Get an AMD 8150 instead of a 3570K, and then get a better graphics card?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Yeah, it would (assuming the PC is for gaming).
Lox_Cropek
So, the 8150 is on par with a 3570K?
Because my friends know nothing about PCs (one just bought an Alienware), so it looks a lot cooler if I say "I have an overclocked 8 core", as opposed to "I have an overclocked i5." (I'm thinking of starting a custom computer business as well, and the general public jump at stuff like lots of RAM, lots of storage, lots of VRAM, lots of processor cores) I know that the i5s are equal to the i7s for gaming, but generally, my friends just have the reasoning "Why would Intel make it $100 more then?".
[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]
Yeah, it would (assuming the PC is for gaming).
Daanyal
So, the 8150 is on par with a 3570K?
Because my friends know nothing about PCs (one just bought an Alienware), so it looks a lot cooler if I say "I have an overclocked 8 core", as opposed to "I have an overclocked i5." (I'm thinking of starting a custom computer business as well, and the general public jump at stuff like lots of RAM, lots of storage, lots of VRAM, lots of processor cores) I know that the i5s are equal to the i7s for gaming, but generally, my friends just have the reasoning "Why would Intel make it $100 more then?".
No, the 3570k is noticeably faster than the 8150; but for gaming, worse CPU + better GPU > better CPU + worse GPU.[QUOTE="Daanyal"]
[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]
Yeah, it would (assuming the PC is for gaming).
Lox_Cropek
So, the 8150 is on par with a 3570K?
Because my friends know nothing about PCs (one just bought an Alienware), so it looks a lot cooler if I say "I have an overclocked 8 core", as opposed to "I have an overclocked i5." (I'm thinking of starting a custom computer business as well, and the general public jump at stuff like lots of RAM, lots of storage, lots of VRAM, lots of processor cores) I know that the i5s are equal to the i7s for gaming, but generally, my friends just have the reasoning "Why would Intel make it $100 more then?".
No, the 3570k is noticeably faster than the 8150; but for gaming, worse CPU + better GPU > better CPU + worse GPU.This. For gaming it is better to save money on the CPU and get a better GPU. It is very likely games will continue to improve with their multi-threaded coding so I believe the 8-Core AMD will be able to remain relevant for gaming for a while into the future. And either way the first upgrade you will probably have to get will be a new GPU, there's nothin that will change that.[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]No, the 3570k is noticeably faster than the 8150; but for gaming, worse CPU + better GPU > better CPU + worse GPU.This. For gaming it is better to save money on the CPU and get a better GPU. It is very likely games will continue to improve with their multi-threaded coding so I believe the 8-Core AMD will be able to remain relevant for gaming for a while into the future. And either way the first upgrade you will probably have to get will be a new GPU, there's nothin that will change that.[QUOTE="Daanyal"]
So, the 8150 is on par with a 3570K?
Because my friends know nothing about PCs (one just bought an Alienware), so it looks a lot cooler if I say "I have an overclocked 8 core", as opposed to "I have an overclocked i5." (I'm thinking of starting a custom computer business as well, and the general public jump at stuff like lots of RAM, lots of storage, lots of VRAM, lots of processor cores) I know that the i5s are equal to the i7s for gaming, but generally, my friends just have the reasoning "Why would Intel make it $100 more then?".
General_X
I've got enough in the budget for a 3570K and a 670 2GB. Would it be smarter to get a 8150 and then get a 670 4GB?
This. For gaming it is better to save money on the CPU and get a better GPU. It is very likely games will continue to improve with their multi-threaded coding so I believe the 8-Core AMD will be able to remain relevant for gaming for a while into the future. And either way the first upgrade you will probably have to get will be a new GPU, there's nothin that will change that.[QUOTE="General_X"][QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]No, the 3570k is noticeably faster than the 8150; but for gaming, worse CPU + better GPU > better CPU + worse GPU.
Daanyal
I've got enough in the budget for a 3570K and a 670 2GB. Would it be smarter to get a 8150 and then get a 670 4GB?
No, get the 3570k + 670 2GB.[QUOTE="Daanyal"]
[QUOTE="General_X"]This. For gaming it is better to save money on the CPU and get a better GPU. It is very likely games will continue to improve with their multi-threaded coding so I believe the 8-Core AMD will be able to remain relevant for gaming for a while into the future. And either way the first upgrade you will probably have to get will be a new GPU, there's nothin that will change that.Lox_Cropek
I've got enough in the budget for a 3570K and a 670 2GB. Would it be smarter to get a 8150 and then get a 670 4GB?
No, get the 3570k + 670 2GB.OK, then. Thanks for the advice.
[QUOTE="Lox_Cropek"]
[QUOTE="Daanyal"]This. For gaming it is better to save money on the CPU and get a better GPU. It is very likely games will continue to improve with their multi-threaded coding so I believe the 8-Core AMD will be able to remain relevant for gaming for a while into the future. And either way the first upgrade you will probably have to get will be a new GPU, there's nothin that will change that.Daanyal
I've got enough in the budget for a 3570K and a 670 2GB. Would it be smarter to get a 8150 and then get a 670 4GB?
No, get the 3570k + 670 2GB.Agreed, the difference between the 670 2GB and 670 4GB isn't that big, but the difference in power between a 8150 and the 3570k is massive. AMD builds should only be considered for relatively low budget builds, but it sounds like you have fairly high budget to work with.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment