[QUOTE="Cerza"][QUOTE="Large_Soda"][QUOTE="Cerza"]I agree with everyone else that I don't like the new E3.
SONY is the one people should be bashing here, NOT Nintendo. SONY is just in it for the money. They don't care about class or quality and they proved this at last years E3 and with their trashy PS3. But, oh no, no one ever bashes them, because they bring console gamers such "quality" and "mature" titles like God of War, which is just senseless violence, and GTA, which is just smut. Then there is little Nintendo, who everyone picks on, because they still have class and some what of a passion for what they are doing. They seek to make their games fun and enjoyable to people of ALL ages so EVERYONE can enjoy them. They refine their products, even the blatant cash in ones such Smash Bros., Mario Golf, Mario Kart, and so on. Some of those are Nintendo's best sellers, and what's best of all is they don't pump out a new one every year that is the same game as before with one or two new added features and slightly better graphics like EA, Microsoft, and SONY do. Nintendo isn't for little boys. Nintendo is for everyone, and by saying Nintendo is just for kids all you are doing is showing how shallow, stuck in the past, and immature you are.
Large_Soda
You lost all credibility when you stated God of War is just senseless violence. The last sentence you wrote is a perfect example of hypocrisy.
Lost credablity? I'm sorry you can't look beyond the surface of the game to see what you are really playing. The sex in GoW is gratitutous and completely uncalled for, as are the fatalities and horrendous methods by which you go about killing things. GoW isn't about the story of Kratos. It's about going around killing things in the most awful, brutal, uncalled for manner possible. SONY put those things in the game for shock value and to try and cover up the fact that what they have is just a medicore action adventure title with a weak script that is only able to stand because it's acted out by good voice actors.
As far as the hyocrisy goes, you have to explain yourself, because I see nothing hypocritical about it.
The point of my post wasn't to piss people off. The point was that people pick on Nintendo and label them as being childish because they don't make a point of having ultra violent games, or smut titles on their systems. Instead they choose to make games that anyone can enjoy and everyone puts them down for it.
The loss of credibility comes from the fact that you are writing off a game because it is violent and has nudity. The game is much deeper than gore and women, the story is engaging and takes you on a very cinematic adventure and it just happens to be your opinion that you don't like it.
What pisses me off about your statements is that you are singling out Sony, and stating that they made the decision to add these things, that Sony and Sony alone create games with senseless blood and gore and that is so far from the truth. Rockstar makes the most violent games, notably Manhunt, and Sony, the bloodsucking evil empire that apparently encourages tasteless violence is agreeing that it should be banned.
Your statements reek of anti-Sony sentiments and that truly disgusts me.
My statement about your "last sentence" being hypocritical goes like this: You got defensive when someone stated that Nintendo was nothing but kids games. You were commenting that it was not fair to label a company, based on dated and incorrect statements.
If find it hypocritical that you get so defensive when someone does this to Nintendo, yet you see nothing wrong with attacking Sony with the same incorrect assumptions.
A company in it for money? What a Sony-centric notion.
I agree with what you said about Nintendo, but I can't stand it when people speak highly in one regard and then trample their opinions with flagrant, factually wrong arguments.
completey agree i ahte fanboys too.
Log in to comment