All games should have 3D from now on!!!!

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts

Please write to your local devs to support this.

Avatar image for resevl4rlz
resevl4rlz

3848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 resevl4rlz
Member since 2005 • 3848 Posts

not sure if trolling or what. 3d is soo over-rated. do you even own a 3d tv op?

Avatar image for dramaybaz
dramaybaz

6020

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 dramaybaz
Member since 2005 • 6020 Posts
And we are certainly not interested in gimmicks.
Avatar image for volume_three
volume_three

2142

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 volume_three
Member since 2005 • 2142 Posts

:|

And each game released henceforth must also be a FPS :P

Avatar image for CKYguy25
CKYguy25

2087

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 CKYguy25
Member since 2012 • 2087 Posts

TC, i really hope you're joking

Avatar image for MonsieurX
MonsieurX

39858

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 MonsieurX
Member since 2008 • 39858 Posts
Troll escaped from SW
Avatar image for MonkeySpot
MonkeySpot

6070

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 MonkeySpot
Member since 2010 • 6070 Posts

I really don't see that happening. After the wave crested six or eight months ago, I thought that should be obvious. Devs are treating it like any other feature, and for the games where it might make sense, they've made it available, But the biggest reason why I think you don't see more of it, is that most devs realize they need to make a really good GAME, first. That's the biggest hump to get over right now. So adding stereoscopic visuals has to actually bring something TO the gameplay, or they'll be called out on the carpet for relying on a gimmick, which is a sure and fast way into the dumper...

3D hasn't been used to radically alter the way we play games, the same way motion gaming didn't replace a gamepad, and Segue riding didn't alter human locomotion... These things are neat little gags, but unless it brings something of a noticeable enhancing nature to gaming (and it's widely available & affordable with other video programming so that you're not spending $1000s of dollars on a one-use display), it's just not going to stick.

I like the splitting of screens so that 3 players can use the entire display when "split-screening", but outside that, I haven't seen anything which makes me want the tech. And definitely not for prolonged gaming sessions, that would make me sick...

:|

Avatar image for meetroid8
meetroid8

21152

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 meetroid8
Member since 2005 • 21152 Posts
Sure, why not? One more extra feature, no matter how useless it is, is still one more extra feature.
Avatar image for Namgis
Namgis

3592

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 5

#9 Namgis
Member since 2009 • 3592 Posts

Neat story, I reject everything you said.

Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts
Sure, why not? One more extra feature, no matter how useless it is, is still one more extra feature.meetroid8
thats what im saying, why not have the option??? i would play all the games in 3D, and i actually buy 3D games over non 3D games if faced with the choice between 2 games
Avatar image for Rod90
Rod90

7269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#11 Rod90
Member since 2008 • 7269 Posts

:|

And each game released henceforth must also be a FPS :P

volume_three
Yay!
Avatar image for campzor
campzor

34932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 campzor
Member since 2004 • 34932 Posts
naaaaa im alright thanks
Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts
Why? 3D sucks, it's the same crap from the 80s.
Avatar image for mjk400
mjk400

366

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 mjk400
Member since 2008 • 366 Posts

I'm not impressed at all with 3D technology.

Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts
Why? 3D sucks, it's the same crap from the 80s.Fightingfan
no, this is streostropic 3D, its not the same at all. honestly guys, its way more immersive......i mean, once 3D tv's, which are selling everywhere, become the standard, and games make amazing use of this 3D effect, you will all wish you wrote the devs sooner...
Avatar image for zabu213
zabu213

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 zabu213
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
I never played a 3d game on the ps3. I wonder how many people here are just dismissing 3d because they don't own a 3d tv. If you enjoy 3d, so be it..... For me though, I think the glasses could get annoying.
Avatar image for Serial_Killa
Serial_Killa

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 1

#17 Serial_Killa
Member since 2006 • 25 Posts

I have two 3D TV's but I am yet to buy glasses. Sitting in front of the TV for hours on end wearing glasses is not my idea of fun. It might be ok for the duration of a movie but there is no way I am playing through a game from start to finish wearing glasses.

Avatar image for viper_69_rt10
viper_69_rt10

161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 viper_69_rt10
Member since 2004 • 161 Posts

*yawn*

Avatar image for ra84ma
ra84ma

159

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 ra84ma
Member since 2012 • 159 Posts
I would say "All games should be good from now on!!!" hahahahhaha if a game is good... then thats its... if is in 3D, well, thats just an extra..... and also now not everyone has a 3d tv.....
Avatar image for NinjaLegacy
NinjaLegacy

189

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 NinjaLegacy
Member since 2012 • 189 Posts

only people that talk smack about 3D tv's are the ones that don't have them. And if you say you have one and still think it's a gimmik then you must post spoon pics with your 3Dtv or you don't have one.

Avatar image for ColdScorpion
ColdScorpion

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#21 ColdScorpion
Member since 2005 • 506 Posts

No all games shouldnt be in 3D although Warriors Orochi 3 is one of the best i've seen so far.

Avatar image for SplitExpletive
SplitExpletive

42

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 SplitExpletive
Member since 2010 • 42 Posts

Please write to your local devs to support this.

PinnacleGamingP

Shhhhh! Keep your voice down! You're likely to get flamed for this! Oh, wait, hang on a minute... too late.

Honestly I agree with you for the most part. The people who say it's a gimmick are wrong, but they are entitled to their opinion ;)

Seriously though, so far there are around 100 games for the PS3 that support steroscopic 3D and some of them are amazing (Uncharted 3, MotorStorm Apocalypse, de Blob 2, Avatar, Gran Turismo 5, God of War HD games, SOTC, Wipeout HD, SSHD, ...). In almost all cases 3D adds to the game (hell, even Happy Feet 2 is much better, really) but there are a couple that are down right bad in 3D (Sonic Generations, Dungeon Defenders, Tetris and Crysis 2 come to mind).

I don't think that *every* game should get a 3D option, but for those where it makes sense and is technically feasible it should be an option. I'd guess that the top third of allHDTV's selling at the moment support 3D. Not everyone is going to buy one (and 3D doesn't work well for everyone) but a lot of people sure are. With it reportedly costing around 2% of dev budget to add stereoscopic 3D support to a game3D gamerssure appreciate the effort.

Avatar image for BullyRay44
BullyRay44

483

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 BullyRay44
Member since 2012 • 483 Posts
360 has no games.
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#24 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

Please write to your local devs to support this.

PinnacleGamingP

why bother when a low percentage of users will utilize the feature and it requires extra processing power that could be better spent in other areas of the game.

Avatar image for PinnacleGamingP
PinnacleGamingP

5120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 PinnacleGamingP
Member since 2012 • 5120 Posts

[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]

Please write to your local devs to support this.

razgriz_101

why bother when a low percentage of users will utilize the feature and it requires extra processing power that could be better spent in other areas of the game.

because it makes the game more immersive than ever before
Avatar image for ShadowsDemon
ShadowsDemon

10059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#26 ShadowsDemon
Member since 2012 • 10059 Posts
Bullcrap. 3D is a gimmick, and I really dislike you. You write to them. Good luck with that.
Avatar image for razgriz_101
razgriz_101

16875

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#27 razgriz_101
Member since 2007 • 16875 Posts

[QUOTE="razgriz_101"]

[QUOTE="PinnacleGamingP"]

Please write to your local devs to support this.

PinnacleGamingP

why bother when a low percentage of users will utilize the feature and it requires extra processing power that could be better spent in other areas of the game.

because it makes the game more immersive than ever before

As i will reiterate why bother when only a small percentage will utilize it? its a waste of cash, and developement time that can be focused elsewhere.

Avatar image for H_M_1
H_M_1

1150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 H_M_1
Member since 2011 • 1150 Posts

only people that talk smack about 3D tv's are the ones that don't have them. And if you say you have one and still think it's a gimmik then you must post spoon pics with your 3Dtv or you don't have one.

NinjaLegacy
Atm I only want a 3D tv for Silent Hill Downpour. Should up the Horror even more that way.
Avatar image for nyc05
nyc05

10190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 nyc05
Member since 2005 • 10190 Posts

Ugh. More "3D isn't needed; it's a gimmick" comments. Isn't HD a gimmick? What about surround sound? None of those make the game, or alter the actual gameplay, but they sure as hell add to it. 3D is no different. When playing a well done 3D game, the extra depth added to the game really helps pull you into the world. It seems like a lot of people have either never seen a good example of what 3D can do, or they think it's just an attempt to stick something out of the screen at your face. Not true.

Today's 3D is like a window into the TV. We see depth and distance in the game world like our eyes do in the real world. Without 3D, there's no sense of space or distance because the TV screen is flat; our eyes don't see the real world as flat, so why should our game worlds be flat? 3D allows us to see the game world as our eyes do the real world, and, when done right, it's a remarkable thing. Again, it doesn't make the game, but, like HD and surround sound --also "gimmicks"-- it really helps immerse you into the game world.

Before I bought my 3D plasma last year, I really didn't think much of the possibilities that 3D offered. I thought "why do I need something poking out at me?" Little did I know that objects poking out isn't the point, like it was during the last big 3D phase. Then, after scoring a fantastic deal on a 3D plasma, I bought it, a few 3D movies and 3D games, and I totally understand its intended purpose and uses now. What's exciting is that it's only going to get better with time and experience.

I understand not everybody has seen great examples of it, and that not everyone's eyes can see the difference, but 3D is more than a gimmick; it's another step in accomplishing what developers want and that's drawing us into their world even more. With HD, surround sound and now 3D, we can really be immersed. As a game and movie lover, I've always wanted to be as immersed as possible in the world, and that is more possible today than ever. I'm quite excited for that.

Avatar image for nyc05
nyc05

10190

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 nyc05
Member since 2005 • 10190 Posts

Troll escaped from SWMonsieurX

So he's a troll for liking and supporting 3D? Where do you get that from? More importantly, why bother posting that? Either contribute to the topic at hand, or perhaps don't comment at all?

Why? 3D sucks, it's the same crap from the 80s.Fightingfan

You couldn't be more incorrect, Fightingfan. This is a comment made out of ignorance. 3D today is nothing, absolutely nothing like 3D from the 80's. That can't even be disputed; it's pure fact. Perhaps brush up on 3D, as well as experience it, before saying something like that because, again, it's factually incorrect.

only people that talk smack about 3D tv's are the ones that don't have them. And if you say you have one and still think it's a gimmik then you must post spoon pics with your 3Dtv or you don't have one. NinjaLegacy

There's certainly some merit to this, but it's not fair to dismiss all 3D dislikers as those who don't have 3D TV's. To be fair, some people literally can't see (as in their eyes can't see the difference) what it brings, and some of them just don't care for it; there's nothing wrong with that. Nobody has to like 3D. However, your point (people not having 3D TV's) is true in many instances.

Bullcrap. 3D is a gimmick, and I really dislike you. You write to them. Good luck with that.ShadowsDemon

You dislike somebody because they like and support 3D. What is wrong with you? Yet another rude comment that brings nothing of substance to the conversation, so why bother?

Atm I only want a 3D tv for Silent Hill Downpour. Should up the Horror even more that way.H_M_1

Downpour is a great game in 3D, H_M. The depth to the game is great and it really helps place you into the world. I very much recommend Downpour in 3D.

Avatar image for ShadowsDemon
ShadowsDemon

10059

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#31 ShadowsDemon
Member since 2012 • 10059 Posts
[QUOTE="nyc05"]

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]

So he's a troll for liking and supporting 3D? Where do you get that from? More importantly, why bother posting that? Either contribute to the topic at hand, or perhaps don't comment at all?

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

There's certainly some merit to this, but it's not fair to dismiss all 3D dislikers as those who don't have 3D TV's. To be fair, some people literally can't see (as in their eyes can't see the difference) what it brings, and some of them just don't care for it; there's nothing wrong with that. Nobody has to like 3D. However, your point (people not having 3D TV's) is true in many instances.

Bullcrap. 3D is a gimmick, and I really dislike you. You write to them. Good luck with that.ShadowsDemon

You dislike somebody because they like and support 3D. What is wrong with you? Yet another rude comment that brings nothing of substance to the conversation, so why bother?

Atm I only want a 3D tv for Silent Hill Downpour. Should up the Horror even more that way.H_M_1

Downpour is a great game in 3D, H_M. The depth to the game is great and it really helps place you into the world. I very much recommend Downpour in 3D.

I meant to say that I dislike it, not him. That was a poor typo on my part.
Avatar image for unrealtron
unrealtron

3148

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 unrealtron
Member since 2010 • 3148 Posts
I do not like 3D at all.
Avatar image for foxfacer2d2
foxfacer2d2

570

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 foxfacer2d2
Member since 2010 • 570 Posts

Im just sayin but

It will never happen. Most of the people aren't really interested in 3d but I am.

Avatar image for H_M_1
H_M_1

1150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 H_M_1
Member since 2011 • 1150 Posts

[QUOTE="MonsieurX"]

So he's a troll for liking and supporting 3D? Where do you get that from? More importantly, why bother posting that? Either contribute to the topic at hand, or perhaps don't comment at all?

[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]

There's certainly some merit to this, but it's not fair to dismiss all 3D dislikers as those who don't have 3D TV's. To be fair, some people literally can't see (as in their eyes can't see the difference) what it brings, and some of them just don't care for it; there's nothing wrong with that. Nobody has to like 3D. However, your point (people not having 3D TV's) is true in many instances.

[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"]Bullcrap. 3D is a gimmick, and I really dislike you. You write to them. Good luck with that.nyc05

You dislike somebody because they like and support 3D. What is wrong with you? Yet another rude comment that brings nothing of substance to the conversation, so why bother?

Atm I only want a 3D tv for Silent Hill Downpour. Should up the Horror even more that way.H_M_1

Downpour is a great game in 3D, H_M. The depth to the game is great and it really helps place you into the world. I very much recommend Downpour in 3D.

Yeh, I don't mind 3D, a friend keeps telling me of small 3D tvs for small rooms etc at good prices but I'm holding back until September/October. Seriously, for some games, 3D is brilliant, I heard Assassins Creed Revelations (I think it's this one) looks perfect in 3D, so does Uncharted 3.
Avatar image for Ravenlore_basic
Ravenlore_basic

4319

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#35 Ravenlore_basic
Member since 2003 • 4319 Posts

Please write to your local devs to support this.

PinnacleGamingP

Okay I like 3D games but it is not right for all games. It takes up power so that means that there is power aviable for other aspects of the game.

Next Gen 2016 (make a patetion) would be a better time as more TVs will have 3D and processing power will be up to speed.

Avatar image for tagzskie
tagzskie

151

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 tagzskie
Member since 2006 • 151 Posts

Though i didn't try 3d games i dont see why some people against it! its just extra features, and if i have to choose between a same tittle, a game /w 3d or w/out, i go w/3d of course, as i remember theres 2 type of batman aa the other type is 3d support, same goes for tv i go w/ 3d rather than w/out 3d.. Dont hate it if you dont have it, and if have it dont use it if you dont like it. simple as that

Avatar image for LP4EVA2005
LP4EVA2005

8585

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 LP4EVA2005
Member since 2004 • 8585 Posts

Go back to System wars you foul demon!

Avatar image for Audacitron
Audacitron

991

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 Audacitron
Member since 2012 • 991 Posts
i would play all the games in 3D, and i actually buy 3D games over non 3D games if faced with the choice between 2 gamesPinnacleGamingP
I'm the same. All other considerations aside, I will play the game with 3d over the flat game. Especially on my 3ds.
I do not like 3D at all.unrealtron
in that case you should walk around with one eye closed all the time.
Avatar image for rwallacefan
rwallacefan

4886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#39 rwallacefan
Member since 2005 • 4886 Posts

:|

And each game released henceforth must also be a FPS :P

volume_three
Singlehandedly the best comeback I have ever seen in regards to gaming :P
Avatar image for krayzieE99
krayzieE99

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 krayzieE99
Member since 2010 • 544 Posts
i remember way back when people said the same things about HDTV. they'd say stuff like, there is no difference between SD and Hd, but im pretty sure most of those people have HDTVs now, and im sure the see a difference. uncharted, gears 3, and stardust are great in 3d.
Avatar image for krayzieE99
krayzieE99

544

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 krayzieE99
Member since 2010 • 544 Posts
Why? 3D sucks, it's the same crap from the 80s.Fightingfan
where you even born in the 80's? stereoscopic is a much different than the red/blue glasses in the 80's.
Avatar image for GalvatronType_R
GalvatronType_R

3194

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#42 GalvatronType_R
Member since 2003 • 3194 Posts

To the naysayers: Uncharted 3 looks UNBELIEVABLE in 3D, better than 2D.

Avatar image for Justforvisit
Justforvisit

2660

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#43 Justforvisit
Member since 2011 • 2660 Posts

Local devs? What local devs here in germany, the No. 1 desert of customer service worldwide ._. We can be glad we even have some video game companies ._.

Avatar image for Xx51LLYR4BB1TxX
Xx51LLYR4BB1TxX

778

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#44 Xx51LLYR4BB1TxX
Member since 2007 • 778 Posts

I got myslef a sony 46 inch hd3d tv back in november of last year and I have not used the 3d much. The game ive played so far that look pretty cool in 3d are just halo anniversary and sonic generations. ///it's ok but nothing to bust you nut over its cool though .

Avatar image for morgan-1122
morgan-1122

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 morgan-1122
Member since 2012 • 25 Posts
Agree I would love for this to happen :D Fifa would be so much better