This topic is locked from further discussion.
Two completely different genres, one is a first person shooter and the other one is a third person action adventure, so comparing the two really isn't fair.MushroomWig
Like MushroomWig said you really can't compare the two, but for overall game enjoyment I'm voting for Batman.
Two completely different genres, one is a first person shooter and the other one is a third person action adventure, so comparing the two really isn't fair.MushroomWig
Agreed
[QUOTE="MushroomWig"]Two completely different genres, one is a first person shooter and the other one is a third person action adventure, so comparing the two really isn't fair.coasterguy65
Like MushroomWig said you really can't compare the two, but for overall game enjoyment I'm voting for Batman.
I think that's what he's talking about. Its hard to say for me. I have Batman and like it but dont love it. Personally, I like Infamous 2 better. Its definitely the best Batman game I have played though. I would still take it over Battlefield. Im sick to death of these COD chasing modern military shooters that water down their formula for the COD crowd. That is exactly what BF3 is. The Beta was awful. As a BF2 fan, I can boldly say this is a Bad Company sequel, not a sequel to BF2...especially on consoles where the max players is 24 i think.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment