73r
Member since 2010 • 56 Posts
[QUOTE="MrHun73r"]

Would you like a sticker :) for all of those that have luck with wireless gratz. i live next to an exchange have an awesome wireless setup and i still get rubbish ping etc, do you even know the difference between N and G etc..... they all have there disadvantages... obviously depending on where you are compared to the router depends on which frequency to use.... N is actually poorer at further ranges, where as others perform well at lower speeds for longer distances (dont know the specifics gave up wireless a long time ago... WIRED FTW ! Once you have had a gigabit switch you never go back : ) oh yea.... PS3 Probably does not support gigabit :( Awesome NIC there xD

KLONE360
Why would ps3 need gigabit? Well i live in the boonies and get no interference so i understand in heavily populated areas wireless is useless. It actually depends on alot of things wireless does and its up to the person setting it up to troubleshoot everything.

Because when you buy something you want to know your getting the best XD AND Tbh i dunno really, i use mine just for ease, perfectly streaming (although you can do from a 10/100) having LANS etc, Gigabit is just a way to make me happy
Avatar image for bigfootstew
bigfootstew

382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 bigfootstew
Member since 2010 • 382 Posts
The notion of "Gaming" routers is just a marketing gimmick. You also probably don't want an N router at this point, because the standard was just finalized a few months ago, and most of the "N" routers on the market now are really draft N, and quite junky in my experience. The truth is that all consumer level routers are pretty terrible. But you help yourself out a lot if you buy one that can be flashed with a custom firmware like DD-WRT or Tomato, like the Linksys WRT54GL or a Buffalo router. You'll end up with a much less flaky router with better features. Also D-Link and Netgear are absolutely horrid, and many/most of their routers don't use broadcom chipsets that can be flashed.
Avatar image for MrHun73r
MrHun73r

56

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 MrHun73r
Member since 2010 • 56 Posts

Yea, flashing routers is awesome, i think my router cost me around £130 and its awesome, so many features (because i wanted good features for bandwith limiting etc without using a linux computer to run server software)

Avatar image for simplyderp
simplyderp

266

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 simplyderp
Member since 2009 • 266 Posts

[QUOTE="simplyderp"]

Wireless is just bad for gaming. It's unstable, causes higher ping, and will be affected by interference in crowded areas such as your apartment. A gaming router is like a discrete NIC gaming card. It doesn't do **** but you pay $50 more for it anyway. If you want a real gaming router, buy a WRT54GL and put Tomato or dd-wrt (I prefer Tomato, especially for a linux-compatible router) on it. That way, you can set up QoS exactly how you want it and have features that beat almost all consumer routerrs, such as bandwidth monitoring.

KLONE360

Stop throwing out BS. I used wired for ever with my ps3 then switched to wireless recently and noticed NO diffrence still good pings and everything. And thats with a cheap router and the PS3 wireless NIC which uses the b or g standard cant remember which i use though.

My bad for taking it out of context. Wireless ping is not bad. I get sub-20 ping with wired on one game server, but above 30 with wireless. That in itself is not bad at all, but the instability gives me headaches. When I use wireless for gaming, I get random lag spikes, lost packets, and sometimes disconnects. Then again, I live in an apartment. It is probably better in less crowded areas. Using WRT54GL with Tomato.

Avatar image for HotRevolver
HotRevolver

532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 HotRevolver
Member since 2009 • 532 Posts

^Yes, wireless is affected by where you live. Luckily I live in a house, my ping times on wireless are only 1-2 ms slower than they are on wired.