XP vs. Vista For New Gaming PC and other questions from a PC newbie.

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for pgrcronin
pgrcronin

27

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 pgrcronin
Member since 2007 • 27 Posts

Hi,

I'm just looking at buying a gaming PC at the moment, but I don't really know too much about the things at the moment.

It's vitals will be something along the lines of: quad core 2.4Ghz, 4 or 8 Gb of 800Mhz DDR2corsair ram and an 8800GTX 768Mbvideo card.

What would the better OS be for me?

I've also heard that 2x 8800GT 512Mb are better than a single 8800GTX and cheaper, is this actually true or does the DX10 make enough of a difference on vista to make the 8800GTX worth it.

Additionally what wattage of power supply should I be looking(single HDD) and is liquid cooling worth the extra money or is that really only worth it for top of the range gaming PCs.

Sorry for bombarding you with questions any answers and advice will be greatly welcomed.

Avatar image for NosmoKing1984
NosmoKing1984

115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#2 NosmoKing1984
Member since 2007 • 115 Posts

It might be worth checking the SLIzone forums for the best advice on what graphics/power configurations to go with. But I'd say that 8800GTS 640Mb edition would be a safe bet, they're slightly better than the GT (not to be confused with the normal GTS edition which is slower than the GT... why nVidia have played around with their naming I don't know but it sucks.)

But like I said, just do some searches on the SLIzone forum and you'll find tons of usefull information.

Oh and 8 Gb of RAM is pointless, nothing will utilise that. 4 Gb is a bit of over kill also, you wouldn't see much difference between 2 and 4 Gb to be honest, but if you do go with 4Gb you NEEDa 64-bit OS because 32-bit OS's can't see all the RAM, I don't know the full reason why, I just know that 64-bit is required to use 4Gb.

Have fun

Avatar image for G013M
G013M

6424

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 G013M
Member since 2006 • 6424 Posts

It might be worth checking the SLIzone forums for the best advice on what graphics/power configurations to go with. But I'd say that 8800GTS 640Mb edition would be a safe bet, they're slightly better than the GT (not to be confused with the normal GTS edition which is slower than the GT... why nVidia have played around with their naming I don't know but it sucks.)

But like I said, just do some searches on the SLIzone forum and you'll find tons of usefull information.

Oh and 8 Gb of RAM is pointless, nothing will utilise that. 4 Gb is a bit of over kill also, you wouldn't see much difference between 2 and 4 Gb to be honest, but if you do go with 4Gb you NEEDa 64-bit OS because 32-bit OS's can't see all the RAM, I don't know the full reason why, I just know that 64-bit is required to use 4Gb.

Have fun

NosmoKing1984

You mean the GTS 512meg version. The 640/320 are the older versions, which are slower then the GT.

Avatar image for ryan_returns29
ryan_returns29

3191

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#4 ryan_returns29
Member since 2006 • 3191 Posts
8GB of RAM???? Now that's what I call an overkill. I would personally go with 2GB, but go with 4GB...if you must.
Avatar image for kodai
kodai

924

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 kodai
Member since 2003 • 924 Posts
A common misunderstanding about 32bit OS (namely XP and Vista) is the 4GB issue. Mainly with XP the SP1 version and above wont report more than 3GB and it wont use more than that for it'self. It will allow any app that can use it to use a full 4GB though. There just arent that many 32bit apps that use 4GB. Photoshop and Gimp will and a hand full of others. The only game taht I'm awayre of that will even "use" 4 gigs is Supreme Commander and to really say it uses anything over three is is inaccurate. The CPU'S and GPU's willbottleneck that game LONG before it needs more than3gigs.There is also some video editing software that will use it, but again games are pretty happy with 2-3 gigs at the momment. Get 4 if you plan for a64bit OS upgrade in the future and dont want to deal with swaping out the previous two just incase. The only reason you might have to do that is overclocking problems. If you plan to overclock then get two matched pairs of 2GB sticks now. The odds are you would have to toss your two gigs out if you upgradeto64bit in the future becuase overclcoking is really picky about matched memory. If 64bit is not a plan for this rig then save the cash or put it towards the best two gigs you can get for your board. Also if you plan to overclock make sure to check out as many forums as you can to seeEXACTLY what make and model ramis working on your board for the best overclocking.
Avatar image for incubus_1_7
incubus_1_7

322

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 incubus_1_7
Member since 2003 • 322 Posts
[QUOTE="NosmoKing1984"]

It might be worth checking the SLIzone forums for the best advice on what graphics/power configurations to go with. But I'd say that 8800GTS 640Mb edition would be a safe bet, they're slightly better than the GT (not to be confused with the normal GTS edition which is slower than the GT... why nVidia have played around with their naming I don't know but it sucks.)

But like I said, just do some searches on the SLIzone forum and you'll find tons of usefull information.

Oh and 8 Gb of RAM is pointless, nothing will utilise that. 4 Gb is a bit of over kill also, you wouldn't see much difference between 2 and 4 Gb to be honest, but if you do go with 4Gb you NEEDa 64-bit OS because 32-bit OS's can't see all the RAM, I don't know the full reason why, I just know that 64-bit is required to use 4Gb.

Have fun

G013M

You mean the GTS 512meg version. The 640/320 are the older versions, which are slower then the GT.

The gts640/320 version are both slower than the gt. the gts 512 is faster than the gt