World in Conflict Beta.

Who here plays the World in Conflict beta? I do, it is absoultly amazing. I believe it is the best stratgy game made this year. Wasdie

not best - don't forget C&C 3, but yeah it's great RTS with great graphics - and multiplayer requires team work

Its a truly good game, though it still needs a bit of work. For one thing, the specialties need balancing, and the performance needs to be optimized a bit. But thats why its still in beta : /

Plus I'm a Supreme Commander man myself, and the super small unit focus is a bit out of my style.

I played in the closed beta and I'm currently in the open beta. I like the game, I think it is enjoyable and fast paced and the multiplayer is quite fun, especially if one is lucky enough to join a team that works together well. Engine needs optimizations but it is still a beta version of the game. The explosion effects are fabulous.

Being a veteran of Ground Control and Ground Control II, I was excited when World in Conflict was announced.

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Who here plays the World in Conflict beta? I do, it is absoultly amazing. I believe it is the best stratgy game made this year. PredatorRules

not best - don't forget C&C 3, but yeah it's great RTS with great graphics - and multiplayer requires team work

Maybe great graphics, but I'm not a fan of instant-spawning-units.

It definetly an amazing looking game, thats for sure.

Iam also enjoying the multiplayer beta, alot of fun, but i have to say it plays quite differently to many other RTS games, iam really considering buying it, but iam not sure just yet.

It was something different and rather entertaining, but something wasn't quite right. Not sure I would buy it without trying a demo of the final release.

[QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Who here plays the World in Conflict beta? I do, it is absoultly amazing. I believe it is the best stratgy game made this year. Skullheart

not best - don't forget C&C 3, but yeah it's great RTS with great graphics - and multiplayer requires team work

Maybe great graphics, but I'm not a fan of instant-spawning-units.

it's not instant - you need to wait about 15 sec - and perhaps it's just in the mp - sp can be different

LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. gogators4life

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. PredatorRules

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

[QUOTE="Skullheart"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Who here plays the World in Conflict beta? I do, it is absoultly amazing. I believe it is the best stratgy game made this year. PredatorRules

not best - don't forget C&C 3, but yeah it's great RTS with great graphics - and multiplayer requires team work

Maybe great graphics, but I'm not a fan of instant-spawning-units.

it's not instant - you need to wait about 15 sec - and perhaps it's just in the mp - sp can be different

Best argument ever. "YOU DON'T GET YOUR ARMY INSTANTLY! IT TAKES 15 SECONDS, MAJOR DIFFERENCE"

[QUOTE="PredatorRules"][QUOTE="Skullheart"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]Who here plays the World in Conflict beta? I do, it is absoultly amazing. I believe it is the best stratgy game made this year. TongHua

not best - don't forget C&C 3, but yeah it's great RTS with great graphics - and multiplayer requires team work

Maybe great graphics, but I'm not a fan of instant-spawning-units.

it's not instant - you need to wait about 15 sec - and perhaps it's just in the mp - sp can be different

Best argument ever. "YOU DON'T GET YOUR ARMY INSTANTLY! IT TAKES 15 SECONDS, MAJOR DIFFERENCE"

DUDE - you get army at the same time that enemy get - what's your problem? it's mostly team tactical RTS

[QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. gogators4life

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

[QUOTE="gogators4life"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. PredatorRules

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

I didn't say Supcom has the best strategy, it's has some strategy. In C&C 3, you spam pitbulls and rush them. Nothing can stop that. The game right now is very imbalanced, 3+ it still has bugs and glitches. I guarntte you, by end of the year, C&C 3 will be forgotten, because it's expansion pack will be here in december.

Generals release date- Feb 10, 2003
Zero Hour announced- July 3rd
Zero Hour release date- Sep 22, 2003

BFME II release date- Mar 2, 2006
ROTWK announced- July 29th
ROTWK release date- Nov 28, 2006

C&C 3 Tiberium Wars- Mar 26, 2007
C&C 3 expansion announced- August ##, 2007?
C&C 3 expansion pack- Dec ##, 2007

[QUOTE="gogators4life"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. PredatorRules

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

What's the strategy in spamming pitbulls with the mortar upgrade? Those currently are UNSTOPPABLE. They are very cheap, fast, takes 8secs to build one. Even if you SOMEHOW manage to kill a wave of them, expect another wavge very soon. And even if you did kill one wave, they'll have dmged your economy, base and army severly since they do alot of damage.

cnc3 was good at launch...not anymore......its all bugged and crappy now and its a total waste of time to update the game now cause the patches are broken like the game.

supcom was over hyped and is worth just as much as a 20 year old game like.....mmmmmm.uhhhhh....o ya....TOTAL ANNHILIATION. an old man made supcom and old men cant change. (like the game)

WORLD IN CONFLICT FTW!!!!!

=P

[QUOTE="PredatorRules"][QUOTE="gogators4life"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. DarkRecruit

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

What's the strategy in spamming pitbulls with the mortar upgrade? Those currently are UNSTOPPABLE. They are very cheap, fast, takes 8secs to build one. Even if you SOMEHOW manage to kill a wave of them, expect another wavge very soon. And even if you did kill one wave, they'll have dmged your economy, base and army severly since they do alot of damage.

pitbulls are unstoppable? WOW you must suck at C&C 3

[QUOTE="DarkRecruit"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"][QUOTE="gogators4life"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. PredatorRules

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

What's the strategy in spamming pitbulls with the mortar upgrade? Those currently are UNSTOPPABLE. They are very cheap, fast, takes 8secs to build one. Even if you SOMEHOW manage to kill a wave of them, expect another wavge very soon. And even if you did kill one wave, they'll have dmged your economy, base and army severly since they do alot of damage.

pitbulls are unstoppable? WOW you must suck at C&C 3

Are you joking? omg wow....are you getting payed by EA? or you must be the biggest fan boy ever

saying C&C 3 is buggy and crappy all because you can't play good doesn't mean a thing - stop be angry because you can't play it well PredatorRules

LOL, just to be clear, we are talking online here. C&C 3 IS buggy and crappy online. I don't know who you played but the Pitbull spam and rush fest is ruining the game.

saying C&C 3 is buggy and crappy all because you can't play good doesn't mean a thing - stop be angry because you can't play it well PredatorRules

o i didnt noe the 3 factions were all balanced and units don't get stuck on the sides of maps and fences.

cnc3 is very buggy....the singleplayer is quite good but multiplayer in this gameis HELL

well sorry all - i thought you mean the singleplayerPredatorRules

Singleplayer is great, even skirmish matches with the AI are fun, since the AI doesn't pitbull spam.

You guys should see this,

http://www.gamespyarcade.com/software/imglib/portraits/user/101/187/13/01001.jpg

[QUOTE="gogators4life"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. PredatorRules

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

Have you ever played supcom? If you think you simply spam units toward an enemy base, you have clearly never played the game.

I have to admit, it has its problems. But really that is why it is in open beta, to fix those balance and gameplay issues. I think it is just so unique. The scale is much smaller than most RTSs but for some reason it works better than most them.

I have yet to play SupCom, but I think this is better than C&C 3.

way too many RTS' for the PC maybe in my opinon. When do we finally see a new genre for gaming btw? The Wii is all the NES controllers that that they couldnt market to begin with. The PS3 is finally has graphics hardware support instead of software emulation, the XBOX 360 is just PC games with new hardware and control schemes and PC Games are just bland now. Maybe its cause Im old. I dont know.

--str8trance

[QUOTE="PredatorRules"][QUOTE="gogators4life"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. onemic

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

Have you ever played supcom? If you think you simply spam units toward an enemy base, you have clearly never played the game.

i have played it thank you - i've finished the 2 levels in the demo - it's simply create units that good against aircraft and send them to kill the aircrafts, it's creating units that good against turrets that shoot from a far and send them to destroy the turrets, and so on - i don't think that's much of strategy - it's boring

You guys should see this,

http://www.gamespyarcade.com/software/imglib/portraits/user/101/187/13/01001.jpg

gogators4life

LOL

lol there is no such thing as an unstoppable rush solely made up of 1 unit type.

A good player always scouts.

A good player would have scouted that you are pitbull spamming and before you can techcenter > mortar upgrade he would have owned you with disintegrators/rocket militia.

[QUOTE="onemic"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"][QUOTE="gogators4life"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. PredatorRules

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

Have you ever played supcom? If you think you simply spam units toward an enemy base, you have clearly never played the game.

i have played it thank you - i've finished the 2 levels in the demo - it's simply create units that good against aircraft and send them to kill the aircrafts, it's creating units that good against turrets that shoot from a far and send them to destroy the turrets, and so on - i don't think that's much of strategy - it's boring

That's why. Anyone that has supcom knows that the demo is a horrible representation of the game. Try those same tactics in MP mode and you'll get your ass handed to you all the time. Spamming units will never give you victory in supcom. Even in SP past the 2nd level the game forces you to actually use your head when creating and placing units.

[QUOTE="PredatorRules"][QUOTE="onemic"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"][QUOTE="gogators4life"][QUOTE="PredatorRules"]

[QUOTE="gogators4life"]LOL, I think C&C 3 is the worst RTS game this year. 3+ months the game still lacks depth. The online is filled with bugs and exploits. onemic

you must be SupCom fan - aren't you?

No actually I am not, Supcom is a little boring for me. But I prefer Supcom over C&C 3 anyday, because Supcom has strategy and C&C 3 doesn't.

sure - SupCom has best strategy - i guess sending lots of units is strategy to you - the real strategy is in C&C games when you can breach any enemy defence with small amount of units and use the right abilities

Have you ever played supcom? If you think you simply spam units toward an enemy base, you have clearly never played the game.

i have played it thank you - i've finished the 2 levels in the demo - it's simply create units that good against aircraft and send them to kill the aircrafts, it's creating units that good against turrets that shoot from a far and send them to destroy the turrets, and so on - i don't think that's much of strategy - it's boring

That's why. Anyone that has supcom knows that the demo is a horrible representation of the game. Try those same tactics in MP mode and you'll get your ass handed to you all the time. Spamming units will never give you victory in supcom. Even in SP past the 2nd level the game forces you to actually use your head when creating and placing units.

well i might try the full game to see how it's like - thanks for kinda convincing me to get the full game