This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for NextGenNow
NextGenNow

2622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 NextGenNow
Member since 2007 • 2622 Posts

don't wanna get into trouble so here it goes....Played both...both are good....PS3 downfalls reported by GS are BS no matter how you slice it....are they bias? I dunno....wiki them and you'll see they gave Resistance the lowest score of any review magazine....hmmmmmmm *wonders* anyways take it for what it is, this is my friendly way of saying what I did earlier.

Avatar image for SportsFanatic10
SportsFanatic10

1453

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 SportsFanatic10
Member since 2005 • 1453 Posts
It looks like you are aiming for System Wars?  If so just post it there cuz this is the PS3 board and stuff so yea.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#4 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
well, in GS's comparison, they used component, not HDMI. that may have something to do with it. imo, HDMI is definitely sharper, cleaner and the colors are usually different than component. this is why you usually need to calibrate your HDTV for different connections. this is one of the flaws in GS's comparison imo.
Avatar image for NextGenNow
NextGenNow

2622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 NextGenNow
Member since 2007 • 2622 Posts
It looks like you are aiming for System Wars?  If so just post it there cuz this is the PS3 board and stuff so yea.SportsFanatic10
no way man I'm just tired of people lying on here and saying "oh PS3 sux or 360 version sux." I played both and can say now 360 > PS3 online. PS3 > 360 version graphically. Does that mean the score shoulda been that low or even used in a comparison that lost? HECK NO
Avatar image for NextGenNow
NextGenNow

2622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 NextGenNow
Member since 2007 • 2622 Posts
well, in GS's comparison, they used component, not HDMI. that may have something to do with it. imo, HDMI is definitely sharper, cleaner and the colors are usually different than component. this is why you usually need to calibrate your HDTV for different connections. this is one of the flaws in GS's comparison imo.rahzel54
very true....
Avatar image for Eric_VA
Eric_VA

404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#7 Eric_VA
Member since 2003 • 404 Posts
I Don't think he's going for a System War, But i do understand what he's saying, i have COD3 and RFOM and they both are Great games, i would pick RFOM over COD3 for the fact that the single player is alot longer, but as in Game play, they both are dead on the money, but every where you look G4TV,GameStop,IGN, all these gaming sites put down the PS3 NO matter what game, and no matter if Sony has the fastest of everything out there, they put down Sony for every reason in the book, and since the PS3 has came out, with all this Power everyone is starting to see That.
Avatar image for NextGenNow
NextGenNow

2622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 NextGenNow
Member since 2007 • 2622 Posts
I Don't think he's going for a System War, But i do understand what he's saying, i have COD3 and RFOM and they both are Great games, i would pick RFOM over COD3 for the fact that the single player is alot longer, but as in Game play, they both are dead on the money, but every where you look G4TV,GameStop,IGN, all these gaming sites put down the PS3 NO matter what game, and no matter if Sony has the fastest of everything out there, they put down Sony for every reason in the book, and since the PS3 has came out, with all this Power everyone is starting to see That.Eric_VA
spot on dude.  I LOVE both my PS3 and 360, but it ticks me off to see people rag on either system for non-valid points! I understand trolls and fanboys etc etc but professional reviewers? Are you serious?
Avatar image for Gzus666
Gzus666

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Gzus666
Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts
Are you gay or anti christian or sumthing?PyroXD
no, and yes, and what the hell are you talking about? this was the most random comment ive ever seen. in the future, lets try to spell something right
Avatar image for Eric_VA
Eric_VA

404

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#10 Eric_VA
Member since 2003 • 404 Posts

[QUOTE="Eric_VA"]I Don't think he's going for a System War, But i do understand what he's saying, i have COD3 and RFOM and they both are Great games, i would pick RFOM over COD3 for the fact that the single player is alot longer, but as in Game play, they both are dead on the money, but every where you look G4TV,GameStop,IGN, all these gaming sites put down the PS3 NO matter what game, and no matter if Sony has the fastest of everything out there, they put down Sony for every reason in the book, and since the PS3 has came out, with all this Power everyone is starting to see That.NextGenNow
spot on dude.  I LOVE both my PS3 and 360, but it ticks me off to see people rag on either system for non-valid points! I understand trolls and fanboys etc etc but professional reviewers? Are you serious?

That's what i'm Saying .... PROFESSIONAL... come on now, i think they pick up people off the streets and asked them what they think of this game .. and take their word for it.

Avatar image for RahKayne
RahKayne

3436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#11 RahKayne
Member since 2003 • 3436 Posts

wow...Okay..XBL Gamertag: SuperGayJesus and PSN ID: Thine-Gayeth-One first off so I'm not accused of being a liar. I just played BOTH versions of CoD3....the review and "comparison" were TOTAL BS!!! No offence to these "hard workin" reviewers but yeahhh......hmm...I'm all about giving a game a fair shake but they dropped the ball on talkin smack about the framerate and graphical "brightness." First off as an advid player of the 360 version (used to be I don't really play 360 too much anymore, and NO! not cuz it's not awesome. ) But dang this game looks a lot sharper on PS3 and I don't care what ANYONE says either! I have played BOTH and compared! Even my friend noticed a sharp difference. The PS3 version being a tad bit brighter, but shows off a whole lot more in the distance with greater clarity! My final verdict is this....both are GREAT versions! If you want the amazing online play I suggest 360 version, if you want the prettier version imma say PS3 all day. Honestly if you want top notch console FPS action get Resistance, if you want a decent FPS get CoD3.

NextGenNow


this has been said before, actually the reason why fanboys and reviewers don't like the PS3 version IS BECAUSE it is brighter than the 360 version, they say it makes a better atmosphere.  However the models are more detailed.

i guess what helps them sleep at night
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#12 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
Dude you better hide real quick, cause the SS are gunning for you. You mentioned the 3..word like 10 times, it's the pits for you boy.
Avatar image for NextGenNow
NextGenNow

2622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 NextGenNow
Member since 2007 • 2622 Posts
Dude you better hide real quick, cause the SS are gunning for you. You mentioned the 3..word like 10 times, it's the pits for you boy. pimperjones
I only mention it cuz I'm not gonna rant how amazing just the PS3 version is. I AM being honest. Both are really good versions of a decent game. I would NOT say that the PS3 version deserves the stigma that has been spread all over the place...
Avatar image for pimperjones
pimperjones

3116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#14 pimperjones
Member since 2006 • 3116 Posts
Wow your still alive, the SS are slow today. I got COD3 for PS3 aside from the framerate stutters it's pretty good.
Avatar image for deactivated-61ff675e61178
deactivated-61ff675e61178

12558

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 deactivated-61ff675e61178
Member since 2004 • 12558 Posts
It's because gs reviewed both games on component "to be fair" just like they played all 1080p capable ps3 games in 1080i "to be fair". That's why so many ps3 games were deemed subpar graphically to their 360 counterparts. The gs reviewers didn't utilize all the advantages of the ps3 to make them look better.
Avatar image for NextGenNow
NextGenNow

2622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 NextGenNow
Member since 2007 • 2622 Posts
It's because gs reviewed both games on component "to be fair" just like they played all 1080p capable ps3 games in 1080i "to be fair". That's why so many ps3 games were deemed subpar graphically to their 360 counterparts. The gs reviewers didn't utilize all the advantages of the ps3 to make them look better.makingmusic476
I played it on SD tv and CoD3 looked visibly better...knitty gritty? DUDE I PLAYED BOTH LOL!!! The darker version just looks darker thats it...there is no surreal feeling of a war torn battlefield lol! Both are great but the PS3 version has the graphics aspect on effen lock. Stuttering? Did notice some stutters but cannot say they were absent in CoD3 for the "other" system either. Basically I don't buy GS reviewers or any reviewer that compared them like that...As far as I'm concerned only major difference was multiplayer.
Avatar image for rahzel54
rahzel54

1732

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#17 rahzel54
Member since 2004 • 1732 Posts
[QUOTE="NextGenNow"]

wow...Okay..XBL Gamertag: SuperGayJesus and PSN ID: Thine-Gayeth-One first off so I'm not accused of being a liar. I just played BOTH versions of CoD3....the review and "comparison" were TOTAL BS!!! No offence to these "hard workin" reviewers but yeahhh......hmm...I'm all about giving a game a fair shake but they dropped the ball on talkin smack about the framerate and graphical "brightness." First off as an advid player of the 360 version (used to be I don't really play 360 too much anymore, and NO! not cuz it's not awesome. ) But dang this game looks a lot sharper on PS3 and I don't care what ANYONE says either! I have played BOTH and compared! Even my friend noticed a sharp difference. The PS3 version being a tad bit brighter, but shows off a whole lot more in the distance with greater clarity! My final verdict is this....both are GREAT versions! If you want the amazing online play I suggest 360 version, if you want the prettier version imma say PS3 all day. Honestly if you want top notch console FPS action get Resistance, if you want a decent FPS get CoD3.

RahKayne


this has been said before, actually the reason why fanboys and reviewers don't like the PS3 version IS BECAUSE it is brighter than the 360 version, they say it makes a better atmosphere. However the models are more detailed.

i guess what helps them sleep at night

the people who complain about brightness must not know a THING about TV's and the need for calibration for different devices, or even if you use a different connection. if people complain about brightness, guess what? theres a BRIGHTNESS control on ANY display... brightness controls the black levels; if set too high, the image will looked washed out, but if set too low, you will lose shadow detail. i've heard people saying the ps3 version looks more washed out and too bright... setting the brightness lower will eliminate both.
Avatar image for Gzus666
Gzus666

2304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Gzus666
Member since 2007 • 2304 Posts
[QUOTE="RahKayne"][QUOTE="NextGenNow"]

wow...Okay..XBL Gamertag: SuperGayJesus and PSN ID: Thine-Gayeth-One first off so I'm not accused of being a liar. I just played BOTH versions of CoD3....the review and "comparison" were TOTAL BS!!! No offence to these "hard workin" reviewers but yeahhh......hmm...I'm all about giving a game a fair shake but they dropped the ball on talkin smack about the framerate and graphical "brightness." First off as an advid player of the 360 version (used to be I don't really play 360 too much anymore, and NO! not cuz it's not awesome. ) But dang this game looks a lot sharper on PS3 and I don't care what ANYONE says either! I have played BOTH and compared! Even my friend noticed a sharp difference. The PS3 version being a tad bit brighter, but shows off a whole lot more in the distance with greater clarity! My final verdict is this....both are GREAT versions! If you want the amazing online play I suggest 360 version, if you want the prettier version imma say PS3 all day. Honestly if you want top notch console FPS action get Resistance, if you want a decent FPS get CoD3.

rahzel54


this has been said before, actually the reason why fanboys and reviewers don't like the PS3 version IS BECAUSE it is brighter than the 360 version, they say it makes a better atmosphere. However the models are more detailed.

i guess what helps them sleep at night

the people who complain about brightness must not know a THING about TV's and the need for calibration for different devices, or even if you use a different connection. if people complain about brightness, guess what? theres a BRIGHTNESS control on ANY display... brightness controls the black levels; if set too high, the image will looked washed out, but if set too low, you will lose shadow detail. i've heard people saying the ps3 version looks more washed out and too bright... setting the brightness lower will eliminate both.

i loved the review that showed an alley on one of the pictures that said the ps3 version wasnt lit enough, there was 1 flood light, and the other system version was lit like a friggin laser light show, while the ps3 version was lit realistically based off 1 flood light, which wont completely fill an area with light
Avatar image for The_Rick_14
The_Rick_14

9945

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#19 The_Rick_14
Member since 2006 • 9945 Posts
You mentioned the 3..word like 10 times. pimperjones
HAHAHAHA the 3..word. I like it.
Avatar image for SirRaven
SirRaven

934

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 SirRaven
Member since 2005 • 934 Posts
Most of the trashtalking of the ps3 version have been about the brightness and washed out colors. It has already been proven with side-by-side comparisons that they look pretty much identical when the ps3 version is adjusted brightness and color-wise via tv menus.
Avatar image for b11051973
b11051973

7621

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#21 b11051973
Member since 2002 • 7621 Posts
I have no idea what the original poster is trying to say.
Avatar image for Sully28
Sully28

5097

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#22 Sully28
Member since 2003 • 5097 Posts

Honestly COD3 is crap on every system. It has nice character models, but over all the only thing that is fun in multiplayer. That said, event he multiplayer gets boring fast. They should just leave the COD makign to the people who made number 2.

Avatar image for Realtop
Realtop

397

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 Realtop
Member since 2006 • 397 Posts
COD 3 on PS3 is 1st gen game, give it time until ps3 will break through everybody's wall of ignorance. Also, take a good look around, 70% of gamespot is pro-microsoft, that leaves 30% for the rest.