World of Warcraft SHOULD HAVE NO MONTHLY FEES!

  • 88 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SuperGamer911
SuperGamer911

253

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SuperGamer911
Member since 2008 • 253 Posts

I think its pretty stupid having to pay for a game that youve already bought. Thats why i quit WoW. Millions of people are addicted to this game. Eliminating the monthly fees for WoW would be a small price for Blizzard to pay. Because of Diablo etc. they rack in millions if not billions of dollars on an annual basis. Plz post your opinions.

Avatar image for Mavlow
Mavlow

223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 Mavlow
Member since 2007 • 223 Posts

you have no idea what you are talking about...how about you become informed on a topic before you make a thread...

Ill use old school wow for an example...with out the monthley fees you would have not had ZG, AQ20, AQ40, or Naxx...that is more than 2/3 of the end game...i can say you definately were not and end game player...

Avatar image for i--Ki1l--U
i--Ki1l--U

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#3 i--Ki1l--U
Member since 2009 • 104 Posts

I agree it should have no monthly fees

Avatar image for Noverech
Noverech

1635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Noverech
Member since 2003 • 1635 Posts
the amount of new content and changes justifies the monthly fees. some of the bigger wow patches have more content then a standard $50 game.
Avatar image for Benjiman_Guile
Benjiman_Guile

199

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Benjiman_Guile
Member since 2009 • 199 Posts
Never got into WoW because of their monthly fees.
Avatar image for joshuahaveron
joshuahaveron

2165

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 joshuahaveron
Member since 2004 • 2165 Posts
To maintain the servers they have to charge this and of course to make a profit. Aswell as bringing out all the new content so people don't get bored. I stopped playing though because of the balancing issues with the new death knights. IMHO they made the new death knights so powerful to make everyone buy the expansion.
Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#7 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts
They definitely do not have any real incentive to stop charging a monthly fee. It's like they are printing money. I don't quite understand why $15 a month has become the industry standard across the board, but whatever. Guild Wars 2 aims to be a full-fledged MMORPG without the subscription fees, but that won't be out for probably at least two years, and it is yet to be seen just what exactly it ends up being.
Avatar image for Delro333
Delro333

594

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#8 Delro333
Member since 2007 • 594 Posts

I'll tell you why there are monthy fee's...because blizzard knows they can charge gamers $15 a month and they'll fork it over in a heartbeat. Is it a ripoff?, it depends how you look at it. Blizzard spends countless hours patching WoW and doing regular maintenance on it. Now I've only tried to free trial of WoW myself and It just wasnt for me.

Its just good business.

Avatar image for Dr_Brocoli
Dr_Brocoli

3724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Dr_Brocoli
Member since 2007 • 3724 Posts
Err... it would be a HUGE price to pay, do you have ANY idea how much it costs to constantly update the game and bandwidth cost?
Avatar image for deactivated-5f0340ca5ecca
deactivated-5f0340ca5ecca

1890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 deactivated-5f0340ca5ecca
Member since 2005 • 1890 Posts
Maintaining an mmorpg + always releasing content to it by the use of an organized and big gaming company with a good number of employees = Outcome , to compensate for this outcome you have the small monthly fee of 15$ . Without the income there would be too much outcome and therefore making the game just a moneypit and forcing blizzard to shut down WoW . like in real life , you get a job to compensate for your outcomes etc...
Avatar image for johnny27
johnny27

4400

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#12 johnny27
Member since 2006 • 4400 Posts
blizzard would never take out the fees as they make a boatload of money from it :P and running all those servers isnt cheap ya know the total cost for running wow since 2004 has more then 200 million dollars!!! altough i do wish the standard fee for mmo was lowered 15$ a month is a bit pricey IMO
Avatar image for Skullcandy
Skullcandy

763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#13 Skullcandy
Member since 2003 • 763 Posts
Whether or not it should be pay to play is irrelevent. People already pay to play and will continue to do so as long as WoW continues to be the standard all other MMO's strive to overtake. Make money while you can. Eventually this money machine will die and Blizzard will have to replace it.
Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts
MMO with Monthly fees = the epitome of Capitalism.
Avatar image for jcoe85
jcoe85

48

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 jcoe85
Member since 2008 • 48 Posts
I agree to an extent, and as such I don't play it, but its just business. Yes I'm sure it costs an absolute fortune to maintain, update and get the servers or whatever but I am also sure they make an absolute fortune on top of that. But as I said its just business (a very good one at that) and they surely are not going to get rid of/lower subscription fees because people don't particularly like them (unless an epic revolt happened and everyone boycotted the game, which will never happen). Its the same in every business though mate look at something like TVs, an extra few hundred pounds (or dollars) for an extra inch in size, I bet you the difference in production costs is next to nothing or add one more scart input and increase the price by 20%. Thats capitalism for you, but at least we're not dirty commies eh?
Avatar image for Aslyum_Beast
Aslyum_Beast

975

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Aslyum_Beast
Member since 2008 • 975 Posts

Too late. the experiment has already been done. They released it with monthly fees, people took the bait, and now the studies show that they can milk you of your money.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#17 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts
It's a lot to do with the upkeep that it takes to run an MMO, plus they want profit. If you made a game, sold it for $50 and then over the next 4-5 years raked in $15 a month of around 10million people, would you give it up? Didn't think so
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts
It costs a lot of money to keep the servers running,,,do your research before posting.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f0340ca5ecca
deactivated-5f0340ca5ecca

1890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#19 deactivated-5f0340ca5ecca
Member since 2005 • 1890 Posts
including the initial price of one high end server is around 40,000$+.
Avatar image for GPAddict
GPAddict

5964

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#20 GPAddict
Member since 2005 • 5964 Posts

Guild Wars 2 aims to be a full-fledged MMORPG without the subscription fees, but that won't be out for probably at least two years, and it is yet to be seen just what exactly it ends up being.SpaceMoose

I personally cant wait for it. But I got many games (including Guild Wars) to keep me busy until then. Actually even if WoW was same as GW with no monthly fees, I still wouldn't play it.

Avatar image for deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
deactivated-57af49c27f4e8

14149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
Member since 2005 • 14149 Posts
right. and then they pay for server maintenance by begging.... actually, that might work. many rabid fans. but nothing will change, and it doesn't concern me as i avoid the game like the plague.
Avatar image for weirjf
weirjf

2392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#22 weirjf
Member since 2002 • 2392 Posts

I think its pretty stupid having to pay for a game that youve already bought. Thats why i quit WoW. Millions of people are addicted to this game. Eliminating the monthly fees for WoW would be a small price for Blizzard to pay. Because of Diablo etc. they rack in millions if not billions of dollars on an annual basis. Plz post your opinions.

SuperGamer911

Yes yes... the world environment is getting to the point that socialism is good and capitalism is bad. They made a product and they can do what they want with it and make as much money as they can with it. When you make a game, YOU can let people play for free. Until then, don't tell people what to do with their products, especially one as successful as WoW. That's like telling MS they should give their OSs away because you bought Windows 3.1... Don't be a commie.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#23 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts
[QUOTE="SuperGamer911"]

I think its pretty stupid having to pay for a game that youve already bought. Thats why i quit WoW. Millions of people are addicted to this game. Eliminating the monthly fees for WoW would be a small price for Blizzard to pay. Because of Diablo etc. they rack in millions if not billions of dollars on an annual basis. Plz post your opinions.

weirjf

Yes yes... the world environment is getting to the point that socialism is good and capitalism is bad. They made a product and they can do what they want with it and make as much money as they can with it. When you make a game, YOU can let people play for free. Until then, don't tell people what to do with their products, especially one as successful as WoW. That's like telling MS they should give their OSs away because you bought Windows 3.1... Don't be a commie.

Socialism is always a good idea... just doesn't work too well in reality, however it's why some of the best countries in the world are socialist/capitalist

Avatar image for weirjf
weirjf

2392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#24 weirjf
Member since 2002 • 2392 Posts
[QUOTE="weirjf"][QUOTE="SuperGamer911"]

I think its pretty stupid having to pay for a game that youve already bought. Thats why i quit WoW. Millions of people are addicted to this game. Eliminating the monthly fees for WoW would be a small price for Blizzard to pay. Because of Diablo etc. they rack in millions if not billions of dollars on an annual basis. Plz post your opinions.

lundy86_4

Yes yes... the world environment is getting to the point that socialism is good and capitalism is bad. They made a product and they can do what they want with it and make as much money as they can with it. When you make a game, YOU can let people play for free. Until then, don't tell people what to do with their products, especially one as successful as WoW. That's like telling MS they should give their OSs away because you bought Windows 3.1... Don't be a commie.

Socialism is always a good idea... just doesn't work too well in reality, however it's why some of the best countries in the world are socialist/capitalist

:lol:

right...

name 3

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#25 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts
Are you kidding me? Countries like Switzerland etc hold to a social capitalist society... Capitalism and Socialism are not mutually exclusive
Avatar image for weirjf
weirjf

2392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#26 weirjf
Member since 2002 • 2392 Posts

Are you kidding me? Countries like Switzerland etc hold to a social capitalist society... Capitalism and Socialism are not mutually exclusivelundy86_4

I said name 3. I'm not interested in the exception to the rule. There is always an exception to the rule.

Avatar image for swazidoughman
swazidoughman

3520

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 91

User Lists: 0

#27 swazidoughman
Member since 2008 • 3520 Posts
The gameplay in WoW is so bad that it isn't even worth the money buying it.
Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#28 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"]Are you kidding me? Countries like Switzerland etc hold to a social capitalist society... Capitalism and Socialism are not mutually exclusiveweirjf

I said name 3. I'm not interested in the exception to the rule. There is always an exception to the rule.

Fair enough, it's applied in the Nordic region, consisting on Finland, Iceland, Denmark, Norway and Sweden... Switzerland, and the People's Republic of China in which the PRC economy has grown leaps and bounds since it's economic liberalization in 1978

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#29 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts
  • ~250 realm servers
  • lots and lots of instance servers
  • 24/7 GM support accross all those realms
  • website/email technical support for the game including accounts
  • World servers which I think handle logging in and out
  • A massive team of developers creating new content for patches which would equal at least a large expansion pack of another game
  • Massive amounts of bandwidth flowing in and out of their centers
..and that's only for the US.

Avatar image for REforever101
REforever101

11223

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 REforever101
Member since 2005 • 11223 Posts

Never got into WoW because of their monthly fees. Benjiman_Guile

i've never gotten into any game with a montly fee

Avatar image for eclarkdog
eclarkdog

1310

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#31 eclarkdog
Member since 2004 • 1310 Posts
It's not the monthly fees that keep me from playing. I don't play because WOW blows.
Avatar image for Treflis
Treflis

13757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 Treflis
Member since 2004 • 13757 Posts

[QUOTE="lundy86_4"][QUOTE="weirjf"]

Yes yes... the world environment is getting to the point that socialism is good and capitalism is bad. They made a product and they can do what they want with it and make as much money as they can with it. When you make a game, YOU can let people play for free. Until then, don't tell people what to do with their products, especially one as successful as WoW. That's like telling MS they should give their OSs away because you bought Windows 3.1... Don't be a commie.

weirjf

Socialism is always a good idea... just doesn't work too well in reality, however it's why some of the best countries in the world are socialist/capitalist

:lol:

right...

name 3

Norway, England and Sweden are the first 3 I can think of.

Avatar image for thusaha
thusaha

14495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 thusaha
Member since 2007 • 14495 Posts
It'd be nice if it had no monthly fee.
Avatar image for SatanAntichrist
SatanAntichrist

355

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 SatanAntichrist
Member since 2009 • 355 Posts
WoW sucks. I have always thought so. I have never liked it.
Avatar image for Johnny_Rock
Johnny_Rock

40314

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 Johnny_Rock
Member since 2002 • 40314 Posts

I think its pretty stupid having to pay for a game that youve already bought. Thats why i quit WoW. Millions of people are addicted to this game. Eliminating the monthly fees for WoW would be a small price for Blizzard to pay. Because of Diablo etc. they rack in millions if not billions of dollars on an annual basis. Plz post your opinions.

SuperGamer911

A small price to pay!!?!?!?!?? Are you nuts? You know how much it costs to run that game? Millions per month.

Avatar image for Kill_My_Self
Kill_My_Self

578

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 Kill_My_Self
Member since 2009 • 578 Posts
i dont agree its online
Avatar image for weirjf
weirjf

2392

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#38 weirjf
Member since 2002 • 2392 Posts

Sorry, but you just mentioned 3 failing socialist countries (feel free to believe the media, though). England is struggling to keep their socialist policies above water. Their way of breathing life back into it was to offer a better form of health care for those that pay for it and that was a long time ago, but it is still failing. Sweden has a nearly 70% individual tax rate combining income tax and property/sales taxes (sounds like Canada), they have life-long benefits, free education and they can even accumulate over 500 vacation days per year (yes, over 500). What is the result? They are on the verge of collapse on many of their "socialist" programs. The life-long benefits and the education benefits are on the bubble. They also love to tout their less than 4% unemployment rate but with that 500+ vacation days per year, how long will you accumulate before you just plain decide to stop working.... but because you are technically on vacation, you aren't unemployed. It is a veil, nothing more. They have their real unemployed and mentally ill in government programs which titles them "employed",

Don't fool yourselves kiddies... the only way these countries have lasted as long as they have is because they took what makes capitalism great and used the gains to act socialist (not Marxist socialist). It cannot last forever and is failing in the same manner as the USA's Social Security program. Same limitations, same weaknesses... same result. You definately don't try to make a country with 2 trillion in national debt into a capitalist/socialist state because you're just planting the headstone. Maybe with 2 trillion SURPLUS you could make a good run at it for half a century or so.

Anyways, my original point was the idiotic new perspective that seems to be infesting the minds of the world that socialism is good but capitalism and success are bad, is wrong and stupid. If you want to say that socialism is good and socialist countries can succeed with a capitalist foundation... ok, they can succeed, for a little while. The more capitalist they are, the longer they will stay afloat. If Bliz was forced to give their game away because of government oversight it would be good for whiners like the OP but in the end it only hurts the company that entertains us and the taxes it creates to pay for the people that just plain don't want to work and the 800 billion pork bill they just signed into law.

Avatar image for RT_Jackson
RT_Jackson

3830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#39 RT_Jackson
Member since 2003 • 3830 Posts

It's cost Blizz 200 million to run the game since 2004. Yes, they make that much in about 2 months, but there are 2 advantages and maybe 3 for you.

1) They release tons of free content patches that are pretty significant
2) Depending on how addicted you get, you might not buy another game while you are into WoW, saving you money in the long run.
3) If it helps, you could think that you are helping to attract and pay top-tier talent and ensuring quality development on other blizz games.

Avatar image for lundy86_4
lundy86_4

62001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#40 lundy86_4  Online
Member since 2003 • 62001 Posts

Sorry, but you just mentioned 3 failing socialist countries (feel free to believe the media, though). England is struggling to keep their socialist policies above water. Their way of breathing life back into it was to offer a better form of health care for those that pay for it and that was a long time ago, but it is still failing. Sweden has a nearly 70% individual tax rate combining income tax and property/sales taxes (sounds like Canada), they have life-long benefits, free education and they can even accumulate over 500 vacation days per year (yes, over 500). What is the result? They are on the verge of collapse on many of their "socialist" programs. The life-long benefits and the education benefits are on the bubble. They also love to tout their 500 vacation days per year you will accumulate before you just plain decide to stop working.... but because you are technically on vacation, you aren't unemployed. It is a veil, nothing more.

Don't fool yourselves kiddies... the only way these countries have lasted as long as they have is because they took what makes capitalism great and used the gains to act socialist (not Marxist socialist). It cannot last forever and is failing in the same manner as the USA's Social Security program. Same limitations, same weaknesses... same result. You definately don't try to make a country with 2 trillion in national debt into a capitalist/socialist state because you're just planting the headstone. Maybe with 2 trillion SURPLUS you could make a good run at it for half a century or so.

Anyways, my original point was the idiotic new perspective that seems to be infesting the minds of the world that socialism is good but capitalism and success are bad, is wrong and stupid. If you want to say that socialism is good and socialist countries can succeed with a capitalist foundation... ok, they can succeed, for a little while. The more capitalist they are, the longer they will stay afloat. If Bliz was forced to give their game away because of government oversight it would be good for whiners like the OP but in the end it only hurts the company that entertains us and the taxes it creates to pay for the people that just plain don't want to work and the 800 billion pork bill they just signed into law.

weirjf

I never said Capitalism was bad? I also stated that Socialism is a good concept, however very rarely works when put into practice, it's certainly why communism failed, because of the fact that it was extreme socialism. I stated that the best form of economy is a hybrid, which is Social Capitalism. I have lived in the UK, and currently reside in Canada. It's not just specific countries which are suffering. It is the world economy that is. Pretty much every country is in debt.

Also I never believe the media with anything, I work in banking and many people I speak to are hording and hording money in order to ride this out because of what the media have said, when in truth, whilst the economy is bad, it's not as bad as stated in the news.

Avatar image for fatzebra
fatzebra

1470

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 fatzebra
Member since 2005 • 1470 Posts
For those of you saying "They need the money for updates, expansions, ect.," let me throw a few numbers at ya. At 8million users paying $15 a month, Blizzard was making $56 a second. Try to comprehend that amount of money. Not only has the user base risen, but more expansions have been bought since then. All of this, not including the 11million who bought the game at $20-$50 dollars. Now, the last thing Blizzard needs is more money, they COULD stop charging, for the fan base, but they wont.
Avatar image for Jade_Monkey
Jade_Monkey

4830

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#42 Jade_Monkey
Member since 2004 • 4830 Posts

I think its pretty stupid having to pay for a game that youve already bought. Thats why i quit WoW. Millions of people are addicted to this game. Eliminating the monthly fees for WoW would be a small price for Blizzard to pay. Because of Diablo etc. they rack in millions if not billions of dollars on an annual basis. Plz post your opinions.

SuperGamer911

There is the same problem with WOW that is with Xbox Live for 360 users. As long as the company providing the servide has enough people willing to pay for it then they will continue to charge for it. You may not like it, but because millions of others don't care enough not to pay for it you have no choice but to either pay or not use the service. I'm mostly with you on this, aside form the fact I can sympethize with Blizzard needing to cover the cost of servers and what not.

Avatar image for crazymaghie123
crazymaghie123

1209

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 crazymaghie123
Member since 2004 • 1209 Posts
By paying it people say they agree with the price
Avatar image for MythPro1
MythPro1

2746

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#44 MythPro1
Member since 2003 • 2746 Posts

Because free MMOs are known to be good. If they cut the monthly fee, they'll charge you for extra content. Want to run the newest dungeon in Northrend? Pay 15 dollars to unlock it.

Be happy you don't have to buy a new expansion every 6 months a la Everquest.

Avatar image for Helbrec
Helbrec

1325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#45 Helbrec
Member since 2008 • 1325 Posts
WoW brings in about 90% of blizzards revenue...
Avatar image for SpaceMoose
SpaceMoose

10789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 SpaceMoose
Member since 2004 • 10789 Posts
[QUOTE="weirjf"]

Sorry, but you just mentioned 3 failing socialist countries (feel free to believe the media, though). England is struggling to keep their socialist policies above water. Their way of breathing life back into it was to offer a better form of health care for those that pay for it and that was a long time ago, but it is still failing. Sweden has a nearly 70% individual tax rate combining income tax and property/sales taxes (sounds like Canada), they have life-long benefits, free education and they can even accumulate over 500 vacation days per year (yes, over 500). What is the result? They are on the verge of collapse on many of their "socialist" programs. The life-long benefits and the education benefits are on the bubble. They also love to tout their less than 4% unemployment rate but with that 500+ vacation days per year, how long will you accumulate before you just plain decide to stop working.... but because you are technically on vacation, you aren't unemployed. It is a veil, nothing more. They have their real unemployed and mentally ill in government programs which titles them "employed",

Don't fool yourselves kiddies... the only way these countries have lasted as long as they have is because they took what makes capitalism great and used the gains to act socialist (not Marxist socialist). It cannot last forever and is failing in the same manner as the USA's Social Security program. Same limitations, same weaknesses... same result. You definately don't try to make a country with 2 trillion in national debt into a capitalist/socialist state because you're just planting the headstone. Maybe with 2 trillion SURPLUS you could make a good run at it for half a century or so.

Anyways, my original point was the idiotic new perspective that seems to be infesting the minds of the world that socialism is good but capitalism and success are bad, is wrong and stupid. If you want to say that socialism is good and socialist countries can succeed with a capitalist foundation... ok, they can succeed, for a little while. The more capitalist they are, the longer they will stay afloat. If Bliz was forced to give their game away because of government oversight it would be good for whiners like the OP but in the end it only hurts the company that entertains us and the taxes it creates to pay for the people that just plain don't want to work and the 800 billion pork bill they just signed into law.

That's an awful lot of bold claims which you have provided no sources for whatsoever. I love how every that goes on long enough always degenerates into a political or religious argument anyway. :roll: I'm not even going to get involved in this pointless argument. I'm just saying....no sources.
Avatar image for Mazoch
Mazoch

2473

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#47 Mazoch
Member since 2004 • 2473 Posts

I think its pretty stupid having to pay for a game that youve already bought. Thats why i quit WoW. Millions of people are addicted to this game. Eliminating the monthly fees for WoW would be a small price for Blizzard to pay. Because of Diablo etc. they rack in millions if not billions of dollars on an annual basis. Plz post your opinions.

SuperGamer911

How would it benefit Blizzard to keep you playing WoW if you didnt pay a monthly fee for doing so? It would be bad buisness to spend large sums of money to pay upkeep for a product that wasent generating a significant income.

As for the idea of pay to play WoW is actually not a good example since it's in such a unique possition due to it's incredible success. There are several things that sets the pay to play games appart from the free to play (potentially after a purchase):

1) Upkeep. Most games are ultimatly finished when launched. While a minor patch or two might be released, for the most part they stay the same after having been launched. Pay to play games keep eveolving since it's in their interest to keep players interested. In order to do so they employ a full development team to keep adding new features, content and art to the game.

2) Persistant servers. The major diffrence between most free multiplayer games and pay to play multiplayer games is that the later employs persistant servers. In diablo 2 you only connected to battlenet in order to sync up with other players. The actual gameplay were hosted on the players machines. Thats also the reason for the hard cap on the number of players you could find in one world.

In essence the pay to play games are less of a game in the traditional sense and more of an ongoing service. Paying a monthly fee allows you continued access to that service. Thats not at all diffrent from many other similar services you most likely already pay for. To use the original argument.. After I buy a mobile phone, why should I keep paying every month to be able to use it? If I buy a satelite dish, why should I continue to pay every month to get the programming?.. Hey.. If I buy a house, why should I keep paying rent after having bought it?

So.. is it worth it or is $15 unreasonable?

Thats obviously up to the individual. I've played a lot of MMO's over the years and generally enjoy the genre. for me it's generally worth it. I can easily spend 40-60 hours a month (if not more if I have the free time) in my MMO of choice. Compare that to the number of hours of game play you get from most games you buy for $40-50? 10 hours? 30 hours? There are exceptions (especially if you enjoy online FPS's) but generally even long games with a lot of content ends up being a lot more expensive 'pr hour' than most MMO's. At the end of the day, if you enjoy the genre you get a lot more game time for your money than you do with, for example, single player RPG's or single player shooters.

Avatar image for i--Ki1l--U
i--Ki1l--U

104

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#48 i--Ki1l--U
Member since 2009 • 104 Posts

To maintain the servers they have to charge this and of course to make a profit. Aswell as bringing out all the new content so people don't get bored. I stopped playing though because of the balancing issues with the new death knights. IMHO they made the new death knights so powerful to make everyone buy the expansion.joshuahaveron

Guild Wars and RuneScape have similar players and they manage to do it without the fees.

Avatar image for Erlkoenig
Erlkoenig

715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 Erlkoenig
Member since 2006 • 715 Posts

I keep hearing about

For those of you saying "They need the money for updates, expansions, ect.," let me throw a few numbers at ya. At 8million users paying $15 a month, Blizzard was making $56 a second. Try to comprehend that amount of money. Not only has the user base risen, but more expansions have been bought since then. All of this, not including the 11million who bought the game at $20-$50 dollars. Now, the last thing Blizzard needs is more money, they COULD stop charging, for the fan base, but they wont.fatzebra
Do you have any idea how much it costs to maintain the servers? I highly doubt you do, unless you're working within the industry. So please stop making useless arguments like that. You obviously don't understand the concepts of revenue and income. I'm not saying Blizzard isn't making a lot of money, but your statement was just too thoughtless.

[QUOTE="joshuahaveron"]To maintain the servers they have to charge this and of course to make a profit. Aswell as bringing out all the new content so people don't get bored. I stopped playing though because of the balancing issues with the new death knights. IMHO they made the new death knights so powerful to make everyone buy the expansion.i--Ki1l--U

Guild Wars and RuneScape have similar players and they manage to do it without the fees.


I haven't played Runescape but to compare what's offered in Guild Wars to that in WoW? I hope you're kidding.

Avatar image for KalDurenik
KalDurenik

3736

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 KalDurenik
Member since 2004 • 3736 Posts
Dont tell me you just compared Guild Wars and lolscape with Wow... ... ...