wow the q6600 price is dropping fast

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#1 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11789 Posts
I just went on some sites and the processer is like $160-180 now because of the i7 if anyone builing a new pc should consider this
Avatar image for CPM_basic
CPM_basic

4247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#2 CPM_basic
Member since 2002 • 4247 Posts
I'm keeping my eye on q6600 prices as well as other processors. Might build a new PC after xmas.
Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts
If it drops below $150 I might decide to retire my E6600 (P965, Yorkfield and Wolfdale are not an option).
Avatar image for AdamK47
AdamK47

1127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 AdamK47
Member since 2003 • 1127 Posts

The Core 2 Quads were never appealing to me. It's non native quad core architecture (read: two Core 2 Duos glued together) isn't very efficient. I upgraded my E8400 to a Core i7 920 two days ago.

Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#5 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11789 Posts
can I have ur e8400?

well I plan to get a i7 but i'm gonna wait till after the new year
Avatar image for AdamK47
AdamK47

1127

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 AdamK47
Member since 2003 • 1127 Posts
My wife is getting it to replace her Athlon 3200+ system. The E8400 overclocks to 4GHz easily and has been running at that speed since January. That should be plenty for her when she plays WoW.
Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#7 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11789 Posts
My wife is getting it to replace her Athlon 3200+ system. The E8400 overclocks to 4GHz easily and has been running at that speed since January. That should be plenty for her when she plays WoW.AdamK47

wow u convinced ur wife to play warcraft?
Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

The Core 2 Quads were never appealing to me. It's non native quad core architecture (read: two Core 2 Duos glued together) isn't very efficient. I upgraded my E8400 to a Core i7 920 two days ago.

AdamK47

It's more efficient than AMD's native Quad-core design, unless Deneb shows some marked improvements (and it looks like it very well might at that).

Avatar image for redneckdouglas
redneckdouglas

2977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 redneckdouglas
Member since 2005 • 2977 Posts
Cool another fellow with I7 here. I have a I7 940 with 3.6 24/7 clock. I wouldn't even think about buying a Q6600 or any old Quads. Dualcore or I7 Quad makes more sense.
Avatar image for BeavermanA
BeavermanA

2652

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 BeavermanA
Member since 2003 • 2652 Posts
Fry's had the Q6600 + crap mobo for $120 last week. E6850 + crap mobo for $100. So pissed it was the one day I didn't check the deals, stuff was sold out very quickly as you can imagine. All I need is cpu + mobo for a complete decent second pc. Could've donated my P4 to a friend.
Avatar image for X360PS3AMD05
X360PS3AMD05

36320

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 X360PS3AMD05
Member since 2005 • 36320 Posts
Cool another fellow with I7 here. I have a I7 940 with 3.6 24/7 clock. I wouldn't even think about buying a Q6600 or any old Quads. Dualcore or I7 Quad makes more sense.redneckdouglas
Uh not to me, E7300 is all i would consider from there there is a gap between $120-$320 or how much the 920 i7 goes for...........
Avatar image for wolfdogelite
wolfdogelite

495

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#12 wolfdogelite
Member since 2008 • 495 Posts
the i7 920, cheapest ones, are going for like 380 on newegg, and are out of stock, and from the benchmarks I've seen, they aren't really setting themselves apart from the wolfdales just yet, the e8500 was only 2-4 fps behind them all the way, makes me feel good about my investment
Avatar image for Hadentar
Hadentar

73

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Hadentar
Member since 2007 • 73 Posts

Really? Last year they were like £90-£100, now they're like £140-£150.

Damn the economy.

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#14 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

The Core 2 Quads were never appealing to me. It's non native quad core architecture (read: two Core 2 Duos glued together) isn't very efficient. I upgraded my E8400 to a Core i7 920 two days ago.

AdamK47

WOW, and i bet for 3x the cost you are getting much greater performance increases in games right? ;)

PS: the 3x is refering the silly cost of the mobo, ddr3 ram, and new tech cpu

Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#15 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

Cool another fellow with I7 here. I have a I7 940 with 3.6 24/7 clock. I wouldn't even think about buying a Q6600 or any old Quads. Dualcore or I7 Quad makes more sense.redneckdouglas

depends on how much money you have to spend,,,a q6600 will give similar performance in many instances and costs a LOT less!

Avatar image for redneckdouglas
redneckdouglas

2977

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 redneckdouglas
Member since 2005 • 2977 Posts
On multi-tasking, Q6600 is about 30% slower or even worse on some programs that supports more than 8 threads.
Avatar image for kemar7856
kemar7856

11789

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 20

User Lists: 0

#17 kemar7856
Member since 2004 • 11789 Posts

Really? Last year they were like £90-£100, now they're like £140-£150.

Damn the economy.

Hadentar

i mean in US currentcy
Avatar image for Daytona_178
Daytona_178

14962

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#18 Daytona_178
Member since 2005 • 14962 Posts

On multi-tasking, Q6600 is about 30% slower or even worse on some programs that supports more than 8 threads.redneckdouglas

LOL, so what? The Q6600 overclocked is still an absolute beast for a bargain price! The i7 can sometimes be upto 30% better but in games its barely any better,,,so for most people its a waste of money.

Avatar image for RayvinAzn
RayvinAzn

12552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 RayvinAzn
Member since 2004 • 12552 Posts

On multi-tasking, Q6600 is about 30% slower or even worse on some programs that supports more than 8 threads.redneckdouglas

So it depends entirely on the kinds of programs you want to use.