Call Of Duty 4 !!!!!!!!!!

new video

www.gametrailers.com/player/21128.html

this game is going to be amazing

i will buy this game for sure!

i hope they drastically improve the multiplayer for this game. COD2 for the ps2 was horrid and COD3 was only a minor improvement IMO. with a solid multiplayer this will be a must have title for me.

With the ways things are, I'll hold out until I see the PS3 version of the game. CyanX73

there is a video of the ps3 version on gamespot. dont know how to link but if u go to the video above it should be in the playlist area.. Its about the lighting and stuff..but explains the graphic jump with the ps3

[QUOTE="CyanX73"]With the ways things are, I'll hold out until I see the PS3 version of the game. ktrotter11

there is a video of the ps3 version on gamespot. dont know how to link but if u go to the video above it should be in the playlist area.. Its about the lighting and stuff..but explains the graphic jump with the ps3

the video in the PS3 section is not the PS3 version...it's the 360's version.

[QUOTE="ktrotter11"]

[QUOTE="CyanX73"]With the ways things are, I'll hold out until I see the PS3 version of the game. eclipsed4utoo

there is a video of the ps3 version on gamespot. dont know how to link but if u go to the video above it should be in the playlist area.. Its about the lighting and stuff..but explains the graphic jump with the ps3

the video in the PS3 section is not the PS3 version...it's the 360's version.

You beat me to it. So yeah, I'm waiting until I see what the PS3 version looks like. In fact, I'm going to take this approach for all multi-plats from now on. The only games that I can trust are the ones either directly stated as being started on PS3 or being done by Sony. All others are suspect of being an inferior port.

[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="ktrotter11"]

[QUOTE="CyanX73"]With the ways things are, I'll hold out until I see the PS3 version of the game. CyanX73

there is a video of the ps3 version on gamespot. dont know how to link but if u go to the video above it should be in the playlist area.. Its about the lighting and stuff..but explains the graphic jump with the ps3

the video in the PS3 section is not the PS3 version...it's the 360's version.

You beat me to it. So yeah, I'm waiting until I see what the PS3 version looks like. In fact, I'm going to take this approach for all multi-plats from now on. The only games that I can trust are the ones either directly stated as being started on PS3 or being done by Sony. All others are suspect of being an inferior port.

agreed.

[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"][QUOTE="ktrotter11"]

[QUOTE="CyanX73"]With the ways things are, I'll hold out until I see the PS3 version of the game. CyanX73

there is a video of the ps3 version on gamespot. dont know how to link but if u go to the video above it should be in the playlist area.. Its about the lighting and stuff..but explains the graphic jump with the ps3

the video in the PS3 section is not the PS3 version...it's the 360's version.

You beat me to it. So yeah, I'm waiting until I see what the PS3 version looks like. In fact, I'm going to take this approach for all multi-plats from now on. The only games that I can trust are the ones either directly stated as being started on PS3 or being done by Sony. All others are suspect of being an inferior port.

I am so angry. There are several flaws. You can only have 16 players in multiplayer, NO vehicles, shooting through walls is a bit corny (because there's no way to take cover), and they kept refering to Call of Duty 2. I know the people who made COD2 are making COD4, but Call of Duty 3 was the best out of the WHOLE series. I hope you guys are seeing where Im going with this.mentalhelp

I can deal with the 16 players and no vehicles, but the shooting through walls suck. so basically, there is no cover and it's just a run-and-gun game.

[QUOTE="mentalhelp"]I am so angry. There are several flaws. You can only have 16 players in multiplayer, NO vehicles, shooting through walls is a bit corny (because there's no way to take cover), and they kept refering to Call of Duty 2. I know the people who made COD2 are making COD4, but Call of Duty 3 was the best out of the WHOLE series. I hope you guys are seeing where Im going with this.eclipsed4utoo

I can deal with the 16 players and no vehicles, but the shooting through walls suck. so basically, there is no cover and it's just a run-and-gun game.

Basically. Though my idea of this game was that it was going to have like 30 players online, HUGE maps, vehicles and tanks with good graphics. It's pure chaos when an enemy tank is trying to blow you away when you're in a house. And I like chaos.

[QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"]

[QUOTE="mentalhelp"]I am so angry. There are several flaws. You can only have 16 players in multiplayer, NO vehicles, shooting through walls is a bit corny (because there's no way to take cover), and they kept refering to Call of Duty 2. I know the people who made COD2 are making COD4, but Call of Duty 3 was the best out of the WHOLE series. I hope you guys are seeing where Im going with this.mentalhelp

I can deal with the 16 players and no vehicles, but the shooting through walls suck. so basically, there is no cover and it's just a run-and-gun game.

Basically. Though my idea of this game was that it was going to have like 30 players online, HUGE maps, vehicles and tanks with good graphics. It's pure chaos when an enemy tank is trying to blow you away when you're in a house. And I like chaos.

[QUOTE="mentalhelp"][QUOTE="eclipsed4utoo"]

[QUOTE="mentalhelp"]I am so angry. There are several flaws. You can only have 16 players in multiplayer, NO vehicles, shooting through walls is a bit corny (because there's no way to take cover), and they kept refering to Call of Duty 2. I know the people who made COD2 are making COD4, but Call of Duty 3 was the best out of the WHOLE series. I hope you guys are seeing where Im going with this.GreasyFetus69

I can deal with the 16 players and no vehicles, but the shooting through walls suck. so basically, there is no cover and it's just a run-and-gun game.

Basically. Though my idea of this game was that it was going to have like 30 players online, HUGE maps, vehicles and tanks with good graphics. It's pure chaos when an enemy tank is trying to blow you away when you're in a house. And I like chaos.

And people make fun of my username. I still don't like the shooting through walls thing, EVEN if it's special guns. Everyone will be shooting them..... greasyfetus69! LMAO.

i dunno, darkness is pretty good and vegas was rated almost same here on gamespot, only difference is things overblown by fanboys and websites. i remember back in the day there was really something to complain about between ps2 and xbox ports. xbox ports looked noticebly better and had way better effects sometimes even though ps2 was main platform. now people are down to complaingin about jaggies that arent there when the game is in motion, only there in screenshots, and textures you actually have to sit and stare at hard to see the difference.

anyhow mercenaries 2, new burnout, and a lot of other games are main dev kit ps3 but i like sony's 1st and 2nd party the best, they have the best and nintendo is close behind but weak hardware and 360 only has halo, and we saw the beta and made a collective "meh"
Mandingo101

I didn't see they would all be inferior ports...I said they were suspect of being until I see video of the PS3 version. This doesn't mean there are no good ports out there or that there won't be any in the future.

I can't wait for this game! Looks great! :DElviathan