??Woah there. The graphics for the PSP are good for a handheld but not as good as a PS3. Even the best game on the psp (graphic wise) is more like a decent graphical title on the PS2.
Oh you said PS3..I think though it does have some capablities of a PS2. Maybe more of a hardware upgrade and it could have the fullp otential of a PS2 but from what I have seen it seems to have the capablities of the PS2 in it's early stage maybe abit better... or more the PS1 at it's best.
Oh you said PS3..I think though it does have some capablities of a PS2. Maybe more of a hardware upgrade and it could have the fullp otential of a PS2 but from what I have seen it seems to have the capablities of the PS2 in it's early stage maybe abit better... or more the PS1 at it's best. DarkMaster7991
What???? the PS1 did'nt have video, photo, internet or PSN capabilities.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"]Oh you said PS3..I think though it does have some capablities of a PS2. Maybe more of a hardware upgrade and it could have the fullp otential of a PS2 but from what I have seen it seems to have the capablities of the PS2 in it's early stage maybe abit better... or more the PS1 at it's best. camera3
What???? the PS1 did'nt have video, photo, internet or PSN capabilities. Oh i meant for graphics in that part. For grpahics it's like PS1 when ti was at it's best and the early stages of PS2. As far as capablities the PSP already has them. The only thing really setting them apart is the graphics.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"]Oh you said PS3..I think though it does have some capablities of a PS2. Maybe more of a hardware upgrade and it could have the fullp otential of a PS2 but from what I have seen it seems to have the capablities of the PS2 in it's early stage maybe abit better... or more the PS1 at it's best. DarkMaster7991
What???? the PS1 did'nt have video, photo, internet or PSN capabilities. Oh i meant for graphics in that part. For grpahics it's like PS1 when ti was at it's best and the early stages of PS2. As far as capablities the PSP already has them. The only thing really setting them apart is the graphics. OK but some PSP games have better graphics than the early PS2 stage like Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"][QUOTE="camera3"] What???? the PS1 did'nt have video, photo, internet or PSN capabilities.
Oh i meant for graphics in that part. For grpahics it's like PS1 when ti was at it's best and the early stages of PS2. As far as capablities the PSP already has them. The only thing really setting them apart is the graphics. OK but some PSP games have better graphics than the early PS2 stage like Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2. But not as good as later games. Some of the later PS2 games and big title ones have alot better graphics. I just see the PSP being able to be THAT good but it has the possiblity to be good. Your example, Resistence, Crisis Core, and GOW are somes games with great graphical features.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"] Oh i meant for graphics in that part. For grpahics it's like PS1 when ti was at it's best and the early stages of PS2. As far as capablities the PSP already has them. The only thing really setting them apart is the graphics. DarkMaster7991
OK but some PSP games have better graphics than the early PS2 stage like Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2. But not as good as later games. Some of the later PS2 games and big title ones have alot better graphics. I just see the PSP being able to be THAT good but it has the possiblity to be good. Your example, Resistence, Crisis Core, and GOW are somes games with great graphical features. Aggreed but in the near future the PSP might evolve in graphical perspective, the PSP2 for example.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"][QUOTE="camera3"] OK but some PSP games have better graphics than the early PS2 stage like Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter 2.
But not as good as later games. Some of the later PS2 games and big title ones have alot better graphics. I just see the PSP being able to be THAT good but it has the possiblity to be good. Your example, Resistence, Crisis Core, and GOW are somes games with great graphical features. Aggreed but in the near future the PSP might evolve in graphical perspective, the PSP2 for example. If the PSP2 is real or will be annouced (which I hope it is not).
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"] But not as good as later games. Some of the later PS2 games and big title ones have alot better graphics. I just see the PSP being able to be THAT good but it has the possiblity to be good. Your example, Resistence, Crisis Core, and GOW are somes games with great graphical features. DarkMaster7991
Aggreed but in the near future the PSP might evolve in graphical perspective, the PSP2 for example. If the PSP2 is real or will be annouced (which I hope it is not). What are you a microsoft jerk?
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"][QUOTE="camera3"] Aggreed but in the near future the PSP might evolve in graphical perspective, the PSP2 for example.
If the PSP2 is real or will be annouced (which I hope it is not). What are you a microsoft jerk? No but I hate the fact that it could have a touch screen and digital download only. No umd-drive. That means all the games coming out that are on UMD (which they are) and the games I have won't be bakcwards compatiable. I would have to carry 2 psps, Touch screens can be very un-responsive and too much like a DS copy-cat, and well most of the rumros regarding a new psp seem stupid. WHY GET RID OF UMD DRIVE when you are making and have a such a libary. I mean it's not like it's a true succesor of the PSP and most succesors do have backward compatiblity.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"] If the PSP2 is real or will be annouced (which I hope it is not).DarkMaster7991
What are you a microsoft jerk? No but I hate the fact that it could have a touch screen and digital download only. No umd-drive. That means all the games coming out that are on UMD (which they are) and the games I have won't be bakcwards compatiable. I would have to carry 2 psps, Touch screens can be very un-responsive and too much like a DS copy-cat, and well most of the rumros regarding a new psp seem stupid. WHY GET RID OF UMD DRIVE when you are making and have a such a libary. I mean it's not like it's a true succesor of the PSP and most succesors do have backward compatiblity. Acctualy there might be a UMD drive so don't dis the PSP 2 yet.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"][QUOTE="camera3"] What are you a microsoft jerk?
No but I hate the fact that it could have a touch screen and digital download only. No umd-drive. That means all the games coming out that are on UMD (which they are) and the games I have won't be bakcwards compatiable. I would have to carry 2 psps, Touch screens can be very un-responsive and too much like a DS copy-cat, and well most of the rumros regarding a new psp seem stupid. WHY GET RID OF UMD DRIVE when you are making and have a such a libary. I mean it's not like it's a true succesor of the PSP and most succesors do have backward compatiblity. Acctualy there might be a UMD drive so don't dis the PSP 2 yet. None of the rumros suggest a UMD Drive. Anyways Im jsut saying I wouldn't want a PSP 2 if it's anythign like the main most talekd about rumors.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"] No but I hate the fact that it could have a touch screen and digital download only. No umd-drive. That means all the games coming out that are on UMD (which they are) and the games I have won't be bakcwards compatiable. I would have to carry 2 psps, Touch screens can be very un-responsive and too much like a DS copy-cat, and well most of the rumros regarding a new psp seem stupid. WHY GET RID OF UMD DRIVE when you are making and have a such a libary. I mean it's not like it's a true succesor of the PSP and most succesors do have backward compatiblity. DarkMaster7991
Acctualy there might be a UMD drive so don't dis the PSP 2 yet. None of the rumros suggest a UMD Drive. Anyways Im jsut saying I wouldn't want a PSP 2 if it's anythign like the main most talekd about rumors. I would it will still be good easier to carry and you don't have to get rid of your old PSP and UMD library.
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"][QUOTE="camera3"] Acctualy there might be a UMD drive so don't dis the PSP 2 yet.
None of the rumros suggest a UMD Drive. Anyways Im jsut saying I wouldn't want a PSP 2 if it's anythign like the main most talekd about rumors. I would it will still be good easier to carry and you don't have to get rid of your old PSP and UMD library. You don't but you would have to carry 2 psps. I feel I shouldn't have to do that and well what about the few people who don't have internet. They won't be able to get games and the new psp will be useless. I would be more happy if they kept a drive or found a way ot let us still play or games. I would also like anyhting but a Touch Screen.
I mean not like it's horrible. I have done that before when phoens and games and cameras were all sperate thigns but I feel hard copies are better and since I use my PSP whenever I go out I would have ot carry both systems. Well whatever. We won't know whats goign till next week's E3
I mean not like it's horrible. I have done that before when phoens and games and cameras were all sperate thigns but I feel hard copies are better and since I use my PSP whenever I go out I would have ot carry both systems. Well whatever. We won't know whats goign till next week's E3DarkMaster7991
[QUOTE="DarkMaster7991"]I mean not like it's horrible. I have done that before when phoens and games and cameras were all sperate thigns but I feel hard copies are better and since I use my PSP whenever I go out I would have ot carry both systems. Well whatever. We won't know whats goign till next week's E3camera3
Fine lets wait till E3 then restart this fourm. LOL. okay.
The PSP is extremely good graphically for a handheld. The graphics match early PS2, definately not PS3. Have you played much PS3, if you have playeda lot on PS3 you can tell a huge difference. I look back at some PS2 games now and see the roughe edges on characters and backgrounds. I just wish the PSP had more of a selection, but the reason for that is people keep pirating.
The PSP is extremely good graphically for a handheld. The graphics match early PS2, definately not PS3. Have you played much PS3, if you have playeda lot on PS3 you can tell a huge difference. I look back at some PS2 games now and see the roughe edges on characters and backgrounds. I just wish the PSP had more of a selection, but the reason for that is people keep pirating.
Cody13_2012
In the beggining of this forum I was talking about the capabilities of the psp were equivalent to the ps3 not graphics but I also think games with bad graphics are still fun games like locoroco.
The PSP is extremely good graphically for a handheld. The graphics match early PS2, definately not PS3. Have you played much PS3, if you have playeda lot on PS3 you can tell a huge difference. I look back at some PS2 games now and see the roughe edges on characters and backgrounds. I just wish the PSP had more of a selection, but the reason for that is people keep pirating.
camera3
In the beggining of this forum I was talking about the capabilities of the psp were equivalent to the ps3 not graphics but I also think games with bad graphics are still fun games like locoroco.
locoroco doesn't have bad graphics, It was supposed to look like that. More Cartoony than technical graphics. I don't think the PSP has the full potential to achieve what the PS3 has. The main problem is lack of ram and no hard drive.
Log in to comment