You guys never gets satisfied, do ya?

These past days, many long awaited demos have been released..

There's been a lot of hype about UT3, CoD4, Hellgate London, TimeShift..
Now when the demos finally are out, You're all whining about how bad the game is.
Ohww, the gameplay/graphic/sound isn't 100% perfect! *whine* *whine* UT3 graphics looks like the original UT etc.
I bet that once the Crysis demo is out, everyone will start whining...

You never get satisfied. :|
Personally I found UT3 great, TimeShift was pretty good too, Hellgate London is great too, CoD4 was "OK".

Just had to get it out. :|

i personaly liked UT3 and CoD4 demos. i didn't like Hellgate or TimeShift. i wasn't expecting a whole lot from TimeShift, so it didn't disappoint me, but Hellgate was very disappointing.

i also enjoy Crysis beta a lot, but because of the NDA i'm not gonna say anymore about it.

It doesn't bother me that much, consider it constructive criticism :)

The industry needs to be challenged, especially on the PC since more greatness is possible/achievable, we should have high standards.

Regardless of the standards though, I really liked a number of these recent demos as well! TimeShift, COD4, etc

i personaly liked UT3 and CoD4 demos. i didn't like Hellgate or TimeShift. i wasn't expecting a whole lot from TimeShift, so it didn't disappoint me, but Hellgate was very disappointing.

i also enjoy Crysis beta a lot, but because of the NDA i'm not gonna say anymore about it.

prowler666

the NDA for the crysis beta was lifted a few weeks ago.

Ye, but I mean the demo. :o

Not everyone have access to the beta right? Only a few?

the NDA for the crysis beta was lifted a few weeks ago.

cobrax25

oh, in that case, the only thing to whine about the beta is that i can get decent FPS only on low settings... i tried it on med-high just to see how good the game can look, but no hope playing it that way... low FPS really kills the feeling, specially when talking about a multiplayer.

and yes, i know that the actual problem is my rig, but i guess there's still some optimizing to do with Crysis. gotta do some updating when the full version comes out.

For me it's about gameplay and all these new games just don't do it because they're the same as what i played 5 years ago but on a new engine :\

oh, in that case, the only thing to whine about the beta is that i can get decent FPS only on low settings... i tried it on med-high just to see how good the game can look, but no hope playing it that way... low FPS really kills the feeling, specially when talking about a multiplayer.

and yes, i know that the actual problem is my rig, but i guess there's still some optimizing to do with Crysis. gotta do some updating when the full version comes out.

prowler666

You definitely aren't alone, optimization by far seemed to be the most common complaint about the Crysis beta. I didn't try the beta, but am anxious for the demo :)

one thing i just couldnt believe reading was people whining about ut3 beta demo graphics. i mean what more do you want from the medium settings, wich tbh already looked awsome?! gee

We should not push developers , first we want it released quick but we got so many ideas to the game so it doesn't really make any sense. Then when it is released (maybe) we cry out for patches to fix those things that could've easily been fixed if we didn't want it to be released so damn fast.

If i would be a boss over a game company i would've never said a release date -even year! until it was gold . And it was gonna be gold whenever we had completed it with ideas features , and most important polished and optimized.

Right now it feels like people make companys release half finished games without polishing and completing it with the patches (about 9 months depends on the company) . And get no way to do that extra polishing that give games that extra feel to it.

And makes sense that people complain about upgrading all the time , the games ain't getting there well-deserved optimizing. I can't beleive that i just wrote a complain post about complaints.

I find that the problem is typically the attitude of the gamer. For some reason, most gamers think that it is the SOLE RESPONSIBILITY for devs to provide them entertainment. Like they're just kept in a cage all day and told what to do and if something they make doesn't make someone happy they feel like they're OWED a better game.

They don't take into consideration that it's just a job for the people making the game. Even if you wear big daddy underoos or have Gordon Freeman bed sheets, it doesn't entitle you to anything.

People need to learn to enjoy the games that they can and appreciate the good ones that come along. The devs do it for the money...not your praise.

But let me just say this...we wouldn't have all of this stale gameplay with awesome new graphics had it not been for Xbox and its influence on gaming. If people want to have amazing games to play they HAVE TO STOP SUPPORTING CRAP! Xbox = all flash and no substance and because PC gamers are getting ports, not the way it should be, we're getting these games with amazing graphics but no originality or innovation.

If you ever contributed a single dime to Xbox you removed any right to complain...it's your fault :P