I want it because in WWll there are alot of single shot guns that are power ful which adds challenge and because the guns have weird looks to them(like the BAR) and there will be vehicles and bigger online maps. The online will be fun because the re-interduction of the flamethrower(It was also in United Offensive), and the ability to hide in trees will be good for snipers escpecialy in a jungle map with a lot of trees that are close together. Anouther plus is the online co-op, so you can play through the story with your buds instead of an A.i. who will not cover your back(Im lookin at you COD4).I might rent COD3 just to get used to WWll again.
you guys are all retards THIS GAME IS NOT CALL OF DUTY "5": WORLD AT WAR, ITS CALL OF DUTY: WORLD AT WAR
Call of Duty 5 has alredy been announced by activision to be currently worked on by infinity ward
ronniepage588
Shhhhh. Don't correct our stupidity.Just leave your opinions on the game. I wonder if the japenese guys will use a sword for there melee attack instead of knifing or hitting people with the butt of the rifle.
Tyearch (idk how to spell that) is making it so bacicaly that means the singular player won't be as good as Cod4 but the multi-player will be better.Cod3 had great multi-player, but a weak singular player.
Ha I loled think about a WWll version of S&D that would be sick on the big maps. I want a real capture the flag not just domination, because domination is to easy.
Ha I loled think about a WWll version of S&D that would be sick on the big maps. I want a real capture the flag not just domination, because domination is to easy.linkinpark494
Yea i think that would be better than domination or sabotage
I am too. Modern warfare was and still is a great game.. But after a while you wish you could go back to the World War years, it gives the game more of a feel when its a World War years game.. I dont know why. The multiplayer if it is better than COD4's then it will probably be one of the best ever, Along with COD4 lol.
I got a idea for a trophy if they had capture the flag. If you kill people by hitting them with the flagpole you get a trophy. That would be a funny kill cam.
i probably wont get COD5. It does look pretty good but why go back to world war 2 everyone who bought COD4 loved it every game i played i would say "this is good but not as good as COD4" also if they did add flamethrowers they would be overpowerd and everyone would just run straight for them and get a big boosted start like HALO3
I don't think there having random wepons laying around, you probaly have to unlock them. And the flamethrower would probaly be a perk and have limited use.
I wasn't to excited when I heard of it fist because I like the modern COD4 look. But now that I've read some things and saw the trailer I'm getting more excited
However, I won't be getting it upon release. With Far Cry 2 and Resistance 2 coming out within a month or so of each other, I'll have no need for another shooter - World at War - for a while.
please stop calling it cod5. no where in the actual title is it called call of duty 5. call of duty 5 has been recently announced as being work on by infinity ward for a 2009 release date. this is codww
please stop calling it cod5. no where in the actual title is it called call of duty 5. call of duty 5 has been recently announced as being work on by infinity ward for a 2009 release date. this is codwwronniepage588
Log in to comment