wow, just got my 3870x2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for SSGWright
SSGWright

1039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 SSGWright
Member since 2003 • 1039 Posts

card is stock overclocked q6600 @ 3.7 and I scored almost 19,000 on 3dmark!!!!

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5243677

Avatar image for crippo_gamer
crippo_gamer

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 crippo_gamer
Member since 2005 • 1164 Posts
holy crap do you have crysis and how does it preform?
Avatar image for aveman1
aveman1

3383

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 aveman1
Member since 2004 • 3383 Posts
Good work! Give yourself a proper pat on the back! As a side note, how do you like using the 64 bit OS instead of 32 bit?
Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts
Wow. My 8800 gts 320mb with AMD X2 3800 has trouble pushing 7000.
Avatar image for Penguin_dragon
Penguin_dragon

1516

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 Penguin_dragon
Member since 2005 • 1516 Posts
Wow what case do you have? Ive heard the card is giant.
Avatar image for SSGWright
SSGWright

1039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 SSGWright
Member since 2003 • 1039 Posts
no bigger than a gtx, i've got a thermaltake kandolf case
Avatar image for harrisi17
harrisi17

4010

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#8 harrisi17
Member since 2004 • 4010 Posts
Im happy with 10000
Avatar image for blackleather223
blackleather223

1569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 blackleather223
Member since 2004 • 1569 Posts
Very nice and congtats on your graphic card there.
Avatar image for osan0
osan0

18263

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#10 osan0
Member since 2004 • 18263 Posts

wow. itll be interesting to see how it goes in a real world test like crysis in a big fight. but 19,000 is nothing to joke about...thats impressive to say the least.

my poor old fart only manages 11,000. poor fluffy :S.

Avatar image for Rob_101
Rob_101

3291

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 Rob_101
Member since 2004 • 3291 Posts
I'm pretty angry that I didn't wait to get one, and very jealous of those who did.
Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#12 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
Big whoop. Come back when you start showing us some in-game runs with the thing, at a real man's resolution, not that 1024x768 **** that 3dMark runs their benches at. Any modern GPU can perform well @ 10x7. It takes a serious **** of a graphics chip to do the same at 1920x1200.
Avatar image for Lilgunney612
Lilgunney612

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#13 Lilgunney612
Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts
[QUOTE="codezer0"]Big whoop. Come back when you start showing us some in-game runs with the thing, at a real man's resolution, not that 1024x768 **** that 3dMark runs their benches at. Any modern GPU can perform well @ 10x7. It takes a serious **** of a graphics chip to do the same at 1920x1200.

Resolution 1280x1024 when did you become such an ass anyway? in the full version you can choose the res. still very impressive.
Avatar image for Zenkuso
Zenkuso

4090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Zenkuso
Member since 2006 • 4090 Posts

Big whoop. Come back when you start showing us some in-game runs with the thing, at a real man's resolution, not that 1024x768 **** that 3dMark runs their benches at. Any modern GPU can perform well @ 10x7. It takes a serious **** of a graphics chip to do the same at 1920x1200.codezer0

http://www.guru3d.com/article/Videocards/496/10/

Does that help? or do you want me to post 10 other reviews?

Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#15 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

Congratz :)

[QUOTE="codezer0"]Big whoop. Come back when you start showing us some in-game runs with the thing, at a real man's resolution, not that 1024x768 **** that 3dMark runs their benches at. Any modern GPU can perform well @ 10x7. It takes a serious **** of a graphics chip to do the same at 1920x1200.Lilgunney612
Resolution 1280x1024

:lol:

Avatar image for el_carl
el_carl

2376

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 el_carl
Member since 2006 • 2376 Posts
OH SNAP!
Avatar image for SSGWright
SSGWright

1039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 SSGWright
Member since 2003 • 1039 Posts
lol, i sense anger for some reason ;)
Avatar image for Lilgunney612
Lilgunney612

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#18 Lilgunney612
Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts
lol, i sense anger for some reason ;)SSGWright
i sense a flame war.. maybe i shouldn't have said that?
Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

[QUOTE="SSGWright"]lol, i sense anger for some reason ;)Lilgunney612
i sense a flame war.. maybe i shouldn't have said that?

You put him in its place, you did what you had to do.

Avatar image for pc478
pc478

162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 pc478
Member since 2007 • 162 Posts
Still patiently wait for 9800x2 and gtx .....
Avatar image for BlueBirdTS
BlueBirdTS

6403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#21 BlueBirdTS
Member since 2005 • 6403 Posts

Congratulations! 19,000 marks is nothing to sneeze at. Very impressive overclock with the Q6600 by the way.

Oh, and it might be time to update your sig. :P

Avatar image for battledroid978
battledroid978

819

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 battledroid978
Member since 2003 • 819 Posts
19,000? I couldn't make it past 5500 with a X1950XT. Congrats.
Avatar image for 9mmSpliff
9mmSpliff

21751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 9mmSpliff
Member since 2005 • 21751 Posts
Im ordering my VisionTek 3870x2 tomorrow and my 2nd one in a month from now with a new CoolerMaster 1000wt PSU. I hope you enjoy yours man, its a hell of a card I have seen and let us know how it runs
Avatar image for ket222
ket222

192

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 ket222
Member since 2003 • 192 Posts
what is stocked overclocked? if I get someone at geeksquad to make my comp, can they make a quad core that is overclocked with this card, and if so do I have to get some watercoolant/coolant device?
Avatar image for Sistem_42
Sistem_42

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#25 Sistem_42
Member since 2005 • 372 Posts
great man.
Avatar image for Zenkuso
Zenkuso

4090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Zenkuso
Member since 2006 • 4090 Posts

what is stocked overclocked? if I get someone at geeksquad to make my comp, can they make a quad core that is overclocked with this card, and if so do I have to get some watercoolant/coolant device?ket222

Its called factory clocked not stocked overclocked ;)

Its where they make faster versions of the basic models but they are still able to be overclocked themselves. As for making a QC overclocked with this card then yes its very simple and overclocking doesn't require water cooling but it does help, I would recommend custom cooling options for your cpu (water cooling or heat sink/fan setups) if you are going to overclock cause they do run pretty hot otherwise.

If you do overclock a 3870X2 then I seriously would make sure your running a custom water cooling setup on the card itself because they already in load with the fan setup they come with run at 79-80C (while idle its very cool at 50C).

Avatar image for SearchMaster
SearchMaster

7243

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 SearchMaster
Member since 2005 • 7243 Posts

Yeah, its the time now to update your sig. Hope you would enjoy now gaming with that card.
I cant wait till i get my hand on one of these as well

Avatar image for SSGWright
SSGWright

1039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 SSGWright
Member since 2003 • 1039 Posts

yeah i got 2 asus 3870x2, one's still in the box patiently waiting for the crossfirex drivers. I also ordered 2 EK waterblocks for them. I should be getting them tomorrow.

I also just got my q6600 stable at 3.8, here's a new link

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5247952

can get it to boot at 4.0 but it's not quite stable yet

this card is really impressive, I was expecting alot of issues with it, but I've had literly 0 problems with all of my games. I even run crysis at 1680x1050 with everything on very high except shaders and shadows, those I had to leave on high

Avatar image for My_name_a_Borat
My_name_a_Borat

762

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 My_name_a_Borat
Member since 2007 • 762 Posts

Holy hell, that's quite a score. Very nice. ATI just went up a notch in my book. :P

Thought I was high and mighty with the 12.5K posted by my Opty at 3.2+SLI'd GTS-640s...

Avatar image for 04dcarraher
04dcarraher

23858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#30 04dcarraher
Member since 2004 • 23858 Posts
Well Ive read somewhere that the 3780X2 did worse than a single 8800GTX in Crysis. If the game/games support crossfire then this thing is a beast, most but not all new AA-AAA games do support SLI/Crossfire anyways. Reemeber how bad the 79**GX2 or what ever they were didnt do as good as people thought because at the time 95% of games did use SLI. Well the 8800GT's are coming down in price and you can pick them up as low as $210 and kill this card in SLI and save alittle money if you can, but as soon as ATI comes out with Crossfire drivers O Boy :) But then you got the 9800GX2 coming which again give Nvidia top dog rank again.
Avatar image for DJ8WORK
DJ8WORK

2675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 DJ8WORK
Member since 2003 • 2675 Posts

holy crap do you have crysis and how does it preform?crippo_gamer

you do know that GPU is no better with is dual cpus config compaired to something of the same power but with 1 CPU when playing crysis!! im not sure if its a bug or just badly programed to take us of muilty GPU cores! there were some benchmarks i think! or am i getting mistaken for the new intel montherboard with its dual CPU setup?

Avatar image for DJ8WORK
DJ8WORK

2675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 DJ8WORK
Member since 2003 • 2675 Posts

yeah i got 2 asus 3870x2, one's still in the box patiently waiting for the crossfirex drivers. I also ordered 2 EK waterblocks for them. I should be getting them tomorrow.

I also just got my q6600 stable at 3.8, here's a new link

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm06=5247952

can get it to boot at 4.0 but it's not quite stable yet

this card is really impressive, I was expecting alot of issues with it, but I've had literly 0 problems with all of my games. I even run crysis at 1680x1050 with everything on very high except shaders and shadows, those I had to leave on high

SSGWright
man i'd love to know how to overclose the FSB and ram so they work in harmony, but im useless at it :(
Avatar image for inyourface_12
inyourface_12

14757

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#33 inyourface_12
Member since 2006 • 14757 Posts
vista or xp?
Avatar image for codezer0
codezer0

15898

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 44

User Lists: 0

#34 codezer0
Member since 2004 • 15898 Posts
[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]Resolution 1280x1024 when did you become such an ass anyway? in the full version you can choose the res. still very impressive.

And just as quickly someone can post a 3dMark result at 640x480 that shows them having 10 million 3dMark points, too. Your point? 3DMark is a joke. You don't play 3DMark, it just runs through prerendered **** And it's not like both ATi and NV have not been guilty of coding their drivers to artificially bump up the benchmark scores that their hardware gets. The fact that people still have such a throbbing hard-on for some benchmark score that has nothing to do with actual game play just signifies that you need to increase your e-dick to make up for your own personal... shortcomings. And fawning over people like this just lumps you into it as "guilty by association", far as I'm concerned. Why the **** should I care about how a 3DMark @ 1280x1024 or 10x7 is when I game at a much higher resolution? What's the ****ing point when I don't care about gaming @ 12x10, but rather at 16x10 or 19x12? Or even 2560x1600?
Avatar image for SSGWright
SSGWright

1039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 SSGWright
Member since 2003 • 1039 Posts

[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]Resolution 1280x1024 when did you become such an ass anyway? in the full version you can choose the res. still very impressive.codezer0
And just as quickly someone can post a 3dMark result at 640x480 that shows them having 10 million 3dMark points, too. Your point? 3DMark is a joke. You don't play 3DMark, it just runs through prerendered **** And it's not like both ATi and NV have not been guilty of coding their drivers to artificially bump up the benchmark scores that their hardware gets. The fact that people still have such a throbbing hard-on for some benchmark score that has nothing to do with actual game play just signifies that you need to increase your e-dick to make up for your own personal... shortcomings. And fawning over people like this just lumps you into it as "guilty by association", far as I'm concerned. Why the **** should I care about how a 3DMark @ 1280x1024 or 10x7 is when I game at a much higher resolution? What's the ****ing point when I don't care about gaming @ 12x10, but rather at 16x10 or 19x12? Or even 2560x1600?

HAHAAAA little emotional are we?? mommy can't afford a good card for you?? damn man relax, why even bother posting that crap?

a card still has to use it's "power" to render all the 3dmark tests, show me one card that scores low on 3dmark but is a beast at "real world games"... face it, if a card can put out good numbers in 3dmark it's going to put out the frames in games.

Avatar image for Sistem_42
Sistem_42

372

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 Sistem_42
Member since 2005 • 372 Posts

3dmark uses the same principle as the games do... it takes the 3d model made of polygons puts a texture on it and renders it with shaders or without it. this takes the cards memory and processor, and the less the time it takes to render the best result is. some of the GAMES problem is that they lack support or maybe driver suppor for the game.

Avatar image for wklzip
wklzip

13925

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#37 wklzip
Member since 2005 • 13925 Posts

[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]Resolution 1280x1024 when did you become such an ass anyway? in the full version you can choose the res. still very impressive.codezer0
And just as quickly someone can post a 3dMark result at 640x480 that shows them having 10 million 3dMark points, too. Your point? 3DMark is a joke. You don't play 3DMark, it just runs through prerendered **** And it's not like both ATi and NV have not been guilty of coding their drivers to artificially bump up the benchmark scores that their hardware gets. The fact that people still have such a throbbing hard-on for some benchmark score that has nothing to do with actual game play just signifies that you need to increase your e-dick to make up for your own personal... shortcomings. And fawning over people like this just lumps you into it as "guilty by association", far as I'm concerned. Why the **** should I care about how a 3DMark @ 1280x1024 or 10x7 is when I game at a much higher resolution? What's the ****ing point when I don't care about gaming @ 12x10, but rather at 16x10 or 19x12? Or even 2560x1600?

Do you know that gamespot gives us the chance to make blogs?
Avatar image for tcarruth
tcarruth

926

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 tcarruth
Member since 2005 • 926 Posts

[QUOTE="codezer0"]Big whoop. Come back when you start showing us some in-game runs with the thing, at a real man's resolution, not that 1024x768 **** that 3dMark runs their benches at. Any modern GPU can perform well @ 10x7. It takes a serious **** of a graphics chip to do the same at 1920x1200.Lilgunney612
Resolution 1280x1024 when did you become such an ass anyway? in the full version you can choose the res. still very impressive.

He'll PM you shortly and tell that "its just his stlye". Pathetic.

Avatar image for Lilgunney612
Lilgunney612

1878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#39 Lilgunney612
Member since 2005 • 1878 Posts
[QUOTE="codezer0"] Why the **** should I care about how a 3DMark @ 1280x1024 or 10x7 is when I game at a much higher resolution? What's the ****ing point when I don't care about gaming @ 12x10, but rather at 16x10 or 19x12? Or even 2560x1600?

i have to leave for work in a few minutes so i cant make a long ass statement... no one says you should **** care about 3dmark, its a general benchmarking software for people to put a basis on how good their system is, not to brag about anything at all, if you don't like it than fine, but don't bring your **** around here, thats what blogs are for. 19000 on 3Dmark with 1280x1024 res is still very impressive even if it is 3D mark, i am not saying "If you can gat a good score on 3Dmark you can run any game that well" im saying its very impressive for a 3Dmark score. Get your head out of your ass and respond like a normal human being.
Avatar image for Domobomb
Domobomb

1914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 Domobomb
Member since 2004 • 1914 Posts

[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]Resolution 1280x1024 when did you become such an ass anyway? in the full version you can choose the res. still very impressive.codezer0
And just as quickly someone can post a 3dMark result at 640x480 that shows them having 10 million 3dMark points, too. Your point? 3DMark is a joke. You don't play 3DMark, it just runs through prerendered **** And it's not like both ATi and NV have not been guilty of coding their drivers to artificially bump up the benchmark scores that their hardware gets. The fact that people still have such a throbbing hard-on for some benchmark score that has nothing to do with actual game play just signifies that you need to increase your e-dick to make up for your own personal... shortcomings. And fawning over people like this just lumps you into it as "guilty by association", far as I'm concerned. Why the **** should I care about how a 3DMark @ 1280x1024 or 10x7 is when I game at a much higher resolution? What's the ****ing point when I don't care about gaming @ 12x10, but rather at 16x10 or 19x12? Or even 2560x1600?

LOL, is this guy serious? Heh, what a joke.

Avatar image for Wesker776
Wesker776

7004

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Wesker776
Member since 2005 • 7004 Posts

[QUOTE="Lilgunney612"]Resolution 1280x1024 when did you become such an ass anyway? in the full version you can choose the res. still very impressive.codezer0
And just as quickly someone can post a 3dMark result at 640x480 that shows them having 10 million 3dMark points, too. Your point? 3DMark is a joke. You don't play 3DMark, it just runs through prerendered **** And it's not like both ATi and NV have not been guilty of coding their drivers to artificially bump up the benchmark scores that their hardware gets. The fact that people still have such a throbbing hard-on for some benchmark score that has nothing to do with actual game play just signifies that you need to increase your e-dick to make up for your own personal... shortcomings. And fawning over people like this just lumps you into it as "guilty by association", far as I'm concerned. Why the **** should I care about how a 3DMark @ 1280x1024 or 10x7 is when I game at a much higher resolution? What's the ****ing point when I don't care about gaming @ 12x10, but rather at 16x10 or 19x12? Or even 2560x1600?

You don't have to rain on his parade.

3DMark06 is the most used, unofficial PC benchmarking tool used by enthusiasts worldwide.

You don't have to get all moody over a statistic if you think so little of it.

Avatar image for crippo_gamer
crippo_gamer

1164

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#42 crippo_gamer
Member since 2005 • 1164 Posts
^^^