This topic is locked from further discussion.
It's been a while since I've read text quite that terribly written before, to be honest.GranpireEnglish probably isn't his first language. Your brain can still decipher what he means, though. Anyway.. TC, good list, but a correction: the Metal Gear Solid HD collection contains the second and third games.
Probably means retail games. And Sound Shapes is no more spectacular.Where's Sound Shapes:|
Golden Abyssis a showpiece and nothing more.
Gxgear
I personally think Little Big Planet Vita showed what the Vita IS really capable of, its #1 on my list.. and after watching videos of ragnarok, the graphics look 5x better then any game thats been out for Vita.. this can't be proven until we have it in our own hands.. but other then that I really liked Gravity Rush and Uncharted + mortal Kombat and Ultamate Marvel VS Capcom ports.. and tbh I had high hopes for Sound Shapes but I guess its just not my type of game.
I personally would say hell no to Uncharted, very generic and average game to me, looks awesome and plays decent but apart from that it feels almost Soulless compared to the other Uncharted games. Unless your desperate for another Vita game then get it otherwise there are games more deserving of your money and anyones.
Tis sad that only ragnarok oddysey caught my eye and when I was desperate i bought disgaea 3. Wii u got good titles to offer but this vita which is more powerful than the wii u got this kind of line up? Twas expected of sony which sells tv and some other stuff unlike nintendo which is pure blooded video game companyfoxfacer2d2Lol vita isn't even as strong as the ps3, much less the wii u. Unless you meant 3ds? In which case yeah it curb stomps It
I know the games I own aren't the best Vita games, but they are all pretty good.
My games for Vita are Uncharted GA, Mortal Kombat, Unit 13, Motorstorm RC, Hotshots Golf Treasures of Montezuma Blitz (free game but it's really addicting), and the best of them all Little Big Planet Vita. I still want Gravity Rush, MGS collection, Fifa 13 (almost out), and Resistance BR (for the multiplayer)...I feel like I'm missing something too. *edit* Soundshapes is the one I missed *edit*
There is still AC3:L to come out, and that has priority over the other games I mentioned. The Vita doesn't really have it that bad in terms of software, I just wish the system sold better. Plus it has the Cross-Buy games coming like PSA and Sly 4.
If I had to catorgarize the top 5 (even the ones I don't own) it would be:
5. Uncharted: Golden Abyss
4. Unit 13
3. Soundshapes
2. Gravity Rush
1. Little Big Planet PSVita
Which ones on that list is Sound Shapes better than?Still better than half the games on that list.
Gxgear
[QUOTE="foxfacer2d2"]Tis sad that only ragnarok oddysey caught my eye and when I was desperate i bought disgaea 3. Wii u got good titles to offer but this vita which is more powerful than the wii u got this kind of line up? Twas expected of sony which sells tv and some other stuff unlike nintendo which is pure blooded video game companyWreckEm711Lol vita isn't even as strong as the ps3, much less the wii u. Unless you meant 3ds? In which case yeah it curb stomps It
not sure about gpu, but ram and cpu wise vita is superior to even ps3. wii u is underrated hardware, people don't realize how powerful it is. naturally ps4/xbox720 will kill it
Vita's CPU is nowhere near the PS3's. The PS3 is clocked at 3.2 GHZ, and the Vita is somewhere between 800MHZ and 2GHZ(not this much though, according to Sony, since the battery would "last five minutes and probably set fire to your pants."). It's likely around 800-1000MHZ, though it's also likely that Sony will increase the clock speed furthur into the Vita's life cycle, the same way they did with the PSP.
Vita's RAM is 512MB, with a Video memory of 128MB, while the PS3 has 256MB of each (RAM and VRAM), so that's... partly true.
Vita's CPU is nowhere near the PS3's. The PS3 is clocked at 3.2 GHZ, and the Vita is somewhere between 800MHZ and 2GHZ(not this much though, according to Sony, since the battery would "last five minutes and probably set fire to your pants."). It's likely around 800-1000MHZ, though it's also likely that Sony will increase the clock speed furthur into the Vita's life cycle, the same way they did with the PSP.
Vita's RAM is 512MB, with a Video memory of 128MB, while the PS3 has 256MB of each (RAM and VRAM), so that's... partly true.
Granpire
vita has a quad cores, ps3 has 1 core with small mini cores. so vita kills it in cpu terms. arm cpu run pretty cool
No. Quad core does help, but the PS3's processor far outdoes the Vita. 3.2 GHZ will beat out (or possibly match) a 2GHZ Quad Core in power, for one thing, and the Cell's SPUs allowed developers to offload additional processing elements like Antialiasing or Bloom lighting to take stress from the GPU.
The Vita is a more straightforward device to develop for, but it doesn't have the versatility of the PS3's SPUs, or even the raw processing power. Four cores does not multiply the clock speed by four, and a quad core processor isn't necessarily faster than a single core one - even if it were accurate to say the PS3's processor were "single-core".
Gravity Rush is not a great game and it's not a must buy game. The game is far from great and falls short on many things: such as a broken story and no side quests.
[QUOTE="Granpire"]
Vita's CPU is nowhere near the PS3's. The PS3 is clocked at 3.2 GHZ, and the Vita is somewhere between 800MHZ and 2GHZ(not this much though, according to Sony, since the battery would "last five minutes and probably set fire to your pants."). It's likely around 800-1000MHZ, though it's also likely that Sony will increase the clock speed furthur into the Vita's life cycle, the same way they did with the PSP.
Vita's RAM is 512MB, with a Video memory of 128MB, while the PS3 has 256MB of each (RAM and VRAM), so that's... partly true.
aryanbrar
vita has a quad cores, ps3 has 1 core with small mini cores. so vita kills it in cpu terms. arm cpu run pretty cool
yah like what this guys said. 4 cores beats wii U 3 cores and ps3's cell technology but MAN!!! it was stomped in the launch titles.
No, The Vita's (approximately) 1GHZ Quad Core is not equal to three cores at 3GHZ, even if it were as simple as multiplying clock speed. To make full use of all processing cores, developers actually have to split up processes to run separately on each core. It's not like the Vita's processor is quantifiably 4GHZ! The Vita doesn't beat out any of the current-gen consoles in any specs outside of System RAM.yah like what this guys said. 4 cores beats wii U 3 cores and ps3's cell technology but MAN!!! it was stomped in the launch titles.
foxfacer2d2
Able to do them with some heavy optimization and lower-quality assets! Case in point: Mortal Kombat's ugly character models, Wipeout HD's (DLC for Wipeout 2048) sub-30FPS framerate, and Ninja Gaiden's 30FPS framerate.Granpire
so I guess the vita isn't that great. well, better get the wii U
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment