Would these computer specs run wow on all ultra settings

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dante251299
dante251299

93

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#1 dante251299
Member since 2010 • 93 Posts
3rd Gen Intel® Core CPUs 2GB GeForce GT 650M HD 1366 x 768 Resolution NVIDIA® Optimus SuperSpeed USB 3.0 HDMI Output Connection 1.3MP Webcam BluRay Capable Wireless Fitted as Standard Bluetooth Option Available VGA Output Connection Up to 4 Hour Battery Life 8gb RAM 500gb hard drive
Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#2 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

Well "3rd Gen Core cpu" doesn't really say anything. i3? i5? i7? dual-core? quad-core? Either way, I doubt it would matter. WoW isn't exactly a resource hog, and it's like 8 years old. I'd be surprised if you can even buy a computer these days that would have any trouble running it maxed out, at any resolution.

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#3 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

I doubt it'll run at ultra. Yes WoW is 8 years old, but the graphics have changed a lot over the years.

Avatar image for the_bi99man
the_bi99man

11465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#4 the_bi99man
Member since 2004 • 11465 Posts

Yeah, I guess it would make sense that the graphics would advance at least a bit with the expansions. But still, a system with a 2gb graphics card, 8gb ram, and (i'm assuming) at least an i5 cpu wouldn't max it out? Is it THAT advanced?

Avatar image for JwresB
JwresB

217

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#5 JwresB
Member since 2008 • 217 Posts

Nope....the 4hour battery life is going to get ya.

Avatar image for jhalter1
jhalter1

302

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 jhalter1
Member since 2011 • 302 Posts

I have:

-amd quadcore, 3.2 ghz

-560 ti

-4 gb RAM

And I can kick wow in its fat face. I dont think you would have a problem running the game on ultra. The 8 gb of RAM is more than enough and the GPU should do some work as well. I have no idea about the CPU, but if a quad core amd can run it I would be shocked if an intel processor couldn't.

Crap, just realized that the resolution is painfully small. Yeah man, at that resolution the game will run on the absolute highest setting except for like...16x aa.

Avatar image for Starshine_M2A2
Starshine_M2A2

5593

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 19

#7 Starshine_M2A2
Member since 2006 • 5593 Posts

It could certainly run it but I can't tell you how smooth it would be...

The shadows are usually what sap the life out my peformance. I find if I just turn those off it improves the frame rate dramatically. And WoW is the type of game that can easily be played without missing shadows.

Avatar image for deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9
deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9

7779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5a9b3f32ef4e9
Member since 2009 • 7779 Posts

At that low resolution you should be fine.

Just turn everything to minimum anyway - you'll get more dps.

Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#9 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

I have:

-amd quadcore, 3.2 ghz

-560 ti

-4 gb RAM

And I can kick wow in its fat face. I dont think you would have a problem running the game on ultra. The 8 gb of RAM is more than enough and the GPU should do some work as well. I have no idea about the CPU, but if a quad core amd can run it I would be shocked if an intel processor couldn't.

Crap, just realized that the resolution is painfully small. Yeah man, at that resolution the game will run on the absolute highest setting except for like...16x aa.

jhalter1

The 560 Ti is apparently a much more powerful card than the 650M though.

Avatar image for HyperWarlock
HyperWarlock

3295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 HyperWarlock
Member since 2011 • 3295 Posts

At that low resolution you should be fine.

Just turn everything to minimum anyway - you'll get more dps.

Postmortem123

Did you mean to say FPS? Or did you actually mean Damage Per Second?

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#11 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="jhalter1"]

I have:

-amd quadcore, 3.2 ghz

-560 ti

-4 gb RAM

And I can kick wow in its fat face. I dont think you would have a problem running the game on ultra. The 8 gb of RAM is more than enough and the GPU should do some work as well. I have no idea about the CPU, but if a quad core amd can run it I would be shocked if an intel processor couldn't.

Crap, just realized that the resolution is painfully small. Yeah man, at that resolution the game will run on the absolute highest setting except for like...16x aa.

-Unreal-

The 560 Ti is apparently a much more powerful card than the 650M though.

do you have your head shoved up blizzard's so much that you're trying to pass WoW as a demanding game? it's an MMO, being easy to run is one of the priorities. "i doubt it'll run on ultra" is the most ridiculous thing i've seen you say. those specs can max out far more demanding and visually impressive games. if anything, you're making WoW look like an unoptimized PoS.
Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

I doubt it'll run at ultra. Yes WoW is 8 years old, but the graphics have changed a lot over the years.

-Unreal-

True they changed but they're still pretty lame looking and a piece of p!ss to run

Avatar image for Jamiemydearx3
Jamiemydearx3

4062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Jamiemydearx3
Member since 2008 • 4062 Posts

Yea you can definitely play WoW at ultra settings.

Avatar image for trastamad03
trastamad03

4859

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 trastamad03
Member since 2006 • 4859 Posts

[QUOTE="Postmortem123"]

At that low resolution you should be fine.

Just turn everything to minimum anyway - you'll get more dps.

HyperWarlock

Did you mean to say FPS? Or did you actually mean Damage Per Second?

He meant dps as in Derps per second. On Topic: You'd probably be better off using high/med settings. Don't expect high fps in crowded cities and don't set Shadows to Ultra.
Avatar image for JohnF111
JohnF111

14190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#15 JohnF111
Member since 2010 • 14190 Posts
Yes it'll run it on Ultra, my old 9600GT could run it on Ultra and get 60fps for the most part.
Avatar image for Doctor_Dino
Doctor_Dino

36

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Doctor_Dino
Member since 2012 • 36 Posts

I would think that machine could. You could always test it yourself and just download the trial version at their site.

Avatar image for C2N2
C2N2

759

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 C2N2
Member since 2012 • 759 Posts

My friend has a laptop with similar specs (i7 3610QM, 6GB DDR3, and 650M) and he can run Battlefield 3 on it at medium settings @ 1366x768, so I would assume it can run WoW at max 1366x768 (ie: slightly above 720p)...

Though it really depends on what you are doing on WoW as well... I have an i5 2500k @ 4.2GHz, 8GB Cprsair Vengeance 1600, and a GTX680 and I max almost everything, but still get slowdowns... Including WoW (not entirely sure on this though as I got slowdowns on my GTX470 SLI setup which is similar in performance to a single 680, but have since unsubscribed since getting my 680)... I will have a 99% uptime, but there are still points where max setting (including max AF/AA) will slow you down when raiding and the likes, (loading hundreds of animations, 25 characters, a boss, all with highest level of line smoothing and texture bluring there is, etc) it can get choppy depending on the fight and the effects in the fight...

I know that with those specs and at that resolution you will at least be able to max it a majority of the time, including AF/AA, but in a raid if you do it, you may need to turn the AA/AF down... And play at a desk... A GPU like that will get extremely hot playing games, especially if you are pushing it and have it maxed out...

Avatar image for SwarmKing
SwarmKing

106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 SwarmKing
Member since 2012 • 106 Posts
You should be. The game's graphics are pretty hideous so I doubt it'd take any sort of powerful PC to max it.
Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#19 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts
[QUOTE="-Unreal-"]

[QUOTE="jhalter1"]

I have:

-amd quadcore, 3.2 ghz

-560 ti

-4 gb RAM

And I can kick wow in its fat face. I dont think you would have a problem running the game on ultra. The 8 gb of RAM is more than enough and the GPU should do some work as well. I have no idea about the CPU, but if a quad core amd can run it I would be shocked if an intel processor couldn't.

Crap, just realized that the resolution is painfully small. Yeah man, at that resolution the game will run on the absolute highest setting except for like...16x aa.

BrunoBRS

The 560 Ti is apparently a much more powerful card than the 650M though.

do you have your head shoved up blizzard's so much that you're trying to pass WoW as a demanding game? it's an MMO, being easy to run is one of the priorities. "i doubt it'll run on ultra" is the most ridiculous thing i've seen you say. those specs can max out far more demanding and visually impressive games. if anything, you're making WoW look like an unoptimized PoS.

 You.
Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#20 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts
[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="-Unreal-"]The 560 Ti is apparently a much more powerful card than the 650M though.-Unreal-
do you have your head shoved up blizzard's so much that you're trying to pass WoW as a demanding game? it's an MMO, being easy to run is one of the priorities. "i doubt it'll run on ultra" is the most ridiculous thing i've seen you say. those specs can max out far more demanding and visually impressive games. if anything, you're making WoW look like an unoptimized PoS.

 You.

annoyed that your attempted blizzard praise backfired?
Avatar image for -Unreal-
-Unreal-

24650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 1

#21 -Unreal-
Member since 2004 • 24650 Posts

[QUOTE="-Unreal-"][QUOTE="BrunoBRS"] do you have your head shoved up blizzard's so much that you're trying to pass WoW as a demanding game? it's an MMO, being easy to run is one of the priorities. "i doubt it'll run on ultra" is the most ridiculous thing i've seen you say. those specs can max out far more demanding and visually impressive games. if anything, you're making WoW look like an unoptimized PoS.BrunoBRS
 You.

annoyed that your attempted blizzard praise backfired?

My Blizzard praise never backfires. In I believe my Blizzard praise and loyalty has helped sell some of the game, which in turn has helped destroy some of the lesser MMOs like Guild Wars which failed to come anywhere close to WoW's mighty reign despite being free to play.

I love Blizzard. You're just going to have to deal with that. Rage_Guy_emoticon_4_messenger_by_Urahara

Avatar image for deactivated-59b71619573a1
deactivated-59b71619573a1

38222

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-59b71619573a1
Member since 2007 • 38222 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="-Unreal-"]  You.-Unreal-

annoyed that your attempted blizzard praise backfired?

My Blizzard praise never backfires. In I believe my Blizzard praise and loyalty has helped sell some of the game, which in turn has helped destroy some of the lesser MMOs like Guild Wars which failed to come anywhere close to WoW's mighty reign despite being free to play.

I love Blizzard. You're just going to have to deal with that. Rage_Guy_emoticon_4_messenger_by_Urahara

lol such a dumb fanboy. WoW hasn't been relevant in a long time and has turned into crap the last few years. Only reason people still play is due to them having high characters from years ago and they don't want to let them go. Just cos it was ONCE the best doesn't mean it still IS the best. Just like CoD. Also GW2 comes out soon and it may surprise you how many people start playing that

Avatar image for BrunoBRS
BrunoBRS

74156

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#23 BrunoBRS
Member since 2005 • 74156 Posts

[QUOTE="BrunoBRS"][QUOTE="-Unreal-"]  You.-Unreal-

annoyed that your attempted blizzard praise backfired?

My Blizzard praise never backfires. In I believe my Blizzard praise and loyalty has helped sell some of the game, which in turn has helped destroy some of the lesser MMOs like Guild Wars which failed to come anywhere close to WoW's mighty reign despite being free to play.

I love Blizzard. You're just going to have to deal with that. Rage_Guy_emoticon_4_messenger_by_Urahara

you trying to pass WoW as a hardware demanding game would only serve to scare away potential new players. i don't see how lying to scare away newcomers could possibly help blizzard.