Call of Duty 4 or Resistance: Fall of Man

I am getting a PS3 very soon and I will be getting Uncharted: Drakes Fortune for free with the PS3 package.

Should I get Call of Duty 4 or Resistance: Fall of Man?

I like Resistance because it looks like a Gears of War/Halo type game, and I loved both of those games. Resistance also looks even more appealing because Resistance 2 is coming out very soon.

But then again, everybody says Call of Duty 4 is one of the best shooting games out right now. But I just dont know.

I have played none of these 2 games before, and they both look great. Which one should I get?

Well i think if you want a more single player campaign Resistance is the way(CoD takes maybe 3-4 hours if your average compared to i think like 8-10 hours for resistance) but if you want pure online mayhem CoD4 is better but Resistance online isnt anything to sneeze at either.

If single player is what you crave, then get Resistance

If it's multiplayer that you want, then go with CoD4

If single player is what you crave, then get Resistance

If it's multiplayer that you want, then go with CoD4

hazelnutman

RFOM also has good multiplayer, but just every other game (FPS) pales in comparison to COD4.

[QUOTE="hazelnutman"]

If single player is what you crave, then get Resistance

If it's multiplayer that you want, then go with CoD4

americahellyeah

RFOM also has good multiplayer, but just every other game (FPS) pales in comparison to COD4.

yeah, I was going to edit my comment saying that Resistance has one of the best multiplayers on the PS3, but everything's pale in comparison to CoD4 (maybe except Warhawk :D)

[QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="hazelnutman"]

If single player is what you crave, then get Resistance

If it's multiplayer that you want, then go with CoD4

hazelnutman

RFOM also has good multiplayer, but just every other game (FPS) pales in comparison to COD4.

yeah, I was going to edit my comment saying that Resistance has one of the best multiplayers on the PS3, but everything's pale in comparison to CoD4 (maybe except Warhawk :D)

i find warhawk quite stale and boring after COD4 actually. even UT3 sucks after COD4. its essentially ruined FPS games for me.

[QUOTE="hazelnutman"][QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="hazelnutman"]

If single player is what you crave, then get Resistance

If it's multiplayer that you want, then go with CoD4

americahellyeah

RFOM also has good multiplayer, but just every other game (FPS) pales in comparison to COD4.

yeah, I was going to edit my comment saying that Resistance has one of the best multiplayers on the PS3, but everything's pale in comparison to CoD4 (maybe except Warhawk :D)

i find warhawk quite stale and boring after COD4 actually. even UT3 sucks after COD4. its essentially ruined FPS games for me.

Times like these when you wonder if playing CoD 4 is a good thing in the first place :lol:

[QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="hazelnutman"][QUOTE="americahellyeah"][QUOTE="hazelnutman"]

If single player is what you crave, then get Resistance

If it's multiplayer that you want, then go with CoD4

hazelnutman

RFOM also has good multiplayer, but just every other game (FPS) pales in comparison to COD4.

yeah, I was going to edit my comment saying that Resistance has one of the best multiplayers on the PS3, but everything's pale in comparison to CoD4 (maybe except Warhawk :D)

i find warhawk quite stale and boring after COD4 actually. even UT3 sucks after COD4. its essentially ruined FPS games for me.

Times like these when you wonder if playing CoD 4 is a good thing in the first place :lol:

i know, i just can't play any shooters anymore, even just Halo for fun with my cousins sucks compared to COD, its both a curse and a blessing. luckily i still like Half Life 2.

i was just being nice before. cod4 owns resistance in every way, shape and form. even with it's 6 hour campain. do not get resistance patrick5152003

get both man!!! they both are too good of games to pass, personally i have both but i lost Resistance becuase i accidentally sended it into blockbuster....but while it lasted it was great!! :)

I would go with Resistance. CoD4 story-mode was much to short though intense. I think for Resistance I complete the story-mode in 18-20 hours and CoD4 I beat in 9 hours. I'm not much into online gaming at this time so Resistance had more staying power for me. Plus I like killing alien baddies! Along with CoD4, Resistance is a very nice looking game that runs at a very sold framerate with tons of enemies on screen.

[QUOTE="hazelnutman"]

If single player is what you crave, then get Resistance

If it's multiplayer that you want, then go with CoD4

americahellyeah

RFOM also has good multiplayer, but just every other game (FPS) pales in comparison to COD4.

I heard someone say that the only thing COD4 multiplayer has is the leveling system. If it didn't have that, than many gamers wouldn't be praising it as much as they are.

However, from what I played of the two games I would say, you can't go wrong either way.

i was just being nice before. cod4 owns resistance in every way, shape and form. even with it's 6 hour campain. do not get resistance patrick5152003