X-Plane 10.22 (max rendering videos)

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for seveverino
seveverino

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 seveverino
Member since 2013 • 25 Posts
Hi, some videos with latest version of X-Plane (10.22) and max rendering options. I hope you like :) C210 Centurion II http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ZKr2LViWpc AS350 B3+ Mountain rescue http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wEzT0B2yF1s F-16 Falcon http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGGXZ06nCPU Boeing 777 300ER http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XilscQAZvak Boeing 727 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lUNLaoCdhXE C-17 Globemaster III http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rtKv8rKUUI YAK-55 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gPzcmLAgS0 Cessna 340 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vGYDvapLYs
Avatar image for skrat_01
skrat_01

33767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 skrat_01
Member since 2007 • 33767 Posts
X-Plane sure has come a long way, looking good.
Avatar image for Gamesterpheonix
Gamesterpheonix

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#3 Gamesterpheonix
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts
Theres WING physics! Did anyone else see the wings bobbing up and down when the 777 hit the water? Dang. So cool. Is this released yet or what? Im so buying this to add to my flight sim collection.
Avatar image for MrUnSavory1
MrUnSavory1

777

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 MrUnSavory1
Member since 2005 • 777 Posts

FSX has wing physics like that also and has for a long time.

Avatar image for Gamesterpheonix
Gamesterpheonix

3676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#5 Gamesterpheonix
Member since 2005 • 3676 Posts

FSX has wing physics like that also and has for a long time.

MrUnSavory1
Whaaat? I had no idea. All this time I thought these games just used rigid models for those things along with instant snap off wings when really damaged. I also went and saw what they charge for X-Plane 10...freaking $70. Thats a hell no for me...even with 40 available planes and pretty nice graphics...
Avatar image for WiiRocks66
WiiRocks66

3488

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#6 WiiRocks66
Member since 2007 • 3488 Posts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9Fll4jmA2c

Skip to :45 to watch the wing bounce on landing. That's FSX. Most of the default planes have static wings, but most addons(free and paid) have wing physics that are usually pretty accurate.

X-Plane has definitely come a long way, but it still can't replace FSX for me. 

Avatar image for mr_chalupa
mr_chalupa

176

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 mr_chalupa
Member since 2005 • 176 Posts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q9Fll4jmA2c

Skip to :45 to watch the wing bounce on landing. That's FSX. Most of the default planes have static wings, but most addons(free and paid) have wing physics that are usually pretty accurate.

X-Plane has definitely come a long way, but it still can't replace FSX for me. 

WiiRocks66
It has replaced it for me since a long time for the whole sensation. Its like FSX renders then pays attention to physics and XPlane the other way around. and is starting to look acceptable this days. I cant describe the next thing very well but i hope i give you enough info to understand what its in my mind: The landing part is real different. FSX runs a whole damn lot of scripts when you touch down. bogging the whole system sometimes even skipping some frames. Kind of like deciding if you crashed or not and then continue with the render. XPlane doesnt, you are part of the world and when you land the motion is fluent. like the springs on the wheels actually work, like... picture this, xplanes got springs on wheels that do contract while you land, and if you exceed that you break, while in FSX you are a flying square that calculates the force on "touch down", and loading an animation on the plane while not actually doing it. I hope this sums up, and is explained well enough for it to be understood, on why i made the switch.
Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

[QUOTE="MrUnSavory1"]

FSX has wing physics like that also and has for a long time.

Gamesterpheonix

I also went and saw what they charge for X-Plane 10...freaking $70. Thats a hell no for me...even with 40 available planes and pretty nice graphics...

$70 isn't bad. Remember how much FSX cost when it was newly released? The Deluxe version cost like $80.