A conspiracy perhaps?

there reviews suck anyway...Unknown_Hero3

yea no joke, always try to find a flaw when there aint any or isnt really that important lol, but wont say nothin about the other console :S

[QUOTE="Unknown_Hero3"]there reviews suck anyway...JoKeR_421

yea no joke, always try to find a flaw when there aint any or isnt really that important lol, but wont say nothin about the other console :S

Well it is important, its a professional gaming site. not a fan site. When you get paid to do something your a pro at that. Thus obligations come along with it. Thus you have to do it to a certain manner. And they cant let other manners get in the way. But, all these "look odd as of late" user reviews and product scores, payed sponsors, ratings, whats a legit contract, what not. All that is gonna burst open soon, and will have to be restructured everywhere on the net.

[QUOTE="JoKeR_421"]

[QUOTE="Unknown_Hero3"]there reviews suck anyway...truenextgen

yea no joke, always try to find a flaw when there aint any or isnt really that important lol, but wont say nothin about the other console :S

Well it is important, its a professional gaming site. not a fan site. When you get paid to do something your a pro at that. Thus obligations come along with it. Thus you have to do it to a certain manner. And they cant let other manners get in the way. But, all these "look odd as of late" user reviews and product scores, payed sponsors, ratings, whats a legit contract, what not. All that is gonna burst open soon, and will have to be restructured everywhere on the net.

yea, i agree. as much as i dont care about reviews, isnt bad that u get paid to do something, but u only do it right for one system? and then they wonder why people call em baised? i mean if u got paid to review ps3, and 360 game/games would u have em for both, sometimes i see a game not even out yet and already has a 9.0 or higher on the other system while ps3 section is collecting dust lol (for those that care about the reviews that is) its just bad for them, they need to do somethin i guess

I'm just sick of seeing Haze on word on the street. They never change that thing and its been there since the Haze review.

Edit: Well i guess they don't show that anymore lol.

[QUOTE="truenextgen"][QUOTE="JoKeR_421"]

[QUOTE="Unknown_Hero3"]there reviews suck anyway...JoKeR_421

yea no joke, always try to find a flaw when there aint any or isnt really that important lol, but wont say nothin about the other console :S

Well it is important, its a professional gaming site. not a fan site. When you get paid to do something your a pro at that. Thus obligations come along with it. Thus you have to do it to a certain manner. And they cant let other manners get in the way. But, all these "look odd as of late" user reviews and product scores, payed sponsors, ratings, whats a legit contract, what not. All that is gonna burst open soon, and will have to be restructured everywhere on the net.

yea, i agree. as much as i dont care about reviews, isnt bad that u get paid to do something, but u only do it right for one system? and then they wonder why people call em baised? i mean if u got paid to review ps3, and 360 game/games would u have em for both, sometimes i see a game not even out yet and already has a 9.0 or higher on the other system while ps3 section is collecting dust lol (for those that care about the reviews that is) its just bad for them, they need to do somethin i guess

They are not biased. Only reason people say they are is because of the incident with Jeff. Each platform has had it's fair share of games get criticized, each fanboy faction just tries to say that GameSpot is against them. Sure..because somehow they benefit from giving a game a poor rating. Most people don't even care about reviews, especially now since most games have demos and multiplayer games have betas which are easily accessible so it's not like they are swaying thousands of people into buying games for System A instead of System B.

[QUOTE="JoKeR_421"][QUOTE="truenextgen"][QUOTE="JoKeR_421"]

[QUOTE="Unknown_Hero3"]there reviews suck anyway...RobNBankz

yea no joke, always try to find a flaw when there aint any or isnt really that important lol, but wont say nothin about the other console :S

Well it is important, its a professional gaming site. not a fan site. When you get paid to do something your a pro at that. Thus obligations come along with it. Thus you have to do it to a certain manner. And they cant let other manners get in the way. But, all these "look odd as of late" user reviews and product scores, payed sponsors, ratings, whats a legit contract, what not. All that is gonna burst open soon, and will have to be restructured everywhere on the net.

yea, i agree. as much as i dont care about reviews, isnt bad that u get paid to do something, but u only do it right for one system? and then they wonder why people call em baised? i mean if u got paid to review ps3, and 360 game/games would u have em for both, sometimes i see a game not even out yet and already has a 9.0 or higher on the other system while ps3 section is collecting dust lol (for those that care about the reviews that is) its just bad for them, they need to do somethin i guess

They are not biased. Only reason people say they are is because of the incident with Jeff. Each platform has had it's fair share of games get criticized, each fanboy faction just tries to say that GameSpot is against them. Sure..because somehow they benefit from giving a game a poor rating. Most people don't even care about reviews, especially now since most games have demos and multiplayer games have betas which are easily accessible so it's not like they are swaying thousands of people into buying games for System A instead of System B.

Um, no. I've seen it WAY before that whole Jeff thing. I'm no "fanboy" and even I saw it. It was worse around launch time though.

[QUOTE="Unknown_Hero3"]there reviews suck anyway...JoKeR_421

yea no joke, always try to find a flaw when there aint any or isnt really that important lol, but wont say nothin about the other console :S

I am just saying it looks kinda odd that the ps3 versions dont have the review.football_legend

Also notice that they had to get a review out for Socom before a patch is used for its servers aswell. But haven't done bioshocks review yet lol.

[QUOTE="football_legend"]I am just saying it looks kinda odd that the ps3 versions dont have the review.bdhoff

Whats weird is, they have the video review of Dead Space on the PS3 page, but not the text review (hence no score). I thought it was a glitch and contacted them, they returned my mail saying they haven't reviewed the title yet. Also Both games are out, I dont know why couldn't they just buy one in a store or something.

You are suprised? you see bias even in these forums.WR_Platinum

seriously . I agree . It's almost inevitable .

But the guys are just doing their jobs .Even if the reviews or final rating can almost be disputed most of the time .

It could be MS paid the GS employers to delay the written review so that no one will get them. The review is really very important to game players. negative review = fail. People will onli listen to reviews and choose whether to purchase them unless there is a demo to convince individualykohwil

We all know that's not true..

Gamespot is doing a good job