8.0 for lasting appeal for Austra... that bites for such a great game, huh? But seriously, ONLY and 8.0? Call of Duty 4 got a 9.0 from IGN in that category, and it had a lackluster single player, with the online being the part that saved it. Same with Halo 3. Killzone 2 ARGUABLY has better online than both, but still maintains a great, varied 10 hour campaign that they gave its fair share of praise to. And how is it a mere 8.0 again considering that?
And then we look at its graphics rating from US. Now, 9.5 is a GREAT score, but IGN gave CoD4 a 10 in graphics! Not only that, but I really don't see the logic in having them knock off .5 points just because the flamethrower and revival ray thing looks comparatively bad. We're talking about probably the console graphics king, here...
Sometimes, I just don't understand IGN.
Log in to comment